Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Gintuit(TM)for Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate Gintuit (TM) (Allogeneic Cultured Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts in Bovine Collagen) as an Alternative to Tissue From the Palate to Enhance Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration and Wound Healing

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00587834
Enrollment
96
Registered
2008-01-07
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2012-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Gintuit as a safe and effective alternative to palatal tissue in the treatment of subjects (with recession-type defects) who have an insufficient zone of attached gingiva associated with at least two nonadjacent teeth.

Interventions

DEVICEGintuit

Application of Gintuit at Day 0 to the gingival bed

OTHERAutologous palatal tissue

Tissue will be harvested from the subject's palate and placed on the gingival bed

Sponsors

Organogenesis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is at least 18 years of age but no more than 70 years of age. * Subject has at least two non-adjacent teeth in contralateral quadrants of the same jaw with an insufficient zone (\< or = 1mm) of attached gingiva that requires soft tissue grafting. (1-3 teeth may be treated. In case of adjacent teeth requiring grafting, only one tooth at each site will act as test or control tooth, but all teeth will get the same treatment). * Root coverage is not desired at the time of grafting. * Females of childbearing potential must have a documented negative urine pregnancy test. * Subjects must have read, understood and signed an institutional review board (IRB) approved Informed Consent Form. * Subjects must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject with class III recession in the presence of a shallow vestibule or class IV recession. * Subject with vestibule depth of less than 7mm from base of recession. * Subject with any systemic conditions that could compromise wound healing and preclude periodontal surgery (i.e., diabetes mellitus, cancer, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), bone metabolic diseases). * Subject who is currently receiving or has received within two months prior to study entry, systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy which could compromise wound healing and preclude periodontal surgery. * Subject with the presence of acute infectious lesions in the areas intended for surgery. * Subject who has used any tobacco product within 3 months. * Subject who is taking intramuscular or intravenous bisphosphonates. * Subject with only molar teeth suitable for soft tissue grafting. * Subject with teeth that have Miller Grade 2 or higher mobility. * Subject with known hypersensitivity to bovine collagen and/or iodine (shellfish allergy). * Subject who has received an investigational drug or biological/bioactive treatment within 30 days prior to study enrollment (medical or dental). * Subject who was previously treated with Gintuit, Dermagraft or any other skin graft at the target site(s) or immediately adjacent teeth. * Subject, who in the opinion of the investigator, for any reason other than those listed above, will not be able to complete the study per protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 2 mm Keratinized Tissue (KT) at 6 Months at the Gintuit Treated Site.6 monthsThe superiority of Gintuit relative to a pre-defined standard (50% success) for a 2 mm KT threshold after six months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Texture Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)6 monthsAn examiner assessed texture of both treated sites compared with the adjacent, non-treated tissue. The assessment was recorded as More Firm, Equally Firm, or Less Firm as compared to adjacent, non-treated tissue. A match in texture with the surrounding tissue is considered a positive aesthetic outcome.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 mm Keratinized Tissue (KT) at 6 Months at the Gintuit Treated Site.6 monthsThe superiority of Gintuit relative to a pre-defined standard (80% success) for a 1 mm KT threshold after six months.
Color Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)6 monthsAn examiner assessed color of both treated sites compared with the adjacent, non-treated tissue. The assessment was recorded as More Red, Equally Red, or Less Red as compared to adjacent, non-treated tissue. A match in color with the surrounding tissue is considered a positive aesthetic outcome.
Surgical Site Sensitivity Mild or Absent After 1 Week(Superiority)6 monthsThe sensitivity of Gintuit, Free Gingival Graft (FGG) and palatal donation sites was assessed with a puff of air and rated by the Investigator as none, mild, moderate or severe sensitivity. The sensitivity of Control was determined as the most sensitive of FGG and palatal donation sites.
Pain Absent After 3 Days (Superiority)Day 3Pain Assessment(Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)
Patient Preference After 6 Months/Early Termination (Superiority)6 monthsNumber of patients expressing preference for Gintuit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gintuit and Autologous Free Gingival Graft (FGG)
Single application of Gintuit and FGG (control); split-mouth design
96
Total96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGintuit and Autologous Free Gingival Graft (FGG)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
87 Participants
Age Continuous47.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.13
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
85 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
87 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
96 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 960 / 960 / 960 / 960 / 96
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 960 / 960 / 960 / 963 / 96

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 2 mm Keratinized Tissue (KT) at 6 Months at the Gintuit Treated Site.

The superiority of Gintuit relative to a pre-defined standard (50% success) for a 2 mm KT threshold after six months.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Per protocol the first 2 subjects per Investigator were training subjects and evaluated for safety only. There were 11 training subjects and the remaining 85 subjects were analyzed for all efficacy outcomes.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GintuitPercentage of Subjects With at Least 2 mm Keratinized Tissue (KT) at 6 Months at the Gintuit Treated Site.95.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Superiority relative to a pre-defined standard (50% success)p-value: <0.0001Exact Bionomial Test
Secondary

Color Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)

An examiner assessed color of both treated sites compared with the adjacent, non-treated tissue. The assessment was recorded as More Red, Equally Red, or Less Red as compared to adjacent, non-treated tissue. A match in color with the surrounding tissue is considered a positive aesthetic outcome.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: See description in primary outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GintuitColor Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Not Equally Red as Adjacent Tissue56 Participants
GintuitColor Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Equally Red as Adjacent Tissue23 Participants
Gintuit Not Equally Red as Adjacent TissueColor Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Equally Red as Adjacent Tissue0 Participants
Gintuit Not Equally Red as Adjacent TissueColor Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Not Equally Red as Adjacent Tissue6 Participants
Comparison: Compare participants with (1) Gintuit equally red and Control not equally red to (2) Gintuit not equally red and Control equally redp-value: <0.0001McNemar
Secondary

Pain Absent After 3 Days (Superiority)

Pain Assessment(Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)

Time frame: Day 3

Secondary

Patient Preference After 6 Months/Early Termination (Superiority)

Number of patients expressing preference for Gintuit.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: See description in primary outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GintuitPatient Preference After 6 Months/Early Termination (Superiority)61 participants
Comparison: The proportion of Gintuit as the preferred procedure.p-value: <0.0001Exact binomial test
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 mm Keratinized Tissue (KT) at 6 Months at the Gintuit Treated Site.

The superiority of Gintuit relative to a pre-defined standard (80% success) for a 1 mm KT threshold after six months.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: See description in primary outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GintuitPercentage of Subjects With at Least 1 mm Keratinized Tissue (KT) at 6 Months at the Gintuit Treated Site.100 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Superiority relative to a pre-defined threshold (80%) successp-value: <0.0001Exact binomial test
Secondary

Surgical Site Sensitivity Mild or Absent After 1 Week(Superiority)

The sensitivity of Gintuit, Free Gingival Graft (FGG) and palatal donation sites was assessed with a puff of air and rated by the Investigator as none, mild, moderate or severe sensitivity. The sensitivity of Control was determined as the most sensitive of FGG and palatal donation sites.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: See description in primary outcome measures. The presence of Coe-Pak (protective periodontal dressing) at Week 1 prohibited the assessment of sensitivity for 14 subjects. The analysis was performed on 71 of the 85 subjects evaluated for efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GintuitSurgical Site Sensitivity Mild or Absent After 1 Week(Superiority)Control Not Sensitive67 Participants
GintuitSurgical Site Sensitivity Mild or Absent After 1 Week(Superiority)Control Sensitive1 Participants
Gintuit Not Equally Red as Adjacent TissueSurgical Site Sensitivity Mild or Absent After 1 Week(Superiority)Control Not Sensitive3 Participants
Gintuit Not Equally Red as Adjacent TissueSurgical Site Sensitivity Mild or Absent After 1 Week(Superiority)Control Sensitive0 Participants
Comparison: Compare participants with (1) Gintuit not sensitive and Control sensitive to (2) Gintuit sensitive and Control not sensitive.p-value: 0.3173McNemar
Secondary

Texture Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)

An examiner assessed texture of both treated sites compared with the adjacent, non-treated tissue. The assessment was recorded as More Firm, Equally Firm, or Less Firm as compared to adjacent, non-treated tissue. A match in texture with the surrounding tissue is considered a positive aesthetic outcome.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: See description in primary outcome measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GintuitTexture Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Equally Firm as Adjacent Tissue46 Participants
GintuitTexture Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Not Equally Firm as Adjacent Tissue35 Participants
Gintuit Not Equally Red as Adjacent TissueTexture Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Equally Firm as Adjacent Tissue0 Participants
Gintuit Not Equally Red as Adjacent TissueTexture Same as Adjacent Tissues After 6 Months (Superiority)Control Not Equally Firm as Adjacent Tissue4 Participants
Comparison: Compare participants with (1)Gintuit equally firm and Control not equally firm to (2) Gintuit not equally firm and Control equally firmp-value: <0.0001McNemar

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026