Skip to content

The Use of Statins Following a Left Atrial Catheter Ablation Procedure to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation

Atorvastatin for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Pulmonary Veins Isolation: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Pilot Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00579098
Acronym
ATTAC
Enrollment
125
Registered
2007-12-21
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation, Endothelial Dysfunction, Inflammation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmia, Pulmonary Vein Isolation, Left atrial catheter ablation, Inflammation, Endothelial dysfunction

Brief summary

To investigate whether statin therapy utilizing the drug Lipitor (atorvastatin) might be effective in preventing short-and long-term atrial fibrillation (AF) following a left atrial ablation procedure. We further hypothesize this reduction will result from diminished peri-procedural inflammation, which will be reflected in lower C-Reactive Protein (CRP) values in the blood.

Detailed description

Although pharmacologic therapy is the traditional mainstay of therapy for AF, curative therapy has recently become possible. There is growing evidence that inflammation may be involved in the pathogenesis of AF. CRP, a sensitive marker of systemic inflammation, is increased in patients with AF compared with patients in sinus rhythm. Elevated CRP levels are associated with increased likelihood of new onset AF and with recurrence of AF after successful cardioversion. Clinical and basic laboratory evidence suggests that, in addition to being potent lipid-lowering agents, statins may also have anti-inflammatory properties and protective effect against AF. 125 eligible patients with AF, undergoing left atrial ablation, will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily 80 mg of atorvastatin or placebo in a double-blind fashion for 3 months after their ablation procedure. Patients will have baseline lipids, CRP, endothelial function tests and Quality of Life (QoL) surveys compared with testing at 3 months post ablation.

Interventions

DRUGAtorvastatin

80 mg tablet taken by mouth daily for 90 days

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo tablet taken by mouth once daily for 90 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \> or = to 18 years of age * Clinically indicated left atrial ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

* Known malignancy * Known inflammatory disease * Surgery or trauma or myocardial infarction in the previous month * Known contraindication to statin therapy * Elevated liver enzymes above two times the upper limit of normal * Patients already receiving therapy with any statin, niacin or fibrates at the time of their randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Without Symptoms of Atrial Fibrillation at 3 MonthsBaseline through 3 monthsAsymptomatic recurrence was defined as any atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 seconds. This was assessed by an electrocardiogram (ECG) and 72-hour Holter monitor recordings. At the end of the study, 336 ECG and Holter recordings were available for analysis (172 in the atorvastatin group and 164 in the placebo group).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Without Atrial Arrhythmia at 3 MonthsBaseline through 3 monthsPercentage of subjects without atrial arrhythmia (as opposed to atrial fibrillation) recurrence, irrespective of symptoms. Atrial arrhythmias included AF, atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter.
Change in Mean C-Reactive Protein LevelBaseline and 3 months
Change in Mean Quality of Life ScoreBaseline and 3 monthsA visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to collect the subject's perception of their current state of health/quality of life. The VAS consists of a vertical 20 centimeter scored line (like a thermometer) with the ends labelled best imaginable health state at the top (100) and worst imaginable health state at the bottom (0). The subject marked a single line to grade his/her own current level of function at the baseline visit and again at the 3 month visit. The average change in VAS score from baseline to 3 months later is reported for each treatment group.
Change in Lipid LevelsBaseline and 3 monthsThe change from baseline to 3 months in blood cholesterol levels (total cholesterol, LDL or low-density lipoprotein and HDL or high-density lipoprotein) was calculated.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled in this trial between January 2008 and December 2009 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota (USA).

Pre-assignment details

847 patients were screened and of those, 567 were excluded, primarily because they were already receiving statin therapy (68%) and/or had known inflammatory disease (16%). 280 met entry criteria but 155 were not willing to participate. 125 were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atorvastatin
Lipitor (atorvastatin) 80 mg tablet taken once daily by mouth for 90 days
62
Placebo
Placebo (dummy) tablet taken once daily by mouth for 90 days
63
Total125

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event23
Overall StudyAF returned after ablation32
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtorvastatinPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Anatomical area of ablation
Cavotricuspid isthmus line
49 Participants51 Participants100 Participants
Anatomical area of ablation
LA isthmus
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Anatomical area of ablation
Nonpulmonary vein foci
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Anatomical area of ablation
Roof line
12 Participants8 Participants20 Participants
Anatomical area of ablation
Wide-area circumferential ablation
44 Participants46 Participants90 Participants
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Amiodarone
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Sodium Channel Blocker Class IC
13 Participants20 Participants33 Participants
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Sotalol/dofetilide
14 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Total on any antiarrhythmic drug
28 Participants33 Participants61 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Chronic kidney disease
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Chronic lung disease
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Congestive Heart Failure
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Dilated cardiomyopathy
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Hypertension
20 Participants16 Participants36 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Old Cardiovascular Accident/Transient Ischemic Att
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Sleep apnea
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Concomitant Conditions
Valvular heart disease
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Duration of Atrial Fibrillation4 Months4 Months4 Months
Echocardiographic parameter-LA diameter, long axis58.4 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
57.5 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
57.9 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Echocardiographic parameter-LA volume index40.4 cc/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
39.4 cc/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
39.9 cc/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Echocardiographic parameter-LVEF60 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
60 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
60 Percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Medication on admission
ACE inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Medication on admission
Aspirin
28 Participants30 Participants58 Participants
Medication on admission
Beta blocker
35 Participants30 Participants65 Participants
Medication on admission
Oral anticoagulation
46 Participants41 Participants87 Participants
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation44 Participants46 Participants90 Participants
Procedural time110 Minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39
113 Minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47
111 Minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42
Region of Enrollment
United States
62 participants63 participants125 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants49 Participants98 Participants
Years of Atrial Fibrillation5.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
4.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.96
5.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.45

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 621 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 620 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects Without Symptoms of Atrial Fibrillation at 3 Months

Asymptomatic recurrence was defined as any atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 seconds. This was assessed by an electrocardiogram (ECG) and 72-hour Holter monitor recordings. At the end of the study, 336 ECG and Holter recordings were available for analysis (172 in the atorvastatin group and 164 in the placebo group).

Time frame: Baseline through 3 months

Population: Intent-to-treat analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AtorvastatinPercentage of Subjects Without Symptoms of Atrial Fibrillation at 3 Months95 Percentage of subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Without Symptoms of Atrial Fibrillation at 3 Months93.5 Percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.75Log Rank
Secondary

Change in Lipid Levels

The change from baseline to 3 months in blood cholesterol levels (total cholesterol, LDL or low-density lipoprotein and HDL or high-density lipoprotein) was calculated.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Population: Intent-to-treat analysis population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtorvastatinChange in Lipid LevelsChange in total cholesterol-50 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42
AtorvastatinChange in Lipid LevelsChange in LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholestero-47 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35
AtorvastatinChange in Lipid LevelsChange in HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholest.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7
PlaceboChange in Lipid LevelsChange in total cholesterol15 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29
PlaceboChange in Lipid LevelsChange in LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholestero9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23
PlaceboChange in Lipid LevelsChange in HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholest.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9
Comparison: The change in total cholesterol was compared between treatment groups.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The change in LDL cholesterol was compared between treatment groups.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The change in HDL cholesterol was compared between treatment groups.p-value: 0.92t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Mean C-Reactive Protein Level

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Population: Intent-to-treat analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtorvastatinChange in Mean C-Reactive Protein Level-0.75 mg/dLStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboChange in Mean C-Reactive Protein Level2.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.9
p-value: 0.11t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Mean Quality of Life Score

A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to collect the subject's perception of their current state of health/quality of life. The VAS consists of a vertical 20 centimeter scored line (like a thermometer) with the ends labelled best imaginable health state at the top (100) and worst imaginable health state at the bottom (0). The subject marked a single line to grade his/her own current level of function at the baseline visit and again at the 3 month visit. The average change in VAS score from baseline to 3 months later is reported for each treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Population: Intent-to-treat analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtorvastatinChange in Mean Quality of Life Score13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
PlaceboChange in Mean Quality of Life Score11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
p-value: 0.53t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Without Atrial Arrhythmia at 3 Months

Percentage of subjects without atrial arrhythmia (as opposed to atrial fibrillation) recurrence, irrespective of symptoms. Atrial arrhythmias included AF, atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter.

Time frame: Baseline through 3 months

Population: Intent-to-treat analysis population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AtorvastatinPercentage of Subjects Without Atrial Arrhythmia at 3 Months85 Percentage of subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Without Atrial Arrhythmia at 3 Months88 Percentage of subjects
p-value: 0.37Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026