Skip to content

Long-term Safety Study of Open-label Pramipexole ER in Patients With Advanced PD

Long-term Safety Study of Open-label Pramipexole Extended Release (ER) in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00577460
Enrollment
391
Registered
2007-12-20
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

The general aim of this study is to obtain long-term safety and tolerability data on pramipexole extended release (ER), in daily doses from 0.375mg to 4.5mg once daily (qd), in patients who have previously completed a pramipexole double-blind study in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) (248.525 trial).

Interventions

DRUGPramipexole

Pramipexole ER 0.375 -4.5 mg

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo tablets identical to Pramipexole ER tablets

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
32 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Completion of the double-blind trial 248.525 2. Male or female patient with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), with a Modified Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2 to 4 at on-time, and a concomitant treatment with standard or controlled release L-Dopa+, or a combination of L-Dopa+ and entacapone. 3. Patient willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures. In particular the patient should be able to recognise the off-time and on-time periods during waking hours and the patient (or a family member or a guardian) should be able to record them accurately in the patient diary. 4. Signed informed consent obtained before any study procedures are carried out (in accordance with International Conference of Harmonization - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines and local legislation).

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients prematurely withdrawn from the double-blind trial 248.525 2. Atypical parkinsonian syndromes due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis or degenerative diseases 3. Any psychiatric disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria that could prevent compliance or completion of the study and/or put the patient at risk if he/she takes part in the study 4. History of psychosis, except history of drug induced hallucinations 5. History of deep brain stimulation 6. Clinically significant ECG abnormalities at baseline 7. Clinically significant hypotension and/or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension at baseline 8. Malignant melanoma or history of previously treated malignant melanoma 9. Any other clinically significant disease, whether treated or not, that could put the patient at risk or could prevent compliance or completion of the study 10. Pregnancy or breast-feeding 11. Sexually active female of childbearing potential not using a medically approved method of birth control 12. Serum levels of aspartate transaminase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase) (SGPT)), alkaline phosphatase (AP) or bilirubin \> 2 upper limit normal (ULN) at baseline 13. Patients with a creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min at baseline 14. Any medication with central dopaminergic antagonist activity within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit 15. Any of the following drugs within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit: methylphenidate, cinnarizine, amphetamines 16. Flunarizine within 3 months prior to baseline 17. Known hypersensitivity to pramipexole or its excipients 18. Drug abuse, according to investigators judgement, within 2 years prior to baseline 19. Participation in investigational drug studies other than the trial 248.525, or use of other investigational drugs within one month or five times the half-life of the investigational drug (whichever is longer) prior to baseline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse Events80 weeksThe aim of this study was to obtain long-term safety and tolerability data on pramipexole ER, in patients who have previously completed a pramipexole double blind study in advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) (248.525 (NCT00466167)). Therefore these items were considered as a safety evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients Successfully Switched From Pramipexole (PPX) IR or ER to ER Assessed on UPDRS II+IIIOne weekUnified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Successfully switched means: UPDRS II+III baseline score \>20 without a relative worsening of UPDRS II+III score \> 15% from baseline or UPDRS II+III baseline score \<=20 without an absolute worsening of UPDRS II+III score \> 3 from baseline UPDRS II+III ranging from 0 (normal) to 160 (severe). UPDRS part II measures activities of daily living, part III measures motor symptoms
UPDRS II+III Change From Open Label (OL) BaselineOL Baseline and week 80UPDRS II+III ranging from 0 (normal) to 160 (severe). UPDRS part II measures activities of daily living, part III measures motor symptoms
Number of Participants With UPDRS II+III ResponseWeek 80A response means an improvement of \>=20% in UPDRS II+III from OL baseline UPDRS II+III ranging from 0 (normal) to 160 (severe). UPDRS part II measures activities of daily living, part III measures motor symptoms
Number of Patients Successfully Switched From PPX IR or ER to ER Assessed on Off-timeOne weekA patient was considered as successfully switched if he/she has converted to ER without a worsening of off time by more than 12.5% from baseline. Off-time is based on patient diary data and describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease).
Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours Total Score: Change From BaselineBaseline and week 80Percentage off-time based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). A negative change implies improvement
Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 WeeksBaseline and week 80Percentage on-time based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement.
Percentage on Time With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 WeeksBaseline and week 80Percentage on-time with non troublesome dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement
Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia or With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 WeeksBaseline and week 80Percentage on-time without dyskinesia or with non troublesome dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement
Percentage on Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 WeeksBaseline and week 80Percentage on-time with troublesome dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement
Number of Participants With Response in CGI-I32 weeksClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I), CGI-I scores ranging from '1' (very much improved) to '7' (very much worse). For patients previously treated with Placebo, all patients with at least much improved were considered as responders. For patients previously treated with PPX ER or IR, all patients with no change to very much improved were considered as responders
Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I32 weeksPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), PGI-I scores ranging from '1' (very much better) to '7' (very much worse). For patients previously treated with Placebo, all patients with at least much better were considered as responders. For patients previously treated with PPX ER or IR, all patients with no change to very much better were considered as responders
Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I for Early Morning Off Symptoms32 weeksPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for early morning off symptoms, PGI-I scores ranging from '1' (very much better) to '7' (very much worse). For patients previously treated with Placebo, all patients with at least much better were considered as responders. For patients previously treated with PPX ER or IR, all patients with no change to very much better were considered as responders
UPDRS I Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80OL baseline and week 80UPDRS I ranging from 0 (normal) to 16 (severe). UPDRS I measures Mentation, Behavior and Mood
UPDRS II Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80OL baseline and week 80UPDRS II ranging from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). UPDRS Part II is calculated as the average of UPDRS part II at on and UPDRS part II at off-period for each of the 13 activities
UPDRS III Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80OL baseline and week 80UPDRS III ranging from 0 (normal) to 108 (severe). UPDRS part III measures motor symptoms
Number of Participants With Response in Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours80 weeksResponse means \>=20% improvement relative to OL baseline in the % off-time during waking hours
Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80OL baseline and week 80PFS-16 (Parkinson fatigue scale) ranging from 16 (better perceived health status) to 80 (severe symptoms of the disease) measuring aspects of fatigue that are relevant to patients with PD
Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80OL baseline and week 80
Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineOL baseline and week 80
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events80 weeks
Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetOL Baseline and Week 80ESS Total score ranges from zero (best) to 24 (worst); scale has 8 items, each rated from zero (no chance of dozing) to 3 (high chance of dozing)
Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetBaseline, 80 weeksThe mMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulsive control disorders. The scale was modified to focus behaviors of: pathological gambling, compulsive buying and compulsive sexual behavioral.
UPDRS IV Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80OL baseline and week 80UPDRS IV ranging from 0 (normal) to 23 (severe). UPDRS IV measures complications of therapy

Countries

Austria, Czechia, Hungary, India, Italy, Philippines, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PPX ER (Previous Placebo)
Pramipexole ER Treatment with placebo in previous trial
129
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)
Pramipexole ER Treatment with Pramipexole ER in previous trial
123
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)
Pramipexole ER Treatment with Pramipexole IR in previous trial
139
Total391

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event11714
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up034
Overall StudyOther032
Overall StudyProtocol Violation011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject556

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPPX ER (Previous Placebo)PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Total
Age, Continuous61.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
61.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
61.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants55 Participants65 Participants178 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants68 Participants74 Participants213 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
87 / 12974 / 12381 / 139242 / 391
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 12911 / 12314 / 13939 / 391

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse Events

The aim of this study was to obtain long-term safety and tolerability data on pramipexole ER, in patients who have previously completed a pramipexole double blind study in advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) (248.525 (NCT00466167)). Therefore these items were considered as a safety evaluation.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: Patients from Treated Set (defined as all patients who were dispensed study drug and were documented to have at least one dose of investigational treatment)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Serious Adverse Events10.9 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Adverse Drug Reactions52.7 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Adverse Events85.3 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Adverse Drug Reactions48.8 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Adverse Events83.7 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Serious Adverse Events8.9 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Adverse Events79.9 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Serious Adverse Events10.1 Percentage of participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Reactions, Serious Adverse EventsPercentage of Patients with Adverse Drug Reactions45.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline61.9 kgStandard Deviation 13
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL63.6 kgStandard Deviation 13.8
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline61.7 kgStandard Deviation 14
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL61.7 kgStandard Deviation 15
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline63.8 kgStandard Deviation 14.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Female Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL63.6 kgStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline73.0 kgStandard Deviation 15.7
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL73.9 kgStandard Deviation 16.4
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline72.1 kgStandard Deviation 12.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL72.7 kgStandard Deviation 12.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline70.8 kgStandard Deviation 13.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Body Weight of Male Patients, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL72.0 kgStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated Set

ESS Total score ranges from zero (best) to 24 (worst); scale has 8 items, each rated from zero (no chance of dozing) to 3 (high chance of dozing)

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetOL Baseline7.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetChange from baseline at end of OL0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetOL Baseline8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetChange from baseline at end of OL1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetOL Baseline8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Baseline and End of Open Label, Treated SetChange from baseline at end of OL1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Secondary

Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated Set

The mMIDI is a semi-structured interview designed to assess impulsive control disorders. The scale was modified to focus behaviors of: pathological gambling, compulsive buying and compulsive sexual behavioral.

Time frame: Baseline, 80 weeks

Population: Treated Set - all patients dispensed drug and documented to have taken at least one dose

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - compulsive sexual behavior2 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - compulsive buying2 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - pathological gambling0 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - compulsive sexual behavior2 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - pathological gambling0 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - compulsive buying0 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - compulsive buying2 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - pathological gambling0 participants
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (mMIDI), Frequency of Patients With at Least One Abnormal Behavior, Treated SetAbnormal behavior - compulsive sexual behavior0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL Baseline

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from Treated Set (all patients who were dispensed study drug and were documented to have at least one dose of investigational treatment) and treated until week 80

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineReduced56 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineIncreased29 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineUnchanged40 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineReduced33 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineIncreased39 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineUnchanged43 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineUnchanged53 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineReduced26 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineIncreased47 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineReduced115 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineIncreased115 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Changes in Pramipexole Doses After 80 Weeks Compared to Pramipexole Dose at OL BaselineUnchanged136 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with documentation of levodopa (L-DOPA) daily dose at week 80

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80No change93 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Increase8 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Decrease24 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80No change84 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Decrease12 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Increase18 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Decrease12 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80No change93 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Increase27 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Increase53 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80No change270 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With L-dopa Daily Dose Change: Change From OL Baseline at Week 80Decrease48 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response in CGI-I

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I), CGI-I scores ranging from '1' (very much improved) to '7' (very much worse). For patients previously treated with Placebo, all patients with at least much improved were considered as responders. For patients previously treated with PPX ER or IR, all patients with no change to very much improved were considered as responders

Time frame: 32 weeks

Population: Patients from FAS with values of CGI-I at week 32

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Response in CGI-I50 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in CGI-I106 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in CGI-I114 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Response in CGI-I270 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response in Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours

Response means \>=20% improvement relative to OL baseline in the % off-time during waking hours

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: Patients from FAS with values of off time during waking hours at 80 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Response in Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours35 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours40 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours28 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Response in Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours103 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), PGI-I scores ranging from '1' (very much better) to '7' (very much worse). For patients previously treated with Placebo, all patients with at least much better were considered as responders. For patients previously treated with PPX ER or IR, all patients with no change to very much better were considered as responders

Time frame: 32 weeks

Population: Patients from FAS with values of PGI-I at week 32

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I45 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I102 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I113 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Response in PGI-I260 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I for Early Morning Off Symptoms

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for early morning off symptoms, PGI-I scores ranging from '1' (very much better) to '7' (very much worse). For patients previously treated with Placebo, all patients with at least much better were considered as responders. For patients previously treated with PPX ER or IR, all patients with no change to very much better were considered as responders

Time frame: 32 weeks

Population: Patients from FAS with values of PGI-I for early morning off symptoms at week 32

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I for Early Morning Off Symptoms45 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I for Early Morning Off Symptoms103 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Response in PGI-I for Early Morning Off Symptoms112 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Response in PGI-I for Early Morning Off Symptoms260 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: The Treated Set (TS) included all patients who were dispensed study drug and were documented to have at least one dose of investigational treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events14 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events11 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events14 Patients
Total PPX ERNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events39 Patients
Secondary

Number of Participants With UPDRS II+III Response

A response means an improvement of \>=20% in UPDRS II+III from OL baseline UPDRS II+III ranging from 0 (normal) to 160 (severe). UPDRS part II measures activities of daily living, part III measures motor symptoms

Time frame: Week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS II+III at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Participants With UPDRS II+III Response35 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With UPDRS II+III Response30 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Participants With UPDRS II+III Response31 Patients
Secondary

Number of Patients Successfully Switched From PPX IR or ER to ER Assessed on Off-time

A patient was considered as successfully switched if he/she has converted to ER without a worsening of off time by more than 12.5% from baseline. Off-time is based on patient diary data and describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease).

Time frame: One week

Population: Patients from FAS and who maintain the final dose of the previous study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Number of Patients Successfully Switched From PPX IR or ER to ER Assessed on Off-time57 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Number of Patients Successfully Switched From PPX IR or ER to ER Assessed on Off-time70 Patients
Secondary

Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80

PFS-16 (Parkinson fatigue scale) ranging from 16 (better perceived health status) to 80 (severe symptoms of the disease) measuring aspects of fatigue that are relevant to patients with PD

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of PFS-16 score at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80-0.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 803.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 803.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
p-value: 0.0148ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0201ANCOVA
Secondary

Patients Successfully Switched From Pramipexole (PPX) IR or ER to ER Assessed on UPDRS II+III

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Successfully switched means: UPDRS II+III baseline score \>20 without a relative worsening of UPDRS II+III score \> 15% from baseline or UPDRS II+III baseline score \<=20 without an absolute worsening of UPDRS II+III score \> 3 from baseline UPDRS II+III ranging from 0 (normal) to 160 (severe). UPDRS part II measures activities of daily living, part III measures motor symptoms

Time frame: One week

Population: Patients from Full Analysis Set (FAS included all patients who were dispensed study medication, had received at least one dose of study drug and had provided any post-baseline efficacy assessment) and who maintain the final dose of the previous study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Patients Successfully Switched From Pramipexole (PPX) IR or ER to ER Assessed on UPDRS II+III88 Patients
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Patients Successfully Switched From Pramipexole (PPX) IR or ER to ER Assessed on UPDRS II+III106 Patients
Secondary

Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours Total Score: Change From Baseline

Percentage off-time based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). A negative change implies improvement

Time frame: Baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS II+III at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours Total Score: Change From Baseline-1.5 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours Total Score: Change From Baseline-0.3 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage Off Time During Waking Hours Total Score: Change From Baseline1.7 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2
p-value: 0.559ANCOVA
p-value: 0.1289ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage on Time With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks

Percentage on-time with non troublesome dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement

Time frame: Baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of on time during waking hours at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage on Time With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks3.8 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 1.8
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-2.7 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 1.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks0.2 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 1.8
p-value: 0.0009ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0573ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks

Percentage on-time based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of on time during waking hours at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-1.6 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks2.9 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.7
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-2.0 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.6
p-value: 0.1073ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8694ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia or With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks

Percentage on-time without dyskinesia or with non troublesome dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement

Time frame: Baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of on time during waking hours at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia or With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks1.8 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia or With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks0.7 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.3
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time Without Dyskinesia or With Non Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-0.9 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 2.3
p-value: 0.6434ANCOVA
p-value: 0.2469ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage on Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks

Percentage on-time with troublesome dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period when the patient has no symptoms of off-time and is not asleep. A positive change implies improvement

Time frame: Baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of on time during waking hours at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Percentage on Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-0.4 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-0.3 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 1.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Percentage on Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia During Waking Hours: Change From Baseline After 80 Weeks-0.7 percentage during waking hoursStandard Error 1.1
p-value: 0.9741ANCOVA
p-value: 0.762ANCOVA
Secondary

Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.8 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL77.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.3 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL78.1 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.3
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL76.4 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline78.3 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10.7
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL79.3 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 8.7
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline78.0 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL77.7 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.7 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL78.8 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10.4
Secondary

Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline120.2 mm HgStandard Deviation 13.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL121.9 mm HgStandard Deviation 15
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline121.1 mm HgStandard Deviation 16.4
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL121.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 14.3
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline120.9 mm HgStandard Deviation 15.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Standing Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL120.5 mm HgStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.4 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL77.4 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.3 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL78.3 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline77.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.4
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL77.2 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.3
Secondary

Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline73.6 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL75.8 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline72.6 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL74.2 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline73.2 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Pulse Rate, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL74.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated Set

Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 80

Population: Vital Signs Treated Set - All participants treated with study drug and have both baseline and week 80 vital sign data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline121.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 12.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL124.2 mm HgStandard Deviation 13.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline124.5 mm HgStandard Deviation 15.4
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL123.8 mm HgStandard Deviation 14.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetOL Baseline125.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 14.8
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)Supine Systolic Blood Pressure, Baseline and Week 80, Vital Signs Treated SetEnd of OL124.4 mm HgStandard Deviation 14.7
Secondary

UPDRS II+III Change From Open Label (OL) Baseline

UPDRS II+III ranging from 0 (normal) to 160 (severe). UPDRS part II measures activities of daily living, part III measures motor symptoms

Time frame: OL Baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS II+III at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)UPDRS II+III Change From Open Label (OL) Baseline-3.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS II+III Change From Open Label (OL) Baseline1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS II+III Change From Open Label (OL) Baseline2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Comparison: PPX ER versus Placebop-value: 0.0039ANCOVA
Comparison: PPX IR versus Placebop-value: 0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

UPDRS III Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80

UPDRS III ranging from 0 (normal) to 108 (severe). UPDRS part III measures motor symptoms

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS III at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)UPDRS III Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS III Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS III Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 801.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
p-value: 0.0015ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0002ANCOVA
Secondary

UPDRS II Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80

UPDRS II ranging from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). UPDRS Part II is calculated as the average of UPDRS part II at on and UPDRS part II at off-period for each of the 13 activities

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS II at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)UPDRS II Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS II Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS II Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 801.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
p-value: 0.1713ANCOVA
p-value: 0.013ANCOVA
Secondary

UPDRS I Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80

UPDRS I ranging from 0 (normal) to 16 (severe). UPDRS I measures Mentation, Behavior and Mood

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS I at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)UPDRS I Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS I Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS I Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
p-value: 0.0831ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0759ANCOVA
Secondary

UPDRS IV Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80

UPDRS IV ranging from 0 (normal) to 23 (severe). UPDRS IV measures complications of therapy

Time frame: OL baseline and week 80

Population: Patients from FAS with values of UPDRS IV at week 80

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PPX ER (Previous PPX ER)UPDRS IV Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS IV Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 80-0.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
PPX ER (Previous PPX IR)UPDRS IV Total Score and Change From OL Baseline at Week 800.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
p-value: 0.876ANCOVA
p-value: 0.5113ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026