Skip to content

Alprostadil in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (PAOD) Stage IV

Multinational, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Groups Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Prostaglandin E1 in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia (Fontaine Stage IV)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00596752
Acronym
ESPECIAL
Enrollment
840
Registered
2008-01-17
Start date
2004-03-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2018-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Keywords

Alprostadil, Prostavasin, PAOD, Fontaine Stage IV

Brief summary

The study is to confirmatorily show a superior effect of Alprostadil compared to placebo on the rate of complete healing of ischemic necroses and ulcerations as well as on the frequency and height of major amputations in patients suffering from PAOD stage IV.

Interventions

* Active Substance: Prostaglandin E1 * Pharmaceutical Form: solution for infusion * Concentration: 40 μg b.d. * Route of Administration: intravenous infusion

OTHERPlacebo

* Active Substance: Lactose * Pharmaceutical Form: solution for infusion * Concentration: 40 μg b.d. * Route of Administration: intravenous infusion

Sponsors

Aptiv Solutions
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is at least 45 years of age * Subjects with macro-angiopathy, proven PAOD Stage IV with up to 2 ischaemic skin lesions for more than 2 weeks * Subject has a complete angiography of pelvis, thigh and calf within one month of inclusion * Systolic ankle pressure ≤ 70 mmHg in subjects without media sclerosis of the lower limb artery or systolic big toe pressure ≤ 50 mmHg in diabetics with media sclerosis of the lower limb artery * Subject is not in the position to be primarily revascularized or refuses surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Imminent or foreseeable amputation * Major amputation on the affected extremity * History of chronic alcohol or drug abuse * More than two ischemic ulcerations * One ulcer ≥ 6 cm\^2, both ulcers ≤ 1 cm\^2 or at least one ulcer affecting the bone or tendons * Acute ischemia and peripheral vascular disorders of inflammatory or immunologic origin * Neuropathic or venous ulcers * Buerger's disease * Septic gangrene * Use of vasoactive medication or prostaglandins * Treatment with prostanoids within 3 months prior to inclusion * Surgical or interventional measures performed on the affected extremity within 3 months prior to study drug treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 12 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 12 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentThe assessment of ulcer area was collected per lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject (both legs could be affected). In the analysis a subject is only considered completely healed at a time point, if all ischemic lesions are reported as completely healed at that time point.
Occurrence of Major Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentAssessment of amputations was collected per leg affected by a lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject. Amputations were regarded as major if they were performed at the ankle joint level or above. Amputations of toes or part of the foot leaving a stump thereon the subject can walk were regarded as minor. An affected leg is defined as a leg with at least 1 lesion on Study Day -6 to -2 and only amputations of affected legs are considered in the efficacy analysis of amputations. A subject is counted as major/minor amputated, if at least 1 affected leg was major/minor amputated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Increase/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentIn case of two ulcers the worse ulcer status is analyzed. The categories of investigator assessment are: complete healing, decrease by ≥ 50 %, unchanged, increase by ≥ 50 %.
Consumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)During the course of the study (up to 196 days)The number of subjects who used analgesics are summarized for different time points/intervals during the course of the study.
Systolic Pressure at Ankle Level at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentSystolic pressure at ankle level was measured at the Arteria tibialis posterior and the Arteria dorsalis pedis. Two individual series of measurements of arterial pressures per subject across the assessed visits were selected for the analysis. For the first analysis (worst change analysis) the series of measurements in the one artery which has the worst change from Baseline at the final measurement was used. For the second analysis (worst value analysis) the series of measurements which has the worst final post-Baseline measurement was used. The series relevant for the analyses was selected from the series for the affected leg or legs only. The selection is 1 out of up to 4 series available per subject. Series without Baseline value and series with at least 1 measurement of more than 150 mmHg were excluded from the selection process due to the suspicion of media sclerosis of the lower limb artery.
Minor Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentAssessment of amputations was collected per leg affected by a lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject. Amputations were regarded as major if they were performed at the ankle joint level or above. Amputations of toes or part of the foot leaving a stump thereon the subject can walk were regarded as minor. An affected leg is defined as a leg with at least 1 lesion on Study Day -6 to -2 and only amputations of affected legs are considered in the efficacy analysis of amputations. A subject is counted as major/minor amputated, if at least 1 affected leg was major/minor amputated. The number of subjects with minor amputation prior to or at 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment is presented below.
Complete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentThe assessment of ulcer area was collected per lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject (both legs could be affected). In the analysis a subject is only considered completely healed at a time point, if all ischemic lesions are reported as completely healed at that time point.
All-cause Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)During the course of the study (up to 196 days)
Cardiovascular Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)During the course of the study (up to 196 days)
Cardiovascular Morbidity During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)During the course of the study (up to 196 days)Cardiovascular morbidity is presented as number of subjects with myocardial infarction and/or stroke during the course of the study.
Revascularization Procedures at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentThe number of subjects with revascularization prior to or at 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment is presented below.
Intensity of Rest Pain Induced by Ischemic Lesions at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentAt 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatmentVisit values of intensity of rest pain from a visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (maximum conceivable pain), had to be reported in the case of presence of rest pain only. If the leading question in regard to the presence of rest pain is answered with No and no visit value is specified, the visit value will be set to 0 for the analysis.

Countries

Czechia, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Ukraine

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study started to enroll subjects in March 2004 in order to end up with 840 enrolled subjects. The study was conducted using a two-stage group sequential adaptive design with possible sample size adjustment after the planned interim analysis, which was performed after stage 1. After the interim analysis subjects were included in stage 2.

Pre-assignment details

Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set (RS). RS consists of all subjects randomized into the study who have completed the study or terminated prematurely.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alprostadil
Prostavasin® 40 μg will be infused intravenously twice daily over 2 hours in 50 to 150 ml isotonic sodium chloride solution during a Treatment Phase of 4 weeks. Alprostadil: - Active Substance: Prostaglandin E1 * Pharmaceutical Form: solution for infusion * Concentration: 40 μg b.d. * Route of Administration: intravenous infusion
416
Placebo
Placebo will be infused intravenously twice daily over 2 hours in 50 to 150 ml isotonic sodium chloride solution during a Treatment Phase of 4 weeks. Placebo: - Active Substance: Lactose * Pharmaceutical Form: solution for infusion * Concentration: 40 μg b.d. * Route of Administration: intravenous infusion
423
Total839

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event3434
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy47
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2238
Overall StudyOther Reason4449
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Compliance96
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject129

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboAlprostadilTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
253 Participants263 Participants516 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
170 Participants153 Participants323 Participants
Age, Continuous66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
117 Participants123 Participants240 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
306 Participants293 Participants599 Participants
Weight76.6 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
75.4 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
76.0 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
61 / 41662 / 423
serious
Total, serious adverse events
87 / 41662 / 423

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 12 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

The assessment of ulcer area was collected per lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject (both legs could be affected). In the analysis a subject is only considered completely healed at a time point, if all ischemic lesions are reported as completely healed at that time point.

Time frame: At 12 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) in case of missing values. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilComplete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 12 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 1 (n=253, n=251)49 participants
AlprostadilComplete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 12 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 2 (n=161, n=173)27 participants
PlaceboComplete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 12 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 1 (n=253, n=251)43 participants
PlaceboComplete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 12 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 2 (n=161, n=173)30 participants
Comparison: Primary goal was to test the following null hypothesis:~H01: πhealingPGE1≤ πhealingPlacebo, with πhealing=proportion of subjects with complete ulcer healing. The planned information rate for stage 1 of the two-stage group sequential test design with an overall one-sided comparison-wise α=0.0125 for this co-primary endpoint is given by 0.83.~This is the statistical analysis of stage 1.p-value: 0.2587Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Primary goal was to test the following null hypothesis:~H01: πhealingPGE1≤ πhealingPlacebo, with πhealing=proportion of subjects with complete ulcer healing.~This is the statistical analysis of stage 1 and stage 2 combined.p-value: 0.3463Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Occurrence of Major Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

Assessment of amputations was collected per leg affected by a lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject. Amputations were regarded as major if they were performed at the ankle joint level or above. Amputations of toes or part of the foot leaving a stump thereon the subject can walk were regarded as minor. An affected leg is defined as a leg with at least 1 lesion on Study Day -6 to -2 and only amputations of affected legs are considered in the efficacy analysis of amputations. A subject is counted as major/minor amputated, if at least 1 affected leg was major/minor amputated.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) in case of missing values. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilOccurrence of Major Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 1 (n=253, n=251)32 participants
AlprostadilOccurrence of Major Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 2 (n=161, n=173)20 participants
PlaceboOccurrence of Major Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 1 (n=253, n=251)49 participants
PlaceboOccurrence of Major Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentStage 2 (n=161, n=173)13 participants
Comparison: Primary goal was to test the following null hypothesis:~H02: πampPGE1≥ πampPlacebo, with πamp=proportion of subjects with major amputations.~The planned information rate for stage 1 of the two-stage group sequential test design with an overall one-sided comparison-wise α=0.0125 for this co-primary endpoint is given by 0.83.~This is the statistical analysis of stage 1.p-value: 0.0173Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Primary goal was to test the following null hypothesis:~H02: πampPGE1≥ πampPlacebo, with πamp=proportion of subjects with major amputations.~This is the statistical analysis of stage 1 and stage 2 combined.p-value: 0.1154Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

All-cause Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)

Time frame: During the course of the study (up to 196 days)

Population: Safety Set consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilAll-cause Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)20 participants
PlaceboAll-cause Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)15 participants
Secondary

Cardiovascular Morbidity During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)

Cardiovascular morbidity is presented as number of subjects with myocardial infarction and/or stroke during the course of the study.

Time frame: During the course of the study (up to 196 days)

Population: Safety Set consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilCardiovascular Morbidity During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Myocardial infarctions5 participants
AlprostadilCardiovascular Morbidity During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Strokes3 participants
PlaceboCardiovascular Morbidity During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Myocardial infarctions6 participants
PlaceboCardiovascular Morbidity During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Strokes3 participants
Secondary

Cardiovascular Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)

Time frame: During the course of the study (up to 196 days)

Population: Safety Set consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilCardiovascular Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)11 participants
PlaceboCardiovascular Mortality During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)14 participants
Secondary

Complete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

The assessment of ulcer area was collected per lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject (both legs could be affected). In the analysis a subject is only considered completely healed at a time point, if all ischemic lesions are reported as completely healed at that time point.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Of the 838 subjects in the Full Analysis Set (FAS), 568 are included in the analysis of this outcome measure. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilComplete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment108 participants
PlaceboComplete Healing of Ischemic Necroses and Ulcerations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment103 participants
Secondary

Consumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)

The number of subjects who used analgesics are summarized for different time points/intervals during the course of the study.

Time frame: During the course of the study (up to 196 days)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Prior to treatment (n=414, n=424)300 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 1 (n=414, n=424)292 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 2 (n=414, n=424)295 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 3 (n=413, n=424)295 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 4 (n=412, n=423)292 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 5 (n=411, n=423)294 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 6 (n=411, n=423)290 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 7 (n=409, n=422)290 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Week 2 (n=409, n=422)292 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Week 3 (n=399, n=416)259 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Week 4 (n=393, n=404)238 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 29-42 (n=348, n=354)170 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 43-56 (n=361, n=370)164 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 57-70 (n=361, n=346)155 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 71-84 (n=352, n=344)146 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 85-98 (n=341, n=339)143 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 99-112 (n=321, n=318)132 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 113-140 (n=309, n=301)122 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 141-168 (n=306, n=304)118 participants
AlprostadilConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 169-196 (n=272, n=271)98 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 113-140 (n=309, n=301)117 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Prior to treatment (n=414, n=424)318 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Week 4 (n=393, n=404)257 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 1 (n=414, n=424)314 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 85-98 (n=341, n=339)140 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 2 (n=414, n=424)313 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 29-42 (n=348, n=354)191 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 3 (n=413, n=424)317 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 169-196 (n=272, n=271)90 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 4 (n=412, n=423)316 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 43-56 (n=361, n=370)173 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 5 (n=411, n=423)311 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 99-112 (n=321, n=318)127 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 6 (n=411, n=423)312 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 57-70 (n=361, n=346)155 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Study Day 7 (n=409, n=422)306 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 141-168 (n=306, n=304)109 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Week 2 (n=409, n=422)308 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Post treatment, Study Days 71-84 (n=352, n=344)148 participants
PlaceboConsumption and Type of Analgesic Medication During the Course of the Study (up to 196 Days)Concomitant, Week 3 (n=399, n=416)284 participants
Secondary

Increase/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

In case of two ulcers the worse ulcer status is analyzed. The categories of investigator assessment are: complete healing, decrease by ≥ 50 %, unchanged, increase by ≥ 50 %.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Of the 838 subjects in the Full Analysis Set (FAS), 465 are included in the analysis of this outcome measure. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentComplete healing101 participants
AlprostadilIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentDecrease by >= 50 %57 participants
AlprostadilIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentRemains unchanged45 participants
AlprostadilIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentIncrease by >= 50 %30 participants
PlaceboIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentIncrease by >= 50 %30 participants
PlaceboIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentComplete healing98 participants
PlaceboIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentRemains unchanged48 participants
PlaceboIncrease/Decrease in Ulcer Area of ≥ 50 % at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentDecrease by >= 50 %56 participants
Secondary

Intensity of Rest Pain Induced by Ischemic Lesions at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

Visit values of intensity of rest pain from a visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (maximum conceivable pain), had to be reported in the case of presence of rest pain only. If the leading question in regard to the presence of rest pain is answered with No and no visit value is specified, the visit value will be set to 0 for the analysis.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) in case of missing values. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AlprostadilIntensity of Rest Pain Induced by Ischemic Lesions at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment17.57 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 25.33
PlaceboIntensity of Rest Pain Induced by Ischemic Lesions at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment16.38 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 25.08
Secondary

Minor Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

Assessment of amputations was collected per leg affected by a lesion with up to 2 lesions per subject. Amputations were regarded as major if they were performed at the ankle joint level or above. Amputations of toes or part of the foot leaving a stump thereon the subject can walk were regarded as minor. An affected leg is defined as a leg with at least 1 lesion on Study Day -6 to -2 and only amputations of affected legs are considered in the efficacy analysis of amputations. A subject is counted as major/minor amputated, if at least 1 affected leg was major/minor amputated. The number of subjects with minor amputation prior to or at 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment is presented below.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Of the 838 subjects in the Full Analysis Set (FAS), 613 are included in the analysis of this outcome measure. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilMinor Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment65 participants
PlaceboMinor Amputations at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment40 participants
Secondary

Revascularization Procedures at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

The number of subjects with revascularization prior to or at 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment is presented below.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Of the 838 subjects in the Full Analysis Set (FAS), 577 are included in the analysis of this outcome measure. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AlprostadilRevascularization Procedures at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment6 participants
PlaceboRevascularization Procedures at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment7 participants
Secondary

Systolic Pressure at Ankle Level at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug Treatment

Systolic pressure at ankle level was measured at the Arteria tibialis posterior and the Arteria dorsalis pedis. Two individual series of measurements of arterial pressures per subject across the assessed visits were selected for the analysis. For the first analysis (worst change analysis) the series of measurements in the one artery which has the worst change from Baseline at the final measurement was used. For the second analysis (worst value analysis) the series of measurements which has the worst final post-Baseline measurement was used. The series relevant for the analyses was selected from the series for the affected leg or legs only. The selection is 1 out of up to 4 series available per subject. Series without Baseline value and series with at least 1 measurement of more than 150 mmHg were excluded from the selection process due to the suspicion of media sclerosis of the lower limb artery.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after the end of study drug treatment

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) in case of missing values. FAS consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of trial medication and who provide valid data to assess at least one of the primary efficacy endpoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AlprostadilSystolic Pressure at Ankle Level at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentWorst change analysis42.83 mmHgStandard Deviation 30.16
AlprostadilSystolic Pressure at Ankle Level at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentWorst value analysis39.39 mmHgStandard Deviation 29.92
PlaceboSystolic Pressure at Ankle Level at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentWorst change analysis39.47 mmHgStandard Deviation 28.32
PlaceboSystolic Pressure at Ankle Level at 24 Weeks After the End of Study Drug TreatmentWorst value analysis36.45 mmHgStandard Deviation 27.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026