Skip to content

Development Of New Techniques For Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Brain

Development Of New Techniques For Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Brain

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00593931
Enrollment
215
Registered
2008-01-15
Start date
1999-05-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2017-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnosis, Psychiatric

Keywords

Brain functional MRI

Brief summary

This Protocol is intended to facilitate development and testing of new techniques for functional MRI by UC Davis Research Faculty, as well as to facilitate the evaluation of new techniques provided by the system manufacturers (GE and Siemens).

Detailed description

New techniques covering a wide range of clinical and scientific applications will be developed, tested and evaluated. These include 1. Investigation of sensory stimulus processing and cognitive processing, both in normal subjects and patients with psychiatric disorders, 2. Early detection of stroke and other ischemic injury, and 3. Characterization of tumor distribution and activity. The new techniques will routinely need to be tested with respect to the following: 1. Sensitivity to blood oxygenation versus blood flow versus blood volume contrast mechanisms, 2. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio, 3. Spatial and temporal resolution, 4. Distribution and severity of image artifacts, and 5. Duty cycle limitations. Most clinical applications will require coverage of the entire brain and consequently high duty cycle operation, which needs to be traded off with spatial and temporal resolution, as well as contrast mechanisms. The work will also involve the testing of different experimental paradigms (time sequence of stimuli or cognitive tasks) to identify that which provides the highest signal change associated with the specific brain activity of interest. Although 3T provides twice the signal of 1.5T systems, for some research applications this image quality advantage of 3T may be outweighed by other effects of higher field on the signal. Consequently, most new techniques will be evaluated on both the 1.5T and 3T systems, and a decision will be made based upon the overall image quality, regarding which system is to be used. The Protocol does not involve injection of any contrast agent or drug, or other minimally-invasive or invasive procedure. It is intended specifically for those studies in which the subject is required, in addition to trying to relax and lie still, only to experience and respond to various non-harmful sensory stimuli, or to perform common cognitive (e.g. math calculations) and or motor (e.g. finger tapping) tasks.

Interventions

OTHERfMRI

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging without contrast

Sponsors

University of California, Davis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * ability to give informed, written consent * Not pregnant or breastfeeding

Exclusion criteria

* Electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated implants (for example, cardiac-pacemakers) * Ferromagnetic implant, such as an aneurysm clip, surgical clip, or prosthesis * History of uncontrolled claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
transient changes in blood flow in the brain that occurs with neuronal activityPost-scanning

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity to blood oxygenation versus blood flow versus blood volume contrast mechanismsPost-scanning

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026