Skip to content

Evaluating E2007 (Perampanel) in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

A Multi-Center, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of E2007 (Perampanel) in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00592904
Enrollment
262
Registered
2008-01-14
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2016-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuralgia

Keywords

Neuralgia, neuropathy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and continued efficacy of perampanel in patients previously enrolled in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN).

Interventions

DRUGE2007

Perampanel doses will be up-titrated in 2 mg steps at minimum weekly intervals starting at 2 mg daily and up-titrated to 12 mg daily (taken orally).

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Each patient must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled in this study: 1. Met and continues to meet all inclusion and none of the

Exclusion criteria

for the preceding PDN or PHN study and received study drug or placebo under double-blind conditions. 2. Completed the preceding double-blind study End of Treatment (EOT) Visit no more than 12 weeks prior to Baseline (Visit 1) for the open-label study. The eligibility status of patients who do not enroll during this 12 week period will be evaluated on a case by case basis via discussion between the Investigator and the Sponsor. 3. Males and females ≥18 years of age. Female patients should be either of nonchildbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device \[IUD\]) for at least 1 month before the Baseline Visit (Visit 1) and for 1 month after the end of the study (Visit 16). They must also have a negative pregnancy test at Baseline (Visit 1). Female patients using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD) throughout the study. 4. Provide written informed consent prior to entering the study and prior to undergoing any study-related procedures. 5. Is reliable, willing, and able to cooperate with the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.Baseline and Week 48Mean change from baseline to open-label study endpoint and other study visits in SF-MPQ scores sensory and affective). SF-MPQ was completed to assess intensity of pain over the past 48 days for all 15 descriptors: throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting,tiring-exhausting, sickening, fear-causing, punishing-cruel. Each descriptor was scored by participant on a 4-point intensity scale (0=none to 3=severe) and totaled in each subclass (sensory range 0-45); higher scores indicated higher intensity of pain.
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.Baseline and Week 48SF-MPQ VAS consists of a line 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) in length; range is 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). Subjects placed a mark indicating the intensity of their pain. Distance from left-hand end of line was measured and entered on Case Report Form (CRF) as score in mm. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48Baseline and Week 48Mean change from baseline in SF-MPQ (CPI) at study endpoint. Affective score ranges from 0-5. Higher scores indicate more severe pain (0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible, 5=excrutiating).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline and Week 48The PGIC asked subjects to evaluate the change in their overall status compared with the start of open-label treatment on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). \[Please note high withdrawl rate during study\].
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTBaseline and Week 48Mean change from baseline in SF-36 Item Health Survey Scores at study endpoint. Each component on the SF-36 Item Health Survey is scored from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better subject status.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of Placebo
All subjects in this study received open-label perampanel, up-titrated in 2-mg increments from 2 mg/day to 12 mg/day. Subjects took 1 to 4 tablets orally once daily (QD), depending upon the subject's dose at that time. All subjects in this study previously completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for PDN or PHN.
57
PDN: Prior Treatment of Perampanel
All subjects in this study received open-label perampanel, up-titrated in 2-mg increments from 2 mg/day to 12 mg/day. Subjects took 1 to 4 tablets orally QD, depending upon the subject's dose at that time. All subjects in this study previously completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for PDN or PHN.
148
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of Placebo
All subjects in this study received open-label perampanel, up-titrated in 2-mg increments from 2 mg/day to 12 mg/day. Subjects took 1 to 4 tablets orally QD, depending upon the subject's dose at that time. All subjects in this study previously completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for PDN or PHN.
27
PHN: Prior Treatment of Perampanel
All subjects in this study received open-label perampanel, up-titrated in 2-mg increments from 2 mg/day to 12 mg/day. Subjects took 1 to 4 tablets orally QD, depending upon the subject's dose at that time. All subjects in this study previously completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for PDN or PHN.
30
Total262

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1525135
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2723
Overall StudyOther3300
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0310
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject41612

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPainful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboPDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelPost Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboPHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelTotal
Age, Customized
<65
40 Participants97 Participants9 Participants9 Participants155 Participants
Age, Customized
≥65
17 Participants51 Participants18 Participants21 Participants107 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
4 Participants11 Participants0 Participants3 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants9 Participants1 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
48 Participants127 Participants26 Participants24 Participants225 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants52 Participants11 Participants22 Participants113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants96 Participants16 Participants8 Participants149 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 84132 / 178160 / 20544 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 8425 / 17831 / 2055 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48

Mean change from baseline in SF-MPQ (CPI) at study endpoint. Affective score ranges from 0-5. Higher scores indicate more severe pain (0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible, 5=excrutiating).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48-0.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48-1.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48-1.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.57
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48-1.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.

SF-MPQ VAS consists of a line 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) in length; range is 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). Subjects placed a mark indicating the intensity of their pain. Distance from left-hand end of line was measured and entered on Case Report Form (CRF) as score in mm. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.-43.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.17
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.-33.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.49
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.-35.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.55
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.-35.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 27.66
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.

Mean change from baseline to open-label study endpoint and other study visits in SF-MPQ scores sensory and affective). SF-MPQ was completed to assess intensity of pain over the past 48 days for all 15 descriptors: throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting,tiring-exhausting, sickening, fear-causing, punishing-cruel. Each descriptor was scored by participant on a 4-point intensity scale (0=none to 3=severe) and totaled in each subclass (sensory range 0-45); higher scores indicated higher intensity of pain.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All enrolled subjects (starting at Visit 1) who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 efficacy assessment in this trial comprised the ITT Population. All efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT Population. One subject had a protocol violation after consenting and was withdrawn from treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.-10.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.41
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.-8.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.65
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.-9.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.72
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.-9.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.19
Secondary

Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)

The PGIC asked subjects to evaluate the change in their overall status compared with the start of open-label treatment on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). \[Please note high withdrawl rate during study\].

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: Subset of ITT population used, including subjects that completed PGIC at Week 15 visit, and using BOCF (baseline observation carried forward) subjects that terminated prior to Week 15 received a 'No Change' if due to AE or Lack of Therapeutic Efficacy, subjects who discontinued due to other reasons used PGIC scores from Early Termination visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much improved (1)8 Participants
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much worse (6)1 Participants
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally worse (5)0 Participants
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much improved (2)16 Participants
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much worse (7)0 Participants
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally improved (3)12 Participants
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)No change (4)3 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much worse (6)2 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)No change (4)13 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally improved (3)39 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally worse (5)12 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much worse (7)1 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much improved (2)33 Participants
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much improved (1)22 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)No change (4)3 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much improved (1)5 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much improved (2)3 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally improved (3)4 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally worse (5)2 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much worse (6)3 Participants
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much worse (7)1 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally improved (3)7 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much worse (7)0 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much worse (6)0 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Much improved (2)9 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Very much improved (1)6 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)Minimally worse (5)0 Participants
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelAnalysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)No change (4)5 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOT

Mean change from baseline in SF-36 Item Health Survey Scores at study endpoint. Each component on the SF-36 Item Health Survey is scored from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better subject status.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTPhysical Component Score5.48 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.14
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTMental Component Score0.40 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.9
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTMental Component Score-2.32 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.62
PDN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTPhysical Component Score5.14 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.36
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTPhysical Component Score1.72 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN): Prior Treatment of PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTMental Component Score-1.53 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.77
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTPhysical Component Score2.18 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.3
PHN: Prior Treatment of PerampanelMean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOTMental Component Score-3.12 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.44

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026