Skip to content

Daratumumab (HuMax®-CD38) Safety Study in Multiple Myeloma

Daratumumab (HuMax®-CD38) Safety Study in Multiple Myeloma - Open Label, Dose-escalation Followed by Open Label, Single-arm Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00574288
Enrollment
104
Registered
2007-12-17
Start date
2008-03-26
Completion date
2017-04-03
Last updated
2018-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma, Daratumumab, Safety, HuMax-CD38, Dose-escalation

Brief summary

Establishment of safety profile of HuMax-CD38 when given as monotherapy in participants with multiple myeloma relapsed from or refractory to at least 2 different cytoreductive therapies and without further established treatment options.

Detailed description

This study is conducted in two parts. In part I, participants are enrolled into cohorts at increasing dose levels. Participant safety and efficacy during part I will determine the doses used for Part II. In part II participants will be enrolled into one of two sequential treatment arms using two of the doses defined in part 1 of the study. Part II was 5 cohorts, 3 with 8 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) and 2 with 16 mg/kg. Part I and all but the last cohort in Part II were dosed with Phase 1/ 2 drug product. The last cohort in Part II was dosed with Phase 3 drug product. Both Part I and Part II are open-label/unmasked.

Interventions

DRUGPart 1: Daratumumab

First participant will receive intravenous (injection of a substance into a vein) 0.005 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (planned dose) infusion of daratumumab and other participants will receive different doses. The participants will receive 7 full infusions of daratumumab and 2 predose infusions every 2 weeks. The dose of daratumumab will be escalated sequentially and considering the safety and efficacy of dose in Part 1, dose for Part 2 of the study will be decided. A predose infusion of 10% of the full dose of daratumumab will be administered a day before the first 2 full infusions.

DRUGPart 2: Daratumumab

In Part 2, the participants will receive dose of daratumumab as determined in part 1 (16 mg/kg) of the study. Participants will receive 8 full infusions at weekly intervals followed by biweekly (every 2 weeks) infusions for 16 additional weeks and monthly infusions until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity, whichever comes first. Predose was dropped at some point in Part 2. A predose infusion of 10 mg daratumumab will be administered on the day before the first full infusion in select cohorts.

OTHERMethylprednisolone

Pre-dose: Participants (part 1) will receive methylprednisolone 80 mg intravenous (IV) injection 30 minutes to 2 hours before treatment. Participants (part 2) will receive 100 mg methylprednisolone IV 60 minutes to 2 hours before treatment; if a patient experiences no significant infusion-related reactions, the dose of methylprednisolone may be decreased to 50 mg after Visit 4. Post-dose: All participants (part 1) will receive 40 mg methylprednisolone orally on the first and the second day after all full infusions. During Part 2, all participants will receive 20-25 mg methylprednisolone orally or equivalent on the first and second days after all full-dose infusions.

OTHERDexamethasone

Participants (Part 2) will receive 20 mg dexamethasone intravenous (IV) injection pre-dose, on the first and second days after every full-dose infusions.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) requiring systemic therapy * Age greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 * Life expectancy greater than (\>) 3 months * Relapsed from or refractory to two or more different prior therapies * Signed Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Plasma cell leukemia defined as a plasma cell count \> 2000/millimeter\^3 (mm\^3) * Known amyloidosis * Participants who previously have received an allogeneic stem cell transplant * Sensory or motor neuropathy of \>= grade 3 * Past or current malignancy * Chronic or ongoing active infectious disease * Clinically significant cardiac disease * Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, renal (except related to MM), hepatic, hematological except MM, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral or psychiatric disease * A baseline QT interval as corrected by Fridericia's formula \> 470 millisecond (msec) for female participants or \> 450 msec for male participants or a complete left bundle branch block (defined as a QRS interval \>= 120 msec in left bundle branch block form) * Hypokalemia * Clinical signs of meningeal involvement of MM * Known severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than (\<) 60 percentage (%) of expected * History of significant cerebrovascular disease * Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus seropositivity * Positive serology for hepatitis B * Screening laboratory values * Concomitant corticosteroid * Other chemotherapy that is or may be active against myeloma within 3 weeks prior to Visit 2 (Part 1) or the first dose of daratumumab (Part 2). However, corticosteroid for myeloma (less than a 4-day course) could be administered within 1 week before Visit 2 (Part 1) or the first dose of daratumumab (Part 2) * Known hypersensitivity to components of the investigational product or severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized products * Participants who have received treatment with any nonmarket drug substance within 4 weeks before the first dose of daratumumab * Current participation in any other interventional clinical trial * Participants known or suspected of not being able to comply with a trial protocol (example, due to alcoholism, drug dependency, or psychological disorder) * Breastfeeding women or women with a positive pregnancy test at Screening * Women of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception, defined as hormonal birth control or intrauterine device, during the trial and for 1 year after the last dose of daratumumab. For participants in the United States, the use of a double-barrier method is also considered adequate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to Week 28 (for Part 1) and up to approximately 2.5 years (for Part 2)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Time to ResponseUp to Week 28Time to first response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). Time to best response was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and the date of the initial evaluation of the best response (PR or better) to treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution of time to response and time to best response.
Part 2: Time to Progression (TTP)Up to Week 27TTP was defined as the number of days from the date of first infusion (Day 1) to the date of first record of disease progression. Disease progression (IMWG criteria): increase of 25 percent (%) from lowest response level in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dL); urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24 hour; only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels (absolute increase must be \>10 mg/dL); Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Median TTP was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Part 2: Duration of Response as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-MeierUp to Week 27Duration of response was calculated from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease, as defined in the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Overall Response RateUp to Week 28 (for Part 1) and Week 27 (for Part 2)Overall response defined as percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR). Per IMWG criteria, sCR: is defined as normal free light chain (FLC) ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry; CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5 % plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \< 100mg/24 hours; PR: \>= 50 % reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by \>= 90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours; if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria.
Part 2: Time to ResponseUp to Week 27Time to first response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). Time to best response was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and the date of the initial evaluation of the best response (PR or better) to treatment. Time to VGPR (very good partial response) was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of VGPR response. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to response.
Part 2: Overall SurvivalApproximately 3 yearsOverall Survival (OS) was defined as the number of days from administration of the first infusion (Day 1) to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Part 2: Progression-Free SurvivalUp to Week 27Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and either disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.

Countries

Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1 - <4 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 7 full intravenous (IV) infusion of 0.005, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2 milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/kg) daratumumab once weekly, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 80 mg IV injection before first 2 infusions and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions. First 2 infusions were separated by 3 week washout period.
20
Part 1 - 4 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 7 full IV infusion of 4 mg/kg daratumumab once weekly, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 80 mg IV injection before first 2 infusions and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions. First 2 infusions were separated by 3 week washout period.
3
Part 1 - 8 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 7 full IV infusion of 8 mg/kg daratumumab once weekly, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 80 mg IV injection before first 2 infusions and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions. First 2 infusions were separated by 3 week washout period.
3
Part 1 - 16 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 7 full IV infusion of 16 mg/kg daratumumab once weekly, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 80 mg IV injection before first 2 infusions and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions. First 2 infusions were separated by 3 week washout period.
3
Part 1 - 24 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 7 full IV infusion of 24 mg/kg daratumumab once weekly, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 80 mg IV injection before first 2 infusions and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions. First 2 infusions were separated by 3 week washout period.
3
Part 2 - 8 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 8 full IV infusions of 8 mg/kg daratumumab once weekly for 8 weeks, then every 2 weeks (q2w) for 16 weeks, then every 4 weeks (q4w) until the participant experienced disease progression or unmanageable toxicity whichever came first, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg IV before treatment and 20-25 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions.
30
Part 2 - 16 mg/kg
Participants were administered with 8 full IV infusions of 16 mg/kg daratumumab once weekly for 7 weeks, then every 2 weeks (q2w) for 14 weeks, then every 4 weeks (q4w) until the participant experienced disease progression or unmanageable toxicity whichever came first, along with this participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg IV before treatment and 20-25 mg methylprednisolone orally for 2 days after all full infusions. First 2 infusions were separated by 3 week washout period.
42
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event2000100
Overall StudyDeath000002521
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0000012
Overall StudyOther1100000
Overall StudyProgressive Disease17232100
Overall StudyStudy Terminated By Sponsor0000005

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1 - <4 mg/kgPart 1 - 4 mg/kgPart 1 - 8 mg/kgPart 1 - 16 mg/kgPart 1 - 24 mg/kgPart 2 - 8 mg/kgPart 2 - 16 mg/kgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants9 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants21 Participants22 Participants63 Participants
Age, Continuous61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.05
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.27
61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
No. of Prior Lines of Therapy
<= 3 Lines
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants16 Participants26 Participants
No. of Prior Lines of Therapy
> 3 Lines
18 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants24 Participants26 Participants78 Participants
Refractory to proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory agent (IMiD)
Both a PI and IMiD
0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants19 Participants27 Participants54 Participants
Refractory to proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory agent (IMiD)
IMiD only
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Refractory to proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory agent (IMiD)
None
20 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants8 Participants32 Participants
Refractory to proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory agent (IMiD)
PI only
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
11 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants14 Participants8 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
5 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants5 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants14 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants9 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants21 Participants27 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 203 / 33 / 33 / 33 / 330 / 3041 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 200 / 31 / 32 / 32 / 312 / 3016 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and up to approximately 2.5 years (for Part 2)

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events19 participants
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events3 participants
Part 1:Daratumumab 8 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events3 participants
Part 1: Daratumumab 16 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events3 participants
Part 1:Daratumumab 24 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events3 participants
Part 2: Daratumumab 8 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events30 participants
Part 2: Daratumumab 16 mg/kgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events41 participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate

Overall response defined as percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR). Per IMWG criteria, sCR: is defined as normal free light chain (FLC) ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry; CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5 % plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \< 100mg/24 hours; PR: \>= 50 % reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by \>= 90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours; if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria.

Time frame: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and Week 27 (for Part 2)

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. For Part 1, only participants treated with \>= 4 mg/kg daratumumab were used for efficacy analyses and less than (\<) 4 mg/kg doses were considered under the therapeutic levels.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgOverall Response Rate33.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgOverall Response Rate0 percentage of participants
Part 1:Daratumumab 8 mg/kgOverall Response Rate33.3 percentage of participants
Part 1: Daratumumab 16 mg/kgOverall Response Rate66.7 percentage of participants
Part 1:Daratumumab 24 mg/kgOverall Response Rate10.0 percentage of participants
Part 2: Daratumumab 8 mg/kgOverall Response Rate35.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 1: Time to Response

Time to first response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). Time to best response was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and the date of the initial evaluation of the best response (PR or better) to treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution of time to response and time to best response.

Time frame: Up to Week 28

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. For Part 1, only participants treated with \>= 4 mg/kg daratumumab were used for efficacy analyses and less than (\<) 4 mg/kg doses were considered under the therapeutic levels.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to first responseNA months
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to best responseNA months
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to best responseNA months
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to first responseNA months
Part 1:Daratumumab 8 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to first response8.4 months
Part 1:Daratumumab 8 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to best response8.4 months
Part 1: Daratumumab 16 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to first response1.9 months
Part 1: Daratumumab 16 mg/kgPart 1: Time to ResponseTime to best response1.9 months
Secondary

Part 2: Duration of Response as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-Meier

Duration of response was calculated from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease, as defined in the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.

Time frame: Up to Week 27

Population: Subset of All-Treated Analysis Set included those who had overall response in Part 2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 2: Duration of Response as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-Meier6.9 months
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Duration of Response as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-MeierNA months
Secondary

Part 2: Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the number of days from administration of the first infusion (Day 1) to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Approximately 3 years

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 2: Overall Survival18.2 months
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Overall Survival34.3 months
Secondary

Part 2: Progression-Free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and either disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: Up to Week 27

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival2.4 months
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Progression-Free Survival5.6 months
Secondary

Part 2: Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the number of days from the date of first infusion (Day 1) to the date of first record of disease progression. Disease progression (IMWG criteria): increase of 25 percent (%) from lowest response level in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dL); urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24 hour; only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels (absolute increase must be \>10 mg/dL); Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Median TTP was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Up to Week 27

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to Progression (TTP)2.4 months
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to Progression (TTP)5.6 months
Secondary

Part 2: Time to Response

Time to first response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). Time to best response was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and the date of the initial evaluation of the best response (PR or better) to treatment. Time to VGPR (very good partial response) was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of VGPR response. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to response.

Time frame: Up to Week 27

Population: All-Treated Analysis Set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here 'n' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to ResponseTime to first response1.36 monthsStandard Deviation 0.774
Part 1: Daratumumab Less Than (<) 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to ResponseTime to best response1.36 monthsStandard Deviation 0.774
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to ResponseTime to first response1.33 monthsStandard Deviation 0.955
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to ResponseTime to best response2.46 monthsStandard Deviation 2.8
Part 1: Daratumumab 4 mg/kgPart 2: Time to ResponseTime to VGPR or better response0.49 monthsStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026