Skip to content

The Effect of a Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine Device (IUD) Versus a Copper Containing IUD on Risk of Blood Clots

The Effect of a Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine Device Versus a Copper Containing Intrauterine Device on Coagulation Parameters

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00584610
Enrollment
50
Registered
2008-01-02
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2010-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Coagulation Disorders

Keywords

Women's health

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of a levonorgesterel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG IUD, Mirena®) versus a copper IUD (Paraguard®) on coagulation parameters known to be associated with risk of thrombosis (blood clots). Both the LNG IUD and the copper IUD are FDA approved devices for contraception. Women enrolled in this study will be randomized to receive either the LNG IUD or the copper IUD. They will complete a one month bleeding diary prior to insertion of the IUD and again for one month while the IUD is in place. They will undergo phlebotomy (blood draw) at baseline (prior to insertion of the IUD), two and four months. Stored samples will be used to measure D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), antithrombin (AT), factor VIIIc, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated partial thromboplastin time plus activated protein C (aPTT + APC). Both groups will undergo a GYN exam with screening for bacterial vaginosis and gonorrhea/chlamydia cultures prior to insertion of the IUD. A brief survey to assess the women's experience with the IUD, including symptomatology and satisfaction with the device, will be conducted at the four months after insertion.

Interventions

DEVICELevonorgestrel-containing IUD (Mirena®)

Levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine device insertion

DEVICECopper-containing IUD (Paraguard®)

Copper-containing intrauterine device insertion

Sponsors

University of Vermont
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 52 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women who desire long-term, reversible contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Women with coagulopathies * History of thrombotic events * Pregnancy * Active pelvic infection * Known hypersensitivity to progestin * Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding * Wilson's disease * Sensitivity to copper * Uterine anatomy that precludes insertion of an IUD * Women with multiple sexual partners and history within the last 5 years of alcoholism or drug abuse. * Additionally, women must be greater than 3 months postpartum and have had two months without oral contraceptive pills or 6 months without Depo Provera prior to enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of this study will be change in coagulation parameters, with sample size calculations powered to detect a 35% change in D-dimer within groups and a 50% difference between groups.4 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction with IUD device4 years
Difference in bleeding patterns between groups4 years

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactPenny Fairhurst, RN
penny.fairhurst@vtmednet.org802-847-0985

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026