Skip to content

Evaluation of Orientation and Visual Acuity of Four Toric Soft Contact Lenses When Head is Tilted at 90 Degrees

Clinical and Theoretical Evaluation of Factors Affecting Soft Toric Lens Performance: Part 3

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00583908
Enrollment
14
Registered
2008-01-02
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2015-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Keywords

astigmatism, orientation, visual acuity, contact lenses

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the relative performance of a new toric soft contact lens against three toric contact lens currently available in market, specifically with orientation and visual acuity when head is tilted at 90 degrees.

Detailed description

Non-dispensing single-masked (subject-masked), randomised, 1-visit controlled study, \ 2 hour duration.

Interventions

DEVICEsenofilcon A

toric contact lens

toric contact lens

toric contact lens

toric contact lens

Sponsors

Visioncare Research Ltd.
CollaboratorOTHER
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. be at least 18 and less than or equal to 50 years of age 2. be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the protocol. 3. have a distance spherical component between -1.00 D and -6.00D with cylinder in the range of 0.75 D to 1.75D 4. Sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT. 5. Have normal, healthy eyes

Exclusion criteria

1. The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear. 2. Pre-existing ocular disease precluding contact lens fitting. 3. Insufficient lacrimal secretions 4. Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea 5. Previous eye surgery involving the anterior segment 6. Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge). 7. Use of concurrent ocular medication 8. Active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Orientation During Head Tilt.after fit of each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation on the eye with the head tilted.
Visual Acuity During Head Tiltafter each of the four lens insertionslogarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and in(towards the nose).
Degree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing out(towards the temple).
Degree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing in(towards the nose).
Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up.
Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and in.
Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down.
Degree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.After each of the four lens insertionsDegree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and out.
Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.After each of 4 lens insertions.,Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and out(towards the temple).

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study Population
Summary for overall study population
14
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study Population
Age, Continuous42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 20 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Lens Orientation During Head Tilt.

Degree of lens rotation on the eye with the head tilted.

Time frame: after fit of each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricLens Orientation During Head Tilt.12.2 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 10.7
Balafilcon A ToricLens Orientation During Head Tilt.39.7 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 18.5
Lotrafilcon B ToricLens Orientation During Head Tilt.27.6 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 22.7
Omafilcon A ToricLens Orientation During Head Tilt.39.3 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 15.9
Comparison: Alternative Hypothesis was senofilcon A toric was superior to balafilcon A toric by having less degrees of rotationp-value: <0.0001t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Hypothesis was senofilcon A toric was superior to lotrafilcon B toric by having less degree of rotationp-value: 0.0002t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Hypothesis was senofilcon A toric was superior to omafilcon A toric by having less degree of rotationp-value: <0.0001t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Visual Acuity During Head Tilt

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMar values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

Time frame: after each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some of the lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricVisual Acuity During Head Tilt0.02 logMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.06
Balafilcon A ToricVisual Acuity During Head Tilt0.15 logMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.2
Lotrafilcon B ToricVisual Acuity During Head Tilt0.07 logMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.1
Omafilcon A ToricVisual Acuity During Head Tilt0.11 logMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.14
Comparison: Alternative hypothesis was senofilcon A toric was superior to balafilcon A toric by having a lower logMAR scorep-value: 0.0083t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Alternative hypothesis was senofilcon A toric was superior to lotrafilcon B toric by having a lower logMAR scorep-value: 0.052t-test, 1 sided
Comparison: Alternative hypothesis was senofilcon A toric was superior to omafilcon A toric by having a lower logMAR scorep-value: 0.015t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and out.

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some of the lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.3.9 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 3.9
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.5.3 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 4.1
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.3.7 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 2.8
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation Inferior-temporal Gaze.2.5 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 2.3
p-value: 0.17t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.89t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.56t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down.

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some of the lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.3.9 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 4.3
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.5.0 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 4
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.4.2 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 6.3
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior Gaze.2.4 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 1.9
p-value: 0.27t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.85t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.73t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing down and in.

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some of the lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.3.0 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 1.6
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.9.0 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 6.9
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.5.9 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 2.9
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Inferior-nasal Gaze.9.5 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.8
p-value: 0.008t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.0049t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.0058t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing in(towards the nose).

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.3.2 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 3.3
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.7.1 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.9
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.2.4 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 1.3
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Nasal Gaze.3.3 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 3.2
p-value: 0.061t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.47t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.38t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up.

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.3.3 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 3.8
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.6.0 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 4.7
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.3.7 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 2.6
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior Gaze.6.5 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 7
p-value: 0.16t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.73t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.044t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and in(towards the nose).

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.6.2 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.4
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.5.6 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 3.6
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.6.9 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 4.8
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-nasal Gaze.5.8 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 4.9
p-value: 0.78t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.68t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.78t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing up and out(towards the temple).

Time frame: After each of 4 lens insertions.,

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.6.3 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.5
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.9.4 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.4
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.4.9 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 2.3
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Superior-temporal Gaze.8.6 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.8
p-value: 0.044t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.31t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.44t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Degree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.

Degree of lens rotation while participant is gazing out(towards the temple).

Time frame: After each of the four lens insertions

Population: Only participants who completed the study per protocol. Some participants had missing data for some lenses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Senofilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.4.1 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 3.1
Balafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.7.2 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.8
Lotrafilcon B ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.2.8 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 2.2
Omafilcon A ToricDegree of Lens Rotation in Temporal Gaze.6.6 Degree of rotationStandard Deviation 5.4
p-value: 0.16t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.11t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.31t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026