Skip to content

AV Node Ablation and Pacemaker Therapy Compared to Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Study

Pacing and AV Node Ablation Compared to Drug Therapy in Symptomatic Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trial (PACIFIC) - Pilot Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00589303
Acronym
PACIFIC
Enrollment
27
Registered
2008-01-09
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2013-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, AV Node ablation, Cardiac pacemaker, Antiarrhythmic drug

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether early atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation with pacing device therapy will reduce death and hospitalization when compared to the conventional drug therapy in elderly patients with recurrent and symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).

Detailed description

Epidemiologic studies have shown that 70-80% of patients with atrial fibrillation are older than 65 years of age. Drug therapy for atrial fibrillation is not effective or not tolerated in many elderly patients, for both rate or rhythm strategies. Preliminary data from AVN ablation and pacemaker therapy demonstrated this strategy is highly effective in controlling symptoms among patients who have failed numerous drug therapy. Quality of life is improved while hospital admission and office visits are reduced. Pilot Study Design * All patients will be 1:1 randomized to standard-care drug therapy (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline, 2006) or AV node ablation and pacemaker therapy * For patients randomized to AVN ablation, there will be a 1:1 sub-randomization to conventional right ventricular apex pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy (biventricular pacing) * All patients will be followed at 2 and 6 months from the time of randomization in the pilot study. * A total of 60 patients from 5-15 clinical sites will be enrolled during an active recruiting period of 12 months for the pilot study.

Interventions

DRUGFDA approved rate and rhythm control drugs

Any approved rate or rhythm control drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation may be prescribed under the primary physician's discretion. Rate Control: Beta-Blocker: * metoprolol * atenolol * carvedilol Calcium Channel Blocker: * verapamil * diltiazem Rhythm Control: * procainamide * quinidine * disopyramide * propafenone * flecainide * sotalol * dofetilide * amiodarone

DEVICEAV Node ablation and device implant

Pacing Systems: * Enpusle Premarket Approval Number (PMA#) P980035 * EnRhythm PMA# P980035 * Adapta PMA# P980035 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Pacing Systems: \- InSync III/ Insync Maximo/InSyncII Marquis PMA# P010031 Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Pacing Systems: * EnTrust PMA# P980016 * Virtuoso PMA# P980016 ICD CRT Pacing Systems: * InSync Maximo PMA# P980016 * InSync Sentry PMA# P890003 * Concerto PMA# P980016

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 65 years * Paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation * Index event of atrial fibrillation is documented on electrocardiogram or rhythm strip. Atrial fibrillation must be the qualifying event. Atrial flutter can have been present in the past, but it must not be considered the index arrhythmia. * Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes must be recurrent (two or more episodes in the past 6 months). At least one of the paroxysmal episodes must be sustained, defined as lasting greater than 1 hour documented by a Holter monitor or by history in conjunction with an ECG or a rhythm strip. * At least one attempt of unsuccessful drug therapy, either for rate, for rhythm, or for rate-and-rhythm control. * Symptoms related to atrial fibrillation within the last 6 months * Eligible for long-term treatment with both treatment strategies * Must provide informed consent, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization, and be willing to comply with follow-up requirements.

Exclusion criteria

* Reversible causes of atrial fibrillation * On heart transplant list * Familial cardiac conditions with increased risk of sudden death * Asymptomatic * Medical condition limiting expected survival to be less than one year * Contraindications to anticoagulation * Pre-existing implanted pacemaker, implantable automatic cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization device. * Pre-existing indication for permanent pacemaker, implantable automatic cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization device * More than one attempt of drug therapy for rate, for rhythm, or for rate-and-rhythm control * Planned major surgery within the next six months, including thoracic surgery * Disability that would preclude collection of study data or have co-morbidity that would contraindicate device implantation * Participated in another clinical trial within the previous 30 days using a therapeutic modality which could have potential residual effects that might confound the results of this pilot study * Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac Hospitalization Within Six Months of EnrollmentSix months after enrollmentNumber of patients who were hospitalized for cardiovascular problems within 6 months of enrollment.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 5 sites: (Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona; Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota; Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, Oregon; University of Calgary in Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and The Heart Group in Evansville, Indiana.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Drug Therapy
FDA approved rate and rhythm control drugs
14
Atrioventricular Node (AVN) Ablation / Pacing
Atrioventricular Node ablation and device implant
13
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDrug TherapyAtrioventricular Node (AVN) Ablation / PacingTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants11 participants23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 145 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Cardiac Hospitalization Within Six Months of Enrollment

Number of patients who were hospitalized for cardiovascular problems within 6 months of enrollment.

Time frame: Six months after enrollment

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug TherapyCardiac Hospitalization Within Six Months of Enrollment3 participants
Atrioventricular Node (AVN) Ablation / PacingCardiac Hospitalization Within Six Months of Enrollment4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026