Interdisciplinary Communication, Management, Medication Therapy
Conditions
Keywords
Interdisciplinary Communication, Safety Management, Management, Medication Therapy, Cooperative Behavior, Drug Therapy Management, Physician Nurse Relationships, Side Effects, Hospital Information Systems, Documentation, Quality Assurance, Health Care
Brief summary
The purpose of this research study is to examine the clinical processes of care involved with the sharing and communicating of medication management information in the inpatient setting between nurses, pharmacists and physicians. The study is unique in that few studies have examined communication content and processes in depth and in relation to specific clinical care. The study will be conducted in two phases. The first phase involves using three focus groups across three sites (a total of nine) each involving between 6-8 individuals to examine perceptions regarding role and procedures associated with medication management. The focus group discussions will be tape-recorded and analyzed using qualitative methods. The information gleaned will assist us in identifying patterns of problems in enhancing the sharing of information, to develop better measures for assessing communication as well as designing effective interventions to enhance communication. In the second phase of the study, 400 2-4 hour time slots will be randomly selected over about a 5-week period for nursing staff and 500 events over a 6-week period for physicians to conduct ethnographic observations during which specific communication events will be recorded and coded. Every effort will be made to minimize interruptions during clinical care. This research has not been done in terms of medication management content in the inpatient setting (non-ICU).
Detailed description
Background: Medication management is a complex clinical task. It requires substantial collaboration and coordination between physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Addressing ineffective communication has been identified by the Institute of Medicine as a high priority. Ineffective communication regarding medication management coordination can result in increased medication errors, rates of adverse drug events (ADEs), delays in treating adverse drug events and less effective treatment. ADEs are frequent in hospitalized patients, ranging from less than 3% to over 32%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate communication patterns associated with medication management between providers, physicians and pharmacists in the inpatient setting. Objectives: Specific Aim 1. Assess clinicians' beliefs and concerns regarding the role of communication in preventing, detecting and managing ADEs in elderly inpatients (focus groups). Specific Aim 2. Evaluate and characterize communication events between VA nurses, physicians and pharmacists in an inpatient medicine setting (ethnographic observation). Methods: Phase 1: Focus Groups Design: The design of this study was qualitative and used focus group methodology. Settings: Three VA sites that differed in size, location and academic affiliation were selected. Participants: Three focus groups were conducted at each site (one each of pharmacists, nurses and physicians). A total of 19 nurses, 16 pharmacists and 13 doctors participated. Phase 2: Observation Design: The design of this study was quantitative and descriptive. Settings: Two inpatient units at the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System (medicine and telemetry). Participants: Twelve residents were selected randomly from each of the 4 medical teams, 19 nurses were selected randomly from the two in-patient medicine wards, and 8 clinical pharmacists (the total number of clinical pharmacists available) agreed to participate. Status: All data have been collected and initial analyses has been completed.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Providers who are working in the VA on the inpatient setting, including pharmacists, nurses, and physicians.
Exclusion criteria
Staff who have worked at the VA less than 1 year.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incident Rate for Communication Events | 6 months | Observation periods were approximately two-hours long. Some providers were observed more than once. The number of communication events were counted per each observation period. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | 6 months | The number of communication events was recorded on electronic notepads during each observation period. The communication events recorded included: a) physicians to physicians, to nurses, to pharmacists, and to patients; b) nurses to nurses, to physicians, to pharmacists, and to patients; and c) pharmacists to pharmacists, to physicians, to nurses, and to patients. The percentage of each of these types of verbal communications was calculated from the total number of communication events. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| VA Physicians VA physicians who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS. | 12 |
| VA Nurses VA Nurses who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS. | 19 |
| VA Pharmacists VA Pharmacists who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS. | 8 |
| Total | 39 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | VA Physicians | VA Nurses | VA Pharmacists | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 18 to 75 years | 12 participants | 19 participants | 8 participants | 39 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 12 participants | 19 participants | 8 participants | 39 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | NA Participants | NA Participants | NA Participants | NA Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | NA Participants | NA Participants | NA Participants | NA Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 8 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 8 |
Outcome results
Incident Rate for Communication Events
Observation periods were approximately two-hours long. Some providers were observed more than once. The number of communication events were counted per each observation period.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Participants were providers who had worked at least one year in the VA and were familiar with the VA's electronic health record, CPRS.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physicians | Incident Rate for Communication Events | 47.6 mean events per observation | Standard Deviation 21.26 |
| Nurses | Incident Rate for Communication Events | 34.74 mean events per observation | Standard Deviation 9.93 |
| Pharmacists | Incident Rate for Communication Events | 34.07 mean events per observation | Standard Deviation 12.88 |
Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles
The number of communication events was recorded on electronic notepads during each observation period. The communication events recorded included: a) physicians to physicians, to nurses, to pharmacists, and to patients; b) nurses to nurses, to physicians, to pharmacists, and to patients; and c) pharmacists to pharmacists, to physicians, to nurses, and to patients. The percentage of each of these types of verbal communications was calculated from the total number of communication events.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physicians | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Physicians | 31 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Physicians | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Nurses | 12 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Physicians | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Pharmacists | 20 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Physicians | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Inpatient Patients | 6 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Nurses | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Inpatient Patients | 27 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Nurses | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Physicians | 21 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Nurses | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Pharmacists | 6 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Nurses | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Nurses | 23 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Pharmacists | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Inpatient Patients | 8 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Pharmacists | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Nurses | 9 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Pharmacists | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Pharmacists | 12 percentage of role involvement in event |
| Pharmacists | Overall Involvement in Conversation by Roles | VA Physicians | 58 percentage of role involvement in event |