Skip to content

Clofarabine, Cytarabine, and Thymoglobulin for Allogeneic Transplantation

A Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Transplantation With Clofarabine, Cytarabine, and Thymoglobulin for Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00593645
Enrollment
7
Registered
2008-01-15
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2014-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

Conditioning regimens, Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Nonmyeloablative conditioning, Clofarabine, Cytarabine, Anti-thymocyte globulin

Brief summary

This study will test the combination of clofarabine, cytarabine, and thymoglobulin as a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Detailed description

Current reduced intensity conditioning regimens have been able to decrease TRM (treatment related mortality) but suffer from increased rates of disease relapse. Disease burden at transplantation, as measured by percent myeloblasts, predicts relapse. Current regimens employ fludarabine and busulfan with various adjutants, but these agents are not part of the usual armamentarium used versus leukemia and have questionable anti-leukemic activity. By substituting clofarabine and cytarabine, a combination with proven anti-leukemic activity in the relapsed and refractory setting as well as activity versus MDS, as the back bone of the regimen we hope overcome residual disease and improve post-transplant relapse rates. Furthermore the principal toxicity of this regimen is myelosuppression, which should be abrogated by the infusion of stem cells. Thymoglobulin is included due to its minimal contribution to toxicity but significant benefits in engraftment, and controlling acute and chronic GVHD, which are major contributors to TRM and disease specific activity in MDS.

Interventions

DRUGClofarabine
DRUGCytarabine
DRUGThymoglobulin
PROCEDUREStem cell infusion

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(Patient): 1. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), as defined by the World Health Organization criteria, OR Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) as defined by the French American British classification OR Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in complete remission \[excluding FAB-M3\] diagnosed by standard criteria and meet the criteria below: 1. Patients may be in any CR 2. No more than 2 cycles of consolidation. Any consolidation regimen may be used. 3. No more than 6 months from documented CR to transplant. 2. Age 18 years or older. 3. ECOG performance status \<=2 4. Identification of suitable donor 5. DLCO \>=40% with no symptomatic pulmonary disease 6. LVEF by MUGA \>= 30% 7. Serum creatinine \<=1.0 mg/dL; if serum creatinine \>1.0 mg/dL, then the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) must be \>60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation where Predicted GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) = 186 x (Serum Creatinine)-1.154 x (age in years)-0.023 x (0.742 if patient is female) x (1.212 if patient is black). 8. Bilirubin \<=2 times the upper limit of normal 9. AST \<=3 times the upper limit of normal Donor criteria: 1. HLA-Matched Sibling: The donor must be an adequate HLA match as determined by serologic typing for class (A, B) and low resolution molecular typing for class II (DRB1) as defined by institutional standards. 2. Matched Unrelated Donor: An acceptable match per NMDP standards based on high resolution molecular typing. 3. The donor must be healthy and must be an acceptable donor as per institutional standards for stem cell collection. 4. The donor must have no significant cardiopulmonary, renal, endocrine, or hepatic disease. 5. There is no upper age restriction for donors, but they must be at least 18 years of age. 6. Syngeneic donors are not eligible. 7. No known HIV.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or nursing. 2. Active systemic infection considered opportunistic, life threatening or clinically significant at the time of treatment. 3. Severe concurrent disease, including severe insulin-dependent diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, transient ischemic attacks, uncontrolled symptomatic coronary artery disease, or symptomatic CNS involvement or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. 4. Known HIV disease. 5. History of other malignancy except for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast unless the subject has been off treatment and free from disease for \> 3 years. 6. Active disease at the time of transplant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Six-month Treatment Related Mortality6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor ChimerismDay +30
Overall Survival5 years from time of restaging
Disease-free Survival5 years from time of restagingDisease-free survival is defined as the length of time after treatment ends that the participant survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer.
Disease Specific Response RatesOne, three, six and twelve months.Disease-specific partial response and complete response.
Rate of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)100 days-1 year after transplant
Use Conventional STR-PCR Method for Monitoring EngraftmentUp to 1 year after transplantIncludes assessment of mixed chimerism in the whole blood, myeloid cells, T cells, and B cells.
Median Time to Progression5 years from time of restagingTime to progression is defined as the length of time from the start of treatment until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body.
Rate of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Up to 100 days after transplantAcute GVHD occurs within 100 days of transplant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment to the study opened on 11/21/2007 and enrollment to the study closed on 08/11/2008

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning Regimen
* Clofarabine 40mg/m2/day IV over two hours daily x 5 days on Days -6 thru -2 * Cytarabine 1gm/m2/day IV over two hours daily x 5 days on Days -6 thru -2 after the START of Clofarabine. * Thymoglobulin 1.0mg/kg IV over 6 hours X 1 day on Day -4, then 2.5mg/kg/day x 2 days on Days -3 and -2. * Stem Cell Transplant - On day 0 a minimum of total CD34+ cell dose of 2 x10E6/kg (actual weight of recipient) will be infused.
7
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning Regimen
Age, Continuous54 years
Diagnosis
Acute myeloid leukemia
4 participants
Diagnosis
Myelodysplastic syndrome
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Six-month Treatment Related Mortality

Time frame: 6 months

Population: This outcome was not analyzed.~Enrollment to the trial was halted after three of the first seven patients expired. This fulfilled the predefined stopping rule as it was unlikely that we would achieve our primary end point of a 6 month treatment-related mortality of 10%.

Secondary

Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival is defined as the length of time after treatment ends that the participant survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer.

Time frame: 5 years from time of restaging

Population: None of the patients analyzed survived without any signs or symptoms of that cancer.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenDisease-free Survival0 participants
Secondary

Disease Specific Response Rates

Disease-specific partial response and complete response.

Time frame: One, three, six and twelve months.

Population: This outcome was not analyzed due to terminating the study after 7 participants were enrolled.~We felt that the engraftment as measured by percent donor chimerism provided better response details than the limited data that was collected for the disease specific partial and complete response rates.

Secondary

Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism

Time frame: Day +30

Population: 2 participants were not analyzed because they expired prior to Day +30.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor ChimerismNot done2 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism50% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism100% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism23.5% donor (FISH)1 participants
Secondary

Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism

Time frame: Day +40-+60

Population: 3 participants were not analyzed because they were expired.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism60% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism70% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism75% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism100% donor (peripheral blood)1 participants
Secondary

Engraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism

Time frame: Day +80-+90

Population: 3 participants were not analyzed as they were deceased.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism0% donor1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism33% donor - myeloid (peripheral blood)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism67% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenEngraftment as Measured by Percent Donor Chimerism100% donor (bone marrow)1 participants
Secondary

Median Time to Progression

Time to progression is defined as the length of time from the start of treatment until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body.

Time frame: 5 years from time of restaging

Population: Of the four surviving patients, three relapsed. One patient remained in remission on day +120.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenMedian Time to Progression152 days
Secondary

Overall Survival

Time frame: 5 years from time of restaging

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenOverall Survival237 days
Secondary

Rate of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

Acute GVHD occurs within 100 days of transplant.

Time frame: Up to 100 days after transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenRate of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

Time frame: 100 days-1 year after transplant

Population: None of the participants had chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). 3 participants expired prior to day 100.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Non-myeloablative Conditioning RegimenRate of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Use Conventional STR-PCR Method for Monitoring Engraftment

Includes assessment of mixed chimerism in the whole blood, myeloid cells, T cells, and B cells.

Time frame: Up to 1 year after transplant

Population: This outcome was not analyzed specifically as the conventional STR-PCR method was used for monitoring engraftment.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026