Skip to content

Determining Optimal Dose and Duration of Diuretic Treatment in People With Acute Heart Failure (The DOSE-AHF Study)

Diuretic Optimal Strategy Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (The DOSE-AHF Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00577135
Enrollment
308
Registered
2007-12-19
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2018-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Loop Diuretics, Furosemide, Fluid Overload, Cardio Renal Failure

Brief summary

Heart failure is a disorder in which the heart does not pump blood adequately. This can lead to several serious problems, including reduced blood flow throughout the body, congestion of blood in the veins and lungs, and fluid accumulation in various organs and limbs. Diuretics are often used to address the problem of fluid accumulation, but the optimal dose and the amount of time over which to administer each dose are unclear. This study will compare high and low doses of diuretics administered over longer and shorter periods of time to determine the safest and most effective combination.

Detailed description

Heart failure is a common disorder in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the needs of the rest of the body. Heart failure symptoms include shortness of breath, swelling, and fatigue. Standard treatment for the swelling associated with heart failure includes the use of diuretic medications, such as furosemide, which cause urination and the removal of excess fluids in the body. Although furosemide has been used to treat heart failure patients for many years, it is still unclear how much of the drug to use, and over what time period the drug should be given. This study will evaluate whether furosemide treatment is safer and more effective when the drug is given in high doses versus low doses and in two to three separate doses versus one continuous infusion. Participants in this study will begin study procedures within the first 24 hours of their hospital admission for heart failure. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the following four treatments: high dose furosemide via continuous intravenous (IV) infusion and placebo every 12 hours via IV bolus; low dose furosemide via continuous IV infusion and placebo every 12 hours via IV bolus; high dose furosemide every 12 hours via IV bolus and placebo via continuous IV infusion; and low dose furosemide every 12 hours via IV bolus and placebo via continuous IV infusion. Each participant will receive treatment for the first 72 hours of his or her hospital stay. Participants will answer questionnaires and undergo physical examinations and blood tests during the first 96 hours of hospitalization and again before hospital discharge or on Day 7, if that occurs first. Participants will be asked to return to their doctors 60 days following hospital discharge to evaluate their responses to treatment.

Interventions

DRUGFurosemide-Q12 hour bolus

Q12 hours bolus

DRUGFurosemide-Continuous Infusion

Continuous infusion

DRUGFurosemide-Low Intensification

1x oral dose

DRUGFurosemide-High Intensification

2.5x oral dose

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prior clinical diagnosis of heart failure that was treated with daily oral loop diuretics for at least 1 month * Current diagnosis of heart failure, as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography) * Daily oral dose of furosemide between 80 mg and 240 mg (or equivalent) * Identified within 24 hours of hospital admission * Current treatment plan includes IV loop diuretics for at least 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) less than 250 mg/mL or N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) less than 1000 mg/mL * Received IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration therapy for heart failure since initial presentation * Treatment plan during current hospitalization includes IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration for heart failure * Substantial diuretic response to pre-randomization diuretic dosing such that higher doses of diuretics would be medically inadvisable * Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg * Serum creatinine level greater than 3.0 mg/dL at baseline or currently undergoing renal replacement therapy * Hemodynamically significant arrhythmias * Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks prior to study entry * Active myocarditis * Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy * Severe stenotic valvular disease * Restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy * Complex congenital heart disease * Constrictive pericarditis * Non-cardiac pulmonary edema * Clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity * Need for mechanical hemodynamic support * Sepsis * Terminal illness (other than heart failure) with expected survival time of less than 1 year * History of adverse reaction to the study drugs * Use of IV iodinated radiocontrast material within 72 hours prior to study entry or planned during hospitalization * Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized clinical trial during this hospitalization * Inability to comply with planned study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog ScaleMeasured at 72 hoursGlobal Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-7200; higher score is better
Change in Serum CreatinineMeasured at baseline and 72 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Weightbaseline and 96 hours
Proportion of Patients Free of CongestionMeasured at 72 hours
Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog ScalesMeasured at 24 hoursGlobal Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better
Change in Serum Creatininebaseline and 24 hours
Change in Cystatin Cbaseline and 72 hours
Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog ScaleMeasured at 24 hoursGlobal Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better
Dyspnea VAS48 hoursDyspnea Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-4800; higher score is better
Change in Uric Acidbaseline and 72 hours
Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptidebaseline and 72 hoursChange in NTproBNP
Change in NTproBNPbaseline and Day 7
Presence of Cardiorenal SyndromeWithin 72 hours
Treatment FailureWithin 72 hoursTreatment failure is defined as the patient met cardiorenal syndrome endpoint, worsening or persistent heart failure endpoint, patient died, or there was clinical evidence of overdiuresis requiring intervention within first 72 hours after randomization
Net Fluid LossThrough 24 hours

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Q12 Hours Bolus & Low Intensification74
Q12 Hours Bolus & High Intensification82
Continuous Infusion & Low Intensification77
Continuous Infusion & High Intensification75
Total308

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQ12 Hours Bolus & Low IntensificationQ12 Hours Bolus & High IntensificationContinuous Infusion & Low IntensificationContinuous Infusion & High IntensificationTotal
Age, Continuous67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants23 Participants23 Participants18 Participants82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants59 Participants54 Participants57 Participants226 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
69 / 15667 / 15276 / 15160 / 157

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: Measured at baseline and 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Serum Creatinine0.05 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.3
Continuous InfusionChange in Serum Creatinine0.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.3
Low IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.04 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.29
High IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.08 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.31
Primary

Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale

Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-7200; higher score is better

Time frame: Measured at 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale4236 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1440.4
Continuous InfusionPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale4372.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1404.4
Low IntensificationPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale4170.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1436.3
High IntensificationPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale4429.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1401.4
Secondary

Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide

Change in NTproBNP

Time frame: baseline and 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in B-type Natriuretic Peptide-1316.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4364.3
Continuous InfusionChange in B-type Natriuretic Peptide-1773.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3827.5
Low IntensificationChange in B-type Natriuretic Peptide-1193.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4094.1
High IntensificationChange in B-type Natriuretic Peptide-1881.6 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4105.4
Secondary

Change in Cystatin C

Time frame: baseline and 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Cystatin C0.11 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.3
Continuous InfusionChange in Cystatin C0.17 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.35
Low IntensificationChange in Cystatin C0.12 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.35
High IntensificationChange in Cystatin C0.17 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Change in Cystatin C

Time frame: baseline and day 60

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Cystatin C0.20 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.51
Continuous InfusionChange in Cystatin C0.16 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.43
Low IntensificationChange in Cystatin C0.18 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.47
High IntensificationChange in Cystatin C0.18 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.46
Secondary

Change in Cystatin C

Time frame: baseline and day 7

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Cystatin C0.21 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.43
Continuous InfusionChange in Cystatin C0.16 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.48
Low IntensificationChange in Cystatin C0.16 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.48
High IntensificationChange in Cystatin C0.21 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.42
Secondary

Change in NTproBNP

Time frame: baseline and Day 7

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in NTproBNP-1133.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4883.4
Continuous InfusionChange in NTproBNP-1552.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4875.8
Low IntensificationChange in NTproBNP-1037.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5211.8
High IntensificationChange in NTproBNP-1629.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4524.6
Secondary

Change in NTproBNP

Time frame: baseline and Day 60

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in NTproBNP-1449.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5010.1
Continuous InfusionChange in NTproBNP-1035.1 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6962.9
Low IntensificationChange in NTproBNP-1445.6 pg/mLStandard Deviation 5805.3
High IntensificationChange in NTproBNP-1038.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6364.3
Secondary

Change in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: baseline and 48 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Serum Creatinine0.02 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.23
Continuous InfusionChange in Serum Creatinine0.05 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.26
Low IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.01 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.23
High IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.06 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.25
Secondary

Change in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: baseline and 96 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Serum Creatinine0.06 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.32
Continuous InfusionChange in Serum Creatinine0.05 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.32
Low IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.05 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.33
High IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Change in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: baseline and day 7

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Serum Creatinine0.10 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.4
Continuous InfusionChange in Serum Creatinine0.04 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.32
Low IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.33
High IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.08 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Change in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: baseline and day 60

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Serum Creatinine0.09 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.41
Continuous InfusionChange in Serum Creatinine0.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.45
Low IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.09 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.43
High IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Change in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: baseline and 24 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Serum Creatinine0.00 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.18
Continuous InfusionChange in Serum Creatinine0.01 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.17
Low IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine-0.01 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.16
High IntensificationChange in Serum Creatinine0.02 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

Change in Uric Acid

Time frame: baseline and day 7

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Uric Acid0.40 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.47
Continuous InfusionChange in Uric Acid0.09 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.96
Low IntensificationChange in Uric Acid0.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.69
High IntensificationChange in Uric Acid0.42 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.75
Secondary

Change in Uric Acid

Time frame: baseline and 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Uric Acid0.30 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.02
Continuous InfusionChange in Uric Acid0.44 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.2
Low IntensificationChange in Uric Acid0.11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.01
High IntensificationChange in Uric Acid0.61 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.15
Secondary

Change in Uric Acid

Time frame: baseline and Day 60

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Uric Acid-0.09 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.28
Continuous InfusionChange in Uric Acid-0.71 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.27
Low IntensificationChange in Uric Acid-0.13 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.33
High IntensificationChange in Uric Acid-0.67 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.24
Secondary

Change in Weight

Time frame: baseline and 96 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusChange in Weight-8.0 lbsStandard Deviation 7.8
Continuous InfusionChange in Weight-9.1 lbsStandard Deviation 10.2
Low IntensificationChange in Weight-7.4 lbsStandard Deviation 10.1
High IntensificationChange in Weight-9.6 lbsStandard Deviation 7.9
Secondary

Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales

Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better

Time frame: Measured at 24 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusDyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales1370.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 486
Continuous InfusionDyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales1453.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 518
Low IntensificationDyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales1426.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 504.5
High IntensificationDyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales1398.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 502.7
Secondary

Dyspnea VAS

Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-4800; higher score is better

Time frame: 48 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusDyspnea VAS2876.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 960.1
Continuous InfusionDyspnea VAS3033.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1039.3
Low IntensificationDyspnea VAS2924.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1012.8
High IntensificationDyspnea VAS2981.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 992.9
Secondary

Dyspnea VAS

Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-7200; higher score is better

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusDyspnea VAS4455.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1468.4
Continuous InfusionDyspnea VAS4699.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1572.7
Low IntensificationDyspnea VAS4477.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1549.7
High IntensificationDyspnea VAS4668.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1496
Secondary

Net Fluid Loss

Time frame: Through 48 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusNet Fluid Loss2996.7 mLStandard Deviation 2490.5
Continuous InfusionNet Fluid Loss3120.6 mLStandard Deviation 2504.2
Low IntensificationNet Fluid Loss2334.8 mLStandard Deviation 2006.4
High IntensificationNet Fluid Loss3747.4 mLStandard Deviation 2716.1
Secondary

Net Fluid Loss

Time frame: Through 24 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusNet Fluid Loss1595.7 mLStandard Deviation 1476.7
Continuous InfusionNet Fluid Loss1796.4 mLStandard Deviation 1685.1
Low IntensificationNet Fluid Loss1209.7 mLStandard Deviation 1309.3
High IntensificationNet Fluid Loss2149.6 mLStandard Deviation 1681.7
Secondary

Net Fluid Loss

Time frame: Through 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusNet Fluid Loss4236.7 mLStandard Deviation 3207.6
Continuous InfusionNet Fluid Loss4249.2 mLStandard Deviation 3104.3
Low IntensificationNet Fluid Loss3575.2 mLStandard Deviation 2634.8
High IntensificationNet Fluid Loss4898.9 mLStandard Deviation 3478.5
Secondary

Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale

Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-4800; higher score is better

Time frame: 48 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale2722.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 940
Continuous InfusionPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale2792.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 932.7
Low IntensificationPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale2706.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 931.5
High IntensificationPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale2805.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 939.8
Secondary

Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale

Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better

Time frame: Measured at 24 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Q 12 Hour BolusPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale1280.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 469.7
Continuous InfusionPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale1303.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 465.1
Low IntensificationPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale1288.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 455.9
High IntensificationPatient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale1294.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 478.4
Secondary

Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome

Time frame: Within 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Q 12 Hour BolusPresence of Cardiorenal Syndrome17.4 percentage of participants
Continuous InfusionPresence of Cardiorenal Syndrome19.2 percentage of participants
Low IntensificationPresence of Cardiorenal Syndrome13.6 percentage of participants
High IntensificationPresence of Cardiorenal Syndrome22.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion

Time frame: Measured at 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Q 12 Hour BolusProportion of Patients Free of Congestion14.4 percentage of participants
Continuous InfusionProportion of Patients Free of Congestion15.3 percentage of participants
Low IntensificationProportion of Patients Free of Congestion11.2 percentage of participants
High IntensificationProportion of Patients Free of Congestion18.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as the patient met cardiorenal syndrome endpoint, worsening or persistent heart failure endpoint, patient died, or there was clinical evidence of overdiuresis requiring intervention within first 72 hours after randomization

Time frame: Within 72 hours

Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Q 12 Hour BolusTreatment Failure38.1 percentage of participants
Continuous InfusionTreatment Failure38.8 percentage of participants
Low IntensificationTreatment Failure36.7 percentage of participants
High IntensificationTreatment Failure40.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026