Skip to content

The Role of Montelukast in Rhinitis and Sleep

Phase 4- The Role of Montelukast on Perennial Rhinitis and Associated Sleep Disturbance and Daytime Somnolence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00590772
Enrollment
31
Registered
2008-01-11
Start date
2003-05-31
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2014-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

sleep, somnolence, allergies, rhinitis, fatigue

Brief summary

The hypothesis is that a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LRA), montelukast, will decrease nasal congestion leading to increased patency of the nose and a decrease in nighttime sleep fragmentation in individuals with year round allergic rhinitis or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). This decrease in sleep fragmentation will reduce daytime somnolence and fatigue.

Detailed description

Montelukast is a once daily LRA indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma, which is both safe and effective. Documented improvement in nasal congestion has been showed in patients with both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. As demonstrated in recent publications, we fully anticipate that nasal congestion will be reduced in individuals afflicted with AR treated with montelukast. We have previously documented that a decrease in nasal congestion is associated with improved subjective sleep quality and subjective improvement in daytime somnolence. However, we have not demonstrated a cause and effect relationship. Currently, we have a study being performed that will allow us to assess the effect of nasal steroids on objective sleep by collecting data using a traditional overnight sleep test in subjects with congestion. We have not yet determined if subjective instruments for daytime somnolence correlate with objective measurements of improved daytime sleepiness. The purpose of this protocol will be three fold. First, we hope to determine the effectiveness of montelukast to reduce fatigue, somnolence and improve sleep, by reducing nasal congestion in allergic rhinitis. Two, we will assess the statistical relation between subjective instruments for sleepiness. Lastly, we want to determine the most appropriate test to use to determine daytime sleepiness or somnolence in patients with seasonal allergen induced congestion and daytime sleepiness. We will be dosing montelukast once a day, which is the manufacturer's suggested dosing schedule. Active drug will be compared to a placebo vehicle, which will mimic the active drug. With the proposed design study, a run-in period is not essential; however, to establish baseline symptoms and adherence to therapy, we have chosen a 1-week run-in while on placebo. After run-in, patients will be randomized to either active drug or placebo after baseline questionnaires and other data are collected. A daily diary to determine symptoms of allergic rhinitis and nighttime disturbance, as well as, daytime fatigue will be issued and expected to be completed daily. Two weeks after randomization, a follow-up will be scheduled in order to insure compliance, to collect diaries, administer questionnaires, and start the second treatment phase. After this visit study subjects will enter a 1-week wash-out and have a return visit before being randomized to the alternative arm. At six weeks, subjects will again be seen to insure compliance and administer questionnaires. The study will conclude following six-weeks. The data used for analyses will be the data collected during the last week of each randomized period. This will decrease cross over affect, typically seen in classical cross over studies, since there will be only a short washout between cross over. Subjects selected for this study will have a history of allergic rhinitis and a positive RAST or skin test to a perennial (year round) allergen and have symptoms that correlate with this allergen. If prior skin test or RAST is not available, a skin test will be performed to confirm allergic rhinitis. The patients will be seen in either the Allergy, Asthma, and Respiratory research center or the GCRC. All care and all studies will be done free of charge at no cost to the subject. Each subject will be compensated for his or her participation as outlined below. Patients will also be expected to have fatigue, daytime somnolence and poor sleep on study entry. An instrument to access the degree of fatigue, sleepiness and sleep quality will not only be required to be positive, but also must designate the symptom as greater than 50% on a severity rating.

Interventions

DRUGmontelukast

10 mg po each day (compared to placebo for 2 weeks)

DRUGplacebo

placebo for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Penn State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria will include: 1. Age 16 to 65. 2. History of allergic rhinitis. 3. The ability to be placed on placebo without significant compromise in the quality of life. 4. General good health. 5. Ability to comply with the protocol and sign an informed consent. 6. Have daytime sleepiness by history. 7. Have poor sleep by history. 8. Have fatigue by history. 9. Have a skin test or RAST test to a perennial allergen (indoor mold, dog, cat, mite) with correlating symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

1. Age fewer than 16 or over 65 years. 2. A history of sleep apnea. 3. Atopic diseases other than allergic rhinitis, such as atopic dermatitis or asthma. 4. Non-allergic rhinitis. 5. Obesity. 6. Inability to tolerate montelukast. 7. Significant other diseases as determined by the investigator. 8. Use of a research medication within 30 days. 9. Use of a nasal steroid or topical antihistamine or decongestant within 30 days. 10. Use of beta-blockers, antidepressants, oral decongestants, oral steroids, or H2-blockers. 11. Excessive use of alcohol or drug abuse. 12. Inability to stop medication use during run-in period. 13. Use of an oral antihistamine within 1 week of enrollment. 14. Failed to have benefit when montelukast was used for rhinitis or asthma in the past

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksbaseline and 2 weeksDaytime sleepiness was assessed on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 with 4 being severe. To determine improvement of daytime sleepiness with active therapy we used a scale of 0 to 4 with 0 being no improvement and 4 being maximal improvement. To determine improvement of daytime fatigue with active therapy we used a scale of 0 to 4 with 0 being no improvement and 4 being significant improvement. For all three above we used data from the last 3 days were averaged and mean of change for each day.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients screened in research laboratory

Pre-assignment details

Patients had a run-in to determine symptoms and only if they had congestion with poor sleep and daytime somnolence were they enrolled

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
cross over
31
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
NA Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
NA Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeks

Daytime sleepiness was assessed on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 with 4 being severe. To determine improvement of daytime sleepiness with active therapy we used a scale of 0 to 4 with 0 being no improvement and 4 being maximal improvement. To determine improvement of daytime fatigue with active therapy we used a scale of 0 to 4 with 0 being no improvement and 4 being significant improvement. For all three above we used data from the last 3 days were averaged and mean of change for each day.

Time frame: baseline and 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
MontelukastChange From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksimproved daytime fatigue0.43 units on a scale
MontelukastChange From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksdaytime sleepiness-0.64 units on a scale
MontelukastChange From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksimproved daytime sleepiness0.46 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksimproved daytime fatigue-0.32 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksdaytime sleepiness0.13 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness at 2 Weeksimproved daytime sleepiness-0.25 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026