Skip to content

Safety & Efficacy of Peginesatide for Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis

AFX01-12: A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-controlled, Open-label, Multi-center Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Peginesatide for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients Previously Treated With Epoetin Alfa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00597753
Acronym
EMERALD 1
Enrollment
803
Registered
2008-01-18
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2013-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Renal Failure

Keywords

anemia, chronic kidney disease, CKD, chronic renal failure, CRF, dialysis, erythropoietin, EPO, erythropoiesis stimulating agent, ESA, Hematide™, hemodialysis, hemoglobin, Hb, Hgb, Omontys, peginesatide, red blood cell, red blood cell production

Brief summary

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peginesatide in the maintenance treatment of anemia in participants on dialysis.

Detailed description

Anemia associated with chronic kidney disease is due to several factors, primarily the inability of the diseased kidneys to produce adequate amounts of endogenous erythropoietin. Ancillary factors include the shortened lifespan of red blood cells, iron and other nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation. The presence and severity of anemia are related to the duration and extent of kidney failure. Anemia is associated with increased mortality, increased likelihood of hospitalization, reduced cognitive function, and increased left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) have been established as a treatment for anemia in chronic renal failure subjects, and have improved the management of anemia over alternatives such as transfusion. Peginesatide is a parenteral formulation developed for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Peginesatide binds to and activates the human erythropoietin receptor, and stimulates erythropoiesis in human red cell precursors in a manner similar to other known erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Eligible participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to peginesatide administered once every 4 weeks or to continued treatment with epoetin alfa administered 1-3 times each week, respectively. Total commitment time for this study was 4 weeks of screening followed by a minimum of 52 weeks of study treatment. To evaluate the cardiovascular safety of peginesatide, a cardiovascular composite safety endpoint (CSE) was defined for use in prospectively planned analyses which combined cardiovascular safety data from the four Phase 3 peginesatide studies (NCT00598273, NCT00597753, NCT00598442, and NCT00597584). The CSE consisted of six events: death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and serious adverse events of congestive heart failure, unstable angina, and arrhythmia. An independent Event Review Committee (ERC) was used to provide blinded adjudication of potential CSE events.

Interventions

Participants received peginesatide by intravenous injection once every 4 weeks. The starting dose was based on the participant's total weekly epoetin alfa dose during the last week of the Screening Period; the first dose was administered one week after the last epoetin alfa dose. The dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin levels in a target range of 10.0-12.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and ± 1.5 g/dL from baseline during the Titration and Evaluation Periods, and 10.0-12.0 g/dL during the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Period.

DRUGEpoetin Alfa

Participants continued to receive commercially available epoetin alfa by intravenous injection, at the same starting dose and frequency as received during the last week of the Screening Period, with the first study dose of epoetin alfa administered after randomization at Week 0. The dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin levels in a target range of 10.0-12.0 g/dL and ± 1.5 g/dL from baseline during the Titration and Evaluation Periods, and 10.0-12.0 g/dL during the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Period.

Sponsors

Takeda
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Affymax
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis for ≥ 3 months prior to randomization. 2. On intravenous epoetin alfa maintenance therapy continuously prescribed for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to randomization. 3. Four consecutive hemoglobin values with a mean ≥ 10.0 and ≤ 12.0 g/dL during the screening period

Exclusion criteria

1. Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding. 2. Known intolerance to any erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) or pegylated molecule or to all parenteral iron supplementation products. 3. Known bleeding or coagulation disorder. 4. Known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease 5. Poorly controlled hypertension 6. Evidence of active malignancy within one year prior to randomization. 7. Temporary (untunneled) dialysis access catheter. 8. A scheduled kidney transplant 9. A scheduled surgery that may be expected to lead to significant blood loss.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodBaseline and Weeks 29-36The baseline hemoglobin value is defined as the mean of five hemoglobin values: the four most recent hemoglobin values taken prior to the day of randomization and the value obtained on the day of randomization. The mean hemoglobin during the Evaluation Period for each participant is calculated as the mean of the available hemoglobin values during study Weeks 29 through 36.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Participants Who Receive Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Titration and Evaluation PeriodsWeeks 0 to 36
Proportion of Participants Whose Mean Hemoglobin Level During the Evaluation Period is Within the Target Range of 10.0 - 12.0 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL)Weeks 29 to 36

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Peginesatide
Participants received peginesatide by intravenous injection once every 4 weeks. The starting dose was based on the participant's total weekly epoetin alfa dose during the last week of the Screening Period; the first dose was administered one week after the last epoetin alfa dose. The dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin levels in a target range of 10.0-12.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and ± 1.5 g/dL from baseline during the Titration and Evaluation Periods, and 10.0-12.0 g/dL during the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Period.
524
Epoetin Alfa
Participants continued to receive commercially available epoetin alfa by intravenous injection, at the same starting dose and frequency as received during the last week of the Screening Period, with the first study dose of epoetin alfa administered after randomization at Week 0. The dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin levels in a target range of 10.0-12.0 g/dL and ± 1.5 g/dL from baseline during the Titration and Evaluation Periods, and 10.0-12.0 g/dL during the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Period.
269
Total793

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event62
Overall StudyDeath5529
Overall StudyDiscontinued Dialysis01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up103
Overall StudyNever dosed20
Overall StudyNoncompliance21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision51
Overall StudyPregnancy10
Overall StudyRelocation176
Overall StudyRenal transplant103
Overall StudySite closed by sponsor197
Overall StudySite elected to close24
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3512

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPeginesatideEpoetin AlfaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
154 Participants79 Participants233 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
370 Participants190 Participants560 Participants
Age Continuous57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.96
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.68
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.86
Sex: Female, Male
Female
231 Participants125 Participants356 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
293 Participants144 Participants437 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
445 / 524235 / 269
serious
Total, serious adverse events
304 / 524168 / 269

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation Period

The baseline hemoglobin value is defined as the mean of five hemoglobin values: the four most recent hemoglobin values taken prior to the day of randomization and the value obtained on the day of randomization. The mean hemoglobin during the Evaluation Period for each participant is calculated as the mean of the available hemoglobin values during study Weeks 29 through 36.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 29-36

Population: Full Analysis Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PeginesatideMean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodBaseline [N=524, 269]11.30 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.523
PeginesatideMean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodEvaluation Period [N=445, 248]11.06 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.932
PeginesatideMean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodChange from Baseline [N=445, 248]-0.24 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.956
Epoetin AlfaMean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodBaseline [N=524, 269]11.32 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.493
Epoetin AlfaMean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodEvaluation Period [N=445, 248]11.25 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.846
Epoetin AlfaMean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation PeriodChange from Baseline [N=445, 248]-0.09 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.922
Comparison: The sample size for this study was determined based on a two group evaluation of non-inferiority using the t-distribution (one-sided significance level 0.025) with a non inferiority margin of -1.0 g/dL. A sample size of approximately 750 (peginesatide group of 500 and epoetin alfa group of 250) provided at least 99% power for the evaluation of non-inferiority, assuming an expected treatment difference of 0.0 g/dL and a standard deviation of 1.5 g/dL.95% CI: [-0.3, -0.01]ANOVA
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Receive Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Titration and Evaluation Periods

Time frame: Weeks 0 to 36

Population: Full Analysis Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PeginesatideProportion of Participants Who Receive Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Titration and Evaluation Periods0.103 percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaProportion of Participants Who Receive Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Titration and Evaluation Periods0.086 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.76, 1.92]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Whose Mean Hemoglobin Level During the Evaluation Period is Within the Target Range of 10.0 - 12.0 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL)

Time frame: Weeks 29 to 36

Population: Full Analysis Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PeginesatideProportion of Participants Whose Mean Hemoglobin Level During the Evaluation Period is Within the Target Range of 10.0 - 12.0 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL)0.630 percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaProportion of Participants Whose Mean Hemoglobin Level During the Evaluation Period is Within the Target Range of 10.0 - 12.0 Grams Per Deciliter (g/dL)0.717 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.79, 0.97]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026