Skip to content

Minimizing Harm From ADEs by Improving Nurse-Physician Communication

Minimizing Harm From ADEs by Improving Nurse-Physician Communication

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00574990
Acronym
MED-COMM
Enrollment
39
Registered
2007-12-17
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2015-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interdisciplinary Communication, Management, Medication Therapy

Keywords

Interdisciplinary Communication, Safety Management, Management, Medication Therapy, Cooperative Behavior, Drug Therapy Management, Physician Nurse Relationships, Side Effects, Hospital Information Systems, Documentation, Quality Assurance, Health Care

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to examine the clinical processes of care involved with the sharing and communicating of medication management information in the inpatient setting between nurses, pharmacists and physicians. The study is unique in that few studies have examined communication content and processes in depth and in relation to specific clinical care. The study will be conducted in two phases. The first phase involves using three focus groups across three sites (a total of nine) each involving between 6-8 individuals to examine perceptions regarding role and procedures associated with medication management. The focus group discussions will be tape-recorded and analyzed using qualitative methods. The information gleaned will assist us in identifying patterns of problems in enhancing the sharing of information, to develop better measures for assessing communication as well as designing effective interventions to enhance communication. In the second phase of the study, 400 2-4 hour time slots will be randomly selected over about a 5-week period for nursing staff and 500 events over a 6-week period for physicians to conduct ethnographic observations during which specific communication events will be recorded and coded. Every effort will be made to minimize interruptions during clinical care. This research has not been done in terms of medication management content in the inpatient setting (non-ICU).

Detailed description

Background: Medication management is a complex clinical task. It requires substantial collaboration and coordination between physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Addressing ineffective communication has been identified by the Institute of Medicine as a high priority. Ineffective communication regarding medication management coordination can result in increased medication errors, rates of adverse drug events (ADEs), delays in treating adverse drug events and less effective treatment. ADEs are frequent in hospitalized patients, ranging from less than 3% to over 32%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate communication patterns associated with medication management between providers, physicians and pharmacists in the inpatient setting. Objectives: Specific Aim 1. Assess clinicians' beliefs and concerns regarding the role of communication in preventing, detecting and managing ADEs in elderly inpatients (focus groups). Specific Aim 2. Evaluate and characterize communication events between VA nurses, physicians and pharmacists in an inpatient medicine setting (ethnographic observation). Methods: Phase 1: Focus Groups Design: The design of this study was qualitative and used focus group methodology. Settings: Three VA sites that differed in size, location and academic affiliation were selected. Participants: Three focus groups were conducted at each site (one each of pharmacists, nurses and physicians). A total of 19 nurses, 16 pharmacists and 13 doctors participated. Phase 2: Observation Design: The design of this study was quantitative and descriptive. Settings: Two inpatient units at the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System (medicine and telemetry). Participants: Twelve residents were selected randomly from each of the 4 medical teams, 19 nurses were selected randomly from the two in-patient medicine wards, and 8 clinical pharmacists (the total number of clinical pharmacists available) agreed to participate. Status: All data have been collected and initial analyses has been completed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Providers who are working in the VA on the inpatient setting, including pharmacists, nurses, and physicians.

Exclusion criteria

Staff who have worked at the VA less than 1 year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incident Rate for Communication Events6 monthsObservation periods were approximately two-hours long. Some providers were observed more than once. The number of communication events were counted per each observation period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles6 monthsThe number of communication events was recorded on electronic notepads during each observation period. The communication events recorded included: a) physicians to physicians, to nurses, to pharmacists, and to patients; b) nurses to nurses, to physicians, to pharmacists, and to patients; and c) pharmacists to pharmacists, to physicians, to nurses, and to patients. The percentage of each of these types of verbal communications was calculated from the total number of communication events.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VA Physicians
VA physicians who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS.
12
VA Nurses
VA Nurses who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS.
19
VA Pharmacists
VA Pharmacists who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS.
8
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVA PhysiciansVA NursesVA PharmacistsTotal
Age, Customized
18 to 75 years
12 participants19 participants8 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants19 participants8 participants39 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
NA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
NA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 190 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 190 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Incident Rate for Communication Events

Observation periods were approximately two-hours long. Some providers were observed more than once. The number of communication events were counted per each observation period.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants were providers who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PhysiciansIncident Rate for Communication Events47.6 mean events per observationStandard Deviation 21.26
NursesIncident Rate for Communication Events34.74 mean events per observationStandard Deviation 9.93
PharmacistsIncident Rate for Communication Events34.07 mean events per observationStandard Deviation 12.88
Comparison: Descriptive counts and chi squared were done on the observation data.p-value: 0.01Chi-squared
Secondary

Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles

The number of communication events was recorded on electronic notepads during each observation period. The communication events recorded included: a) physicians to physicians, to nurses, to pharmacists, and to patients; b) nurses to nurses, to physicians, to pharmacists, and to patients; and c) pharmacists to pharmacists, to physicians, to nurses, and to patients. The percentage of each of these types of verbal communications was calculated from the total number of communication events.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PhysiciansOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Physicians31 percentage of role involvement in event
PhysiciansOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Nurses12 percentage of role involvement in event
PhysiciansOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Pharmacists20 percentage of role involvement in event
PhysiciansOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Inpatient Patients6 percentage of role involvement in event
NursesOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Inpatient Patients27 percentage of role involvement in event
NursesOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Physicians21 percentage of role involvement in event
NursesOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Pharmacists6 percentage of role involvement in event
NursesOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Nurses23 percentage of role involvement in event
PharmacistsOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Inpatient Patients8 percentage of role involvement in event
PharmacistsOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Nurses9 percentage of role involvement in event
PharmacistsOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Pharmacists12 percentage of role involvement in event
PharmacistsOverall Involvement in Conversation by RolesVA Physicians58 percentage of role involvement in event

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026