Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Cancer pain treatment, Fentanyl TTS, Dihydrocodeine, Tramadol, Cancer pain, Durogesic, Ultram
Brief summary
To show, using the analgesic WHO scale, that fentanyl-TTS may be directly used for treating moderate to severe cancer pain in patients treated with NSAIDs, acetaminophen, or metamizole (first step drugs) avoiding the second step, and may be at least as effective and safe as currently used second step drugs, minor opioids.
Detailed description
This study is a multicenter, randomized(study drug assigned by chance), open-label, nationwide study. Patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to the oncological disease (VAS\>5) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized to treatment with fentanyl-TTS (transdermal patches, initial dosage: 25µg/h patch every 3 days, experimental drug) or with minor opioids (Tramadol, initial dosage of 200mg/day and Dihydrocodeine initial dosage of 120mg/day, control arm). The follow-up and drug administration was two months, during which controls were performed every 7 days, except for the first that was on Day 4. If pain was not controlled (VAS\<3), the investigator could increase the dose of the relevant drug (according to data sheet). The primary endpoint has been the control of pain during treatment. Pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale. Pain severity was assessed at each follow-up visit. The secondary endpoint was to assess the advantages of using fentanyl-TTS after the first step of the WHO analgesic ladder as compared to minor opioids. These advantages were assessed based on the incidence of side effects associated with treatment with opioids during treatment where the following was assessed by a table with the most common side effects: nausea, vomiting, constipation and drowsiness (WHO) and their severity, the quantity of support drugs required by the patients to cope with the side effects occurring, adverse events related to the study drug, and the percentage of patients discontinuing or switching treatment due to side effects. Fentanyl, dosage forms: 25µg/h, 50µg/h and 100µg/h. Transdermal patches (initial dosage: 25µg/h patch every 3 days). Tramadol, dosage forms: 100mg, 150mg and 200mg, (initial dosage: 200mg/day). Dihydrocodeine, dosage forms: 60mg, 90mg and 120mg, (initial dosage: 120mg/day). If pain was not controlled (VAS\<3), the investigator could increase the dose of the relevant drug. The follow-up and drug administration was two months, during which controls were performed every 7 days.
Interventions
DRUGFentanyl-TTS
Sponsors
Janssen-Cilag, S.A.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to the oncological condition, defined as VAS =\> 5, treated with first step drugs, either NSAIDs or acetaminophen or metamizole (the dose of first step drugs requiring a switch in treatment is left to the physician's discretion) * Patients with a documented histological diagnosis of cancer.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients whose pain has some neuropathic component * Patients who have been treated with opioids during the 2 months prior to study entry * Patients with dermatological disease, a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl or to adhesive components preventing use of patches * Patients with a history of cardiac, CNS, or respiratory disease that prevents their participation in the study in the investigator's judgment * Patients with kidney or liver failure contraindicating use of opioids based on medical criterion * Pregnant women or women of childbearing age who do not use an effective contraceptive method throughout the study * Patients in whom surgery is planned during the study * Patients who are participating at the same time in another trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint was the control of pain during treatment. Pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale. Pain severity was assessed at each follow-up visit. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The secondary endpoint was to assess the advantages of using fentanyl-TTS after the first step of the WHO analgesic ladder as compared to minor opioids. | — |
Outcome results
None listed