Detrusor Hyperreflexia, Detrusor Instability, Overactive Bladder
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct instillations of Botulinum-A toxin/DMSO into the bladder via a catheter system as a means of treating women with symptoms of overactive bladder and secondary urinary incontinence. In doing so, we will focus on estimating the percentage of women who experience an improvement in their urinary incontinence symptoms at one month and three months following this novel instillation technique.
Detailed description
Rationale: To date, the standard treatment for overactive bladder (including detrusor hyperreflexia and detrusor overactivity) consists of oral anticholinergic medications that can have troublesome side effects and variable efficacy. What's more, patients failing pharmacological therapy must either live with their malady or undergo open surgery that is irreversible and carries a prolonged convalescence. The fact remains however that treatment for overactive bladder is necessary to help maintain quality of life and prevent upper urinary tract deterioration. In recent years, cystoscopic-guided injection of Botulinum-A toxin has been used as a novel method of addressing detrusor hyperreflexia and overactivity by blocking acetylcholine transmission at the bladder. The obvious benefits of a more targeted therapy notwithstanding, this method requires the use of a cystoscope, needle delivery of the agent through approximately 30 separate injection sites and either regional or topical intravesical anesthesia for peri-operative pain control. Clearly, the identification of less invasive and more cost effective means of delivering the beneficial effects of Botulinum-A toxin to the bladder muscle has the potential to enhance the overall appeal of this treatment method. Objectives: The primary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct instillations of Botulinum-A toxin/DMSO into the bladder via a catheter system as a means of treating women with symptoms of overactive bladder and secondary urinary incontinence. In doing so, we will focus on estimating the percentage of women who experience an improvement in their urinary incontinence symptoms at one month and three months following this novel instillation technique. Study Design: We are proposing a single center, Phase II pilot study for this investigation. In this proposal, 25 sterile women between 18-90 years of age with urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity, hyperreflexia or symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome who lack evidence of infection and stress incontinence will be offered bladder instillation of Botulinum-A toxin with DMSO as a carrier agent if they have failed anticholinergic medications or cannot tolerate the pharmacological side effects. We will use two validated measurement tools for determining urinary incontinence severity. These measurement tools will be administered to each women at baseline and then again at one month and three-month follow-up time points. Our analysis will also focus on identifying and describing adverse events among these women and estimating the percentage of women that experience a successful improvement in their urinary incontinence symptoms. Study Duration: Patients will sign an informed consent and be screened for eligibility. Once determined eligible for the study, each patient will be scheduled for baseline evaluation and instillation of Botox/DMSO. Patients will be then followed up at one month and three months. Patients will be removed from the study if they withdraw consent, experience one of the study stopping criteria (in which case the entire study will stop) or when they complete the final follow-up evaluation at three-months.
Interventions
DRUGBotulinum-A toxin
A simple bladder catheterization in the office with a standard urinary catheter and instill the Botulinum-A toxin/DMSO solution.
Subjects received 50 cc of DMSO in an aqueous solution for intravesical instillation with botulinum-A toxin. Each cc contained 0.54 gm DMSO.
Sponsors
Mayo Clinic
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Female patient aged 18 years or older 2. Patient with a history of stress urinary incontinence for at least 12 months 3. Patient with Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency who demonstrate an abdominal leak point pressure of less than 100 cm of water on urodynamic evaluation 4. Patient with urinary incontinence verified by the Provocation test: a mean urinary leakage of 10 g on screening and baseline visits 5. Patient with positive stress test and/or urodynamic stress incontinence 6. Patient who has failed prior non-invasive treatment (e.g. behavior modification, pelvic floor exercises, biofeedback, electrical stimulation and/or drug therapy) 7. Patient with negative Contigen skin test during screening. 8. Patient who is mentally competent with the ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the study 9. Patient who agrees to be available for the follow-up evaluations as required by the protocol 10. Patient who has given signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient with Q-tip angle greater than 30 degrees 2. Patient with Functional Bladder capacity \<200 ml as recorded in the baseline Bladder Diary 3. Patient with Post-Void Residual Urine (PVRU) greater than 100 ml on repeated measures. (Patient with a single PVRU of \>100 ml and followed by two consecutive PVRU measurements of \<100 ml may be included in the study) 4. Patient with vesicoureteral reflux, interstitial cystitis, genitourinary fistulae 5. Patient with predominant urge incontinence 6. Patient with detrusor overactivity on filling cystometry 7. Patient with pelvic organ prolapse stage III or IV, i.e. the most distal part of the prolapse protruding more than 1 cm beyond the hymen (\>+1), at straining 8. Patient with urinary incontinence due to neurological disease that is known to affect urinary tract infection 9. Patient with uninvestigated hematuria 10. Patient with genitourinary malignancies 11. Patient on current medication for stress urinary incontinence, such as alpha-adrenergic agonists or duloxetine, within three weeks prior to completing the baseline Bladder Diary (estrogen therapy on a stable dose for at least two months prior to study start is allowed) 12. Patient who has had bulking therapy for stress urinary incontinence 13. Patient with ongoing complications of prior anti-incontinence surgery 14. Patient who is pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant within the study period 15. Patient who has received pelvic radiation 16. Patient with any condition, which could lead to significant postoperative complications, including current infection and uncontrolled diabetes. 17. Patient who is morbidly obese (defined as BMI \> 32 Kg/m2) 18. Patient who is bedridden, institutionalized or in such physical condition that she cannot move to the closest bathroom without assistance from another person 19. Patient with current or acute urinary tract infection, including cystitis or urethritis. (Patient with such infections should be treated with antibiotics, with subsequent urinalysis tests confirming the absence of such infection before study inclusion) 20. Patient with any condition that would preclude treatment due to contraindications and/or warnings in the study product's labeling 21. Patient on concomitant medication with anticoagulant properties (e.g., Warfarin, Heparin, Aspirin, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), except for cox-2 inhibitors) within two weeks prior to treatment 22. Patient on immunomodulatory therapy (suppressive or stimulatory) 23. Patient with a known allergy to bovine collagen 24. Patient with known lidocaine hypersensitivity or hypersensitivity to any anesthetics to be used during the treatment session/surgical procedure 25. Patient with a concurrent use of another study product within two weeks prior to study start, or who concurrently participate in any other clinical study 26. Any disease that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable for the study 27. Patient with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Median Number of Incontinent Episodes During 24 Hours | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | The study coordinator instructed the subject to keep record of any incontinence episodes during the 24-hour period prior to their baseline and follow-up visits. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Bothersomeness | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | The bothersomeness refers to the question: On a scale of 1-10 (0 is not at all; 10 is intolerable), how badly does loss of urinary control bother you? |
| Median 24 Hour Pad Weight | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | Prior to baseline and follow-up visits, the study coordinator weighed standard pads provided to the subject for the study time period. The study coordinator instructed the subject to bring in any pads used during the 24-hour period prior to baseline and follow up visits. The study coordinator recorded the 24-hour pad weights into the study dataset. |
| Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at Baseline | baseline | The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. This score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6). |
| Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month | 1 month after treatment | The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. This score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6). |
| Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 3 Months | 3 months after treatment | The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. This score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6). |
| Mean Number of Pads Per Day | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | — |
| Postvoid Residual | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | — |
| Urine Culture | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | — |
| Urinary Urgency at Baseline | baseline | Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks. |
| Urinary Urgency at 1 Month | 1 month after treatment | Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks. |
| Urinary Urgency at 3 Months | 3 months after treatment | Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks. |
| Median Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Scores | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | The UDI-6 was one measure of urinary-associated quality of life. The UDI-6 questionnaire has 6 items, scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (greatly), with total scores ranging from 0 to 18, a higher score indicating greater distress. |
| Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short Form (IIQ-7) Scores | baseline, 1 month, 3 months | The IIQ-7 was one measure of urinary-associated quality of life. The IIQ-7 questionnaire has 7 items, scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (greatly), with total scores ranging from 0 to 21, a higher score indicating greater distress. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited from November 2006 to March 2009 at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution Subjects received Botulinum-A toxin and Dimethyl sulfoxide solution. The first 3 subjects in Phase 1 underwent bladder instillation of 50 cc of the solution utilizing 200 units of botulinum-A toxin and 50cc DMSO. The next 6 subjects in the Phase 1 trial received 300 units of botulinum-A toxin and 50cc DMSO.
The 6 subjects in the Phase 1 trial who received 300 units of botulinum-A toxin and 50cc DMSO also continued in the Phase 2 trial. All subjects in the Phase 2 trial received 300 units of botulinum-A toxin and 50cc DMSO.
Botulinum-A toxin: A simple bladder catheterization in the office with a standard urinary catheter and instill the Botulinum-A toxin/DMSO solution.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO): Subjects received 50 cc of DMSO in an aqueous solution for intravesical instillation with botulinum-A toxin. Each cc contained 0.54 gm DMSO. | 25 |
| Total | 25 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 2 | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Botox/DMSO Solution |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 74 years |
| Body Mass Index | 26.6 kg/m^2 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 25 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 18 / 25 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 25 |
Outcome results
Primary
Median Number of Incontinent Episodes During 24 Hours
The study coordinator instructed the subject to keep record of any incontinence episodes during the 24-hour period prior to their baseline and follow-up visits.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median Number of Incontinent Episodes During 24 Hours | Baseline | 4 number of incontinent episodes |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median Number of Incontinent Episodes During 24 Hours | 1 month | 2 number of incontinent episodes |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median Number of Incontinent Episodes During 24 Hours | 3 months | 4 number of incontinent episodes |
Comparison: P value change from baseline at one monthp-value: 0.004Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: 0.81Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month
The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. This score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6).
Time frame: 1 month after treatment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month | None | 1 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month | Mild | 5 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month | Moderate | 5 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month | Severe | 10 participants (per category) |
Comparison: P value change from baselinep-value: 0.005Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 3 Months
The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. This score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6).
Time frame: 3 months after treatment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 3 Months | Moderate | 6 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 3 Months | None | 0 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 3 Months | Mild | 2 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 3 Months | Severe | 13 participants (per category) |
Comparison: P value change from baselinep-value: 0.22Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at Baseline
The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. This score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6).
Time frame: baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at Baseline | None | 0 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at Baseline | Mild | 4 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at Baseline | Moderate | 1 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at Baseline | Severe | 16 participants (per category) |
Secondary
Bothersomeness
The bothersomeness refers to the question: On a scale of 1-10 (0 is not at all; 10 is intolerable), how badly does loss of urinary control bother you?
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Bothersomeness | 3 months | 5 units on a scale |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Bothersomeness | Baseline | 9 units on a scale |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Bothersomeness | 1 month | 5 units on a scale |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to one monthp-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short Form (IIQ-7) Scores
The IIQ-7 was one measure of urinary-associated quality of life. The IIQ-7 questionnaire has 7 items, scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (greatly), with total scores ranging from 0 to 21, a higher score indicating greater distress.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short Form (IIQ-7) Scores | Baseline | 13 units on a scale |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short Form (IIQ-7) Scores | 3 months | 6 units on a scale |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-short Form (IIQ-7) Scores | 1 month | 7 units on a scale |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 1 month.p-value: 0.007Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: 0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Mean Number of Pads Per Day
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Mean Number of Pads Per Day | Baseline | 4 pads per day |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Mean Number of Pads Per Day | 1 month | 3 pads per day |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Mean Number of Pads Per Day | 3 months | 3 pads per day |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 1 monthp-value: 0.24Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: 0.14Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Median 24 Hour Pad Weight
Prior to baseline and follow-up visits, the study coordinator weighed standard pads provided to the subject for the study time period. The study coordinator instructed the subject to bring in any pads used during the 24-hour period prior to baseline and follow up visits. The study coordinator recorded the 24-hour pad weights into the study dataset.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median 24 Hour Pad Weight | 3 months | 55 g |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median 24 Hour Pad Weight | Baseline | 135 g |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median 24 Hour Pad Weight | 1 month | 46 g |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 1 monthp-value: 0.21Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: 0.43Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Median Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Scores
The UDI-6 was one measure of urinary-associated quality of life. The UDI-6 questionnaire has 6 items, scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (greatly), with total scores ranging from 0 to 18, a higher score indicating greater distress.
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Scores | Baseline | 10 units on a scale |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Scores | 1 month | 5 units on a scale |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Median Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Scores | 3 months | 6 units on a scale |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 1 monthp-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 months.p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Postvoid Residual
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Postvoid Residual | Baseline | 8 mL |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Postvoid Residual | 1 month | 19 mL |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Postvoid Residual | 3 months | 24 mL |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 1 monthp-value: 0.24Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: 0.033Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Urinary Urgency at 1 Month
Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks.
Time frame: 1 month after treatment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 1 Month | None | 0 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 1 Month | Mild | 13 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 1 Month | Moderate | 7 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 1 Month | Severe | 1 participants (per category) |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to one monthp-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Urinary Urgency at 3 Months
Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks.
Time frame: 3 months after treatment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 3 Months | Mild | 11 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 3 Months | None | 0 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 3 Months | Moderate | 7 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at 3 Months | Severe | 3 participants (per category) |
Comparison: P value change from baselinep-value: 0.004Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary
Urinary Urgency at Baseline
Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks.
Time frame: baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at Baseline | None | 0 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at Baseline | Mild | 2 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at Baseline | Moderate | 8 participants (per category) |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urinary Urgency at Baseline | Severe | 11 participants (per category) |
Secondary
Urine Culture
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urine Culture | 1 month negative | 16 participants |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urine Culture | 1 month positive | 5 participants |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urine Culture | 3 months negative | 13 participants |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urine Culture | 3 months positive | 8 participants |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urine Culture | baseline negative | 16 participants |
| Botox/DMSO Solution | Urine Culture | baseline positive | 5 participants |
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 1 monthp-value: >0.99Exact binomial sign test
Comparison: P value change from baseline to 3 monthsp-value: 0.25exact binomial sign test