Skip to content

Effect of Eye Movement on Toric Lens Orientation and Visual Acuity

Development and Implementation of a Clinical Test to Investigate the Change in Vision With Soft Toric Contact Lenses During Eye Movements

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00584831
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-01-02
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2015-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Keywords

astigmatism, visual acuity, orientation, contact lenses

Brief summary

The relative performance of a new toric soft contact lens against toric contact lenses currently available in market, specifically for visual acuity and lens orientation. The study will be conducted in a staged approach (2 stages).

Detailed description

Non-dispensing, single-masked (subject-masked), randomised, controlled study. Two visits.

Interventions

DEVICEsenofilcon A

toric contact lens

toric contact lens

toric contact lens

toric contact lens

Sponsors

University of Manchester
CollaboratorOTHER
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. They are aged between 18-39 years. 2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. 3. They are willing and able to follow the protocol. 4. They can attain at least 6/9 in each eye with their spectacle refraction. 5. They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study. 6. They can be fitted with toric soft contact lenses to match the available power range.

Exclusion criteria

1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. 4. They are aphakic. 5. They have had corneal refractive surgery. 6. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus. 7. They are pregnant or lactating. 8. They have grade 2 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear. 9. They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Acuity After Infero-temporal Version Movement.10 minutes after insertionlogarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
Visual Acuity After Infero-nasal Version Movement.10 minutes after lens insertionlogarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
Visual Acuity After Superior-temporal Version Movement10 minutes after lens insertionlogarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
Visual Acuity After Superior-nasal Version Movement.10 minutes after lens insertionlogarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Study Population40
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Study Population
Age, Continuous28.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 400 / 400 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 400 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Acuity After Infero-nasal Version Movement.

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Time frame: 10 minutes after lens insertion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BVisual Acuity After Infero-nasal Version Movement.0.12 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.16
Senofilcon AVisual Acuity After Infero-nasal Version Movement.0.11 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.16
Omafilcon AVisual Acuity After Infero-nasal Version Movement.0.14 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.17
Balafilcon AVisual Acuity After Infero-nasal Version Movement.0.15 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.2
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Primary

Visual Acuity After Infero-temporal Version Movement.

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Time frame: 10 minutes after insertion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BVisual Acuity After Infero-temporal Version Movement.0.12 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.16
Senofilcon AVisual Acuity After Infero-temporal Version Movement.0.1 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.15
Omafilcon AVisual Acuity After Infero-temporal Version Movement.0.16 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.17
Balafilcon AVisual Acuity After Infero-temporal Version Movement.0.14 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.19
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hyposthesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Primary

Visual Acuity After Superior-nasal Version Movement.

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Time frame: 10 minutes after lens insertion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BVisual Acuity After Superior-nasal Version Movement.0.14 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.15
Senofilcon AVisual Acuity After Superior-nasal Version Movement.0.10 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.15
Omafilcon AVisual Acuity After Superior-nasal Version Movement.0.15 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.16
Balafilcon AVisual Acuity After Superior-nasal Version Movement.0.16 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.19
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Primary

Visual Acuity After Superior-temporal Version Movement

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Time frame: 10 minutes after lens insertion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BVisual Acuity After Superior-temporal Version Movement0.11 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.15
Senofilcon AVisual Acuity After Superior-temporal Version Movement0.08 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.14
Omafilcon AVisual Acuity After Superior-temporal Version Movement0.13 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.17
Balafilcon AVisual Acuity After Superior-temporal Version Movement0.14 LogMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.2
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Hypothesis is that visual acuity is the same for all lens types.p-value: 0.02ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026