Skip to content

Intranasal Steroids and Oxymetazoline in Allergic Rhinitis

A Combination of Intranasal Steroid/Oxymetazoline Leads to Faster Relief of Nasal Congestion Without Inducing Rhinitis Medicamentosa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00584987
Enrollment
64
Registered
2008-01-02
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2013-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

We hypothesize that once daily use of oxymetazoline will not cause significant rhinitis medicamentosa and that the combination of fluticasone furoate plus oxymetazoline leads to faster relief of nasal congestion secondary to perennial allergic rhinitis than the use of fluticasone furoate alone.

Detailed description

We performed a 6-week, 4-group, parallel, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trial in 60 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. After an initial screening with an allergy questionnaire and skin puncture testing to confirm an allergic response to a perennial allergen (cat, dog, dust mite, indoor mold), qualified individuals were randomized into 1 of 4 treatment groups. The 4 groups received the following treatments: placebo, OXY (0.05%, 2 puffs in each nostril every evening), FF nasal spray (110 mg per day), and FF nasal spray plus OXY (FF/OXY). All participants received 2 nasal sprays at night, with 1 spray containing FF or its placebo, the other oxymetazoline or its placebo. The nasal sprays were labeled with participant code numbers, and the investigator assigned participants in a sequential randomized fashion to a study code number in blocks of 4. Dropouts were replaced until 60 subjects were randomized. Replacement subjects were assigned the next sequential treatment. Thus, the number of subjects in each group was not exactly 15. Eligible participants completed the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and underwent measurement of nasal volume by acoustic rhinometry before starting the study. Participants were instructed to keep a diary of daily symptoms, nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) meter readings, and medication use during the study; no rescue medications were allowed. The severity of sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and other symptoms was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. Intake of the study medication was performed once daily, at night, after recording of symptoms and NPIF values. Subjects returned to the nasal laboratory every 2 weeks for a total of 4 weeks for review of the symptom diaries, replacement of medications, performance of acoustic rhinometry, and completion of the RQLQ. After the fourth week, participants stopped treatment, returned medication, and continued with the clinical trial for 2 additional weeks. During this time, they maintained symptom diaries and NPIF measurements twice daily. At the end of the 2-week period, participants returned to the nasal laboratory to perform a final acoustic rhinometry, complete an RQLQ survey, and return the diaries.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo Oxymetazoline

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

DRUGFluticasone furoate

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

DRUGPlacebo Fluticasone furoate

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females between 18 and 55 years of age. 2. History of perennial allergic rhinitis. 3. Positive skin test to dust mite, dog, cat or indoor mold antigen. 4. And a combined nasal morning and evening score of ≥4 for nasal congestion in the day preceding entry

Exclusion criteria

1. Physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic or cardiovascular disease. 2. Pregnant or lactating women. 3. Subjects treated with systemic steroids during the previous 30 days. 4. Subjects treated with topical (inhaled, intranasal or intraocular) steroids, Nasalcrom or Opticrom during the previous 30 days. 5. Subjects treated with oral antihistamine/decongestants during the previous seven days. 6. Subjects treated with topical (intranasal or intraocular) antihistamine/decongestants during the previous 3 days. 7. Subjects treated with immunotherapy and are escalating their dose. 8. Subjects on chronic anti-asthma medications. 9. Subjects with polyps in the nose or a significantly displaced septum. 10. Upper respiratory infection within 14 days of study start.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Nasal Congestion Symptom Score28 days of treatmentThe severity of nasal congestion was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. The total nasal congestion symptom score was obtained by adding the symptoms obtained on all 28 days of treatment. Values for this outcome are in the range of 0 to 168 (i.e., 6 x 28). Congestion scores increase with congestion severity (i.e., higher numbers correspond to worse congestion).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RQLQ Score [Baseline]assessed at baselineThe Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
RQLQ Score [2 Weeks]assessed 2 weeks after initiation of treatment regimenThe Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
RQLQ Score [4 Weeks]assessed 4 weeks after initiation of treatment regimenThe Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
RQLQ Score [6 Weeks]assessed 6 weeks after initiation of treatment regimenThe Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.
Total NPIFdays 2 through 28 of the treatment cycleNasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) is a physiological measure of nasal airflow which is particularly sensitive to nasal valve collapse. NPIF was measured objectively in liters per minute with an In-Check Peak Inspiratory FlowMeter (Ferraris Medical Inc, Orchard Park, NY). Subjects obtained 3 readings every morning and every evening and recorded the best flow measured. The morning and evening NPIF measurements were summed for days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle, yielding the total NPIF outcome measure. NPIF scores increase with air flow quality (i.e., higher NPIF values are indicative of better nasal air flow).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo FF + Placebo OXY
Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
15
FF + Placebo OXY
Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
16
Placebo FF + OXY
Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
17
FF + OXY
Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm
16
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo FF + Placebo OXYFF + Placebo OXYPlacebo FF + OXYFF + OXYTotal
Age Continuous29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
31.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
26.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
28.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants12 Participants10 Participants9 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants7 Participants7 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 154 / 162 / 172 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 160 / 170 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Total Nasal Congestion Symptom Score

The severity of nasal congestion was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. The total nasal congestion symptom score was obtained by adding the symptoms obtained on all 28 days of treatment. Values for this outcome are in the range of 0 to 168 (i.e., 6 x 28). Congestion scores increase with congestion severity (i.e., higher numbers correspond to worse congestion).

Time frame: 28 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo FF + Placebo OXYTotal Nasal Congestion Symptom Score94 units on a scale
FF + Placebo OXYTotal Nasal Congestion Symptom Score70 units on a scale
Placebo FF + OXYTotal Nasal Congestion Symptom Score75 units on a scale
FF + OXYTotal Nasal Congestion Symptom Score68 units on a scale
Secondary

RQLQ Score [2 Weeks]

The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

Time frame: assessed 2 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [2 Weeks]2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [2 Weeks]2.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Placebo FF + OXYRQLQ Score [2 Weeks]2.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
FF + OXYRQLQ Score [2 Weeks]1.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

RQLQ Score [4 Weeks]

The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

Time frame: assessed 4 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [4 Weeks]1.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [4 Weeks]1.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Placebo FF + OXYRQLQ Score [4 Weeks]1.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
FF + OXYRQLQ Score [4 Weeks]1.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Secondary

RQLQ Score [6 Weeks]

The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

Time frame: assessed 6 weeks after initiation of treatment regimen

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [6 Weeks]1.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [6 Weeks]1.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Placebo FF + OXYRQLQ Score [6 Weeks]2.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
FF + OXYRQLQ Score [6 Weeks]1.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Secondary

RQLQ Score [Baseline]

The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) has 28 questions and focusses on 7 domains that may be significantly impaired in participants with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: sleep impairment, non-nasal symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and emotional difficulty. The RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains. RQLQ scores range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating more significant impairment.

Time frame: assessed at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [Baseline]3.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
FF + Placebo OXYRQLQ Score [Baseline]3.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Placebo FF + OXYRQLQ Score [Baseline]2.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
FF + OXYRQLQ Score [Baseline]2.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Secondary

Total NPIF

Nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) is a physiological measure of nasal airflow which is particularly sensitive to nasal valve collapse. NPIF was measured objectively in liters per minute with an In-Check Peak Inspiratory FlowMeter (Ferraris Medical Inc, Orchard Park, NY). Subjects obtained 3 readings every morning and every evening and recorded the best flow measured. The morning and evening NPIF measurements were summed for days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle, yielding the total NPIF outcome measure. NPIF scores increase with air flow quality (i.e., higher NPIF values are indicative of better nasal air flow).

Time frame: days 2 through 28 of the treatment cycle

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo FF + Placebo OXYTotal NPIF5240 liters per minute
FF + Placebo OXYTotal NPIF5680 liters per minute
Placebo FF + OXYTotal NPIF4485.5 liters per minute
FF + OXYTotal NPIF5520 liters per minute

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026