Skip to content

Effect of Medium Chain Fatty Acids on Cognitive Function During Acute Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Effect of Medium Chain Fatty Acids on Cognitive Function During Acute Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00592072
Enrollment
12
Registered
2008-01-11
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2015-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Medium Chain Fatty Acid, Hypoglycemia

Brief summary

At present, there are no therapeutic agents that can minimize severe hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and its effects on long-term brain function. The aim of this study is to determine whether the human brain is able to use medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) and/or their metabolites as an alternative fuel source during acute hypoglycemia in patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). The hypothesis is that medium chain fatty acids will provide a rapidly absorbed, non-carbohydrate fuel that will improve cognitive performance during episodes of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar.)

Detailed description

Twelve subjects between the ages of 18 years and 55 years who have had Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus for more than five years and have had tight control of their diabetes as determined by screening blood work will be invited to participate. Each study subject will undergo two hypoglycemic clamp studies (a procedure where the blood sugar is closely regulated with intravenous insulin and glucose.) In these hypoglycemic clamp studies, cognitive testing will be performed during 90 minutes of normal blood glucose followed by 90 minutes of hypoglycemia. During the hypoglycemic period, either the MCFA or a placebo will be administered. Each subject will experience both conditions. The order in which the MCFA is given will be randomized.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTMedium chain fatty acid (Octanoic and Decanoic acid)

Octanoic acid(67%) and Decanoic acid (27%); MCFA 50g total at 25 minute intervals with front loading of 20g then 10g for three administrations.

OTHERSplenda (Placebo Control)

Placebo drink will consist of dietary sweetener Splenda mixed in water at a concentration of 1g/100mL. An unsweetened cherry flavor Koolaid mix will be added at a concentration of 0.3g/100mL of the Splenda drink to enhance flavor.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus for greater than 5 years (C-peptide negative) * Age 18-55 years * Subject is on intensive insulin therapy resulting in a Hemoglobin A1c of less than 7.5% * History of frequent hypoglycemic events as defined as having at least one blood glucose of less than 60 mg/dl in the last four weeks

Exclusion criteria

* History of hypoglycemia induced seizures * Pregnancy * Significant baseline anemia (hemoglobin \< 11.0g/dl or hematocrit \< 33%) * A history of liver cirrhosis or porto-caval shunt surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate Verbal Memory90 minutesResults of cognitive function in diabetic patients using tests such as digit symbol substitution (a test of memory), tests of everyday attention, telephone book searching and map searching during either administration of medium chain triglyceride oil or a control solution. The goal was to determine whether the human brain is able to use medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) and /or their metabolites as an alternative fuel source and thus improve brain function during acute hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 25. A higher score is an improvement.
Delayed Verbal Memory90 minutesThe highest score is 25 and the lowest score is 0. The higher scored indicate an improvement.
Verbal Memory Recognition90 minutesThe highest score is 15. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.
Digit Span Backward90 minutesThe highest score is 35. The lowest score is 0. The higher the score indicates an improvement.
Letter/Number Sequencing90 minutesThe highest score is 21. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.
Digit Symbol Coding90 minutesThe highest score is 133. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.
Map Search (2min)90 minutesThe highest score is 80. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.
Map Search (1min)90 minutesThe highest score is 80. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.
Telephone Search90 minutesThis is a ratio of how many symbols are found during a certain period of time. The highest ratio is the best result.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Number of Subjects
12 subjects started the study and 10 completed the study, however 11 subjects are reported in the baseline characteristics because one subjects withdrew before baseline data was collected.
11
Total11

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Wash Out PeriodLost to Follow-up11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Number of Subjects
Age, Continuous34.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Delayed Verbal Memory

The highest score is 25 and the lowest score is 0. The higher scored indicate an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilDelayed Verbal MemoryEuglycemia14.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.25
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilDelayed Verbal MemoryHypoglycemia14.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.31
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilDelayed Verbal MemoryEuglycemia15.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilDelayed Verbal MemoryHypoglycemia11.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Primary

Digit Span Backward

The highest score is 35. The lowest score is 0. The higher the score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilDigit Span BackwardEuglycemia0.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilDigit Span BackwardHypoglycemia0.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilDigit Span BackwardEuglycemia0.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilDigit Span BackwardHypoglycemia0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Digit Symbol Coding

The highest score is 133. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilDigit Symbol CodingEuglycemia72.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.27
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilDigit Symbol CodingHypoglycemia74.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.56
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilDigit Symbol CodingEuglycemia74.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.59
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilDigit Symbol CodingHypoglycemia68.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.54
Primary

Immediate Verbal Memory

Results of cognitive function in diabetic patients using tests such as digit symbol substitution (a test of memory), tests of everyday attention, telephone book searching and map searching during either administration of medium chain triglyceride oil or a control solution. The goal was to determine whether the human brain is able to use medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) and /or their metabolites as an alternative fuel source and thus improve brain function during acute hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 25. A higher score is an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilImmediate Verbal MemoryEuglycemia15.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilImmediate Verbal MemoryHypoglycemia14.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilImmediate Verbal MemoryEuglycemia17.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.28
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilImmediate Verbal MemoryHypoglycemia13.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Primary

Letter/Number Sequencing

The highest score is 21. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilLetter/Number SequencingEuglycemia12.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilLetter/Number SequencingHypoglycemia10.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilLetter/Number SequencingEuglycemia11.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilLetter/Number SequencingHypoglycemia9.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Primary

Map Search (1min)

The highest score is 80. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilMap Search (1min)Euglycemia53.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.16
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilMap Search (1min)Hypoglycemia48.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.19
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilMap Search (1min)Euglycemia50.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.27
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilMap Search (1min)Hypoglycemia42.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.31
Primary

Map Search (2min)

The highest score is 80. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilMap Search (2min)Euglycemia73.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilMap Search (2min)Hypoglycemia75.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilMap Search (2min)Euglycemia75.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.92
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilMap Search (2min)Hypoglycemia74.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Primary

Telephone Search

This is a ratio of how many symbols are found during a certain period of time. The highest ratio is the best result.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilTelephone SearchEuglycemia2.86 symbols/ 90 minStandard Error 0.17
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilTelephone SearchHypoglycemia3.06 symbols/ 90 minStandard Error 0.2
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilTelephone SearchEuglycemia3.14 symbols/ 90 minStandard Error 0.26
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilTelephone SearchHypoglycemia3.46 symbols/ 90 minStandard Error 0.34
Primary

Verbal Memory Recognition

The highest score is 15. The lowest score is 0. Higher scores indicate an improvement.

Time frame: 90 minutes

Population: With the validation span test, a decrease in cognitive performance from euglycemia to hypoglycemia (22+/-2.3 vs 13.4+/-2.5) or a difference of 8.6 has been reported. Using this, a sample size of 12 will provide 80% power to detect a 23% (i.e. 2 unit) attenuation of the effect of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilVerbal Memory RecognitionEuglycemia13.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Type 1 Diabetes With MCT OilVerbal Memory RecognitionHypoglycemia13.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilVerbal Memory RecognitionEuglycemia14.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Type 1 Diabetes Without MCT OilVerbal Memory RecognitionHypoglycemia12.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026