Skip to content

APL93: Timing of CxT and Role of Maintenance

Assessment of the Optimal Timing of Chemotherapy With or After ATRA and the Role of Maintenance

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00599937
Enrollment
576
Registered
2008-01-24
Start date
1993-01-31
Completion date
1998-12-31
Last updated
2008-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute

Keywords

APL

Brief summary

Objectives of the trial were to assess the optimal timing of chemotherapy with or after ATRA and the role of maintenance therapy.

Detailed description

Induction treatment was stratified by age and initial WBC count. Patients ≤65 years of age with a WBC count less than 5,000/µL were randomized to receive the reference ATRA treatment of our previous trial (APL91 trial) {Fenaux, 1993 #2088}, ie, 45 mg/m2/d ATRA followed by CT (ATRA→CT group) or ATRA plus CT (ATRA+CT). In the ATRA→CT group, patients received 45 mg/m2/d ATRA orally until CR, with a maximum of 90 days. After CR achievement, they received a course of 60 mg/m2/d daunorubicin (DNR) for 3 days and 200 mg/m2/d AraC for 7 days (course I). However, course I was added to ATRA if the WBC count was increased to greater than 6,000/µL, 10,000/µL, or 15,000/µL by day 5, 10, and 15 of ATRA treatment, respectively, be-cause, from our experience, patients were at risk of ATRA syndrome above those thresholds{de Botton, 2003 #1127; De Botton, 1998 #1604}. Patients randomized to the ATRA+CT group received the same combination of ATRA and CT, with course I of CT starting on day 3 of ATRA treatment. Patients with a WBC count greater than 5,000/µL at presentation (irrespective of their age) and patients 66 to 75 years of age with a WBC count ≤ 5,000/µL were not ran-domized but received ATRA plus CT course I from day 1 (high WBC group) and the same schedule as in the ATRA→CT group (elderly group), respectively. Treatment of coagulopathy during the induction phase was based on platelet support to maintain the platelet count at a level greater than 50,000 /µL until the disappea-rance of coagulopathy. The use of heparin, tranexamic acid, fresh frozen plasma, and fibrinogen transfusions was optional. CR patients received 2 CT consolidation courses, including course II (identical to course I) and course III, consisting of 45 mg/m2/d DNR for 3 days and 1 g/m2 AraC every 12 hours for 4 days. The elderly group only received course II. Three to 4 weeks after hematological recovery from this consolidation CT, patients who were still in CR were randomized both to receive or not receive intermittent ATRA (45 mg/m2/d, 15 days every 3 months) and to receive or not receive continuous CT with 6 mercaptopurine (90 mg/m2/d, orally) and methotrexate (15 mg/m2/wk, oral-ly), according to a 2-by-2 factorial design stratified on the initial induction treatment group. Maintenance treatment was scheduled for 2 years. Randomizations for induc-tion and maintenance, stratified on center, were performed through a centralized tele-phone assignment procedure.

Interventions

DRUGATRA

early introduction of ATRA

DRUGATRA and or Chemo as maintenance

patients were randomized both to receive or not receive intermittent ATRA (45 mg/m2/d, 15 days every 3 months) and to receive or not receive continuous CT with 6 mercaptopurine (90 mg/m2/d, orally) and methotrexate (15 mg/m2/wk, orally), according to a 2-by-2 factorial design stratified on the initial induction treatment group

Sponsors

DRC lille, France
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Groupe d'etude et de travail sur les leucemies aigues promyelocytaires
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of APL, based on morphology criteria 2. Age 75 years or less; and 3. Written informed consent. Diagnosis had to be subsequently confirmed by presence of t(15;17) or PML-RAR gene rearrangement. In the absence of t(15;17) and if no analysis of the rearrangement could be made, review of initial marrow slides by an independent morphologist was mandatory.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
For induction treatment event-free survival (EFS), calculated from the date of randomization, was the major endpoint.2 years

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026