Skip to content

Bone Microarchitecture in Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women

A 12-month, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Comparing 150 mg Once-a-month Risedronate and Placebo Using 3-dimensional Micro MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging).

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00577395
Enrollment
13
Registered
2007-12-20
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2013-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare the difference in bone microarchitecture of the distal radius at month 12 in postmenopausal osteopenic women treated with risedronate 150mg taken once a month compared to placebo.

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

oral tablet once a month for 12 months

DRUGrisedronate

tablet, 150 mg once a month for 12 months

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Warner Chilcott
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 57 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female: 40 and 57 years of age inclusive * cessation of menstruation (surgical or natural) between 12 and 36 months prior to study enrollment * have osteopenia defines as having the following: have osteopenia defined as having the following: * Lumbar spine (L1-L4) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T score -1 and less than -2.5 AND a total hip T score of greater than -2.5 OR * Lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD T score greater than -2.5 AND a total hip T score -1 and less than -2.5; * have a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

* history of uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, osteomalacia * use of medications within 3 months of starting study drug that impact bone metabolism such as glucocorticoids, estrogens, calcitonin, calcitriol, other bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone * hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia of any cause

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Erosion Index (A Ratio of Curve-like Structures to Plate-like Structures and is a Measure of the Degree of Structural Degradation) of the Distal Radius12 monthsThe percent was change from baseline in erosion index at the distal radius between the risedronate and placebo groups at Month 12 (the lower the percent change in erosion index, the greater the improvement of structural degradation); the last valid postbaseline measurement was to be used when the Month 12 value was missing (Last Observation Carried Forward or LOCF). NOTE: The study was unable to recruit sufficient numbers of patients to meet with the protocol specified numbers, thus it was terminated early after 5 months. No efficacy analyses were performed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Erosion Index of the Distal Radius6 monthsStudy was terminated prior to acquiring any efficacy endpoints. No efficacy analyses were performed.

Countries

Argentina, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Beginning with the first patient screened on June 18th, 2008, a total of 51 patients were screened for inclusion into the study, of which 38 were excluded from further participation.

Pre-assignment details

The Screening visit was conducted within 45 days of randomization. After obtaining written informed consent, patients underwent a preliminary screening, including Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur. The most frequent reason for screening failure was DXA results.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
One 150 mg Risedronate Once a Month
one 150 mg risedronate once a month, orally
7
Placebo Tablet Once a Month
Placebo tablet once a month, orally
6
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyStudy was terminated early by Sponsor76

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOne 150 mg Risedronate Once a MonthPlacebo Tablet Once a MonthTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Age Continuous51.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
53.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
52.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants3 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 72 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Erosion Index (A Ratio of Curve-like Structures to Plate-like Structures and is a Measure of the Degree of Structural Degradation) of the Distal Radius

The percent was change from baseline in erosion index at the distal radius between the risedronate and placebo groups at Month 12 (the lower the percent change in erosion index, the greater the improvement of structural degradation); the last valid postbaseline measurement was to be used when the Month 12 value was missing (Last Observation Carried Forward or LOCF). NOTE: The study was unable to recruit sufficient numbers of patients to meet with the protocol specified numbers, thus it was terminated early after 5 months. No efficacy analyses were performed.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Study was terminated prior to acquiring any efficacy endpoints. No efficacy analyses were performed.

Secondary

Erosion Index of the Distal Radius

Study was terminated prior to acquiring any efficacy endpoints. No efficacy analyses were performed.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated prior to acquiring any efficacy endpoints. No efficacy analyses were performed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026