Heart Failure
Conditions
Keywords
Loop Diuretics, Furosemide, Fluid Overload, Cardio Renal Failure
Brief summary
Heart failure is a disorder in which the heart does not pump blood adequately. This can lead to several serious problems, including reduced blood flow throughout the body, congestion of blood in the veins and lungs, and fluid accumulation in various organs and limbs. Diuretics are often used to address the problem of fluid accumulation, but the optimal dose and the amount of time over which to administer each dose are unclear. This study will compare high and low doses of diuretics administered over longer and shorter periods of time to determine the safest and most effective combination.
Detailed description
Heart failure is a common disorder in which the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the needs of the rest of the body. Heart failure symptoms include shortness of breath, swelling, and fatigue. Standard treatment for the swelling associated with heart failure includes the use of diuretic medications, such as furosemide, which cause urination and the removal of excess fluids in the body. Although furosemide has been used to treat heart failure patients for many years, it is still unclear how much of the drug to use, and over what time period the drug should be given. This study will evaluate whether furosemide treatment is safer and more effective when the drug is given in high doses versus low doses and in two to three separate doses versus one continuous infusion. Participants in this study will begin study procedures within the first 24 hours of their hospital admission for heart failure. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the following four treatments: high dose furosemide via continuous intravenous (IV) infusion and placebo every 12 hours via IV bolus; low dose furosemide via continuous IV infusion and placebo every 12 hours via IV bolus; high dose furosemide every 12 hours via IV bolus and placebo via continuous IV infusion; and low dose furosemide every 12 hours via IV bolus and placebo via continuous IV infusion. Each participant will receive treatment for the first 72 hours of his or her hospital stay. Participants will answer questionnaires and undergo physical examinations and blood tests during the first 96 hours of hospitalization and again before hospital discharge or on Day 7, if that occurs first. Participants will be asked to return to their doctors 60 days following hospital discharge to evaluate their responses to treatment.
Interventions
Q12 hours bolus
Continuous infusion
1x oral dose
2.5x oral dose
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Prior clinical diagnosis of heart failure that was treated with daily oral loop diuretics for at least 1 month * Current diagnosis of heart failure, as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography) * Daily oral dose of furosemide between 80 mg and 240 mg (or equivalent) * Identified within 24 hours of hospital admission * Current treatment plan includes IV loop diuretics for at least 48 hours
Exclusion criteria
* Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) less than 250 mg/mL or N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) less than 1000 mg/mL * Received IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration therapy for heart failure since initial presentation * Treatment plan during current hospitalization includes IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration for heart failure * Substantial diuretic response to pre-randomization diuretic dosing such that higher doses of diuretics would be medically inadvisable * Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg * Serum creatinine level greater than 3.0 mg/dL at baseline or currently undergoing renal replacement therapy * Hemodynamically significant arrhythmias * Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks prior to study entry * Active myocarditis * Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy * Severe stenotic valvular disease * Restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy * Complex congenital heart disease * Constrictive pericarditis * Non-cardiac pulmonary edema * Clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity * Need for mechanical hemodynamic support * Sepsis * Terminal illness (other than heart failure) with expected survival time of less than 1 year * History of adverse reaction to the study drugs * Use of IV iodinated radiocontrast material within 72 hours prior to study entry or planned during hospitalization * Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized clinical trial during this hospitalization * Inability to comply with planned study procedures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | Measured at 72 hours | Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-7200; higher score is better |
| Change in Serum Creatinine | Measured at baseline and 72 hours | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Weight | baseline and 96 hours | — |
| Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion | Measured at 72 hours | — |
| Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales | Measured at 24 hours | Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better |
| Change in Serum Creatinine | baseline and 24 hours | — |
| Change in Cystatin C | baseline and 72 hours | — |
| Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | Measured at 24 hours | Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better |
| Dyspnea VAS | 48 hours | Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-4800; higher score is better |
| Change in Uric Acid | baseline and 72 hours | — |
| Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide | baseline and 72 hours | Change in NTproBNP |
| Change in NTproBNP | baseline and Day 7 | — |
| Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome | Within 72 hours | — |
| Treatment Failure | Within 72 hours | Treatment failure is defined as the patient met cardiorenal syndrome endpoint, worsening or persistent heart failure endpoint, patient died, or there was clinical evidence of overdiuresis requiring intervention within first 72 hours after randomization |
| Net Fluid Loss | Through 24 hours | — |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Q12 Hours Bolus & Low Intensification | 74 |
| Q12 Hours Bolus & High Intensification | 82 |
| Continuous Infusion & Low Intensification | 77 |
| Continuous Infusion & High Intensification | 75 |
| Total | 308 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Q12 Hours Bolus & Low Intensification | Q12 Hours Bolus & High Intensification | Continuous Infusion & Low Intensification | Continuous Infusion & High Intensification | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 67.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 | 65.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 | 64.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 | 67.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 | 66.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants | 23 Participants | 23 Participants | 18 Participants | 82 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 56 Participants | 59 Participants | 54 Participants | 57 Participants | 226 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 69 / 156 | 67 / 152 | 76 / 151 | 60 / 157 |
Outcome results
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time frame: Measured at baseline and 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.05 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.07 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.04 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| High Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.08 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale
Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-7200; higher score is better
Time frame: Measured at 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 4236 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1440.4 |
| Continuous Infusion | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 4372.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1404.4 |
| Low Intensification | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 4170.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1436.3 |
| High Intensification | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 4429.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1401.4 |
Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide
Change in NTproBNP
Time frame: baseline and 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide | -1316.2 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4364.3 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide | -1773.2 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3827.5 |
| Low Intensification | Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide | -1193.8 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4094.1 |
| High Intensification | Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide | -1881.6 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4105.4 |
Change in Cystatin C
Time frame: baseline and 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Cystatin C | 0.11 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Cystatin C | 0.17 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Cystatin C | 0.12 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| High Intensification | Change in Cystatin C | 0.17 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Change in Cystatin C
Time frame: baseline and day 60
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Cystatin C | 0.20 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Cystatin C | 0.16 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Cystatin C | 0.18 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| High Intensification | Change in Cystatin C | 0.18 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
Change in Cystatin C
Time frame: baseline and day 7
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Cystatin C | 0.21 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Cystatin C | 0.16 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Cystatin C | 0.16 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| High Intensification | Change in Cystatin C | 0.21 mg/L | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Change in NTproBNP
Time frame: baseline and Day 7
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in NTproBNP | -1133.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4883.4 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in NTproBNP | -1552.0 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4875.8 |
| Low Intensification | Change in NTproBNP | -1037.2 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 5211.8 |
| High Intensification | Change in NTproBNP | -1629.7 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4524.6 |
Change in NTproBNP
Time frame: baseline and Day 60
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in NTproBNP | -1449.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 5010.1 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in NTproBNP | -1035.1 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 6962.9 |
| Low Intensification | Change in NTproBNP | -1445.6 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 5805.3 |
| High Intensification | Change in NTproBNP | -1038.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 6364.3 |
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time frame: baseline and 48 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.02 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.05 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.01 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| High Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.06 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time frame: baseline and 96 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.06 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.05 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.05 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| High Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.07 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time frame: baseline and day 7
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.10 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.04 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.07 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| High Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.08 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time frame: baseline and day 60
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.09 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.07 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.09 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| High Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.07 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time frame: baseline and 24 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.00 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.01 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | -0.01 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| High Intensification | Change in Serum Creatinine | 0.02 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
Change in Uric Acid
Time frame: baseline and day 7
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Uric Acid | 0.40 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Uric Acid | 0.09 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Uric Acid | 0.07 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.69 |
| High Intensification | Change in Uric Acid | 0.42 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
Change in Uric Acid
Time frame: baseline and 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Uric Acid | 0.30 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.02 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Uric Acid | 0.44 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Uric Acid | 0.11 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| High Intensification | Change in Uric Acid | 0.61 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
Change in Uric Acid
Time frame: baseline and Day 60
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Uric Acid | -0.09 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Uric Acid | -0.71 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.27 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Uric Acid | -0.13 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
| High Intensification | Change in Uric Acid | -0.67 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
Change in Weight
Time frame: baseline and 96 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Change in Weight | -8.0 lbs | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Continuous Infusion | Change in Weight | -9.1 lbs | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Low Intensification | Change in Weight | -7.4 lbs | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| High Intensification | Change in Weight | -9.6 lbs | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales
Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better
Time frame: Measured at 24 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales | 1370.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 486 |
| Continuous Infusion | Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales | 1453.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 518 |
| Low Intensification | Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales | 1426.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 504.5 |
| High Intensification | Dyspnea, as Determined by Visual Analog Scales | 1398.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 502.7 |
Dyspnea VAS
Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-4800; higher score is better
Time frame: 48 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Dyspnea VAS | 2876.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 960.1 |
| Continuous Infusion | Dyspnea VAS | 3033.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1039.3 |
| Low Intensification | Dyspnea VAS | 2924.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1012.8 |
| High Intensification | Dyspnea VAS | 2981.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 992.9 |
Dyspnea VAS
Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-7200; higher score is better
Time frame: 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Dyspnea VAS | 4455.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1468.4 |
| Continuous Infusion | Dyspnea VAS | 4699.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1572.7 |
| Low Intensification | Dyspnea VAS | 4477.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1549.7 |
| High Intensification | Dyspnea VAS | 4668.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1496 |
Net Fluid Loss
Time frame: Through 48 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Net Fluid Loss | 2996.7 mL | Standard Deviation 2490.5 |
| Continuous Infusion | Net Fluid Loss | 3120.6 mL | Standard Deviation 2504.2 |
| Low Intensification | Net Fluid Loss | 2334.8 mL | Standard Deviation 2006.4 |
| High Intensification | Net Fluid Loss | 3747.4 mL | Standard Deviation 2716.1 |
Net Fluid Loss
Time frame: Through 24 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Net Fluid Loss | 1595.7 mL | Standard Deviation 1476.7 |
| Continuous Infusion | Net Fluid Loss | 1796.4 mL | Standard Deviation 1685.1 |
| Low Intensification | Net Fluid Loss | 1209.7 mL | Standard Deviation 1309.3 |
| High Intensification | Net Fluid Loss | 2149.6 mL | Standard Deviation 1681.7 |
Net Fluid Loss
Time frame: Through 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Net Fluid Loss | 4236.7 mL | Standard Deviation 3207.6 |
| Continuous Infusion | Net Fluid Loss | 4249.2 mL | Standard Deviation 3104.3 |
| Low Intensification | Net Fluid Loss | 3575.2 mL | Standard Deviation 2634.8 |
| High Intensification | Net Fluid Loss | 4898.9 mL | Standard Deviation 3478.5 |
Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale
Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-4800; higher score is better
Time frame: 48 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 2722.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 940 |
| Continuous Infusion | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 2792.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 932.7 |
| Low Intensification | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 2706.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 931.5 |
| High Intensification | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 2805.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 939.8 |
Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale
Global Visual Analog Scale Scale Range 0-2400; higher score is better
Time frame: Measured at 24 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 1280.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 469.7 |
| Continuous Infusion | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 1303.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 465.1 |
| Low Intensification | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 1288.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 455.9 |
| High Intensification | Patient Well Being, as Determined by a Visual Analog Scale | 1294.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 478.4 |
Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome
Time frame: Within 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| Continuous Infusion | Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| Low Intensification | Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome | 13.6 percentage of participants |
| High Intensification | Presence of Cardiorenal Syndrome | 22.7 percentage of participants |
Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion
Time frame: Measured at 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion | 14.4 percentage of participants |
| Continuous Infusion | Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion | 15.3 percentage of participants |
| Low Intensification | Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion | 11.2 percentage of participants |
| High Intensification | Proportion of Patients Free of Congestion | 18.2 percentage of participants |
Treatment Failure
Treatment failure is defined as the patient met cardiorenal syndrome endpoint, worsening or persistent heart failure endpoint, patient died, or there was clinical evidence of overdiuresis requiring intervention within first 72 hours after randomization
Time frame: Within 72 hours
Population: Each analysis performed for this trial was done twice. The first analysis compared Q12hour versus continuous, the second analysis compared low intensification versus high intensification. The study was not testing the combined 4 way as a pre-specified analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Q 12 Hour Bolus | Treatment Failure | 38.1 percentage of participants |
| Continuous Infusion | Treatment Failure | 38.8 percentage of participants |
| Low Intensification | Treatment Failure | 36.7 percentage of participants |
| High Intensification | Treatment Failure | 40.0 percentage of participants |