Skip to content

An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction And Convenience Of Two Formulations Of Lamotrigine In Subjects With A Mood Disorder

An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction and Convenience of Two Formulations of Lamotrigine in Subjects With a Mood Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00579982
Enrollment
97
Registered
2007-12-24
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2016-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mood Disorders

Keywords

Mood disorder

Brief summary

To determine the convenience and satisfaction of new orally disintegrating tablet formulation (ODT) of lamictal in subjects with a mood disorder. This was a multicenter, open-label study in participants with a mood disorder, who reported difficulty or discomfort in swallowing the currently marketed IR compressed tablet formulation of lamotrigine and who had a person (such as a spouse, partner, companion, aid, nurse, caregiver, etc) willing to complete a Companion/Caregiver Question. Subjects were switched from the currently marketed lamotrigine IR formulation to a matching dose of lamotrigine IR orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) for 3 weeks to determine convenience and satisfaction.

Interventions

DRUGLamotrigine

Experimental formulation

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must have a documented diagnosis of a mood disorder as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV (296.00-296.90). * Subject must have a person (such as a spouse, partner, companion, aid, nurse, caregiver, etc) willing to complete a Companion/Caregiver Preference Question either in person or via the telephone. This individual must read, write, and comprehend English at a level sufficient to complete study-related assessments. * Subject must have been taking a stable dose of currently marketed compressed tablet formulation of lamotrigine IR for at least 4 weeks prior to Baseline (Day 1) of the study and must be adherent to the prescribed dosing regimen. The current dose must not exceed 600 mg/day. * Subject's current lamotrigine IR dose, frequency and number of tablets per administration must remain consistent between the IR and ODT regimens. However, the subject's current lamotrigine IR dose may be such that the subject would receive no more than one additional ODT per administration in order to equal their IR dose. * Subject must currently report a difficulty or discomfort swallowing lamotrigine IR compressed tablets, the nature of which is or will be documented. NOTE: A diagnosis of dysphagia is not required. * Subject must have the ability to comprehend the consent form and provide informed consent. * Subject must read, write, and comprehend English at a level sufficient to complete study-related assessments. * Subject is a male or female at least 18 years of age. * If female, the subject is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is not lactating and is of: 1. non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is pre-menarchal or post-menopausal \[defined as one year without menses\]); is surgically sterile \[via hysterectomy and/or removal of the ovaries\] or, 2. child-bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at both Screening and/or Baseline (prior to Investigational Product administration), and agrees to one of the following requirements: * has a male sexual partner who is surgically sterilized (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to Screening or, * sexual partner(s) is/are exclusively female or, * double barrier method: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository). The subject must be using this method for at least 1 week following the discontinuation of Investigational Product or, * any intrauterine device (IUD) with published data showing that the highest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year. Acceptable IUDs, for the purposes of this study, include TCu-380A (Paragard), TCU-380 Slimline (Gyne T Slimline), MULTILOAD-250 (MLCu-250) and 375, Levonorgesterol LNG-20 Intrauterine System (Mirena/Levonova), and Flexigard 330/CuFix PP330 (Gynefix).The subject must have had the device inserted at least 2 weeks prior to Screening, throughout the study, and 2 weeks following the discontinuation of Investigational Product.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has: * a current (or within six months prior to Screening) diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or bulimia. * a diagnosis of a mood disorder due to a general medical condition, or substance abuse per DSM-IV (293.83). * a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. * Subject who meets current criteria of an acute mood disorder and has a CGI-S of ≥4 at Screening. * Subject who crushes lamotrigine IR compressed tablet prior to taking or receiving medication orally. * Subject who, in the investigator's judgment, poses a homicidal or serious suicidal risk; has made a suicide attempt within the six months preceding Screening; or has ever been homicidal. * Subject who has a score of 1 or greater on Suicidality item (Item 9) of the BDI-II at Screening and/or Baseline. * Subject has ever experienced a rash related to prior lamotrigine treatment, or for whom treatment was discontinued for clinically significant safety reasons. * Subject has a history of severe hepato-biliary disease within the past 3 years. * Subject has any medical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, is considered to be clinically significant and could potentially affect subject safety or study outcome. * Subject has a positive urine test at Screening for illicit drug use and/or a history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the past 12 months. * Subject is currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device, or has done so within the preceding month for studies unrelated to the current illness, or six months for studies related to the current illness. * Female subject is pregnant, lactating, or does not agree to use contraceptive method(s) specified in the protocol to avoid pregnancy during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalThe CSS is the sum of items 9 (values: 1=Extremely difficult - 7=Extremely easy), 10 (same set of values as for 9), and 11 (1=Extremely inconvenient - 7=Extremely convenient). The sum has 3 subtracted from it, is divided by 18, and then multiplied by 100; the range is 0-100. Change from baseline=end of study CSS minus baseline score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalClinician assessment evaluating how mentally ill the patient is at time of evaluation. The questionnaire is based on a 7-point scale (from1 = Normal to 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients).
Mean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3 weeks) or at Early WithdrawalParticipant-reported questionnaire consisting of 21 items on a 4 point scale (0 to 3, with 3 indicating most severely ill), with the score being the sum of the items. The change from baseline is the end of study score minus the baseline score; larger values indicate more depression with the ODT formulation relative to the IR formulation.
Number of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalThe Organoleptic Questionnaire (9 items) was used to assess the participants' satisfaction with the physical characteristics of the ODT formulation e.g. rate of dissolution, flavor. Question number 1 on organoleptic questionnaire: Did the tablets dissolve instantly (yes or no)?
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalQuestion number 2 on organoleptic questionnaire: How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the time it took the tablet to dissolve? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (Extremely satisfied)\]
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalQuestion number 3 on organoleptic questionnaire: How did the dissolved tablet feel in your mouth? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely gritty) to 5 (Extremely smooth)\]
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalQuestion number 4 on organoleptic questionnaire: How satisfied were you with the flavor of the tablet? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (Extremely satisfied)\]
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalOrganoleptic Questionnaire, question 5: How would you rate the strength of the flavor of the tablet? \[from 1 a rating of (Extremely bothersome) to 5 (Extremely pleasant)\]
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalThe Global Satisfaction Subscale Score is the sum of item 12 (values: 1=Not at all confident - 5=Extremely confident), item 13 (values: 1=Not at all certain - 5=Extremely certain), and item 14 (Extremely dissatisfied - 7=Extremely satisfied). The sum has 3 subtracted from it, is divided by 14, and then multiplied by 100; thus, the range is 0-100.
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalOrganoleptic Questionnaire, question 7: How satisfied were you with the aftertaste of the tablet (the taste remaining in your mouth after swallowing the tablet)? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 6 (I did NOT experience an aftertaste)\]
Number of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalOrganoleptic Questionnaire, question 8: Compared to standard tablets that need to be swallowed with liquid, how convenient or inconvenient did you find this orally disintegrating tablet? (from a rating of 1 \[Extremely inconvenient\] to 5 \[Extremely convenient\])
Number of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalOrganoleptic Questionnaire, question 9: Compared to standard tablets that need to be swallowed with liquid, how easy or difficult is it to use this orally disintegrating tablet? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely difficult) to 5 (Extremely easy)\]
Number of Participants Indicating a Preference for ODT or the Standard IR Tablet at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalParticipant indicated whether preference was for ODT or the standard IR tablet
Number of Companions/Caregivers Indicating Whether ODT or Standard IR Tablet is More Convenient at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalCompanion/Caregiver indicates whether ODT is more convenient or standard IR tablet is more convenient
Number of Participants Indicating at Week 3 (by Answering Yes/no) That They Would be More Likely to Take the ODT FormulationEnd of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalTablet Routine Questionnaire (Adherence): Adherence to the treatment was evaluated by asking if the participant would be more likely to take the ODT formulation (yes/no)
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalOrganoleptic Questionnaire, question 6: How would you rate the aftertaste of the tablet (the taste remaining in your mouth after swallowing the tablet)? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely bothersome) to 6 (Did NOT experience an aftertaste)\]

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lamotrigine
Orally Disintegrating Tablet (ODT). ODT dosing was to match the dose and regimen of the immediate release (IR) dose the subject was taking at baseline. The mean (standard deviation \[SD\]) ODT dose was 261.3 (118.9) mg/day.
97
Total97

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event4
Overall StudyProtocol Violation4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLamotrigine
Age, Continuous41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.07
Gender
Female
83 Participants
Gender
Male
14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed race
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
94 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 97
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 97

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.

The CSS is the sum of items 9 (values: 1=Extremely difficult - 7=Extremely easy), 10 (same set of values as for 9), and 11 (1=Extremely inconvenient - 7=Extremely convenient). The sum has 3 subtracted from it, is divided by 18, and then multiplied by 100; the range is 0-100. Change from baseline=end of study CSS minus baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT). Ninety-eight participants were enrolled in the study, but one withdrew prior to receiving lamotrigine ODT treatment. All efficacy and safety analyses are based on the Intent to Treat population, which includes the 97 patients who received at least one dose of ODT treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LamotrigineMean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.23.3 Points on a subscaleStandard Deviation 22.5
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3

Clinician assessment evaluating how mentally ill the patient is at time of evaluation. The questionnaire is based on a 7-point scale (from1 = Normal to 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients).

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LamotrigineMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 30.0 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3

Participant-reported questionnaire consisting of 21 items on a 4 point scale (0 to 3, with 3 indicating most severely ill), with the score being the sum of the items. The change from baseline is the end of study score minus the baseline score; larger values indicate more depression with the ODT formulation relative to the IR formulation.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3 weeks) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LamotrigineMean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3-1.7 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.52
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3

The Global Satisfaction Subscale Score is the sum of item 12 (values: 1=Not at all confident - 5=Extremely confident), item 13 (values: 1=Not at all certain - 5=Extremely certain), and item 14 (Extremely dissatisfied - 7=Extremely satisfied). The sum has 3 subtracted from it, is divided by 14, and then multiplied by 100; thus, the range is 0-100.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LamotrigineMean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3-0.3 Points on a subscaleStandard Deviation 29.34
Secondary

Number of Companions/Caregivers Indicating Whether ODT or Standard IR Tablet is More Convenient at Week 3

Companion/Caregiver indicates whether ODT is more convenient or standard IR tablet is more convenient

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Companions/Caregivers Indicating Whether ODT or Standard IR Tablet is More Convenient at Week 3Standard IR tablet more convenient18 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Companions/Caregivers Indicating Whether ODT or Standard IR Tablet is More Convenient at Week 3ODT more convenient79 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3

Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 8: Compared to standard tablets that need to be swallowed with liquid, how convenient or inconvenient did you find this orally disintegrating tablet? (from a rating of 1 \[Extremely inconvenient\] to 5 \[Extremely convenient\])

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Convenient16 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Extremely inconvenient8 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Very inconvenient9 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Very convenient17 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Convenient or Inconvenient Did You Find This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Extremely convenient47 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3

Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 9: Compared to standard tablets that need to be swallowed with liquid, how easy or difficult is it to use this orally disintegrating tablet? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely difficult) to 5 (Extremely easy)\]

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Extremely difficult2 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Very difficult3 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Easy17 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Very easy20 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Compared to Standard Tablets That Need to be Swallowed With Liquid, How Easy or Difficult is it to Use This Orally Disintegrating Tablet? at Week 3Extremely easy55 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3

The Organoleptic Questionnaire (9 items) was used to assess the participants' satisfaction with the physical characteristics of the ODT formulation e.g. rate of dissolution, flavor. Question number 1 on organoleptic questionnaire: Did the tablets dissolve instantly (yes or no)?

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3Yes60 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3No37 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3

Question number 3 on organoleptic questionnaire: How did the dissolved tablet feel in your mouth? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely gritty) to 5 (Extremely smooth)\]

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3Extremely gritty0 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3Very gritty19 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3Smooth45 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3Very smooth19 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3Extremely smooth14 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3

Question number 2 on organoleptic questionnaire: How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the time it took the tablet to dissolve? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (Extremely satisfied)\]

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Extremely dissatisfied3 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Very dissatisfied10 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Satisfied37 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Very satisfied18 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Extremely satisfied29 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3

Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 7: How satisfied were you with the aftertaste of the tablet (the taste remaining in your mouth after swallowing the tablet)? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 6 (I did NOT experience an aftertaste)\]

Time frame: Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3Extremely dissatisfied3 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3Very dissatisfied16 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3Satisfied28 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3Very satisfied11 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3Extremely satisfied11 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3I did NOT experience an aftertaste28 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3

Question number 4 on organoleptic questionnaire: How satisfied were you with the flavor of the tablet? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (Extremely satisfied)\]

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Extremely dissatisfied5 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Very dissatisfied10 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Satisfied26 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Very satisfied23 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Extremely satisfied33 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.

Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 6: How would you rate the aftertaste of the tablet (the taste remaining in your mouth after swallowing the tablet)? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely bothersome) to 6 (Did NOT experience an aftertaste)\]

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.Extremely bothersome4 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.Very bothersome20 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.Pleasant25 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.Very pleasant7 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.Extremely pleasant12 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.I did NOT experience an aftertaste29 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3

Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 5: How would you rate the strength of the flavor of the tablet? \[from 1 a rating of (Extremely bothersome) to 5 (Extremely pleasant)\]

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Extremely bothersome2 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Very bothersome14 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Pleasant36 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Very pleasant22 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3Extremely pleasant23 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Indicating a Preference for ODT or the Standard IR Tablet at Week 3

Participant indicated whether preference was for ODT or the standard IR tablet

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Indicating a Preference for ODT or the Standard IR Tablet at Week 3Prefer ODT72 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Indicating a Preference for ODT or the Standard IR Tablet at Week 3Prefer standard IR tablet25 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Indicating at Week 3 (by Answering Yes/no) That They Would be More Likely to Take the ODT Formulation

Tablet Routine Questionnaire (Adherence): Adherence to the treatment was evaluated by asking if the participant would be more likely to take the ODT formulation (yes/no)

Time frame: End of Study (Week 3) or at Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT: Only 94 of the 97 subjects in the ITT Population responded to the Tablet Routine Questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Indicating at Week 3 (by Answering Yes/no) That They Would be More Likely to Take the ODT FormulationYes84 Number of participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Indicating at Week 3 (by Answering Yes/no) That They Would be More Likely to Take the ODT FormulationNo10 Number of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026