Skip to content

The Influence of SISCOM on Intracranial Electrode Implantation in Epilepsy Surgical Candidates

The Influence of SISCOM on Intracranial Electrode Implantation in Epilepsy Surgical Candidates

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00587951
Enrollment
50
Registered
2008-01-08
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2007-02-28
Last updated
2008-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Keywords

Clinical decision-making, Ictal SPECT, Epilepsy surgery

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine the role of SISCOM (see below) in aiding clinicians to manage epilepsy surgery candidates. SISCOM is already a routine component of pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation at Mayo Clinic. In particular, we are interested in assessing whether use of SISCOM can minimize the need for prolonged (\>24 hours) invasive monitoring with electrodes placed on the surface of the brain prior to surgical resection. Note: this study has recruited the required number of patients and is closed to further enrolment.

Detailed description

Successful epilepsy surgery depends on accurate identification of the area of brain from which seizures originate (the epileptogenic zone). There are many non-invasive tests (including EEG and MRI) to indicate this area. Some patients require implantation of intracranial electrodes in order to determine the epileptogenic zone. A test known as SISCOM (subtraction ictal-interictal SPECT co-registered with MRI) has been validated as a non-invasive means of indicating the epileptogenic zone. However, this test is not widely available in the US, and it is not known how often the additional information provided by SISCOM makes a difference to clinical decision-making. In order to determine the contribution of SISCOM towards clinical decision-making in epilepsy surgery candidates, we will ask epileptologists at Mayo Clinic to consider case presentations given all clinical information except for SISCOM results, and then to reconsider those same cases in conjunction with SISCOM data. This will indicate the degree to which SISCOM influences decision making. 50 patients at Mayo Clinic (38 adults, 12 children) will be enrolled.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of localization-related epilepsy * Evaluated by clinical epileptologist at Mayo Clinic * SISCOM ordered by treating physician * Case presented at weekly Epilepsy Surgery Conference * Patient consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Category of management recommendation (proceed straight to surgical resection, intracranial electrode implantation, more imaging studies OR recommend medical rather than surgical management)Instantaneous

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026