Skip to content

Multi-Channel Gastric Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Gastroparesis

Multi-Channel Gastric Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Gastroparesis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00595621
Enrollment
22
Registered
2008-01-16
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2019-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Stasis

Brief summary

Investigate the safety and efficacy of multi-channel gastric electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with severe diabetic gastroparesis refractory to standard therapy.

Detailed description

Evaluation of severe symptom control of nausea, vomiting, postprandial fullness, early satiety, bloating and discomfort related to drug refractory gastroparesis present as a GI complication in diabetic patients. External gastric pacemaker system will be placed at the same time of implantation of Enterra (internal gastric stimulator-permanent device) to assess symptoms, quality of life improvement and investigate the changes in gastric emptying time in diabetic gastroparesis.

Interventions

DEVICEEnterra Multi-Channel Phased Gastric Pacemaker (MGP-1)

Multi-Channel Phased Gastric Pacemaker (MGP-1)

Sponsors

GI Stimulation, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
American Diabetes Association
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe nausea and vomiting for at least 6 months * Documented delayed gastric emptying * Failed extensive medical treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Previous gastric surgery * Pregnancy or planned pregnancy * Primary eating or swallowing disorders * Scheduled or planned MRI testing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Slow Wave Entrainment12 WeeksParticipants were monitored for up to 3 months. Measure is the percent of normal slow waves (2-4 cpm) generated by MGP-1 device while it was ON or OFF

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percent (Percentage) of Gastric Retention of a Solid Meal12 WeeksThe retention of a study meal was measured at baseline, 1,2,3 and 4 hours of the test. The percent of food retained in a stomach at 4 hours was compared when MGP-1 was ON and OFF.
Severity of Gastroparetic Symptoms12 weeksMeasure represents change in symptom severity as measured by a self assessment Symptom Interview Form evaluating severity of vomiting, nausea, early satiety, bloating, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning. Symptoms were rated from 0 - absence of symptom to 4 - extremely severe. The overall score was calculated from the sum of seven symptom sub-scores with a total possible score range of 0 - absence of all symptoms to 28 - all symptoms extremely severe.
Changes in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment (Physical (P) and Mental (M))12 WeeksMeasure represents percentage change from baseline to end of study. QoL measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 is a generic measure of QoL. Physical QoL (Physical Component Summary; PCS) and emotional QoL (Mental Component summary; MCS) scale components of the survey used for outcome. Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating more disability and higher scores less disability.
Changes in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level12 WeeksHbA1c was evaluated at the baseline and after completion of all the phases of the study
Changes in Hospital Admissions12 WeeksMeasured by days of hospitalization per patient. Number of days of hospitalization was recorded at baseline and after completion of all phases of the study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Diabetic gastroparetic patients who qualified to participate in this study based on inclusionary criteria were recruited from the Gastroenterology Motility Clinic of KUMC in Kansas City, KS

Pre-assignment details

All subjects underwent an open-label phase where multi-channel gastric pacemaker (MGP-1) was turned ON for 6 weeks. After this phase they were randomized in double blind fashion to MGP-1 ON or OFF for another 4 weeks. 3 participants were not randomized to continue the study after the open-label phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MGP-1 ON
Experimental Pacemaker on for 6 weeks during the open label phase then on for 4 weeks during the randomization phase. Enterra Multi-Channel Phased Gastric Pacemaker (MGP-1): Multi-Channel Phased Gastric Pacemaker (MGP-1)
10
MGP-1 OFF
Experimental Pacemaker on for 6 weeks during the open label phase then off for 4 weeks during the randomization phase. Enterra Multi-Channel Phased Gastric Pacemaker (MGP-1): Multi-Channel Phased Gastric Pacemaker (MGP-1)
9
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Open Label Run inAdverse Event10
Open Label Run inPhysician Decision10
Open Label Run inWithdrawal by Subject10
Randomization and StudyAdverse Event20
Randomization and StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMGP-1 OFFMGP-1 ONTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Age, Continuous40 years42 years42 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants10 participants19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 100 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 222 / 100 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 100 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Slow Wave Entrainment

Participants were monitored for up to 3 months. Measure is the percent of normal slow waves (2-4 cpm) generated by MGP-1 device while it was ON or OFF

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MGP-1 ONPercentage of Slow Wave EntrainmentBaseline Pre-Randomization Phase72 percentage of slow waves entrainmentStandard Deviation 3
MGP-1 ONPercentage of Slow Wave EntrainmentPost-Randomization Phase84 percentage of slow waves entrainmentStandard Deviation 2
MGP-1 OFFPercentage of Slow Wave EntrainmentBaseline Pre-Randomization Phase70 percentage of slow waves entrainmentStandard Deviation 2
MGP-1 OFFPercentage of Slow Wave EntrainmentPost-Randomization Phase78 percentage of slow waves entrainmentStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Changes in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level

HbA1c was evaluated at the baseline and after completion of all the phases of the study

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MGP-1 ONChanges in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level8.1 % HbA1c
MGP-1 OFFChanges in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level8.2 % HbA1c
Secondary

Changes in Hospital Admissions

Measured by days of hospitalization per patient. Number of days of hospitalization was recorded at baseline and after completion of all phases of the study.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
MGP-1 ONChanges in Hospital Admissions1.5 days
MGP-1 OFFChanges in Hospital Admissions2.1 days
Secondary

Changes in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment (Physical (P) and Mental (M))

Measure represents percentage change from baseline to end of study. QoL measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 is a generic measure of QoL. Physical QoL (Physical Component Summary; PCS) and emotional QoL (Mental Component summary; MCS) scale components of the survey used for outcome. Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating more disability and higher scores less disability.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MGP-1 ONChanges in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment (Physical (P) and Mental (M))Physical Score60 percentage change in scale scoreStandard Deviation 21
MGP-1 ONChanges in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment (Physical (P) and Mental (M))Mental Score55 percentage change in scale scoreStandard Deviation 19
MGP-1 OFFChanges in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment (Physical (P) and Mental (M))Physical Score30 percentage change in scale scoreStandard Deviation 11
MGP-1 OFFChanges in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment (Physical (P) and Mental (M))Mental Score40 percentage change in scale scoreStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Severity of Gastroparetic Symptoms

Measure represents change in symptom severity as measured by a self assessment Symptom Interview Form evaluating severity of vomiting, nausea, early satiety, bloating, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning. Symptoms were rated from 0 - absence of symptom to 4 - extremely severe. The overall score was calculated from the sum of seven symptom sub-scores with a total possible score range of 0 - absence of all symptoms to 28 - all symptoms extremely severe.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MGP-1 ONSeverity of Gastroparetic SymptomsBaseline Pre-Randomization Phase13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
MGP-1 ONSeverity of Gastroparetic SymptomsPost-Randomization Phase6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
MGP-1 OFFSeverity of Gastroparetic SymptomsBaseline Pre-Randomization Phase14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
MGP-1 OFFSeverity of Gastroparetic SymptomsPost-Randomization Phase16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

The Percent (Percentage) of Gastric Retention of a Solid Meal

The retention of a study meal was measured at baseline, 1,2,3 and 4 hours of the test. The percent of food retained in a stomach at 4 hours was compared when MGP-1 was ON and OFF.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MGP-1 ONThe Percent (Percentage) of Gastric Retention of a Solid MealBaseline Pre-Randomization Phase46 percent of food retained
MGP-1 ONThe Percent (Percentage) of Gastric Retention of a Solid MealPost-Randomization Phase33 percent of food retained
MGP-1 OFFThe Percent (Percentage) of Gastric Retention of a Solid MealPost-Randomization Phase42 percent of food retained
MGP-1 OFFThe Percent (Percentage) of Gastric Retention of a Solid MealBaseline Pre-Randomization Phase36 percent of food retained

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026