Skip to content

A Trial of Neupro® (Rotigotine Transdermal Patch) in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Undergoing Surgery

An Explorative, Multicenter, Open-label Pilot Trial With Neupro® (Rotigotine Transdermal Patch) Once Daily Treatment Administered Perioperatively in Patients With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00594464
Acronym
NEUPOS
Enrollment
14
Registered
2008-01-15
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2014-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Rotigotine, NEUPRO®, Parkinson's Disease (PD), perioperative use, anaesthesia,

Brief summary

Evaluation of efficacy and safety on the use of rotigotine in patients suffering from Parkinson's Disease during and after surgery requiring general anaesthesia.

Interventions

DRUGRotigotine

2 mg/24 h, 4 mg/24 h, 6 mg/24 h and 8 mg/24 h patch; Single patches and a combination of 2 of these patches for a dosage of up to 16 mg/24 h; One (1) regimen on day of surgery, but exceptionally extended for up to 2 (two) weeks if the patient requires unexpected ventilation after surgery.

Sponsors

UCB Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has idiopathic Parkinson's disease (early- or advanced-stage), as defined by the cardinal sign bradykinesia, plus the presence of at least one of the following: resting tremor, rigidity, or postural instability and is without any other known or suspected cause of Parkinsonism. * Subject is scheduled for an operation requiring general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has previously been treated with rotigotine. * Subject has a history of significant skin hypersensitivity to adhesives or other transdermals or recent unresolved contact dermatitis or has a known allergy or hypersensitivity to rotigotine or to other components of the patch. * Subject is scheduled for a surgical procedure (surgery per protocol(SPP)) that requires magnetic resonance imaging or cardioversion. * Subject has a high probability to require extended postoperative ventilation (\> 24 hours). * Subject has any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or compromise the subject's ability to participate in this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Anaesthesiologist.After subject wakes up from general anesthesiaQuestionnaire including 4 items Range of sum score: 4 to 24 Range of item scores: 1 (I agree completely) to 6 (I don't agree at all) Item 1: Patient did not show unexpected symptoms Item 2: Handling was simple Item 3: Handling wasn't time-consuming Item 4: Patch is a considerable option
Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Neurologist.2 weeks after surgeryQuestionnaire including 4 items Range of sum score: 4 to 24 Range of item scores: 1 (I agree completely) to 6 (I don't agree at all) Item 1: Switch to patch was easily feasible Item 2: Re-switch was easily feasible Item 3: Patient did not show unexpected symptoms Item 4: Patch is a feasible option
Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Patient.2 weeks after surgeryQuestionnaire including 3 items Range of sum score: 3 to 18 Range of item scores: 1 (I agree completely) to 6 (I don't agree at all) Item 1: Therapy with patch was easily feasible Item 2: Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease were well controlled Item 3: I felt safe with the Parkinson patch

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Plasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.24 hours

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rotigotine
Patients were dispensed rotigotine patches up to 16mg/24h at a dose left to the discretion of the neurologist.
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDelay in operation2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRotigotine
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Region of Enrollment
Germany
14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Anaesthesiologist.

Questionnaire including 4 items Range of sum score: 4 to 24 Range of item scores: 1 (I agree completely) to 6 (I don't agree at all) Item 1: Patient did not show unexpected symptoms Item 2: Handling was simple Item 3: Handling wasn't time-consuming Item 4: Patch is a considerable option

Time frame: After subject wakes up from general anesthesia

Population: Full Analysis Set (Subjects having valid data for all three feasibility assessments)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RotigotineEfficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Anaesthesiologist.5.0 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Primary

Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Neurologist.

Questionnaire including 4 items Range of sum score: 4 to 24 Range of item scores: 1 (I agree completely) to 6 (I don't agree at all) Item 1: Switch to patch was easily feasible Item 2: Re-switch was easily feasible Item 3: Patient did not show unexpected symptoms Item 4: Patch is a feasible option

Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery

Population: Full Analysis Set (Subjects having valid data for all three feasibility assessments)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RotigotineEfficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Neurologist.5.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Primary

Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Patient.

Questionnaire including 3 items Range of sum score: 3 to 18 Range of item scores: 1 (I agree completely) to 6 (I don't agree at all) Item 1: Therapy with patch was easily feasible Item 2: Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease were well controlled Item 3: I felt safe with the Parkinson patch

Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery

Population: Full Analysis Set (Subjects having valid data for all three feasibility assessments)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RotigotineEfficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Used During Surgery Under General Anaesthesia Assessed by Patient.3.9 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Pharmacokinetic Set (Subjects for whom a blood sample for determination of the plasma concentration of rotigotine was drawn and a valid determination of the plasma concentration could be done)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RotigotinePlasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.0.1640 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
Rotigotine 6mg/24hPlasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.0.2480 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
Rotigotine 8 mg/24hPlasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.0.7570 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.1569
Rotigotine 12 mg/24hPlasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.0.8405 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.3302
Rotigotine 14 mg/24hPlasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.0.8689 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0
Rotigotine 16 mg/24hPlasma Concentration of Rotigotine After Use.1.6958 ng/mlStandard Deviation 2.1951

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026