Skip to content

Thymus Transplantation Dose in DiGeorge #932

Dose Study of Thymus Transplantation in DiGeorge Anomaly, IND 9836, #932.1

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00576836
Enrollment
7
Registered
2007-12-19
Start date
2004-09-02
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete DiGeorge Anomaly, Complete DiGeorge Syndrome, DiGeorge Anomaly, DiGeorge Syndrome

Keywords

Thymus Transplantation, DiGeorge Syndrome, DiGeorge Anomaly, Athymia, Parathyroid Transplantation, Hypocalcemia, Hypoparathyroidism, Low T cell numbers, Immunoreconstitution, Immunodeficiency, Complete DiGeorge, Complete DiGeorge Anomaly, Typical DiGeorge, Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation (CTTI)

Brief summary

One purpose of this study is to determine whether the amount of cultured thymus tissue implanted into DiGeorge anomaly infants has any effect on the immune outcome. Another purpose of this study is to determine whether parental parathyroid transplantation (in addition to cultured thymus tissue implantation (CTTI) can help both the immune and the calcium problems in DiGeorge infants with hypocalcemia. \[Funding Source - FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD)\]

Detailed description

DiGeorge anomaly is a congenital disorder in which infants are born with defects of the thymus, heart, and parathyroid gland. Complete DiGeorge Anomaly is usually fatal within the first two years of life. This trial evaluates the role of cultured thymus tissue dose in cultured thymus tissue implantation (CTTI) in complete (typical) DiGeorge anomaly infants, and continues safety assessments. DiGeorge infants who have successful CTTIs but remain with hypoparathyroidism must go to the clinic for frequent calcium levels and to the hospital for calcium infusions; these infants are at risk for seizures from low calcium. Approximately ½ of infants with profound hypoparathyroidism will develop nephrocalcinosis. This protocol had a parental parathyroid transplant arm for complete DiGeorge infants with athymia and profound hypoparathyroidism.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCultured Thymus Tissue Implantation (CTTI)

Thymus tissue (from unrelated donor), thymus donor, and thymus donor's birth mother screened for safety. CTTI was done under general anesthesia. Cultured thymus tissue was implanted into quadriceps. Thymus dose at least 4grams/m2 body surface area (0.2 grams/kg body weight) and not \>18 grams/m2 body surface area (1.0 grams/kg body weight). At time of CTTI, skin biopsy was obtained to look for preexisting T cells. 2-3 months post-CTTI allograft biopsy was done to evaluate for thymopoiesis & graft rejection. At time of biopsy, skin biopsy done to look for T cell clonal populations. (Allograft biopsy not done if subject medically unstable.) Post-CTTI, subjects followed by immune evaluations, using blood samples.

OTHERCultured Thymus Tissue Implantation with Parathyroid Transplantation

Parental parathyroid donors screened for eligibility and safety. If both parents meet eligibility criteria, the parathyroid will be harvested from parent who shares the most Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) alleles with thymus donor. Parathyroid harvest & transplant preferably done at same time as CTTI. (If parathyroid transplant cannot be done at same time, then it is done within 3-8 weeks of CTTI.) Parathyroid harvest done under general anesthesia. One parathyroid gland is minced & placed in quadriceps muscle; there is no dose in mg. No biopsy done of the parathyroid. Parathyroid donors are monitored as outpatients until recipients' discharge. Recipients' calcium and PTH levels are monitored indefinitely.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Thymus Transplant Inclusion Criteria: * A parent or guardian of the DGS subject signed the consent form. * Medical screening was completed. * For a diagnosis of DGS, the subject had to have one of the following: * Congenital heart disease; * Hypocalcemia requiring replacement; * 22q11.2 hemizygosity or 10p13 hemizygosity; * CHARGE association or CHD7 mutation; * A subject with abnormal ears whose mother had diabetes (type I, type II, or gestational). * To meet the criteria of typical complete DiGeorge Anomaly (cDGA), the subject had to have either: * Circulating CD3+ T cell count by flow cytometry \< 50/mm3 OR * Circulating CD3+ T cells that were also positive for Cluster of Differentiation 45RA (CD45RA)+ CD62L+ and were \< 50/mm3 or less than 5% of total T cells. Thymus Transplant

Exclusion criteria

* Had heart surgery less than 4 weeks prior to projected implant date; * Heart surgery anticipated within 3 months after the proposed time of implantation; * Present or past lymphadenopathy; * Rash associated with T cell infiltration of the dermis and epidermis; * Rejection by the surgeon or anesthesiologist as surgical candidate; * Lack of sufficient muscle tissue to accept a transplant of 4 g/m2 body surface area (BSA) or 0.2 g/kg subject bodyweight; * Had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; * Had prior attempts at immune reconstitution, such as bone marrow transplant or previous thymus transplantation; * Ventilator support or positive pressure support: Subjects had to be off ventilator or other pressure support such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) support for 2 weeks prior to enrollment. If the subject was enrolled and was placed back on ventilator or pressure support, the subject had to be able to be weaned off and remain off ventilator or pressure support for 2 weeks. If the subject could not be successfully weaned off ventilator or pressure support, the subject was to be withdrawn from the study. Additional Inclusion Criteria for Parathyroid Transplant Recipient: * 2 tests in patient showing: intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) \< 5 pg/ml when ionized calcium \< 1.1 mmol/L * All inclusion criteria for thymus transplant must be met * 2 involved parents Exclusion for Parathyroid Transplant Recipient: * Parents do not meet enrollment criteria. * Parent(s) decline to be parathyroid donor(s). Parental Parathyroid Donor Inclusion: * \> 18 years old * Answers all questionnaire items and meets safety screening criteria * Normal serum calcium * Normal PTH function * HLA typing consistent with parentage * Parent chosen for donation will share HLA-DR allele in thymus donor; if not applicable, then either parent will be selected (if meet all other criteria). * Must not be on anticoagulation or can come off for donation/transplantation Parental Parathyroid Donor Exclusion: * Donor is only living involved parent or caretaker of the recipient * Hypoparathyroidism - low parathyroid hormone (PTH) in presence of low serum calcium and high serum phosphate * Hyperparathyroidism (or history of) - elevated PTH in presence of high serum calcium and low serum phosphate * History of cancer * Evidence of any of following: HIV-1, HIV-2, HTLV-1, HTLV-2, syphilis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, West Nile virus, or Trypanosoma Cruzi (Chagas disease) * Elevated AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase \> 3 times upper limit of normal * History including receipt of a xenograft or risk factors for SARS, Mad Cow - Disease or smallpox. Note: if parent has Mad Cow Disease risk factors (but not active disease), parent(s) may give permission for transplantation. * CMV positive urine * Positive CMV IgM antibodies * Positive IgM anti-EBV VCA * On blood thinners and cannot stop for the parathyroid donation * Elevated PT or PTT (\> ULN) * Platelets \< 100,000 * Positive Toxoplasma IgM * The donor will receive a history and physical; may be excluded based on PI's medical judgment * Hemoglobin \< 9 g/dl * Infectious lesion on head or neck * Goiter on ultrasound * Abnormal fiberoptic laryngoscopy of vocal cords * Pregnancy * Positive HSV IgG is not an exclusion; however, post transplantation prophylaxis is needed * Positive VZV IgG is not an exclusion; however, post transplantation prophylaxis is needed * Medical concern of otolaryngologist * Concern by medical psychologist or social worker. Parents are interviewed together and separately regarding following areas: medical history; health habits; substance use; relationships and support; education/work history; mental status/psychological history; readiness for donation. * Questionnaire (safety screening) responses can lead to exclusion. Biological Mother of DiGeorge Subject Inclusion Criteria: * Competent to provide consent * Willing to provide blood for testing (No other inclusion/exclusion for mother)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival at 1 Year Post-CTTI1 year post-CTTISurvival at 1 year post CTTI was assessed using the Kaplan Meier Estimated Survival. This mathematical function estimates the survival for a certain length of time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD3 T Cells1 year post-CTTIThe development of total CD3 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry
Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD4 T Cells1 year post-CTTIThe development of total CD4 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry
Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD8 T Cells1 year post-CTTIThe development of total CD8 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry
Survival at 2 Years Post-CTTI2 years post-CTTISurvival at 2 years post CTTI was assessed using the Kaplan Meier Estimated Survival. This mathematical function estimates the survival for a certain length of time.
Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD8 T Cells1 year post-CTTIThe development of naïve CD8 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry.
Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Response to Mitogens1 year post-CTTIThe development of a T cell proliferative response to the mitogen phytohemagglutinin.
Thymus Allograft Biopsy2 to 3 months post-CTTIEvidence, on biopsy of the thymus tissue implanted in the recipient muscle, that shows the development of new T cells.
Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD4 T Cells1 year post-CTTIThe development of naive CD4 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The goal of this study is survival of subjects after cultured thymus tissue implantation (CTTI) regardless of parathyroid co-transplantation. No subject underwent CTTI with parathyroid transplant.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation
Cultured Thymus Tissue Implantation (CTTI) (previously described as transplantation) is done using allogenic cultured postnatal tissue from unrelated donors.
7
Total7

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCultured Thymus Tissue Implantation
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous316 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 182
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Survival at 1 Year Post-CTTI

Survival at 1 year post CTTI was assessed using the Kaplan Meier Estimated Survival. This mathematical function estimates the survival for a certain length of time.

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Analysis includes cDGA participants. After CTTI, 1 subject was determined to have SCID and not cDGA. Efficacy analysis as reported is on cDGA, without the SCID subject as CTTI cannot lead to T cell development in SCID. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationSurvival at 1 Year Post-CTTI83 % of participants who survive to 1 year
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD3 T Cells

The development of total CD3 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Data were only included on cDGA participants for the 1 year time point if a CD3 T cell count was performed in the relevant time period. The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationImmune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD3 T Cells635 cells/mm3
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD4 T Cells

The development of total CD4 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Data were only included on cDGA participants for the 1 year time point if a CD4 T cell count was performed in the relevant time period. The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationImmune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD4 T Cells499 cells/mm3
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD8 T Cells

The development of total CD8 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Data were only included on cDGA participants for the 1 year time point if a CD8 T cell count was performed in the relevant time period. The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationImmune Reconstitution Efficacy - CD8 T Cells116 cells/mm3
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD4 T Cells

The development of naive CD4 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Data were only included on cDGA participants for the 1 year time point if a T cell count was performed in the relevant time period. The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationImmune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD4 T Cells279 cells/mm3
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD8 T Cells

The development of naïve CD8 T cells at one year as measured using flow cytometry.

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Data were only included on cDGA participants for the 1 year time point if a T cell count was performed in the relevant time period. The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationImmune Reconstitution Efficacy - Naive CD8 T Cells214 cells/mm3
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution Efficacy - Response to Mitogens

The development of a T cell proliferative response to the mitogen phytohemagglutinin.

Time frame: 1 year post-CTTI

Population: Data were only included on cDGA participants for the 1 year time point if testing was performed in the relevant time period. The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationImmune Reconstitution Efficacy - Response to Mitogens135016 counts per minute (cpm)
Secondary

Survival at 2 Years Post-CTTI

Survival at 2 years post CTTI was assessed using the Kaplan Meier Estimated Survival. This mathematical function estimates the survival for a certain length of time.

Time frame: 2 years post-CTTI

Population: Analysis includes cDGA participants. After CTTI, 1 subject was determined to have SCID and not cDGA. Efficacy analysis as reported is on cDGA, without the SCID subject as CTTI cannot lead to T cell development in SCID. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationSurvival at 2 Years Post-CTTI83 % of participants who survive to 2 years
Secondary

Thymus Allograft Biopsy

Evidence, on biopsy of the thymus tissue implanted in the recipient muscle, that shows the development of new T cells.

Time frame: 2 to 3 months post-CTTI

Population: cDGA participants who had a biopsy on the thymus tissue implanted.The study was designed to assess survival. No subjects were enrolled into Arm 1. No subjects received a parathyroid transplant. Therefore, results are reported for Arm 2 only.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationThymus Allograft BiopsyEvidence of thymopoiesis1 Participants
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationThymus Allograft BiopsyEvidence of rejection0 Participants
Cultured Thymus Tissue ImplantationThymus Allograft BiopsyInconclusive for thymopoiesis1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026