Skip to content

Project to Improve Symptoms and Mood in People With Spinal Cord Injury

A Controlled Trial of Venlafaxine XR for Major Depression After Spinal Cord Injury: A Multi-site Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00592384
Acronym
PRISMS
Enrollment
133
Registered
2008-01-14
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2015-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysthymia, Major Depressive Disorder, Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

spinal cord injuries, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, antidepressant agents, pain, quality of life, muscle spasticity, community participation, anxiety

Brief summary

Depression is likely the most prevalent and disabling psychological complication associated with spinal cord injury (SCI). Yet no controlled depression treatment trials have been performed in this population. The proposed study is a multi-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of venlafaxine XR (Effexor XR) in 133 adults with SCI and major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia who are at least one month post injury. Participants will be recruited from four SCI Model System sites, the University of Washington, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, University of Michigan, University of Alabama, Birmingham and Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas, TX. The purpose of the study is to examine the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine XR as a treatment for MDD. The primary outcome will be the percent of responders (those who report at least a 50% reduction in depression severity from baseline to the end of treatment) in the venlafaxine XR versus placebo control group using intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes will include changes in pain, health related quality of life depression-related disability and community participation. A successful clinical trial could lead to more aggressive identification and treatment of MDD as well as improved health and quality of life in this important population.

Detailed description

Depression is likely the most prevalent and disabling psychological complication associated with spinal cord injury (SCI). The prevalence of major depression in people with SCI is 22% or two to six times higher than in the general population. Depression is linked to a myriad of adverse outcomes including poor subjective health, poor community integration, higher rates of medical complications and high rates of suicide. Surprisingly there are no randomized controlled trials for treating major depressive disorder (MMD) in people with SCI. Despite the widespread use of antidepressants in this population, the common assumption that antidepressant medications are effective and well-tolerated among people with SCI is uncertain. Multiple factors such as severe stresses, bereavement and loss of rewarding activities may complicate treatment. Treatment trials suggest antidepressants may not be as effective in people with medical/neurological conditions as they are with depression that develops as a primary condition. For almost 20 years clinicians and scientists have called for controlled clinical trials of antidepressants among people with SCI in order to establish evidence-based treatment. The proposed study is a multi-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of venlafaxine XR (Effexor XR) in 133 adults with SCI and MDD or dysthymia who are at least one month post injury. Participants aged 18-64 will be recruited from four SCI Model System sites, the University of Washington, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, University of Michigan, University of Alabama, Birmingham and Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas TX. The purpose of the study is to examine the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine XR as a treatment for MDD. The primary outcome will be the percent of responders (those who report at least a 50% reduction in depression severity from baseline to the end of treatment) in the venlafaxine XR versus placebo control group using intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes will include changes in pain, health related quality of life and participation. A successful clinical trial could lead to more aggressive identification and treatment of MDD as well as improved health and quality of life in this important population.

Interventions

Once daily oral dose of venlafaxine XR ranging from 37.5 mg up to 300 mg

DRUGplacebo

Once daily oral dose of placebo ranging from 37.5 mg up to 300 mg

Sponsors

University of Michigan
CollaboratorOTHER
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor Health Care System
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Miami
CollaboratorOTHER
New York University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Spinal cord injury (ASIA A-D) * At least one month post injury * Meets DSM IV criteria for major depression or dysthymia on the SCID * At least moderately severe depression (PHQ-9 score \>= 10) * Within reasonable travel distance to one of the study sites

Exclusion criteria

* Current DSM IV alcohol or drug dependence * History of bipolar disorder or psychosis * History of \>= 2 suicide attempts or suicide attempt with 5 years * Current suicidal intent or plan * Medical contraindications * Non-English speaker * Clinically significant cognitive/language impairment * History of allergic reaction to venlafaxine XR or use of MAO-I with 2 weeks * Current use of antidepressant medications (will not exclude if on low dose of a tricyclic antidepressant or trazodone for pain, sleep, or bladder), psychotherapy for depression, or electroconvulsive therapy * Pregnant or lactating women or women of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a reliable form of contraception * Unstable medical condition, as determined by physical examination, CBC w/ platelets (including hematocrit, hemoglobin, WBC, differential), serum chemistry panel (serum sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, BUN, creatinine, glucose), liver transaminases (AST, ALT), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), urinalysis, supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) \> 90 mm Hg, or near terminal illness (primary care physician estimates that patient has \< 1 year to live) * Anticipated major surgical procedures within the 12 weeks of randomization * Use of an investigational drug within 30 days * Use of psychoactive medications, including corticosteroids and anticonvulsants, that have not been at a stable dose for at least 2 weeks * Use of anxiolytic, sedative-hypnotic, or other psychotropic drug or substance (including St. John's Wort) within 7 days of start of double-blind treatment. If the patient is taking a sedative deemed necessary for sleep induction or spasticity, the dosage must have been stable for at least 2 weeks. Use of anticholinergic, low-dose tricyclic antidepressant, GABAergic or adrenergic medications for spasticity are permitted if at a stable dose for at least 2 weeks. * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-170 weeks, 12 weeksThe 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a clinician rated measure of depression severity (we used a structured interview version (Williams 1988) to improve inter-rater reliability). Scores range from 0-52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. Scores of 7 or less indicate remission from depression.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Maier Subscale0 weeks, 12 weeksThe Maier is a 6-item sub scale of the Hamilton derived from Rasch analysis. It is a unidimensional scale with superior sensitivity to change. It excludes somatic items and is therefore especially appropriate for individuals who have substantial physical impairment and medical comorbidity. Scores can range from 0-22 with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Scores of 4 or less indicated in remission from depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Modified Ashworth Spasticity ScaleWeeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Depression ModuleWeeks 0, 12, 24
SF-12Weeks 0, 12, 24
Side Effects ChecklistWeeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12
Craig Handicap and Reporting TechniqueWeeks 0, 12
Symptom Checklist-20 Depression SubscaleWeeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24
Sheehan Disability ScaleWeeks 0, 12
Clinical Global ImpressionWeeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12
Patient Global ImpressionWeeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12
Hamilton Rating Scale for AnxietyWeeks 0, 12
Satisfaction With LifeWeeks 0, 12
Modified Brief Pain InventoryWeeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo Control
placebo: identically encapsulated inactive substance
64
Venlafaxine XR
venlafaxine XR: Once daily oral dose ranging from 37.5 mg up to 300 mg
69
Total133

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo ControlVenlafaxine XRTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
64 Participants69 Participants133 Participants
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
55 Participants64 Participants119 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
23 Participants19 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants48 Participants86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants21 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants48 Participants99 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 642 / 69
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 641 / 69

Outcome results

Primary

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17

The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a clinician rated measure of depression severity (we used a structured interview version (Williams 1988) to improve inter-rater reliability). Scores range from 0-52. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. Scores of 7 or less indicate remission from depression.

Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ControlHamilton Depression Rating Scale-17Baseline19.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Placebo ControlHamilton Depression Rating Scale-1712-week outcome9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Venlafaxine XRHamilton Depression Rating Scale-17Baseline19.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Venlafaxine XRHamilton Depression Rating Scale-1712-week outcome9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Comparison: Primary analyses included observations at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks. Random effects were included for participants' intercepts. Fixed effects were time (linear), treatment (VFN vs. PBO), interaction of time with treatment, stratification factors and potential confounders and variables to improve sensitivity. The primary indicator of treatment effect was the interaction of time by treatment.p-value: <0.025Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Maier Subscale

The Maier is a 6-item sub scale of the Hamilton derived from Rasch analysis. It is a unidimensional scale with superior sensitivity to change. It excludes somatic items and is therefore especially appropriate for individuals who have substantial physical impairment and medical comorbidity. Scores can range from 0-22 with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Scores of 4 or less indicated in remission from depression.

Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo ControlHamilton Depression Rating Scale-Maier SubscaleBaseline8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Placebo ControlHamilton Depression Rating Scale-Maier Subscale12-week outcome3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Venlafaxine XRHamilton Depression Rating Scale-Maier Subscale12-week outcome3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Venlafaxine XRHamilton Depression Rating Scale-Maier SubscaleBaseline9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Comparison: Primary analyses included observations at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks. Random effects were included for participants' intercepts. Fixed effects were time (linear), treatment (VFN vs. PBO), interaction of time with treatment, stratification factors and potential confounders and variables to improve sensitivity. The primary indicator of treatment effect was the interaction of time by treatment.p-value: <0.025Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12

Secondary

Craig Handicap and Reporting Technique

Time frame: Weeks 0, 12

Secondary

Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety

Time frame: Weeks 0, 12

Secondary

Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12

Secondary

Modified Brief Pain Inventory

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12

Secondary

Patient Global Impression

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12

Secondary

Satisfaction With Life

Time frame: Weeks 0, 12

Secondary

SF-12

Time frame: Weeks 0, 12, 24

Secondary

Sheehan Disability Scale

Time frame: Weeks 0, 12

Secondary

Side Effects Checklist

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12

Secondary

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Depression Module

Time frame: Weeks 0, 12, 24

Secondary

Symptom Checklist-20 Depression Subscale

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026