Skip to content

Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure

Strategies for Aggressive Central Afterload Reduction in Patients With Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00588692
Acronym
SACAR
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-01-08
Start date
2007-07-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2014-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Heart Failure, Afterload Reduction, Sphygmocor

Brief summary

Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of hospitalization among Americans over the age of 65 years, affecting greater than 5 million in the U.S. alone. Significant improvements in morbidity and mortality have been achieved through the use of medications that antagonize adverse neurohormonal signaling pathways, particularly therapies that reduce left ventricular (LV) afterload. Vascular stiffness increases with aging, contributing to the increase in cardiac load. One important repercussion of such stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the incident pressure wave generated by cardiac ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch (such as arterial bifurcations), part of the wave is reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, increasing central blood pressure (CBP). With normal aging, hypertension, and heart failure, increased wave velocity causes the reflected wave to reach the heart earlier, in mid to late systole, considerably increasing late-systolic load, impairing cardiac ejection, and diastolic relaxation in the ensuing cardiac cycle. The magnitude of this reflected pressure wave can be quantified by the augmentation index (AIx). The use of vasoactive agents which antagonize this increase in late systolic load (and AIx) may prove useful in the treatment of heart failure, by facilitating cardiac ejection during late systole when reflected pressure waves predominate. However, it has never been conclusively shown in humans that CBP-targeted therapy is useful in the management of HF. LV afterload, measured centrally in the ascending aorta, may differ considerably from brachial cuff-measured pressure, and has traditionally required invasive hemodynamic assessment to determine, limiting the applicability of techniques targeting CBP and late-systolic load. Recently, a novel, hand-held tonometer (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) has been developed for the noninvasive assessment of CBP. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure. This device has received FDA approval for clinical use in the assessment of central pressures. However, it remains unknown whether knowledge of CBP and late-systolic load (AIx) confers any clinically-significant incremental benefit in the management of patients with heart failure. The primary objective of the proposed investigation will be to determine if this assessment might have such a role.

Detailed description

Research Design and Methods Hypotheses Knowledge of central aortic pressure waveforms (central pressure therapy, CPT) will affect the intensity of antihypertensive medication prescription, and treatment decisions based upon this knowledge in turn will lead to an enhanced reduction in CBP and AIx. Finally, it is hypothesized that this reduction in AIx/CBP will lead to improved exercise performance and LV systolic and diastolic reserve function. Basic Study Plan This is a single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel group intervention study examining the effects of a novel, noninvasive diagnostic test for determining AIx and CBP (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) on medical care, blood pressure control, exercise performance, and LV functional reserve in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and systolic dysfunction (25%\<EF\<50%) and with preserved systolic function (EF\>50%). Eligible subjects will undergo resting echocardiogram, noninvasive CBP assessment, and metabolic exercise stress testing on a recumbent cycle ergometer to quantify exercise performance. Echocardiography and CBP assessment will be performed at rest, during graded exercise, and immediately after peak exercise to determine indexes of LV systolic and diastolic performance and changes in CBP. Subjects will then be randomized (1:1) to subsequent determination of CBP at 1 month heart failure clinic visits versus sham (tonometry information acquired, but not shared with investigator). Investigators will then make adjustments to subject's medical therapy and antihypertensive regimen based upon the additional data procured via the Sphygmocor device. Subjects randomized to sham will have adjustments made as per standard clinical judgment based upon brachial blood pressure assessment and other clinical variables. In addition to standard clinical assessment, each subject will undergo 6 minute walk test at each visit, administered by the study coordinator. At the 6 month follow up visit, subjects will undergo resting and exercise echo/CBP/metabolic stress testing exactly as performed at visit 1. The co-primary endpoints will be the change in central augmentation index (defined below) and change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2) from baseline. Secondary endpoints will include the changes in resting and exercise-induced CBP and brachial blood pressures, number of antihypertensive medications prescribed, resting and exercise change in LV systolic and diastolic function (see below), changes in: cardiac output, exercise time, anaerobic threshold, minute ventilation (VE) over carbon dioxide produced (VCO2) slope (ventilatory efficiency). There will be a total of 7 visits, the first and last for exercise testing; the intervening 5 visits will be routine heart failure clinic follow up appointments.

Interventions

The SphygmoCor, a hand-held tonometer will assess central blood pressure noninvasively. This pencil-like device is applied over the radial artery, and uses a validated mathematical transformation to derive central aortic pressure.

Sponsors

AtCor Medical, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or greater * Cardiac Ejection Fraction (EF) greater than or equal to 25% by echocardiography within 12 months * Stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or greater * Heart Failure consultation within the last 18 months * Ability to exercise on a cycle ergometer * Stable angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) dosage for greater than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Enrollment in a concurrent study that may confound the results of this study * Subjects with medical conditions that would limit study participation * Pregnancy * Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure less than 110 mmHg * Baseline AIx less than 15% * Cardiac Surgery with 60 days of potential study enrollment * Myocardial infarction within 30 days of potential study enrollment * Hemodynamically significant valvular stenosis (greater than mild) * Heart failure due to thyroid disease * Active myocarditis or anemia defined as hemoglobin less than 9 mg/dl * Presence of severe renal insufficiency with serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dl * Significant pulmonary hypertension or Cor pumonale * Irregular heart rhythms * Dyspnea due to pulmonary disease * Uninterpretable echocardiographic images or radial tonometry data * Significant competing cause for exercise intolerance (e.g., severe stable angina)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction Subgroupsbaseline, 6 monthsPeak oxygen uptake (VO2) is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption as measured during incremental exercise, most typically on a motorized treadmill. Maximal oxygen consumption reflects the aerobic physical fitness of the individual. VO2 data was obtained via standard breath-by-breath expired gas analysis. Ejection Fraction Subgroups are based on participants reported at baseline.
Change in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction Subgroupsbaseline, 6 monthsAortic stiffness increases with aging, further augmenting cardiac load. One important repercussion of aortic stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the outgoing pressure wave caused by ventricular ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch, it is partially reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, to increase central aortic blood pressure. The magnitude of this systolic pressure wave reflection can be quantified by AIx. Aortic pressures were assessed in the seated position after 5 minutes rest. Aortic pulse waveform analysis was performed using a noninvasive, high-fidelity hand held tonometer placed over the radial artery. The built-in, custom software was then used to convert radial pressure waveforms to central aortic waveforms, which more accurately reflect LV afterload. The ratio of this augmented pressure to aortic pulse pressure is defined as the augmentation index (AIx).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in LV End Systolic Volumebaseline, 6 monthsEnd-systolic volume (ESV) is the volume of blood in a ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. ESV is the lowest volume of blood in the ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle. End systolic volume can be used clinically as a measurement of the adequacy of cardiac emptying, related to systolic function. Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7). LV end systolic volumes was determined from the apical 4 and 2 chamber views using Simpson's method of discs, along with EF.
Change in LV Ejection Fractionbaseline, 6 monthsThe ejection fraction is the percentage of the volume in the left ventricle ejected during a cardiac cycle. The normal ejection fraction is 55 to 75 percent. EF = (EDV - ESV) / EDV where EF = ejection fraction, EDV = volume of blood in the left ventricle at end-diastole, ESV = volume of blood in the left ventricle at end-systole. Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7).
Change in Stroke Volumebaseline, 6 monthsStroke volume (SV) is the volume of blood pumped from one ventricle of the heart with each beat. SV was determined from pulse wave (PW) and continuous wave (CW) Doppler in the LV outflow tract.
Change in Mitral E Velocitybaseline, 6 monthsThe Mitral E velocity is the speed at which blood fills the ventricle. It is determined by echocardiography, an ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modality.
Change in Mitral E/A Ratiobaseline, 6 monthsThe E/A ratio is a marker of the function of the left ventricle of the heart; it is determined by echocardiography, an ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modality. Abnormalities in the E/A ratio on Doppler echocardiography suggest that the left ventricle, which pumps blood into the circulation, cannot fill with blood properly in the period between contractions. The E/A ratio is the ratio of peak early transmitral inflow velocity and peak late mitral inflow velocity.
Change in Mitral E Wave Deceleration Timebaseline, 6 monthsThe deceleration time (DT) is the time taken from the maximum E point to baseline. Normally in adults it is less than 220 milliseconds. The DT was measured by pulse wave doppler.
Change in Heart Ratebaseline, six months
Change in Brachial Diastolic BPbaseline, 6 monthsBlood pressure is a measure of the force of the blood flowing against the walls of your arteries as it moves through your body. There are two numbers in a blood pressure reading. This tells how high in millimeters the pressure of your blood raises a column of mercury. The numbers usually are expressed in the form of a fraction; an example of a blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg. The first, or top, number (120 in the example) is the systolic pressure. The systolic pressure is the measure of your blood pressure as the heart contracts and pumps blood. The second or lower number is the diastolic pressure and is the measure taken when your heart is at rest (80 in the example) Brachial diastolic BP was determined by a standard oscillometric device (Dinemap, Critikon).
Change in Central Systolic BPbaseline, 6 monthsCentral blood pressure (CBP) is the pressure in the aorta, which is the large artery into which the heart pumps. This was determined by noninvasive radial tonometry, which undergoes transfer function using customized software to derive CBP tracings.
Change in Central Diastolic BPbaseline, 6 monthsCentral blood pressure (CBP) is the pressure in the aorta, which is the large artery into which the heart pumps. This was determined by noninvasive radial tonometry, which undergoes transfer function using customized software to derive CBP tracings.
Change in Augmentation Indexbaseline, 6 monthsAortic stiffness increases with aging, further augmenting cardiac load. One important repercussion of aortic stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the outgoing pressure wave caused by ventricular ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch, it is partially reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, to increase central aortic blood pressure. The magnitude of this systolic pressure wave reflection can be quantified by AIx. Aortic pressures were assessed in the seated position after 5 minutes rest. Aortic pulse waveform analysis was performed using a noninvasive, high-fidelity hand held tonometer placed over the radial artery. The built-in, custom software was then used to convert radial pressure waveforms to central aortic waveforms, which more accurately reflect LV afterload. The ratio of this augmented pressure to aortic pulse pressure is defined as the augmentation index (AIx).
Change in Arterial Elastancebaseline, 6 monthsElastance is a measure of the tendency of a hollow organ to recoil toward its original dimensions upon removal of a distending or compressing force. Effective arterial elastance was determined by the ratio of end systolic BP/stroke volume (SV).
Change in Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)baseline, 6 monthsBlood pressure is a measure of the force of the blood flowing against the walls of your arteries as it moves through your body. There are two numbers in a blood pressure reading. This tells how high in millimeters the pressure of your blood raises a column of mercury. The numbers usually are expressed in the form of a fraction; an example of a blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg. The first, or top, number (120 in the example) is the systolic pressure. The systolic pressure is the measure of your blood pressure as the heart contracts and pumps blood. The second or lower number is the diastolic pressure and is the measure taken when your heart is at rest (80 in the example) Brachial systolic BP was determined by a standard oscillometric device (Dinemap, Critikon).
Change in Left Ventricle (LV) End Diastolic Volumebaseline, 6 monthsEnd-diastolic volume (EDV) is the volume of blood in the right and/or left ventricle at end load or filling in (diastole). An increase in EDV increases the preload on the heart and, through the Frank-Starling mechanism of the heart, increases the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle during systole (stroke volume). Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7). LV EDV was determined from the apical 4 and 2 chamber views using Simpson's method of discs, along with ejection fraction (EF).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SphygmoCor Unblinded
The use of the sphygmocor values will determine medication adjustments to optimize HF treatment.
23
SphygmoCor Blinded
Sphygmocor values will be blinded to the investigator.
27
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCancer10
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyHip Surgery01
Overall StudySevere Peptic Ulcer Disease10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSphygmoCor BlindedSphygmoCor UnblindedTotal
Age, Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Body Mass Index29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
29.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
29.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Diabetes
No History of Diabetes
15 participants11 participants26 participants
Diabetes
Prior History of Diabetes
12 participants12 participants24 participants
History of Hypertension
No Prior Hypertension
1 participants3 participants4 participants
History of Hypertension
Prior Hypertension
26 participants20 participants46 participants
Obesity
Not Obese at Baseline
13 participants13 participants26 participants
Obesity
Obese at Baseline
14 participants10 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants23 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants16 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 245 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 242 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups

Aortic stiffness increases with aging, further augmenting cardiac load. One important repercussion of aortic stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the outgoing pressure wave caused by ventricular ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch, it is partially reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, to increase central aortic blood pressure. The magnitude of this systolic pressure wave reflection can be quantified by AIx. Aortic pressures were assessed in the seated position after 5 minutes rest. Aortic pulse waveform analysis was performed using a noninvasive, high-fidelity hand held tonometer placed over the radial artery. The built-in, custom software was then used to convert radial pressure waveforms to central aortic waveforms, which more accurately reflect LV afterload. The ratio of this augmented pressure to aortic pulse pressure is defined as the augmentation index (AIx).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 25-49%-6.9 percentage of change in AIxStandard Deviation 8.8
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 35-49%-8.3 percentage of change in AIxStandard Deviation 8.7
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 25-49%-4.9 percentage of change in AIxStandard Deviation 6.3
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Aortic Augmentation Index (AIx) According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 35-49%-5.5 percentage of change in AIxStandard Deviation 6
Primary

Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction Subgroups

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2) is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption as measured during incremental exercise, most typically on a motorized treadmill. Maximal oxygen consumption reflects the aerobic physical fitness of the individual. VO2 data was obtained via standard breath-by-breath expired gas analysis. Ejection Fraction Subgroups are based on participants reported at baseline.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: For the EF subgroup 25-49%, n=48, 24 SphygmoCor Unblinded, 24 SphygmoCor Blinded. For the EF subgroup 35-49%, n=33, 14 SphygmoCor Unblinded,. 19 SphygmoCor Blinded. 2 subjects had EF either \<25 or \>50, and they were not included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 25-49%, n=481.5 percentage of change in Peak VO2Standard Deviation 3.8
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 35-49%, n=332.0 percentage of change in Peak VO2Standard Deviation 5.4
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 25-49%, n=48-0.5 percentage of change in Peak VO2Standard Deviation 2.5
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) During Maximal Effort Exercise Stress Test According to Ejection Fraction SubgroupsEjection Fraction Subgroup 35-49%, n=33-1.0 percentage of change in Peak VO2Standard Deviation 1.9
Comparison: For 25-49% Ejection Fraction Subgroupp-value: <0.05ANOVA
Comparison: 35-49% Ejection Fraction Subgroupp-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Arterial Elastance

Elastance is a measure of the tendency of a hollow organ to recoil toward its original dimensions upon removal of a distending or compressing force. Effective arterial elastance was determined by the ratio of end systolic BP/stroke volume (SV).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Arterial Elastance-0.3 mmHg/mlStandard Deviation 0.4
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Arterial Elastance-0.3 mmHg/mlStandard Deviation 0.4
p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Augmentation Index

Aortic stiffness increases with aging, further augmenting cardiac load. One important repercussion of aortic stiffening is an increase in pulse wave velocity. As the outgoing pressure wave caused by ventricular ejection encounters zones of impedance mismatch, it is partially reflected backward, summing with the incident wave, to increase central aortic blood pressure. The magnitude of this systolic pressure wave reflection can be quantified by AIx. Aortic pressures were assessed in the seated position after 5 minutes rest. Aortic pulse waveform analysis was performed using a noninvasive, high-fidelity hand held tonometer placed over the radial artery. The built-in, custom software was then used to convert radial pressure waveforms to central aortic waveforms, which more accurately reflect LV afterload. The ratio of this augmented pressure to aortic pulse pressure is defined as the augmentation index (AIx).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Augmentation Index-7 percentage of change in AIxStandard Deviation 9
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Augmentation Index-5 percentage of change in AIxStandard Deviation 6
p-value: 0.4ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Brachial Diastolic BP

Blood pressure is a measure of the force of the blood flowing against the walls of your arteries as it moves through your body. There are two numbers in a blood pressure reading. This tells how high in millimeters the pressure of your blood raises a column of mercury. The numbers usually are expressed in the form of a fraction; an example of a blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg. The first, or top, number (120 in the example) is the systolic pressure. The systolic pressure is the measure of your blood pressure as the heart contracts and pumps blood. The second or lower number is the diastolic pressure and is the measure taken when your heart is at rest (80 in the example) Brachial diastolic BP was determined by a standard oscillometric device (Dinemap, Critikon).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Brachial Diastolic BP-2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Brachial Diastolic BP-4 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
p-value: 0.6ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Blood pressure is a measure of the force of the blood flowing against the walls of your arteries as it moves through your body. There are two numbers in a blood pressure reading. This tells how high in millimeters the pressure of your blood raises a column of mercury. The numbers usually are expressed in the form of a fraction; an example of a blood pressure reading is 120/80 mm Hg. The first, or top, number (120 in the example) is the systolic pressure. The systolic pressure is the measure of your blood pressure as the heart contracts and pumps blood. The second or lower number is the diastolic pressure and is the measure taken when your heart is at rest (80 in the example) Brachial systolic BP was determined by a standard oscillometric device (Dinemap, Critikon).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)-9 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)-9 mmHgStandard Deviation 24
p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.24t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Central Diastolic BP

Central blood pressure (CBP) is the pressure in the aorta, which is the large artery into which the heart pumps. This was determined by noninvasive radial tonometry, which undergoes transfer function using customized software to derive CBP tracings.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Central Diastolic BP-7 mmHgStandard Deviation 10
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Central Diastolic BP-3 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
p-value: 0.11ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.16t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Central Systolic BP

Central blood pressure (CBP) is the pressure in the aorta, which is the large artery into which the heart pumps. This was determined by noninvasive radial tonometry, which undergoes transfer function using customized software to derive CBP tracings.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Central Systolic BP-8 mmHgStandard Deviation 19
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Central Systolic BP-9 mmHgStandard Deviation 18
p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Heart Rate

Time frame: baseline, six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Heart Rate3 bpmStandard Deviation 7
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Heart Rate-1 bpmStandard Deviation 10
p-value: 0.06ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Left Ventricle (LV) End Diastolic Volume

End-diastolic volume (EDV) is the volume of blood in the right and/or left ventricle at end load or filling in (diastole). An increase in EDV increases the preload on the heart and, through the Frank-Starling mechanism of the heart, increases the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle during systole (stroke volume). Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7). LV EDV was determined from the apical 4 and 2 chamber views using Simpson's method of discs, along with ejection fraction (EF).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Left Ventricle (LV) End Diastolic Volume-24 mlStandard Deviation 30
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Left Ventricle (LV) End Diastolic Volume-17 mlStandard Deviation 32
p-value: 0.5ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in LV Ejection Fraction

The ejection fraction is the percentage of the volume in the left ventricle ejected during a cardiac cycle. The normal ejection fraction is 55 to 75 percent. EF = (EDV - ESV) / EDV where EF = ejection fraction, EDV = volume of blood in the left ventricle at end-diastole, ESV = volume of blood in the left ventricle at end-systole. Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7).

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in LV Ejection Fraction2 percentage of LV blood volumeStandard Deviation 2
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in LV Ejection Fraction-0.0 percentage of LV blood volumeStandard Deviation 2
p-value: 0.4ANOVA
Secondary

Change in LV End Systolic Volume

End-systolic volume (ESV) is the volume of blood in a ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. ESV is the lowest volume of blood in the ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle. End systolic volume can be used clinically as a measurement of the adequacy of cardiac emptying, related to systolic function. Ventricular Data was derived from comprehensive echo-Doppler/Tissue Doppler Echo (TDE) study performed at rest, during and immediately after exercise, along with noninvasive blood pressure assessment (GE Vivid7). LV end systolic volumes was determined from the apical 4 and 2 chamber views using Simpson's method of discs, along with EF.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in LV End Systolic Volume-18 mlStandard Deviation 18
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in LV End Systolic Volume-11 mlStandard Deviation 20
p-value: 0.26ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Mitral E/A Ratio

The E/A ratio is a marker of the function of the left ventricle of the heart; it is determined by echocardiography, an ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modality. Abnormalities in the E/A ratio on Doppler echocardiography suggest that the left ventricle, which pumps blood into the circulation, cannot fill with blood properly in the period between contractions. The E/A ratio is the ratio of peak early transmitral inflow velocity and peak late mitral inflow velocity.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Mitral E/A Ratio-0.1 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Mitral E/A Ratio-0.1 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Mitral E Velocity

The Mitral E velocity is the speed at which blood fills the ventricle. It is determined by echocardiography, an ultrasound-based cardiac imaging modality.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Mitral E Velocity5 cm/secStandard Deviation 15
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Mitral E Velocity4 cm/secStandard Deviation 12
p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Mitral E Wave Deceleration Time

The deceleration time (DT) is the time taken from the maximum E point to baseline. Normally in adults it is less than 220 milliseconds. The DT was measured by pulse wave doppler.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Mitral E Wave Deceleration Time-25 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 58
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Mitral E Wave Deceleration Time-5 milliseconds (ms)Standard Deviation 43
p-value: 0.3ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Stroke Volume

Stroke volume (SV) is the volume of blood pumped from one ventricle of the heart with each beat. SV was determined from pulse wave (PW) and continuous wave (CW) Doppler in the LV outflow tract.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SphygmoCor UnblindedChange in Stroke Volume10 mlStandard Deviation 21
SphygmoCor BlindedChange in Stroke Volume10 mlStandard Deviation 21
p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within group change compared to baselinep-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026