Skip to content

Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients (Aim 3)

Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00582114
Enrollment
200
Registered
2007-12-28
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2016-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodialysis, Hypertension, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Keywords

Hemodialysis, Hypertension, Left ventricular hypertrophy

Brief summary

We will directly test the hypothesis that an initial strategy of lisinopril-based therapy will be more effective than atenolol-based therapy in causing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) over one year in patients with hemodialysis hypertension despite similar degree of BP reduction.

Detailed description

This is a parallel group, active control, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of initial therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) vs. beta-blocker therapy (atenolol) each administered three times weekly after dialysis.

Interventions

DRUGLisinopril

Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to \<140/90 mm Hg.

DRUGAtenolol

Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to \<140/90 mm Hg.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients on chronic hemodialysis for \> 3 mos. 2. Compliance with hemodialysis treatments as defined by less than one missed dialysis per month 3. Hypertension as diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) \>135/75 mm Hg after participation in the ultrafiltration (UF) Trial, or those on no antihypertensive medications but unwilling to do UF Trial. 4. Presence of LVH on echocardiogram defined as left ventricular mass index (LVMi) \>104 g/m2 in women and \>116 g/m2 in men. 5. Willingness to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Vascular event (stroke, myocardial infarction or limb ischemia requiring bypass) within previous six months 2. Noncompliance with hemodialysis treatments 3. Known drug abuse 4. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) requiring home oxygen 5. Congestive Heart Failure Class III or IV. 6. Body mass index \> 40 kg/m2. 7. Known contraindication to atenolol (severe heart failure, bradycardia, bronchial asthma, intolerance or allergy) or lisinopril (cough, pregnancy, intolerance or allergy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.Baseline, 6 months, 12 monthsThe primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. A mixed model was used with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as the outcome variable. Fixed effects were indicator variables for time, treatment and their interaction. Random effect was subject and statistical inference was made using the maximum likelihood estimator. No imputation was made for missing data.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination1 yrCardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF), hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. Adverse events reported are those during the course of 12 months of participation in the trial. All serious adverse events were adjudicated by R.A. and A.D.S. who were masked to the drug assignment at the time of adjudication. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. The cardiovascular event rate was calculated by treatment group assignment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). As a post hoc analysis, we also determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included MI, stroke, CHF, or cardiovascular death.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atenolol
Atenolol: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to \<140/90 mm Hg.
100
Lisinopril
Lisinopril: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to \<140/90 mm Hg.
100
Total200

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDeath44
Overall StudyKidney Transplant31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up76
Overall StudyPhysician Decision06
Overall StudyStopped by data safety monitoring board1920
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject816

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAtenololLisinopril
Access type
Catheter
52 participants25 participants27 participants
Access type
Fistula
118 participants59 participants59 participants
Access type
Graft
30 participants16 participants14 participants
Age, Continuous52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
Albumin3.6 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
3.6 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
3.6 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Alcohol
Does not drink alcohol
154 participants73 participants81 participants
Alcohol
Drinks alcohol
46 participants27 participants19 participants
Anuric134 participants68 participants66 participants
Blood flow rate393.4 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.7
394.3 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.9
392.4 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.4
Body mass index27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
28.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
27.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Comorbid conditions
Cerebrovascular disease
33 participants13 participants20 participants
Comorbid conditions
Coronary artery disease
53 participants22 participants31 participants
Comorbid conditions
Coronary revascularization
19 participants4 participants15 participants
Comorbid conditions
Diabetes mellitus
86 participants43 participants43 participants
Comorbid conditions
Hospitalized heart failure
62 participants25 participants37 participants
Comorbid conditions
Peripheral vascular disease
21 participants10 participants11 participants
Creatinine10.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
10.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
10 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
Dialysate flow rate770.4 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 73
779.6 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 61.9
761.3 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 82
Dialysis duration
Delivered dialysis duration
222 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.2
224.1 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.7
219.8 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.7
Dialysis duration
Prescribed dialysis duration
239.4 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.7
239.4 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
239.4 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.9
Dialysis vintage4.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
4.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
3.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Education12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Employed
Not working
137 participants67 participants70 participants
Employed
Retired
45 participants22 participants23 participants
Employed
Working
18 participants11 participants7 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
199 Participants99 Participants100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Etiology of chronic kidney disease
Diabetes mellitus
56 participants29 participants27 participants
Etiology of chronic kidney disease
Glomerulonephritis
9 participants4 participants5 participants
Etiology of chronic kidney disease
Hypertension
100 participants54 participants46 participants
Etiology of chronic kidney disease
Other etiologies
34 participants13 participants21 participants
Etiology of chronic kidney disease
Polycystic kidney disease
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Height67.9 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
68.3 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
67.6 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
Hemoglobin11.3 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
11.3 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
11.3 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Income
< $25,000
164 participants84 participants80 participants
Income
>= $25,000
17 participants10 participants7 participants
Income
Refused
19 participants6 participants13 participants
Marital status
Divorced/separated
33 participants18 participants15 participants
Marital status
Married
42 participants23 participants19 participants
Marital status
Single
109 participants53 participants56 participants
Marital status
Widowed
16 participants6 participants10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Blacks
172 participants86 participants86 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-blacks
28 participants14 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
200 participants100 participants100 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
69 Participants27 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
131 Participants73 Participants58 Participants
Smoking
Current smoker
86 participants43 participants43 participants
Smoking
Non-smoker
114 participants57 participants57 participants
Urea reduction ratio75 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
74 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
76 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Weight83 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
85.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.7
80.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 10029 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
58 / 10070 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.

The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. A mixed model was used with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as the outcome variable. Fixed effects were indicator variables for time, treatment and their interaction. Random effect was subject and statistical inference was made using the maximum likelihood estimator. No imputation was made for missing data.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Population: The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. The analysis was performed by intention to treat, if the patient received at least one dose of the randomized drug regardless of the availability of a post-baseline echocardiogram.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtenololThe Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.LVMI Change from baseline, 6 months-8.4 g/m^2Standard Deviation 5.1
AtenololThe Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.LVMI Change from baseline, 12 months-21.5 g/m^2Standard Deviation 5.7
LisinoprilThe Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.LVMI Change from baseline, 6 months-3.4 g/m^2Standard Deviation 5.5
LisinoprilThe Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year.LVMI Change from baseline, 12 months-15.1 g/m^2Standard Deviation 6.2
Other Pre-specified

Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination

Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF), hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. Adverse events reported are those during the course of 12 months of participation in the trial. All serious adverse events were adjudicated by R.A. and A.D.S. who were masked to the drug assignment at the time of adjudication. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. The cardiovascular event rate was calculated by treatment group assignment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). As a post hoc analysis, we also determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included MI, stroke, CHF, or cardiovascular death.

Time frame: 1 yr

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AtenololSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, cardiovasular events24.6 events/100 patient-years
AtenololSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, combined MI, stroke, CHF, CV death13.5 events/100 patient-years
AtenololSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, congest heart failure6.2 events/100 patient-years
AtenololSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, all-cause hospitalizations89.9 events/100 patient-years
LisinoprilSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, all-cause hospitalizations144.3 events/100 patient-years
LisinoprilSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, cardiovasular events58 events/100 patient-years
LisinoprilSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, congest heart failure20.2 events/100 patient-years
LisinoprilSerious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial TerminationIncidence rate, combined MI, stroke, CHF, CV death31 events/100 patient-years
Comparison: Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals (95% CIs).p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.36, 4.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: As a post hoc analysis, we determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure or cardiovascular death. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals (95% CIs).p-value: 0.0295% CI: [1.07, 5.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hospitalization for congestive heart failure between groups was analyzed. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals.p-value: 0.0295% CI: [1.08, 10.99]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: All-cause hospitalizations between groups were analyzed. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.18, 2.19]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026