Skip to content

Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of Switching Between Two Forms of Tapentadol in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

A Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Period, Crossover Study to Establish the Dose Equivalence and Direct Conversion Between Immediate Release (IR) and Extended-Release (ER) CG5503 in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe, Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00594516
Enrollment
117
Registered
2008-01-15
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2015-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low Back Pain, Dose Equivalence, Tapentadol (CG5503), Tapentadol-IR, Tapentadol-ER

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to test the idea that the immediate-release (IR) form of tapentadol (CG5503) can be directly converted into an approximately equivalent total daily dose (TDD) of the extended-release (ER) form, and vice-versa, with equivalent safety and efficacy.

Detailed description

This study will establish the dose equivalence and the safety and effectiveness of the Immediate Release (IR) and Extended Release (ER) forms of tapentadol (CG5503) to support the conversion from IR to ER, and ER to IR use. Dose equivalence will be examined in patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe, chronic Low Back Pain (LBP) requiring drug treatment for at least 3 months, and who are dissatisfied with current therapy. The study consists of 5 periods: a screening period during which patients are evaluated for study eligibility; a 21-day open-label period to find the best, stable dose of tapentadol (CG5503) IR for each patient individually; a 14-day double-blind period when patients are randomly chosen either to continue for 14 days on the stable IR dose from the open-label period or switch to the ER form; a second, 14-day period during which patients switch to whichever form of tapentadol (CG5503) they did not take during the first 14-day period (the total daily dose \[TDD\] remains approximately equivalent for the IR and ER forms throughout both double-blind periods); and a follow-up period. During the study, pain levels will be recorded and overall safety measures taken. The expectation (thought) is that approximately equivalent doses of both forms of tapentadol (CG5503) provide equivalent effectiveness and safety and that the two forms can be directly converted by dividing the total daily dose by the number of times the drug is taken each day. During the 21-day open-label period, 50, 75 or 100mg of the IR form is given orally every 4 or 6 hours, starting with 50mg every 6 hours. Then, the dose, the frequency of giving the drug, or both may be increased, to a maximum TDD of 500mg, or decreased in 50 mg increments, with minimum TDD of 200 mg, until the optimal stable dose for a patient is found. During the 2 double-blind periods, a TDD approximately equivalent to the stable open-label dose is given orally in IR (or ER) form or placebo.

Interventions

DRUGtapentadol (CG5503) Immediate Release IR

21 day Open Label: an adjustable dose of Tapentadol IR 50-100mg orally every 4-6 hours to maximum total daily dose (TDD) dose of 500 mg during open label period

During 2 double blind periods: Tapentadol ER 100, 150, 200 or 250 mg tablets twice daily in the first intervention period of double-blind phase and Tapentadol IR in the second or Tapentadol IR in first intervention period of double-blind phase and Tapentadol ER in second

DRUGtapentadol (CG5503) Immediate Release (IR)

Following open label period is 2 double blind periods: Tapentadol IR in first intervention period of double-blind phase and Tapentadol ER 100, 150, 200 or 250 mg tablets twice daily in second or Tapentadol ER in first intervention period of double-blind phase and Tapentadol IR in second

Sponsors

Grünenthal GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Low Back Pain (LBP) of non-malignant origin present for at least 3 months immediately before study entry * Taking drug treatment for pain for at least 3 months before screening and who are dissatisfied with current therapy * Subjects receiving opioid treatment must have a total daily opioid dose \<= 160 mg/day of oral morphine equivalent * For entry into open label period patients must have a baseline score \>=5 on an 11-point NRS, calculated as the average pain intensity during the last 3 days of the washout period * For entry into the double-blind period subjects must have remained on the same optimal stable dose and frequency of tapentadol (CG5503) IR administration during the last 3 days of the open-label treatment period

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of conditions other than Low Back Pain (LBP) that could make it hard to assess or self-evaluate pain * Surgery in low back area within 3 months of screening or expected surgery in the low back area during the study * Any scheduled surgery or painful procedure during the study, or any clinically significant disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect efficacy or safety assessments * History of malignancy within the past 2 years, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been treated and is no longer present * Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Moderately or severely impaired liver function * Severely impaired kidney function * History of chronic hepatitis B or C, or HIV, or presence of active hepatitis B or C in past 3 months * History of seizure disorder * Alcohol or drug abuse * Uncontrolled high blood pressure * Clinically relevant history of hypersensitivity, allergy, or contraindications to acetaminophen or opioid analgesics (or ingredients)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Difference in the Mean Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) During the Last 3 Days of Each Double-blind Treatment Period. (Difference Between Two DB Randomization Treatment Sequences)14 days for each cross-over periodFor this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 indicated pain as bad as you can imagine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication During the DB Tapentadol IR Treatment14 days for each cross-over period
The Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication During the DB Tapentadol ER Treatment14 days for each cross-over period
Total Daily Dose (TDD) of Tapentadol IR During the Double-blind Treatment Period14-day for each DB treatment periodAverage total daily dose (TDD) of tapentadol IR during the double blind treatment period
Total Daily Dose (TDD) of Tapentadol ER During the DB Treatment Period.14 days for each treatment periodAverage total daily dose (TDD) of tapentadol ER during the double-blind treatment period.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first site opened on 30 November 2007. The recruitment period for this outpatient, multicenter study occurred between 10 December 2007 and 01 May 2008.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of screening period (up to 21 days), washout period (from 3 to 7 days), open label (OL) treatment period (3 weeks), followed by a double blind (DB) active treatment period, with crossover design of 2 randomized sequences of tapentadol immediate release (IR) to tapentadol extended release (ER) and tapentadol ER to IR (4 weeks)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tapentadol
Subjects treated in the Tapentadol(CG5503) Immediate Release (IR) Open-Label period
116
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
DB: Tapentadol IR to ER & ER to IRAdverse Event002
DB: Tapentadol IR to ER & ER to IRLack of Efficacy011
DB: Tapentadol IR to ER & ER to IRStudy Medication Non compliant032
DB: Tapentadol IR to ER & ER to IRWithdrawal by Subject033
Open Label (OL): Tapentadol IRAdverse Event1600
Open Label (OL): Tapentadol IRLack of Efficacy100
Open Label (OL): Tapentadol IRLost to Follow-up200
Open Label (OL): Tapentadol IRStudy Medication Non Compliant600
Open Label (OL): Tapentadol IRWithdrawal by Subject400

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTapentadol
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
86 Participants
Age, Continuous53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.46
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
14 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
90 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
98 / 116
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 116

Outcome results

Primary

The Difference in the Mean Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) During the Last 3 Days of Each Double-blind Treatment Period. (Difference Between Two DB Randomization Treatment Sequences)

For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 indicated pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: 14 days for each cross-over period

Population: Per-protocol set defined as the number of randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study drug during the DB treatment period, and who met additional criteria which were identified prior to unblinding.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
TapentadolThe Difference in the Mean Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) During the Last 3 Days of Each Double-blind Treatment Period. (Difference Between Two DB Randomization Treatment Sequences)0.1 Units on a scale
Comparison: Comparison of Tapentadol IR to ER analysis of variance model with factors for treatment, double blind cross-over period and subject.95% CI: [-0.09, 0.28]
Secondary

The Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication During the DB Tapentadol ER Treatment

Time frame: 14 days for each cross-over period

Population: DB safety set defined as randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study drug during the DB treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TapentadolThe Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication During the DB Tapentadol ER Treatment29 participants
Secondary

The Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication During the DB Tapentadol IR Treatment

Time frame: 14 days for each cross-over period

Population: DB safety set defined as randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study drug during the DB treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TapentadolThe Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication During the DB Tapentadol IR Treatment24 participants
Secondary

Total Daily Dose (TDD) of Tapentadol ER During the DB Treatment Period.

Average total daily dose (TDD) of tapentadol ER during the double-blind treatment period.

Time frame: 14 days for each treatment period

Population: DB safety set defined as randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study drug during the DB treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TapentadolTotal Daily Dose (TDD) of Tapentadol ER During the DB Treatment Period.330.4 mgStandard Deviation 123.73
Secondary

Total Daily Dose (TDD) of Tapentadol IR During the Double-blind Treatment Period

Average total daily dose (TDD) of tapentadol IR during the double blind treatment period

Time frame: 14-day for each DB treatment period

Population: DB safety set defined as randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study drug during the DB treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TapentadolTotal Daily Dose (TDD) of Tapentadol IR During the Double-blind Treatment Period331.0 mgStandard Deviation 116.17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026