Skip to content

Cyrotherapy vs. APC in GAVE

Prospective Randomized Study of Cryotherapy Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation Therapy for Treatment Of Watermelon Stomach

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00587405
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-01-07
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2016-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Watermelon Stomach

Keywords

Watermelon Stomach, Cryotherapy, Argon Plasma Coagulation

Brief summary

To see if either method of treatment for Watermelon Stomach shows better results

Detailed description

Watermelon stomach (WS) is endoscopically recognized by characteristic stripes of angioectasias involving primarily the antrum, and causes transfusion-dependent anemia in the majority of patients. Current endoscopic treatment options, including argon plasma coagulation (APC) Endoscopic cryotherapy is a novel technique that has the potential to safely and more effectively treat WS by virtue of its mechanism of injury and mode of application.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcryotherapy

The Polar Wand device (GI Supply, Wayne, PA) is FDA 510(k) approved for endoscopic tissue ablation in the GI tract. It consists of a portable cryogen-containing unit and a single-use flexible cryogen spray catheter, designed for use with CO2 that is supplied in standard 20-lb cylinders. Controlled delivery of the cryogen is achieved by a foot pedal, and the tip of the catheter is maintained at about 1 cm from the mucosa. A cryogenic spray is applied to all vascular lesions until a whitened appearance of the mucosa is achieved within 3-5 seconds. Affected areas will be 'painted' by the spray catheter starting at the pylorus and sweeping proximally. A proton pump inhibitor, at double dose, will be prescribed for 1 month after each APC or cryotherapy session to promote mucosal healing post therapy.

As per current clinical standard, the APC 300 device (ERBE Inc., Marietta, GA) will be used in this study. Targeted ablation of all vascular ectasias as best possible will be performed in standard fashion using an end-firing probe at a setting of 60 W and 2 L/min argon flow rate.A proton pump inhibitor, at double dose, will be prescribed for 1 month after each APC or cryotherapy session to promote mucosal healing post therapy

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Confirmed WS at endoscopy that is associated with significant anemia (Hb \< 10 g/dl) and/or overt bleeding (melena, hematochezia or hematemesis) and/or blood transfusions within the past 6 months 2. Able to give informed consent 3. Age \> 18 years

Exclusion criteria

1. Endoscopic or histological findings inconsistent with WS 2. Known coagulopathy (INR \> 2), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000), or bleeding diathesis 3. Endoscopic treatment of WS within the past month 4. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the proportion of clinical responders (no overt and hematological evidence of ongoing bleeding) and non-responders6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Endoscopic response will constitute the secondary outcome6 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026