Skip to content

Phase 2B Study of PTC124 (Ataluren) in Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy (DMD/BMD)

A Phase 2B Efficacy and Safety Study of PTC124 in Subjects With Nonsense-Mutation-Mediated Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00592553
Enrollment
174
Registered
2008-01-14
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2020-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Becker Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Becker muscular dystrophy, Nonsense mutation, Premature stop codon, DMD/BMD, PTC124

Brief summary

DMD/BMD is a genetic disorder that develops in boys. It is caused by a mutation in the gene for dystrophin, a protein that is important for maintaining normal muscle structure and function. Loss of dystrophin causes muscle fragility that leads to weakness and loss of walking ability during childhood and teenage years. A specific type of mutation, called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation is the cause of DMD/BMD in approximately 13 percent (%) of boys with the disease. Ataluren is an orally delivered, investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the nonsense mutation. This study is a Phase 2b trial that will evaluate the clinical benefit of ataluren in boys with DMD/BMD due to a nonsense mutation. The main goals of the study are to understand whether ataluren can improve walking, activity, muscle function, and strength and whether the drug can safely be given for a long period of time.

Detailed description

This study is a Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, efficacy and safety study, designed to document the clinical benefit of ataluren when administered as therapy of patients with DMD/BMD due to a nonsense mutation (premature stop codon) in the dystrophin gene.

Interventions

DRUGAtaluren

Ataluren will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo matching to ataluren will be administered as the schedule specified in the respective arm.

Sponsors

PTC Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide written informed consent (parental/guardian consent if applicable)/assent (if \<18 years of age). * Male sex. * Age ≥5 years. * Phenotypic evidence of DMD/BMD based on the onset of characteristic clinical symptoms or signs (that is, proximal muscle weakness, waddling gait, and Gowers' maneuver) by 9 years of age, an elevated serum CK level, and ongoing difficulty with ambulation. * Documentation of the presence of a nonsense point mutation in the dystrophin gene as determined by gene sequencing from a laboratory certified by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act/Amendment (CLIA), or an equivalent organization. * Documentation that a blood sample has been drawn for confirmation of the presence of a nonsense mutation in the dystrophin gene. * Ability to walk ≥75 meters unassisted during the screening 6-minute walk test. Note: Other personal assistance or use of assistive devices for ambulation (for example, short leg braces, long leg braces or walkers) were not permitted. * Confirmed screening laboratory values within the central laboratory ranges (hepatic, adrenal, renal, and serum electrolytes parameters). * In participants who were sexually active, willingness to abstain from sexual intercourse or employ a barrier or medical method of contraception during the study drug administration and 6-week follow-up periods. * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, study procedures, laboratory tests, and study restrictions. Note: Psychological, social, familial, or geographical factors that might preclude adequate study participation (in particular, the ability to satisfactorily perform the 6MWT) should have been considered.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with systemic aminoglycoside antibiotics within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Initiation of systemic corticosteroid therapy within 6 months prior to start of study treatment or change in systemic corticosteroid therapy (for example, initiation, change in type of drug, dose modification not related to body weight change, schedule modification, interruption, discontinuation, or reinitiation) within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Any change (initiation, change in type of drug, dose modification, schedule modification, interruption, discontinuation, or reinitiation) in prophylaxis/treatment for congestive heart failure within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Treatment with warfarin within 1 month prior to start of study treatment. * Prior therapy with ataluren. * Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug (Litesse® UltraTM \[refined polydextrose\], polyethylene glycol 3350, Lutrol® micro F127 \[poloxamer 407\], mannitol 25C, crospovidone XL10, hydroxyethyl cellulose, vanilla, Cab-O-Sil® M5P \[colloidal silica\], magnesium stearate). * Exposure to another investigational drug within 2 months prior to start of study treatment. * History of major surgical procedure within 30 days prior to start of study treatment. * Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (other than corticosteroids). * Ongoing participation in any other therapeutic clinical trial. * Expectation of major surgical procedure (for example, scoliosis surgery) during the 12-month treatment period of the study. * Requirement for daytime ventilator assistance. * Clinical symptoms and signs of congestive heart failure (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stage C or Stage D) or evidence on echocardiogram of clinically significant myopathy. * Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example, concomitant illness, psychiatric condition, behavioral disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse), medical history, physical findings, electrocardiogram findings, or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the participant, makes it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study results.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The 6MWD test was performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant was instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Baseline, Week 48If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Baseline, Week 48If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline, Week 48If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline, Week 48If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Change From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline, Week 48Upper and lower extremity myometry was performed using a myometer following standardized procedures. Muscle groups evaluated included knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and shoulder abductors. Bilateral assessments were done and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side if possible. Mean values for the left and right sides were calculated.
Change From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Baseline, Week 48The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean activity period/day/visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that greater than (\>) 2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was less than (\<) 50 percent (%) of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline, Week 48The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/day/visit during the active periods was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline, Week 48The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/hour during the active periods for the days in a visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Change From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline, Week 48SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). The maximum continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute total step counts were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48SAM is a pedometer(worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again. Proportion of time during active periods spent at low activity(≤15 steps/minute), medium activity(16-30 steps/minute), and high activity(\>30 steps/minute) were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Change From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Blood samples collected for chemistry assays were used to quantify serum CK concentrations. Serum CK was assessed as a potential biomarker for muscle fragility, with a reduction in serum CK considered to be a positive outcome.
Percent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePre-Treatment (1 week prior to baseline), post-treatment (Week 36)Immunofluorescence evidence of a change in dystrophin expression on biceps muscle biopsy was defined as an increase in the staining of the sarcolemmal membrane with an antibody to the C-terminal portion of the dystrophin protein (excluding revertant fibers) between the pre-treatment (1 week prior to Baseline visit) and post-treatment (Week 36) biopsies. The biceps muscle was biopsied from one arm for confirmation of the absence or reduced levels of dystrophin prior to treatment initiation and from the other arm to assess for production of dystrophin post-treatment.
Change From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline, Week 48HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: It is hard for me to run; I feel sad or blue; I cannot do things that other kids my age can do; and It is hard to pay attention in class. Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline, Week 48HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: It is hard for me to run; I feel sad or blue; I cannot do things that other kids my age can do; and It is hard to pay attention in class. Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: I feel too tired to do things that I like to do; I spend a lot of time in bed; and I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time; Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: I feel too tired to do things that I like to do; I spend a lot of time in bed; and I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time; Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.
Parent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreWeek 48TSQM consisted of 14 questions about treatment satisfaction with drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness (Questions 1-3 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 7 \[extremely satisfied\]), Side Effects (question 4 scored as 0 \[no\] or 1 \[yes\]; question 5 scored as 1 \[extremely bothersome\] to 5 \[not at all bothersome\]; questions 6 - 8 scored as 1 \[a great deal\] to 5 \[not at all\]), Convenience (questions 9 and 10 scored as 1 \[extremely difficult\] to 7 \[extremely easy\]; question 11 scored as 1 \[extremely inconvenient\] to 5 \[extremely convenient\]) and Global Satisfaction (question 12 scored as 1 \[not at all confident\] to 7 \[extremely confident\]; question 13 scored as 1 \[not at all certain\] to 5 \[extremely certain\]; question 14 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 5 \[extremely satisfied\]). The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm was used to create a score of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction.
Change From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Number of falls was determined by daily diary records maintained by participants and/or parent/caregivers.
Change From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Basic attention and working memory was measured using the digit span task. A series of digits (0-9) were presented to the child in an auditory format only. The task had 2 parts; in the forward condition, the child was requested to repeat back the digits in the order they were presented and in the backward condition, he was requested to reverse the order of presentation. A raw score of the total number of correct responses was converted to an age-scaled-score (z-score) by subtracting the corresponding mean and dividing by the corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age.
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline, Week 48The heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rates values were collected prior to, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position prior to the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was collected and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was collected and documented as the recovery heart rate.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 54An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
Study Drug ComplianceBaseline to Week 48Study drug compliance was assessed by participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 185 participants were screened for eligibility, of which 11 participants did not meet entry criteria.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 174 eligible participants were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive either placebo, low-dose ataluren, or high-dose ataluren.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High-Dose Ataluren
Participants received ataluren suspension orally TID, 20 mg/kg at morning, 20 mg/kg at midday, and 40 mg/kg at evening (total daily dose 80 mg/kg) for 48 weeks.
60
Low-Dose Ataluren
Participants received ataluren suspension orally TID, 10 mg/kg at morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg at evening (total daily dose 40 mg/kg) for 48 weeks.
57
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to ataluren orally TID at morning, midday, and evening for 48 weeks.
57
Total174

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyProtocol Noncompliance100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboLow-Dose AtalurenHigh-Dose Ataluren
6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)356.0 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 96.3
359.6 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 87.67
350.0 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 97.55
358.2 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 103.97
Age, Continuous8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
8.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
8.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.91
8.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.53
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
174 Participants57 Participants57 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 6056 / 5757 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 602 / 573 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48

The 6MWD test was performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant was instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48-41.81 metersStandard Deviation 89.234
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48-12.86 metersStandard Deviation 72.007
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48-42.56 metersStandard Deviation 90.046
Comparison: Analysis was performed using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) method including rank transformed 6MWD as the dependent variable; and rank transformed baseline 6MWD, treatment, visit, age (less than \[\<\] 9 years versus \[vs.\] greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 9 years) and corticosteroid use (yes vs. no) stratification factors, and interaction between treatment and visit as independent variables.p-value: 0.475695% CI: [-114.8, 53.75]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis was performed using MMRM method including rank transformed 6MWD as the dependent variable; and rank transformed baseline 6MWD, treatment, visit, age (\< 9 years vs. \>= 9 years) and corticosteroid use (yes vs. no) stratification factors, and interaction between treatment and visit as independent variables.p-value: 0.14995% CI: [-22.66, 147.96]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by Myometry

Upper and lower extremity myometry was performed using a myometer following standardized procedures. Muscle groups evaluated included knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and shoulder abductors. Bilateral assessments were done and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side if possible. Mean values for the left and right sides were calculated.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during elbow extension6.81 poundsStandard Deviation 3.815
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during knee extension-0.59 poundsStandard Deviation 3.511
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during knee flexion12.45 poundsStandard Deviation 4.684
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force exerted during elbow flexion8.72 poundsStandard Deviation 4.709
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during elbow extension-0.28 poundsStandard Deviation 1.473
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during elbow flexion-0.50 poundsStandard Deviation 1.832
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during knee extension12.71 poundsStandard Deviation 7.91
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during knee flexion0.39 poundsStandard Deviation 3.148
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during elbow extension0.10 poundsStandard Deviation 1.493
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during knee flexion12.08 poundsStandard Deviation 4.217
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during knee flexion-0.07 poundsStandard Deviation 3.511
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during knee extension12.81 poundsStandard Deviation 5.753
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during knee extension-0.63 poundsStandard Deviation 3.616
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force exerted during elbow flexion7.66 poundsStandard Deviation 3.154
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during elbow flexion-0.10 poundsStandard Deviation 1.68
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during elbow extension6.19 poundsStandard Deviation 3.083
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during elbow extension-0.51 poundsStandard Deviation 2.333
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during knee flexion0.38 poundsStandard Deviation 2.991
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during elbow flexion-0.35 poundsStandard Deviation 1.807
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during knee extension12.96 poundsStandard Deviation 6.162
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during knee flexion11.06 poundsStandard Deviation 3.494
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force during elbow extension6.77 poundsStandard Deviation 2.785
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryChange at Week 48: Force during knee extension-1.85 poundsStandard Deviation 3.899
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by MyometryBaseline: Force exerted during elbow flexion8.14 poundsStandard Deviation 2.972
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400

The heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rates values were collected prior to, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position prior to the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was collected and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was collected and documented as the recovery heart rate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Resting heart rate105.47 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 12.908
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Resting heart rate-0.63 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 13.008
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Active heart rate142.67 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.07
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Active heart rate-5.00 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 21.976
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Recovery heart rate109.90 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 12.633
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Recovery heart rate-0.23 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 13.475
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Recovery heart rate-1.33 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 13.27
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Resting heart rate109.70 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9.908
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Active heart rate2.39 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.095
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Recovery heart rate113.48 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 10.34
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Resting heart rate-0.36 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 10.223
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Active heart rate141.77 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 15.574
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Resting heart rate-0.26 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 15.614
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Active heart rate136.67 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.713
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Recovery heart rate0.54 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 15.181
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Change at Week 48: Active heart rate1.65 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 21.295
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Resting heart rate104.07 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 11.588
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400Baseline: Recovery heart rate107.86 beats/minuteStandard Deviation 12.066
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). The maximum continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute total step counts were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 60-minute total step count18.58 stepsStandard Deviation 6.21
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 10-minute total step count-2.77 stepsStandard Deviation 8.569
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 20-minute total step count29.13 stepsStandard Deviation 9.272
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 20-minute total step count-2.49 stepsStandard Deviation 7.407
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 30-minute total step count25.00 stepsStandard Deviation 8.053
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 30-minute total step count-2.08 stepsStandard Deviation 6.519
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 60-minute total step count-1.50 stepsStandard Deviation 5.177
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 10-minute total step count35.77 stepsStandard Deviation 10.222
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 20-minute total step count25.68 stepsStandard Deviation 10.038
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 60-minute total step count-1.85 stepsStandard Deviation 4.616
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 20-minute total step count-2.40 stepsStandard Deviation 5.806
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 30-minute total step count22.08 stepsStandard Deviation 9.206
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 30-minute total step count-2.31 stepsStandard Deviation 5.505
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 60-minute total step count16.52 stepsStandard Deviation 7.199
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 10-minute total step count32.24 stepsStandard Deviation 11.374
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 10-minute total step count-2.79 stepsStandard Deviation 6.355
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 10-minute total step count-3.97 stepsStandard Deviation 9.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 30-minute total step count25.70 stepsStandard Deviation 7.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 10-minute total step count36.76 stepsStandard Deviation 8.935
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 20-minute total step count-3.55 stepsStandard Deviation 8.677
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 60-minute total step count-2.33 stepsStandard Deviation 6.241
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 60-minute total step count19.50 stepsStandard Deviation 5.887
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline: 20-minute total step count29.74 stepsStandard Deviation 8.205
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48: 30-minute total step count-3.03 stepsStandard Deviation 7.604
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)

The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean activity period/day/visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that greater than (\>) 2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was less than (\<) 50 percent (%) of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Baseline756.84 minutesStandard Deviation 84.612
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Change at Week 480.87 minutesStandard Deviation 57.833
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Baseline761.86 minutesStandard Deviation 76.984
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Change at Week 48-22.23 minutesStandard Deviation 84.759
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Baseline751.71 minutesStandard Deviation 60.513
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)Change at Week 48-19.91 minutesStandard Deviation 91.96
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/day/visit during the active periods was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline5302.31 steps/dayStandard Deviation 1907.058
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48-615.14 steps/dayStandard Deviation 1468.452
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline4870.13 steps/dayStandard Deviation 2165.522
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48-676.46 steps/dayStandard Deviation 1717.535
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline5602.31 steps/dayStandard Deviation 2023.543
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48-908.34 steps/dayStandard Deviation 1999.969
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/hour during the active periods for the days in a visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline423.67 steps/hourStandard Deviation 168.754
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48-44.51 steps/hourStandard Deviation 125.154
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline383.62 steps/hourStandard Deviation 161.911
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48-42.23 steps/hourStandard Deviation 126.429
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMBaseline446.37 steps/hourStandard Deviation 160.666
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAMChange at Week 48-59.62 steps/hourStandard Deviation 153.054
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48

Basic attention and working memory was measured using the digit span task. A series of digits (0-9) were presented to the child in an auditory format only. The task had 2 parts; in the forward condition, the child was requested to repeat back the digits in the order they were presented and in the backward condition, he was requested to reverse the order of presentation. A raw score of the total number of correct responses was converted to an age-scaled-score (z-score) by subtracting the corresponding mean and dividing by the corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline: Forward condition3.59 z-scoreStandard Deviation 2.554
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Change at Week 48: Backward condition0.56 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.5
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Change at Week 48: Forward condition0.39 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.677
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline: Backward condition1.73 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.846
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Change at Week 48: Backward condition0.33 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.441
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline: Forward condition2.89 z-scoreStandard Deviation 2.18
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Change at Week 48: Forward condition0.50 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.767
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline: Backward condition1.70 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.868
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Change at Week 48: Forward condition0.40 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Change at Week 48: Backward condition0.59 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.203
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline: Backward condition1.59 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48Baseline: Forward condition2.84 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.675
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: It is hard for me to run; I feel sad or blue; I cannot do things that other kids my age can do; and It is hard to pay attention in class. Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: School functioning score2.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.49
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Social functioning score-0.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.47
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score4.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.382
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.088
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Social functioning score61.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.825
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Physical functioning score56.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.955
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: School functioning score66.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.258
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Emotional functioning score70.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.836
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: School functioning score-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.462
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Physical functioning score54.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.592
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score-3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.55
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Emotional functioning score69.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.711
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score3.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.068
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Social functioning score62.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.54
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Social functioning score-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.268
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: School functioning score66.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Emotional functioning score65.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.964
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Physical functioning score51.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.274
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Social functioning score3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score0.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.712
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: School functioning score3.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.913
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.794
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: School functioning score61.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.587
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Social functioning score55.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.269
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: I feel too tired to do things that I like to do; I spend a lot of time in bed; and I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time; Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline73.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.671
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Change at Week 481.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.873
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline70.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.72
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Change at Week 481.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.095
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline68.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Change at Week 482.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.039
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48

Number of falls was determined by daily diary records maintained by participants and/or parent/caregivers.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Baseline0.40 falls/dayStandard Deviation 0.597
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.10 falls/dayStandard Deviation 0.466
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Baseline0.27 falls/dayStandard Deviation 0.48
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Change at Week 48-0.06 falls/dayStandard Deviation 0.501
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Baseline0.54 falls/dayStandard Deviation 0.943
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48Change at Week 480.20 falls/dayStandard Deviation 1.282
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: It is hard for me to run; I feel sad or blue; I cannot do things that other kids my age can do; and It is hard to pay attention in class. Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.742
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: School functioning score67.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.276
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Social functioning score5.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.463
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: School functioning score3.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.008
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Physical functioning score63.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.029
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.125
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Social functioning score67.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.749
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Emotional functioning score73.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.418
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Social functioning score65.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.421
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.725
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Physical functioning score59.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.782
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: School functioning score64.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.396
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Emotional functioning score73.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.223
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Social functioning score3.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.841
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: School functioning score6.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.765
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score2.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.105
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: School functioning score4.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.244
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score4.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.315
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Social functioning score63.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.476
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Physical functioning score61.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.411
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score-1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.022
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: Emotional functioning score70.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.332
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Change at Week 48: Social functioning score7.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48Baseline: School functioning score64.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.841
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: I feel too tired to do things that I like to do; I spend a lot of time in bed; and I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time; Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline69.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.525
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Change at Week 486.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.46
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline71.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.474
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Change at Week 480.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.068
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Baseline69.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.263
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48Change at Week 483.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.512
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48

SAM is a pedometer(worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again. Proportion of time during active periods spent at low activity(≤15 steps/minute), medium activity(16-30 steps/minute), and high activity(\>30 steps/minute) were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at low activity-2.06 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 7.903
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at high activity6.59 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 4.077
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at medium activity-1.35 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.348
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at low activity32.91 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 7.842
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at high activity-0.66 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.79
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at medium activity11.11 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 4.013
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at high activity-0.96 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.828
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at low activity-1.12 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8.22
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at medium activity10.00 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.656
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at medium activity-0.69 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.828
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at low activity32.38 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 8.213
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at high activity5.78 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.785
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at low activity-1.11 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 5.586
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at medium activity11.84 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 4.304
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at low activity32.86 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 6.239
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Baseline: Time spent at high activity7.17 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at medium activity-1.92 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 4.178
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48Change at Week 48: Time spent at high activity-1.03 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 3.783
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48

Blood samples collected for chemistry assays were used to quantify serum CK concentrations. Serum CK was assessed as a potential biomarker for muscle fragility, with a reduction in serum CK considered to be a positive outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Baseline10853.65 units/liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 6251.136
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Change at Week 48-1680.09 units/liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 4264.769
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Baseline12084.70 units/liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 7772.631
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Change at Week 48-2146.32 units/liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 7151.944
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Baseline10569.60 units/liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 6488.477
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48Change at Week 48-1235.13 units/liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 4323.943
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Change at Week 483.51 secondsStandard Deviation 6.794
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline7.63 secondsStandard Deviation 7.522
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline6.94 secondsStandard Deviation 6.474
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Change at Week 482.39 secondsStandard Deviation 4.618
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline6.04 secondsStandard Deviation 5.661
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Change at Week 484.79 secondsStandard Deviation 7.949
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline6.75 secondsStandard Deviation 7.219
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Change at Week 482.95 secondsStandard Deviation 7.323
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline6.08 secondsStandard Deviation 5.985
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Change at Week 482.41 secondsStandard Deviation 6.162
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline5.52 secondsStandard Deviation 5.753
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Change at Week 484.03 secondsStandard Deviation 7.828
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Baseline12.25 secondsStandard Deviation 11.191
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Change at Week 483.00 secondsStandard Deviation 5.686
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Baseline10.80 secondsStandard Deviation 9.924
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Change at Week 483.23 secondsStandard Deviation 5.761
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Baseline11.50 secondsStandard Deviation 11.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48Change at Week 483.24 secondsStandard Deviation 7.253
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Baseline7.80 secondsStandard Deviation 5.243
High-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Change at Week 482.37 secondsStandard Deviation 6.149
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Baseline7.45 secondsStandard Deviation 4.373
Low-Dose AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Change at Week 481.68 secondsStandard Deviation 5.617
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Baseline6.86 secondsStandard Deviation 2.813
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Change at Week 483.03 secondsStandard Deviation 6.691
Secondary

Parent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score

TSQM consisted of 14 questions about treatment satisfaction with drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness (Questions 1-3 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 7 \[extremely satisfied\]), Side Effects (question 4 scored as 0 \[no\] or 1 \[yes\]; question 5 scored as 1 \[extremely bothersome\] to 5 \[not at all bothersome\]; questions 6 - 8 scored as 1 \[a great deal\] to 5 \[not at all\]), Convenience (questions 9 and 10 scored as 1 \[extremely difficult\] to 7 \[extremely easy\]; question 11 scored as 1 \[extremely inconvenient\] to 5 \[extremely convenient\]) and Global Satisfaction (question 12 scored as 1 \[not at all confident\] to 7 \[extremely confident\]; question 13 scored as 1 \[not at all certain\] to 5 \[extremely certain\]; question 14 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 5 \[extremely satisfied\]). The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm was used to create a score of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreEffectiveness score55.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.796
High-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreSide-effects score96.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.199
High-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreConvenience score55.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.008
High-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreGlobal satisfaction score61.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.967
Low-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreGlobal satisfaction score61.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.691
Low-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreEffectiveness score54.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.307
Low-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreConvenience score58.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.04
Low-Dose AtalurenParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreSide-effects score97.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.578
PlaceboParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreGlobal satisfaction score57.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.851
PlaceboParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreSide-effects score96.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.874
PlaceboParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreConvenience score60.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.665
PlaceboParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) ScoreEffectiveness score51.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.536
Secondary

Percent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence evidence of a change in dystrophin expression on biceps muscle biopsy was defined as an increase in the staining of the sarcolemmal membrane with an antibody to the C-terminal portion of the dystrophin protein (excluding revertant fibers) between the pre-treatment (1 week prior to Baseline visit) and post-treatment (Week 36) biopsies. The biceps muscle was biopsied from one arm for confirmation of the absence or reduced levels of dystrophin prior to treatment initiation and from the other arm to assess for production of dystrophin post-treatment.

Time frame: Pre-Treatment (1 week prior to baseline), post-treatment (Week 36)

Population: As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High-Dose AtalurenPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePre-treatment336.096 percent changeStandard Deviation 138.9753
High-Dose AtalurenPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePercent change post-treatment-1.278 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.7432
Low-Dose AtalurenPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePre-treatment359.797 percent changeStandard Deviation 142.7361
Low-Dose AtalurenPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePercent change post-treatment-2.128 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.8287
PlaceboPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePre-treatment357.271 percent changeStandard Deviation 139.665
PlaceboPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by ImmunofluorescencePercent change post-treatment-0.898 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.2112
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 54

Population: As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High-Dose AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)95.0 percentage of participants
Low-Dose AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)96.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)98.2 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Study Drug Compliance

Study drug compliance was assessed by participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
High-Dose AtalurenStudy Drug Compliance97.87 percentage of drug
Low-Dose AtalurenStudy Drug Compliance97.03 percentage of drug
PlaceboStudy Drug Compliance97.74 percentage of drug

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026