Skip to content

PCM Cervical Disc System

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing PCM® Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: 2 Year Results From the US IDE Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00578812
Enrollment
494
Registered
2007-12-21
Start date
2005-01-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2015-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelopathy, Radiculopathy

Brief summary

The PCM Cervical Disc was studied in a prospective, multicenter, randomized FDA-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical trial conducted in the United States to evaluate longitudinal outcomes over 2 years comparatively between the PCM Cervical Disc and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft and plate. Patients with adjacent or non-adjacent prior fusion were allowed. A total of 416 patients with a degenerated cervical disc at one level from C3-C4 to C7-T1 were enrolled in the clinical trial and 403 were treated. Patients were randomly assigned to be treated either with the PCM Cervical Disc or ACDF.

Detailed description

The PCM Cervical Disc was studied in a prospective, multicenter, randomized FDA-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical trial conducted in the United States to evaluate longitudinal outcomes over 2 years comparatively between the PCM Cervical Disc and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft and plate. Patients with adjacent or non-adjacent prior fusion were allowed. A total of 416 patients with a degenerated cervical disc at one level from C3-C4 to C7-T1 were enrolled in the clinical trial and 403 were treated. Patients were randomly assigned to be treated either with the PCM Cervical Disc or ACDF. Patients were evaluated before surgery, during the operation, immediately after surgery, and then at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months, and yearly after surgery. The patients were recommended to have a physical therapy program for non-impact exercises and active range of motion exercises after surgery. Patients were also instructed to avoid repetitive cervical flexion and extension bending and lateral bending and rotation for 6 weeks following surgery. The safety of the PCM Cervical Disc was assessed by comparing the adverse events, any additional surgical procedures, and the neurological outcomes to those in the ACDF control group. The effectiveness of the PCM Cervical Disc was assessed by evaluating patients' pain and function outcomes using a standard questionnaire, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the severity of neck and arm pain based on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessment, quality of life using a standard questionnaire, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), as well as a patient satisfaction questionnaire compared to the ACDF control group. In addition, the patients were evaluated using radiographic evaluations, including spinal range of motion, spinal disc height, device displacement or migration, spinal fusion status, and heterotopic ossification (abnormal bone formation). The primary endpoint of the IDE trial was a composite measure termed overall success, which was evaluated at 24 months postoperatively, and was defined as at least 20% improvement in neck disability index (NDI) from preoperative score; absence of reoperation, revision, or removal; maintenance or improvement in neurological status; and absence of radiographic or major complications during the 24-month follow-up period. On October 26, 2012, the FDA granted Premarket Approval (PMA) for the PCM Cervical Disc. PCM Cervical Disc is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients for reconstruction of a degenerated cervical disc at one level from C3-C4 to C6-C7 following single-level discectomy for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit), with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the disc space, and manifested by at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height as compared to adjacent levels.

Interventions

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a cervical plate and bone graft in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1

PCM Cervical Disc replacement in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1

Sponsors

NuVasive
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-65 years; * Diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy of the cervical spine between C3-4 and C7-T1; * Symptomatic at only one level from C3-C4 to C7-T1; * Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for six weeks, or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of conservative treatment; * Baseline NDI score of ≥30/100; * Radiographically determined pathology at level to be treated correlating to primary symptoms, including at least one of the following: decreased disc height, degenerative spondylosis on CT or MRI, or disc herniation; * Appropriate for treatment using an anterior surgical approach, including having no more than one previous anterior surgical approach to the cervical spine; * Ability and willingness to comply with follow-up regimen; and * Written informed consent given by subject or subject's legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

* Infection at the site of surgery; * History of, or anticipated treatment for, active systemic infection, including HIV infection or hepatitis C; * Prior attempted or completed cervical spine surgery, except (1) laminoforaminotomy with less than one-third facetectomy at any level, or (2) a successful single-level anterior cervical fusion; * More than one immobile vertebral level between C1-T1 from any cause, including but not limited to congenital abnormalities, osteoarthritic spontaneous fusions, and prior cervical spinal fusions; * Previous trauma to the C3-T1 levels resulting in significant bony or disco-ligamentous cervical spine injury; * Axial neck pain in the absence of other symptoms of radiculopathy or myelopathy justifying the need for surgical intervention; * Radiographic confirmation of severe facet joint disease or degeneration. * Osteoporosis: * Severe diabetes mellitus requiring daily insulin management; * Active malignancy: a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless the patient has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years; * Tumor as source of symptoms; * Symptomatic DDD or significant cervical spondylosis at two or more levels; * Known or suspected allergy to cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, titanium, or polyethylene; * Severe myelopathy to the extent that the patient is wheelchair bound; * Pregnant (verified in patients of childbearing potential by a negative urine pregnancy test when preadmission testing is obtained), or interested in becoming pregnant during the duration of the study; * Autoimmune disorders that impact the musculoskeletal system (e.g., lupus, rheumatoid arthritis; ankylosing spondylitis); * Spinal axis disease (thoracic or lumbar) to the extent that surgical consideration is likely anticipated within 6 months after the cervical randomized procedure; * Other degenerative joint disease (e.g. shoulder, hip, knee) to the extent that surgical consideration is likely anticipated within 6 months after the cervical randomized procedure; * Previous spine surgery within the 6 months preceding the cervical randomized procedure; * Current or recent history of substance abuse (drug or alcohol); * Morbid obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) \> 40 or more than 100 lbs. over ideal body weight; * Currently using, or planning to use, bone growth stimulators in the cervical spine; * Use of any other investigational drug or medical device within the last 30 days prior to surgery * Currently a prisoner; or * Currently pursuing personal litigation related to the neck or cervical spine injury; however, involvement in worker's compensation related litigation is not a required exclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Individual Patient Overall Success24 MonthsIndividual patient overall success defined as ≥20% improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) from preoperative score, no device failures requiring revision, reoperation or removal, and the absence of radiographic or major complications during the 24-month follow-up period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Neck Pain Visual Analog Scale24 MonthsMean neck pain at 24 months on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).
Worst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale24 MonthsImprovement of ≥20mm in worst arm pain at 24 months compared to baseline.
Mean Worst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale24 MonthsMean worst arm pain at 24 months on a 0-100mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).
Clinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)24 MonthsImprovement in NDI of ≥20% at 24 months compared to baseline.
Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)24 MonthsMean NDI at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).
Clinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)24 MonthsImprovement of ≥15% on SF-36 PCS at 24 months compared to baseline.
Neck Pain Visual Analog Scale24 MonthsImprovement of ≥20mm in neck pain at 24 months compared to baseline.
Clinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)24 MonthsImprovement of ≥15% on the SF-36 MCS at 24 months compared to baseline.
Mean SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)24 MonthsMean SF-36 MCS at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).
Dysphagia for Swallowing24 MonthsMean dysphagia for swallowing at 24 months on a 0-100mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).
Patient Satisfaction24 MonthsMean Patient Satisfaction at 24 months on a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (higher value is better).
Nurick's Classification of Disability (Myelopathy)24 MonthsMaintenance or improvement in Nurick's Classification from baseline to 24 months. Nurick's classification is a six-point scale, graded 0 to 5. A grade of 0 indicates no symptoms at all, while a grade of 5 is a bed or chair-bound patient. A patient maintained if their Nurick classification grade remained the same or improved if it decreased from baseline to 24 months.
Flexion/Extension Range of Motion at the Operative Level24 MonthsMean flexion/extension range of motion at operative level at 24 months. The operative level is defined as the cervical spinal level at which the surgical procedure was performed.
Mean SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)24 MonthsMean SF-36 PCS at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Each clinical site could treat up to two (2) non-randomized investigational training patients prior to entering the randomized phase of the clinical trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PCM Cervical Disc - Investigational
PCM Cervical Disc replacement in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1
218
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control Group
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a cervical plate and bone graft in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1
185
Total403

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyNot treated67

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPCM Cervical Disc - InvestigationalAnterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupTotal
Age, Continuous45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants5 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
10 participants7 participants17 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
202 participants170 participants372 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
218 participants185 participants403 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
105 Participants89 Participants194 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
113 Participants96 Participants209 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
180 / 214163 / 190
serious
Total, serious adverse events
68 / 21457 / 190

Outcome results

Primary

Individual Patient Overall Success

Individual patient overall success defined as ≥20% improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) from preoperative score, no device failures requiring revision, reoperation or removal, and the absence of radiographic or major complications during the 24-month follow-up period.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalIndividual Patient Overall Success142 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupIndividual Patient Overall Success98 participants
Secondary

Clinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)

Improvement in NDI of ≥20% at 24 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalClinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)156 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupClinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)123 participants
Secondary

Clinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)

Improvement in NDI of ≥15-points at 24 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalClinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)149 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupClinically Significant Improvement on Neck Disability Index (NDI)114 participants
Secondary

Clinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)

Improvement of ≥15% on the SF-36 MCS at 24 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalClinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)87 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupClinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)75 participants
Secondary

Clinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)

Improvement of ≥15% on SF-36 PCS at 24 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalClinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)133 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupClinically Significant Improvement on SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)98 participants
Secondary

Dysphagia for Swallowing

Mean dysphagia for swallowing at 24 months on a 0-100mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalDysphagia for Swallowing8.8 mmStandard Deviation 16.3
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupDysphagia for Swallowing12.1 mmStandard Deviation 20.1
Secondary

Flexion/Extension Range of Motion at the Operative Level

Mean flexion/extension range of motion at operative level at 24 months. The operative level is defined as the cervical spinal level at which the surgical procedure was performed.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalFlexion/Extension Range of Motion at the Operative Level5.7 degreesStandard Deviation 3.9
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupFlexion/Extension Range of Motion at the Operative Level0.8 degreesStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)

Mean NDI at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalMean Neck Disability Index (NDI)21.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupMean Neck Disability Index (NDI)25.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Secondary

Mean Neck Pain Visual Analog Scale

Mean neck pain at 24 months on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalMean Neck Pain Visual Analog Scale26.1 mmStandard Deviation 28.7
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupMean Neck Pain Visual Analog Scale30.4 mmStandard Deviation 28.3
Secondary

Mean SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)

Mean SF-36 MCS at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalMean SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)50.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupMean SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)49.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Secondary

Mean SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)

Mean SF-36 PCS at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalMean SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)46.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupMean SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)45.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Secondary

Mean Worst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale

Mean worst arm pain at 24 months on a 0-100mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalMean Worst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale24.9 mmStandard Deviation 29.2
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupMean Worst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale27.5 mmStandard Deviation 28.3
Secondary

Neck Pain Visual Analog Scale

Improvement of ≥20mm in neck pain at 24 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalNeck Pain Visual Analog Scale139 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupNeck Pain Visual Analog Scale113 participants
Secondary

Nurick's Classification of Disability (Myelopathy)

Maintenance or improvement in Nurick's Classification from baseline to 24 months. Nurick's classification is a six-point scale, graded 0 to 5. A grade of 0 indicates no symptoms at all, while a grade of 5 is a bed or chair-bound patient. A patient maintained if their Nurick classification grade remained the same or improved if it decreased from baseline to 24 months.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol with extended windows

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalNurick's Classification of Disability (Myelopathy)185 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupNurick's Classification of Disability (Myelopathy)148 participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

Mean Patient Satisfaction at 24 months on a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (higher value is better).

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalPatient Satisfaction82.8 mmStandard Deviation 27.1
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupPatient Satisfaction81.4 mmStandard Deviation 25.7
Secondary

Worst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale

Improvement of ≥20mm in worst arm pain at 24 months compared to baseline.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PCM Cervical Disc-InvestigationalWorst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale148 participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - Control GroupWorst Arm Pain Visual Analog Scale113 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026