Skip to content

Effects of PRK 124 Lotion in Acne Rosacea

Effects of PRK 124 (0.125%) Lotion in Acne Rosacea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00580723
Enrollment
24
Registered
2007-12-27
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2014-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Rosacea

Keywords

acne, rosacea, acne rosacea, papulopustular rosacea, erythema, telangiectasia, flushing

Brief summary

The purpose of this open-label study is to determine the tolerance and efficacy of twice-daily application of PRK 124 (Pyratine-6)(0.125%) moisturizing lotion for improving the signs and symptoms of mild to moderate facial rosacea.

Detailed description

Cytokinins are plant growth factors that regulate plant growth and differentiation. PRK 124 (N-furfuryl-9-(2-tetrahydropyranyl) adenine)(Pyratine 6™) is a cytokinin that has been shown to have modulatory, anti-ROS (reactive oxygen species), and antisenescence effects on the growth of human skin cells. Recent clinical studies showed that PRK 124 (0.1%) treatment in 40 subjects for 12 weeks improved the appearance of photodamaged facial skin by decreasing fine wrinkles, roughness and mottled hyperpigmentation. Treatment with PRK 124 lotion furthermore decreased skin transepidermal water loss and also increased skin moisture content. The topical PRK 124 lotion was well tolerated by the subjects with no significant increase in erythema or irritation. Treatment with PRK 124 was shown to decrease both acne and erythema observed at baseline. Rosacea is a common, chronic dermatosis that is characterized by papules and pustules, persistent erythema and telangiectasia. The objective of this study is to compare the long-term efficacy and tolerance of PRK 124 (0.125%) moisturizing lotion applied twice daily for 48 weeks for improving the clinical signs and symptoms of inflammatory acne rosacea as well as cutaneous signs of skin photodamage. Study Design: Twenty four volunteers with mild-to-moderate facial rosacea will participate in this single center, open-label study designed to evaluate the subject=s tolerance and effectiveness of PRK 124 (0.125%) moisturizing lotion applied twice daily for 48 weeks, for improving the signs and symptoms of acne rosacea. Subjects will apply the test lotion twice daily, once in morning and again in the evening before bedtime. Subjects will be assessed at baseline and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment for improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of acne rosacea and effect of treatments on transepidermal water loss (TEWL). In addition, the subject's tolerance will be assessed at each follow-up visit (weeks 4, 8, and 12). Facial photographs will be obtained at baseline and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Subjects will then be given the opportunity to continue treatment for 36 additional weeks. Subjects must have normal clinical laboratory tests, and if female, a negative urine pregnancy test at 12 weeks to continue the 36 weeks treatment. Clinical laboratory tests and urine pregnancy test will be repeated at week 48 or early study completion. Clinical assessments will be done at weeks 24, 36 and 48 during the last 36 weeks. Additional objective measures of skin moisture content and skin erythema using a chromameter will be done at week 12 and at follow-up visits (weeks 24, 36 and 48). Telephone follow-up will be done at weeks 16, 20, 28, 32 and 40 to assess subject tolerance and compliance. Primary Study Variables: The primary study variables are: Observations by Investigator: * Inflammatory lesion count * Erythema and telangiectasia severity * Global assessment of severity * Overall improvement over baseline * Photodamage (fine wrinkles, texture, mottled hyperpigmentation) * Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) * Skin moisture content * Skin erythema as measured by a chromameter Subject self assessment: * Signs & symptoms (burning/stinging, erythema/telangiectasia, papules/pustules) * Overall improvement over baseline * Photodamage (fine wrinkles, texture, mottled hyperpigmentation) * Cosmetic acceptability The local skin tolerance of the treatments will be assessed by the Investigator and by the subject.

Interventions

OTHERPRK 124

Topical PRK 124 (0.125%) moisturizing lotion applied twice daily to the face for 48 weeks

Sponsors

SenetekPLC
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* be at least 21 years old * be in reasonably good health as defined by the study doctor * have routine laboratory tests to evaluate your blood cell count, and kidney and liver function * for females of child-bearing age, not be pregnant or nursing and have a negative urine pregnancy test (except if surgically sterile or at least 1 year menopausal) * for females, agree to use medically acceptable forms of birth control throughout the entire study (medically acceptable forms of birth control include oral contraceptive \[the pill\], implants such as Norplant®, injectable progesterone \[Depo-provera®\], diaphragm and spermicide or condoms and spermicide) * must have mild to moderate acne rosacea * be willing to refrain from using non-approved lotions, moisturizer, cleansers or lotions on affected facial areas during the treatment period * be capable of understanding and giving written, voluntary informed consent before study screening * be willing to consent to facial photographs at baseline and each follow-up visit to monitor treatment with the test product.

Exclusion criteria

* have a history or evidence of any chronic or reoccurring skin disease or disorder (e.g., psoriasis, eczema, etc.) affecting the face * have known or suspected hypersensitivity to study treatment or any of its ingredients * have used systemic retinoids within 6 months prior to study entry (e.g., acitretin, isotretinoin) * have received treatment with systemic corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) or antibiotics within 1 month * have used topical treatment to the face with retinoids (e.g. tretinoin, adapalene), or antibiotics or corticosteroids, within 2 weeks prior to study entry * are unwilling to use a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 during the study * have participated in any clinical trial involving an investigational drug or cosmetic product or procedure within the past 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Erythema SeverityBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Measured by percent improvement on a scale of 0-4. Subjects received a 0 for no improvement, 1 for less than twenty-five percent improvement, a 2 for twenty-five to fifty percent improvement, a 3 for fifty to seventy-five percent improvement and a 4 for greater than seventy-five percent improvement. Mean scores from all continuing 16 participants were averaged for each encounter, for a total of 8 visits. The percent improvement in mean erythema severity was calculated by comparing the change in mean scores at week 48 to mean scores assessed at baseline.
Inflammatory Lesion CountBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Lesion counts were numerically summed for each patient at each encounter, and the average lesion count was calculated from all continuing 16 subjects at each visit, for a total of 8 visits. Percent improvement (reduction in lesion number) was assessed by comparing the average number of lesions at week 48 to the average number of lesions assessed at baseline.
Telangiectasia SeverityBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48Measured by percent improvement on a scale of 0-4. Subjects received a 0 for no improvement, 1 for less than twenty-five percent improvement, a 2 for twenty-five to fifty percent improvement, a 3 for fifty to seventy-five percent improvement and a 4 for greater than seventy-five percent improvement. Mean scores from all continuing 16 participants were averaged for each encounter, for a total of 8 visits. The percent improvement in mean telangiectasia severity was calculated by comparing the change in mean scores at week 48 to mean scores assessed at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Skin ToleranceBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48
Cosmetic AcceptabilityBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
Skin PhotodamageBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Topical PRK 124
Topical PRK 124 (Pyratine-6)(0.125%)
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDid not want to participate in extension3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTopical PRK 124
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants
Age, Continuous51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Erythema Severity

Measured by percent improvement on a scale of 0-4. Subjects received a 0 for no improvement, 1 for less than twenty-five percent improvement, a 2 for twenty-five to fifty percent improvement, a 3 for fifty to seventy-five percent improvement and a 4 for greater than seventy-five percent improvement. Mean scores from all continuing 16 participants were averaged for each encounter, for a total of 8 visits. The percent improvement in mean erythema severity was calculated by comparing the change in mean scores at week 48 to mean scores assessed at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Population: We had a total of 24 subjects. Five were lost to follow up and three did not want to participate in the extension period. The results from the remaining 16 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical PRK 124Erythema Severity44.53 Erythema percent improvementStandard Deviation 0.68
Primary

Inflammatory Lesion Count

Lesion counts were numerically summed for each patient at each encounter, and the average lesion count was calculated from all continuing 16 subjects at each visit, for a total of 8 visits. Percent improvement (reduction in lesion number) was assessed by comparing the average number of lesions at week 48 to the average number of lesions assessed at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Population: We had a total of 24 subjects. Five were lost to follow up and three did not want to participate in the extension period. The results from the remaining 16 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical PRK 124Inflammatory Lesion Count89 Percent change in number of lesionsStandard Deviation 0.58
Primary

Telangiectasia Severity

Measured by percent improvement on a scale of 0-4. Subjects received a 0 for no improvement, 1 for less than twenty-five percent improvement, a 2 for twenty-five to fifty percent improvement, a 3 for fifty to seventy-five percent improvement and a 4 for greater than seventy-five percent improvement. Mean scores from all continuing 16 participants were averaged for each encounter, for a total of 8 visits. The percent improvement in mean telangiectasia severity was calculated by comparing the change in mean scores at week 48 to mean scores assessed at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Population: We had a total of 24 subjects. Five were lost to follow up and three did not want to participate in the extension period. The results from the remaining 16 subjects were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical PRK 124Telangiectasia Severity27.88 Telangiectasia percent improvementStandard Deviation 0.62
Secondary

Cosmetic Acceptability

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Secondary

Skin Photodamage

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Secondary

Skin Tolerance

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48

Secondary

Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026