Skip to content

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Are All Systems Alike?

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Are All Systems Alike?

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00590369
Enrollment
11
Registered
2008-01-10
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2012-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wounds

Brief summary

Hypotheses: (1)Wound healing during hospital stay will be equal between systems, (2)RNs will perceive the Versatile One (EZCare) system as easier to use, (3)Costs related to dressing changes will be less with Versatile one (EZCare), (4)Hospital length of stay will be equal or shorter with the Versatile One (EzCare) system, (5) Nursing time using Versatile One (EZCare) will be less than or equal to VAC system, (6) Patients will report less pain during dressing changes with Versatile One (EZCare).

Detailed description

This is a prospective, 2 group, randomized, comparative study (sample:50; 25 in each group) that will investigate whether differences can be found in selected outcomes related to wound care, using Versatile One (EZCare)versus KCI VAC negative pressure/vacuum systems. Only wounds which currently meet criteria for such device use,and for which a physician's order has been written for the device, will be included in this study.

Interventions

DEVICEKCI -VAC

Negative pressure wound therapy device

DEVICEVersatile One (EZCare)

Negative pressure wound therapy device

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hospitalized adults requiring negative pressure dressings.

Exclusion criteria

* Comatose * Mentally obtunded * Documented chronic psychiatric illness or any documented dementia significant enough to notably impair cognitive function * Presence of Manufacturer's contraindications * Malignancy in wound * Untreated osteomyelitis * Unexplored fistula * Necrotic tissue * Exposed blood vessels or organs * Untreated malnutrition.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, Tunnelingfirst dressing change; typically within 48 hoursdifferences in wound healing rate at first dressing between devices; since 5 variables were assessed via a centimeter ruler

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Painat first dressing change; generally 48 hoursscale of 0= no pain to 10= worst pain possible
Ease of Performing Dressing Changeduring hospital stay; generally 6 daysresponses to questions using a Likert scale regarding ease of dressing change; 8 characteristics; only reported is: Apply/fasten occlusive drape to secure drainage tube; scale range is 0, very difficult to do, takes a lot of time or effort or not possible to 10, simple or very easy to do
Ease of Providing Nursing Careduring hospital stay; generally 6 daysnurse perception of ease of providing nursing care using a Likert-type scale; 5 items assessed. Responses to 1 item provided: Overall experience with nursing care issues related to the wound device. score range is 0, always very difficult, always a problem or not possible to 10, always easy, never or rarely a problem
Cost of Wound Careduring hospital stay; generally 6 dayscost of device/supplies used in application and dressing changes
Nursing Timehospital stay; generally 6 days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Jan 2006-March 2008; study recruitment; study stopped due to slow enrollment rate

Participants by arm

ArmCount
KCI VAC
KCI VAC type negative pressure wound therapy device
6
Versatile One
Versatile One (EZCare)negative wound therapy device
5
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVersatile OneKCI VACTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Age Continuous
median
49 years57 years50 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, Tunneling

differences in wound healing rate at first dressing between devices; since 5 variables were assessed via a centimeter ruler

Time frame: first dressing change; typically within 48 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
KCI VAC5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingLength of wound10.6 centimeters
KCI VAC5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingUndermining of wound0 centimeters
KCI VAC5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingWidth of wound2.75 centimeters
KCI VAC5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingTunneling of wound0 centimeters
KCI VAC5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingDepth of wound2.5 centimeters
Versatile One5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingTunneling of wound0 centimeters
Versatile One5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingDepth of wound2.2 centimeters
Versatile One5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingLength of wound16.5 centimeters
Versatile One5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingWidth of wound4.2 centimeters
Versatile One5 Measures of Wound Healing: Length, Width, Depth, Undermining, TunnelingUndermining of wound0 centimeters
Secondary

Cost of Wound Care

cost of device/supplies used in application and dressing changes

Time frame: during hospital stay; generally 6 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
KCI VACCost of Wound Care510.18 dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 419.77
Versatile OneCost of Wound Care333.54 dollars (USD)Standard Deviation 71.69
Secondary

Ease of Performing Dressing Change

responses to questions using a Likert scale regarding ease of dressing change; 8 characteristics; only reported is: Apply/fasten occlusive drape to secure drainage tube; scale range is 0, very difficult to do, takes a lot of time or effort or not possible to 10, simple or very easy to do

Time frame: during hospital stay; generally 6 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
KCI VACEase of Performing Dressing Change8.5 scores on a scale
Versatile OneEase of Performing Dressing Change6.0 scores on a scale
Secondary

Ease of Providing Nursing Care

nurse perception of ease of providing nursing care using a Likert-type scale; 5 items assessed. Responses to 1 item provided: Overall experience with nursing care issues related to the wound device. score range is 0, always very difficult, always a problem or not possible to 10, always easy, never or rarely a problem

Time frame: during hospital stay; generally 6 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
KCI VACEase of Providing Nursing Care10 scores on a scale
Versatile OneEase of Providing Nursing Care8.0 scores on a scale
Secondary

Nursing Time

Time frame: hospital stay; generally 6 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
KCI VACNursing Time33.2 minutesStandard Deviation 23.8
Versatile OneNursing Time38.8 minutesStandard Deviation 19.9
Secondary

Patient Reported Pain

scale of 0= no pain to 10= worst pain possible

Time frame: at first dressing change; generally 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
KCI VACPatient Reported Pain3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Versatile OnePatient Reported Pain2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026