Skip to content

T-score Comparability Between GE Lunar Prodigy and Norland Excel Densitometers

T-score Comparability Between GE Lunar Prodigy and Norland Excel Densitometers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00593437
Acronym
Wildwood
Enrollment
35
Registered
2008-01-15
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2006-12-31
Last updated
2015-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Densitometry

Keywords

bone density diagnostic equipment discrepancies

Brief summary

Differences in determining bone density scores have been found when comparing different bone density machines. Reducing differences between machines will improve diagnostic agreement for patients measured at different clinics. This study will test if this difference exists between the Norland Excel, such as the one at Wildwood Clinic, and the GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy at the UW Osteoporosis Clinical Research Center.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory women age 40 years and older * Recent spine and hip DXA at Wildwood clinic in Madison, WI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Spine and hip BMD and T-score measurements will be compared between densitometry machines.2 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026