Skip to content

Ramelteon for a Nap Prior to a Night Shift

Effects of Ramelteon on Sleep and Neurobehavioral Performance in a Simulated Night Shift Preceded by a Sleep Opportunity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00595075
Enrollment
11
Registered
2008-01-16
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2012-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

sleep, performance, night shift, Ramelteon, Healthy Individuals

Brief summary

Night shift-workers are often advised to take a prophylactic nap prior to starting the shift in order to improve alertness and performance. However, individuals often report difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep at that time of the day secondary to the alerting influence of the near-24 hour circadian rhythm (biological clock). A sleep-promoting medication may improve the quality of an evening nap and subsequent alertness and performance during a night shift. We will use Ramelteon, a melatonin agonist that is FDA approved for insomnia, in order to test the following hypotheses: 1. ramelteon, compared with placebo, will significantly increase sleep efficiency during a 2-hour nap; 2. sleep inertia, as assessed by neurobehavioral tests and subjective and objective sleepiness assessments will not be significantly increased after ramelteon treatment compared with placebo treatment; and 3. neurobehavioral performance, subjective and objective sleepiness, and subjective mood during a simulated 8-hour night shift will be significantly improved when ramelteon is given prior to a prophylactic nap compared to a prophylactic nap with placebo.

Interventions

DRUGRamelteon

Ramelteon 8 mg tablet by mouth x 1 dose

DRUGplacebo

placebo identical in appearance to active experimental drug x 1 dose

Sponsors

Takeda
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18-35 years; * Non-smoking for at least 6 months; * Healthy (no medical, psychiatric or sleep disorders); * No clinically significant deviations from normal in medical history, vital signs, physical examination, blood chemistry and hematology, and ECG; * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use an acceptable method of birth control, and must have a negative serum pregnancy test; * Body mass index of \> 18 or \< 30 kg/m∧2; * No drugs or medication likely to affect sleep or alertness, as determined by the investigators; * Habitual caffeine consumption \< 300 mg per day on average; * Habitual alcohol consumption \< 10 alcoholic units per week on average.

Exclusion criteria

* History of alcohol or substance abuse; * Positive result on drugs of abuse screening; * Current or past history of sleep disorders, including but not limited to obstructive sleep apnea, or any significant sleep complaint; * Psychiatric disorder, including a history of depression or dysthymia (characterized by depressed mood on the majority of days for at least two years); * Recent acute or chronic medical disorder, including but not limited to hepatic impairment and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; * History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to melatonin or melatonin agonists; * Pregnancy or lactation; * Shift work; * Transmeridian travel (2 or more time zones) in past 2 months; * Any other scientific or medical reason, as determined by the PI, such as non-compliance with protocol or intolerance to inpatient study conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Efficiency2 hourstotal sleep time/time in bed \* 100% (higher values indicate better outcome)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Nap Assessment - Karolinska Sleepiness Scale71 minutesnumerical scale of increasing sleepiness from 1-9 (higher values indicate worse outcome)
Post Nap Assessment - Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Correct Answers)71 minutesA cognitive throughput task consisting of matching symbols to numerical keys; higher numbers indicate a better score
Post-nap Assessment - Visual Analog Scale71 minutesnumerical scale of increasing alertness from 0-100 (higher values are better outcome)
Psychomotor Vigilance Task - Median Reaction Time8 hoursVisual-motor reaction time in which participants hit a button on a response box as fast as possible in response to a visual target (lower values indicate better outcome)
Psychomotor Vigilance Task - Number of Lapses8 hoursNumber of trials per test battery with a reaction time \>0.5 seconds (higher values indicate worse outcome)
Post Nap Assessment - Karolinska Drowsiness Test71 minutesEEG spectral analysis of 5.5-9.0 Hz frequency activity (theta low-frequency alpha), with higher activity indicating increased drowsiness and worse outcome

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Healthy volunteers were recruited

Pre-assignment details

Participants received 1 dose of ramelteon or placebo during the first inpatient visit and then returned approximately four weeks later for the other condition, counterbalanced for order

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ramelteon in First Crossover Period
Ramelteon 8 mg will be given prior to a 2-hour nap
6
Placebo in First Crossover Period
Placebo will be given prior to a 2-hour nap
5
Total11

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo in First Crossover PeriodRamelteon in First Crossover PeriodTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Age Continuous26.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
22.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
24.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Sleep Efficiency

total sleep time/time in bed \* 100% (higher values indicate better outcome)

Time frame: 2 hours

Population: All participants that completed both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonSleep Efficiency89.1 percentStandard Deviation 9.8
PlaceboSleep Efficiency83.3 percentStandard Deviation 14.3
Other Pre-specified

Post Nap Assessment - Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Correct Answers)

A cognitive throughput task consisting of matching symbols to numerical keys; higher numbers indicate a better score

Time frame: 71 minutes

Population: All participants that completed both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonPost Nap Assessment - Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Correct Answers)50.4 correct answersStandard Deviation 9.3
PlaceboPost Nap Assessment - Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Correct Answers)53.3 correct answersStandard Deviation 9.3
Other Pre-specified

Post Nap Assessment - Karolinska Drowsiness Test

EEG spectral analysis of 5.5-9.0 Hz frequency activity (theta low-frequency alpha), with higher activity indicating increased drowsiness and worse outcome

Time frame: 71 minutes

Population: All participants completing both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonPost Nap Assessment - Karolinska Drowsiness Test4.9 microvolts^2/HzStandard Deviation 4.5
PlaceboPost Nap Assessment - Karolinska Drowsiness Test4.0 microvolts^2/HzStandard Deviation 5.6
Other Pre-specified

Post Nap Assessment - Karolinska Sleepiness Scale

numerical scale of increasing sleepiness from 1-9 (higher values indicate worse outcome)

Time frame: 71 minutes

Population: All participants that completed both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonPost Nap Assessment - Karolinska Sleepiness Scale5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboPost Nap Assessment - Karolinska Sleepiness Scale4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Other Pre-specified

Post-nap Assessment - Visual Analog Scale

numerical scale of increasing alertness from 0-100 (higher values are better outcome)

Time frame: 71 minutes

Population: All participants that completed both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonPost-nap Assessment - Visual Analog Scale61.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
PlaceboPost-nap Assessment - Visual Analog Scale67.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Other Pre-specified

Psychomotor Vigilance Task - Median Reaction Time

Visual-motor reaction time in which participants hit a button on a response box as fast as possible in response to a visual target (lower values indicate better outcome)

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: All participants completing both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonPsychomotor Vigilance Task - Median Reaction Time0.662 secondsStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboPsychomotor Vigilance Task - Median Reaction Time0.362 secondsStandard Deviation 0.25
Other Pre-specified

Psychomotor Vigilance Task - Number of Lapses

Number of trials per test battery with a reaction time \>0.5 seconds (higher values indicate worse outcome)

Time frame: 8 hours

Population: All participants completing both crossover periods

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RamelteonPsychomotor Vigilance Task - Number of Lapses15.5 lapsesStandard Deviation 16.3
PlaceboPsychomotor Vigilance Task - Number of Lapses13.2 lapsesStandard Deviation 16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026