Skip to content

Evaluation of Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy

Evaluation of Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy as the Sole Method of Radiation Therapy for Stage 0, 1 and II Lymph Node Negative Breast Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00593346
Enrollment
151
Registered
2008-01-15
Start date
2004-03-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2015-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

Over the past two decades, breast conserving therapy (BCT) has become a major treatment modality for Stage I and II breast carcinoma. The major advantages of breast conserving therapy are superior cosmetic outcome and the reduced emotional and psychological trauma afforded by this procedure compared with conventional mastectomy. The principal disadvantage of BCT is its more complex and prolonged treatment regimen requiring approximately 6 weeks of external beam radiation therapy that poses problems for some patients such as the working woman, elderly patients, and those who live at a significant distance from a treatment center. These factors, along with the patient's geographic location, result in a smaller fraction of the patients who currently meet eligibility criteria for BCT actually receiving it, despite its cosmetic and probable psychological advantages. The logistical problems of BCT are primarily related to the protracted course of external beam radiation therapy to the whole breast. While some investigators reported what they believe to be acceptable local control rates in carefully selected patients treated by wide local excision without radiation therapy, the criteria for patient selection are controversial and poorly defined and probably restrict the access of many patients to breast conserving therapy. If previous observations are valid and breast irradiation following tylectomy exerts its maximal effect in eradicating occult disease remaining in the immediate vicinity of the tylectomy site, can radiation therapy be directed only to the tissue surrounding the excision cavity of the breast, using brachytherapy alone? If so, the entire course of radiation therapy could be delivered over a 4 to 7 day period immediately following tylectomy and/or axillary dissection, thus markedly reducing treatment time. Brachytherapy also inherently provides a higher central dose to the volume most at risk for recurrence. Cosmetic outcome after the use of a brachytherapy boost after external whole breast radiotherapy is comparable or slightly inferior to electron beam boost radiation therapy

Detailed description

This study will evaluate the local control, cosmetic results, quality of life, and complication rates of brachytherapy when used as the sole method of radiation therapy for patients with stage 0,I, and II carcinoma of the breast treated with tylectomy, with histologically assessed negative surgical margins, N0 axillary nodes.

Interventions

RADIATIONbrachytherapy

brachytherapy (radioactive implants)

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* AJCC stage 0, I, or II (TisN0, T1N0, T2N0 = 3 cm) histologically confirmed carcinoma of the breast, treated with tylectomy. Axillary sampling is required only for cases of invasive cancers. Tumor size is determined by the pathologist. Clinical size may be used if the pathologic size is indeterminate. * Signed study-specific informed consent for participation in the study. * Negative, or close but negative, inked histologic margins of tylectomy or reexcision specimen to be confirmed prior to placing the brachytherapy catheters. Margins generally are positive if there is invasive or noninvasive tumor at the inked resection margin, close but negative if the tumor is within 2 mm of the inked margin and negative if the tumor is at least 2 mm away from the inked edge. * Negative post-tylectomy or post-reexcision mammography if cancer presented with malignancy-associated microcalcifications; no remaining suspicious microcalcifications in the breast before brachytherapy. * For patients with invasive cancer, no positive axillary lymph nodes with at least 6 axillary lymph nodes sampled or a negative sentinel node. * Invasive ductal, lobular, medullary, papillary, colloid (mucinous),or tubular histologies. Noninvasive ductal carcinoma in situ. * Chemotherapy or hormonal therapy planned for = 2 weeks after removal of brachytherapy catheters is permitted. Hormonal therapy is allowed during brachytherapy at treating radiation oncologist's decision. * Negative pregnancy test for premenopausal patients with an intact uterus

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with distant metastases. * Patients with in-situ lobular carcinoma or nonepithelial breast malignancies such as sarcoma or lymphoma. * Patients with proven multicentric carcinoma (tumors in different quadrants of the breast, or tumors separated by at least 4 cm) with other clinically or radiographically suspicious areas in the ipsilateral breast unless confirmed to be negative for malignancy by biopsy. * Patients who are pregnant or lactating. * Patients with histologically confirmed positive axillary nodes in the ipsilateral axilla. Palpable or radiographically suspicious contralateral axillary, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes, unless there is histologic confirmation that these nodes are negative for tumor. * Prior non-hormonal therapy for the present breast cancer, including radiation therapy or chemotherapy. * Patients with systemic lupus erythematosis, scleroderma, or dermatomyositis with a CPK level above normal or with an active skin rash. * Patients with coexisting medical conditions in whom life expectancy is \< 2 years. * Patients with psychiatric or addictive disorders that would preclude obtaining informed consent or completing the full series of high dose rate brachytherapy treatments on an outpatient basis. * Patients with Paget's disease of the nipple. * Patients with skin involvement, regardless of tumor size. * Patients with a breast unsatisfactory for brachytherapy. For example, if there is little breast tissue remaining between the skin and pectoralis muscle after surgery, placement of catheters is technically problematic. * Patients with tylectomies so extensive that the cosmetic result is fair or poor prior to brachytherapy. * Surgical margins which cannot be microscopically assessed or are positive at pathological evaluation. * Any previously treated contralateral breast carcinoma or synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma. * Other malignancy, except non-melanoma skin cancer, ≤ 5 years prior to participation in this study; the disease free interval from any prior carcinoma must be continuous. * Time between final definitive breast procedure to radioactive source loading of the brachytherapy catheters is greater than 8 weeks. * Patients with diffuse (\> 1 quadrant or \>5 cm in diameter) suspicious microcalcifications. * Patients with suspicious microcalcifications remaining on the post-tylectomy mammogram

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Local Control Using Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates2 years after treatment completion
Local Control as Measured by Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates5 years after treatment completion
Local Control Using Disease-free Survival Rates2 years after treatment completion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impressions of the Cause of Cosmesis Changes Over Time - Patient Reported3 years-Patients filled out a form Patient Evaluation of the Treated Breast. On this form the patients were asked to compare the memory of what their breast looked like after surgery but before radiation and to compare that memory to the appearance of the breast after radiation. The patients were then asked if their breast changes were due to: * caused mostly by radiation * caused by both the radiation and surgery, but mostly by the radiation * caused by both the radiation and surgery, but mostly by the surgery * caused mostly by the surgery * can't judge which treatment caused the change * there are no changes
Cosmesis Outcome as Measured by Percentage of Breast Retraction Assessment (pBRA)Pre-treatment and 3 years-Cosmetic outcome was evaluated quantitatively by percentage of breast retraction assessment (pBRA)
Quality of Life Completion2 years-QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and EORTC breast cancer module QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. QLQ-C30 is composed of 30 questions. QLQ-BR23 consists of 23 questions.
Occurrence of Mastectomy After Completion of Initial Breast-conserving Treatment5 years after treatment completion
Frequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesUp to 1 year from completion of therapyRTOG acute and late toxicity grading system and via a visual analog scale for pain assessment.
Presence or Absence of Complications5 years after treatment completionAs defined by number of participants who experienced breast infection and symptomatic fat necrosis.
Excellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Patient Reported3 years after completion of therapy* Both the participants and the treating radiation oncologist qualitatively rated cosmesis as excellent, good, fair, or poor over time and ascribed a cause for changes in cosmesis. * The global cosmetic result were scored on a 4-point scare where 0=excellent result (no difference), 1=good (small difference), 2=fair result (moderate difference) and 3=poor result (large difference).
Excellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Physician Reported3 years after completion of therapy* Both the participants and the treating radiation oncologist qualitatively rated cosmesis as excellent, good, fair, or poor over time and ascribed a cause for changes in cosmesis. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated quantitatively by percentage of breast retraction assessment (pBRA). * The global cosmetic result were scored on a 4-point scale where 0=excellent result (no difference), 1=good (small difference), 2=fair result (moderate difference) and 3=poor result (large difference).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study opened to participant enrollment on March 12, 2004 and closed to participant enrollment on 12/22/2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy
Each patient will receive accelerated partial breast brachytherapy with multiple plane implant. Patients will receive 3400 cGy delivered in 10 twice-daily fractions. Treatment is to be given over 5-7 days with a minimum of 6 hours separation between fractions.
151
Total151

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAccelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy
Age, Continuous60 years
Pathologic tumor stage
T1a
19 participants
Pathologic tumor stage
T1b
52 participants
Pathologic tumor stage
T1c
38 participants
Pathologic tumor stage
T1mic
1 participants
Pathologic tumor stage
T2
13 participants
Pathologic tumor stage
Tis
28 participants
Race
African-American
23 participants
Race
Caucasian
128 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
151 participants
Residence at diagnosis
Rural
15 participants
Residence at diagnosis
Urban area
111 participants
Residence at diagnosis
Urban cluster
25 participants
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
No
1 participants
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Yes
122 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
151 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Tumor location
Lower inner quadrant
21 participants
Tumor location
Lower outer quadrant
30 participants
Tumor location
Upper inner quadrant
46 participants
Tumor location
Upper outer quadrant
54 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
151 / 151
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 151

Outcome results

Primary

Local Control as Measured by Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Time frame: 5 years after treatment completion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyLocal Control as Measured by Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates3.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Local Control Using Disease-free Survival Rates

Time frame: 5 years after treatment completion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyLocal Control Using Disease-free Survival Rates94.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Local Control Using Disease-free Survival Rates

Time frame: 2 years after treatment completion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyLocal Control Using Disease-free Survival Rates99.3 percentage of participants
Primary

Local Control Using Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Time frame: 2 years after treatment completion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyLocal Control Using Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cosmesis Outcome as Measured by Percentage of Breast Retraction Assessment (pBRA)

-Cosmetic outcome was evaluated quantitatively by percentage of breast retraction assessment (pBRA)

Time frame: Pre-treatment and 3 years

Population: 82 participants had cosmetic outcome data through 3 years of follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyCosmesis Outcome as Measured by Percentage of Breast Retraction Assessment (pBRA)Pre-treatment7.35 percentage of breast retraction
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyCosmesis Outcome as Measured by Percentage of Breast Retraction Assessment (pBRA)3 years7.64 percentage of breast retraction
Secondary

Excellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Patient Reported

* Both the participants and the treating radiation oncologist qualitatively rated cosmesis as excellent, good, fair, or poor over time and ascribed a cause for changes in cosmesis. * The global cosmetic result were scored on a 4-point scare where 0=excellent result (no difference), 1=good (small difference), 2=fair result (moderate difference) and 3=poor result (large difference).

Time frame: 3 years after completion of therapy

Population: 82 participants had cosmetic outcome data through 3 years of follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Patient ReportedPre-treatment92 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Patient Reported3-4 months after treatment91 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Patient Reported2 years87 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Patient Reported3 years92 percentage of participants
Secondary

Excellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Physician Reported

* Both the participants and the treating radiation oncologist qualitatively rated cosmesis as excellent, good, fair, or poor over time and ascribed a cause for changes in cosmesis. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated quantitatively by percentage of breast retraction assessment (pBRA). * The global cosmetic result were scored on a 4-point scale where 0=excellent result (no difference), 1=good (small difference), 2=fair result (moderate difference) and 3=poor result (large difference).

Time frame: 3 years after completion of therapy

Population: 82 participants had cosmetic outcome data through 3 years of follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Physician ReportedPre-treatment97 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Physician Reported3-4 months after treatment97 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Physician Reported2 years94 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyExcellent-good Cosmetic Outcomes - Physician Reported3 years94 percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Grade 3-4 Toxicities

RTOG acute and late toxicity grading system and via a visual analog scale for pain assessment.

Time frame: Up to 1 year from completion of therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesLate pulmonary - Grade 3/40 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesAcute skin - Grade 3/41 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesAcute breast infection - Grade 3/42 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesAcute subcutaneous - Grade 3/40 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesLate skin - Grade 3/40 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesLate subcutaneous0 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyFrequency of Grade 3-4 ToxicitiesLate heart - Grade 3/40 participants
Secondary

Impressions of the Cause of Cosmesis Changes Over Time - Patient Reported

-Patients filled out a form Patient Evaluation of the Treated Breast. On this form the patients were asked to compare the memory of what their breast looked like after surgery but before radiation and to compare that memory to the appearance of the breast after radiation. The patients were then asked if their breast changes were due to: * caused mostly by radiation * caused by both the radiation and surgery, but mostly by the radiation * caused by both the radiation and surgery, but mostly by the surgery * caused mostly by the surgery * can't judge which treatment caused the change * there are no changes

Time frame: 3 years

Population: 82 participants had cosmetic outcome data through 3 years of follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyImpressions of the Cause of Cosmesis Changes Over Time - Patient ReportedRadiation16.5 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyImpressions of the Cause of Cosmesis Changes Over Time - Patient ReportedSurgery57 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyImpressions of the Cause of Cosmesis Changes Over Time - Patient ReportedUnsure19 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyImpressions of the Cause of Cosmesis Changes Over Time - Patient ReportedNo cosmetic changes7.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Mastectomy After Completion of Initial Breast-conserving Treatment

Time frame: 5 years after treatment completion

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyOccurrence of Mastectomy After Completion of Initial Breast-conserving Treatment4 participants
Secondary

Presence or Absence of Complications

As defined by number of participants who experienced breast infection and symptomatic fat necrosis.

Time frame: 5 years after treatment completion

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyPresence or Absence of ComplicationsBreast infection6 participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyPresence or Absence of ComplicationsFat necrosis (symptomatic)19 participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Completion

-QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and EORTC breast cancer module QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. QLQ-C30 is composed of 30 questions. QLQ-BR23 consists of 23 questions.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyQuality of Life Completion6-8 weeks99 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyQuality of Life Completion3-4 months95 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyQuality of Life Completion6-8 months91 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyQuality of Life Completion1 year88 percentage of participants
Accelerated Partial Breast BrachytherapyQuality of Life Completion2 years74 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026