SLAP Lesions
Conditions
Keywords
SLAP lesions, labral repair, bicepstenodesis, conservative treatment
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is a difference between conservative and operative treatment of Superior Labral Lesions(SLAP)of the shoulder.
Detailed description
Treatment of superior labral lesions is controversial. Some authors advocate labral repair, some advocate biceps tenodesis,and others again questions whether these lesions should be repaired at all. There are no randomized studies comparing operative treatment and conservative treatment(i.e. physical rehabilitation), and likewise no randomized studies comparing labral repair and biceps tenodesis. In this study;all patients who have a patient history, clinical signs of a SLAP lesion,a MRI study revealing an isolated superior labral lesion and have agreed to participate in the study, will have a diagnostic arthroscopy performed. If a SLAP lesion is diagnosed, the patients are randomized to three different groups:1) SLAP repair with suture anchors 2) Biceps tenodesis 3) Physical therapy
Interventions
labral repair with suture anchors
biceps tenodesis with suture anchor
diagnostic arthroscopy
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical history and signs of superior labral lesion * MRI study revealing an isolated superior labral lesion
Exclusion criteria
earlier shoulder procedures, * Other accompanying shoulderpathologies(such as cufflesions, instability, ac-joint pain, arthritis)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| WOSI score Constant score EQ-5D Rowe score Patient Satisfaction | 6 and 24 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Sick leave Time back to sports at preoperative level | 6 and 24 months |
Countries
Norway