Skip to content

Prostate Radiation Therapy or Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Pelvic Lymph Node Radiation Therapy With or Without Prostate Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With a Rising Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) After Surgery for Prostate Cancer

A Phase III Trial of Short Term Androgen Deprivation With Pelvic Lymph Node or Prostate Bed Only Radiotherapy (SPPORT) in Prostate Cancer Patients With a Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00567580
Enrollment
1792
Registered
2007-12-05
Start date
2008-02-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Antihormone therapy, such as flutamide, bicalutamide, and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body. It is not yet known which regimen of radiation therapy with or without androgen-deprivation therapy is more effective for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying prostate radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with short-term androgen deprivation therapy given together with pelvic lymph node radiation therapy with or without prostate radiation therapy in treating patients with a rising PSA after surgery for prostate cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine whether the addition of short-term androgen deprivation (STAD) to prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT) improves freedom from progression (FFP) (i.e., maintenance of a prostate-specific antigen \[PSA\] less than the nadir+2 ng/mL, absence of clinical failure, and absence of death from any cause) for 5 years, over that of PBRT alone in men treated with salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. * To determine whether STAD, pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT), and PBRT improves FFP over that of STAD+PBRT and PBRT alone in men treated with salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Secondary * To compare secondary biochemical failure, the development of hormone-refractory disease , distant metastasis, cause-specific mortality, and overall mortality at five years. * To compare acute and late morbidity based on Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), v. 3.0. * To measure the expression of cell kinetic, apoptotic pathway, and angiogenesis-related genes in archival diagnostic tissue to better define the risk of FFP, distant failure, cause-specific mortality, and overall mortality after salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer, independently of conventional clinical parameters now used. * To quantify blood product-based proteomic and genomic (single nucleotide polymorphisms) patterns and urine-based genomic patterns before and at different times after treatment to better define the risk of FFP, distant failure, cause-specific mortality, and overall mortality after salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer, independently of conventional clinical parameters now used. * To assess the degree, duration, and significant differences of disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) decrements among treatment arms. * To assess whether mood is improved and depression is decreased with the more aggressive therapy if it improves FFP. * To collect paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, serum, plasma, urine, and buffy coat cells for future translational research analyses. Tertiary * To assess whether an incremental gain in FFP and survival with more aggressive therapy outweighs decrements in the primary generic domains of HRQOL (i.e., mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). * To evaluate the cost-utility of the treatment arm demonstrating the most significant benefit (in terms of the primary outcome) in comparison with other widely accepted cancer and non-cancer therapies. * To assess associations between serum levels of beta-amyloid and measures of cognition and mood and depression. * An exploratory aim is to assess the relationship(s) between the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA SI) and urinary morbidity using the CTCAE v. 3.0 grading system. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to seminal vesicle involvement (yes vs no), prostatectomy Gleason score (≤ 7 vs 8-9), pre-radiotherapy PSA (≥ 0.1 and ≤ 1.0 ng/mL vs \> 1.0 and \< 2.0 ng/mL), and pathology stage (pT2 and margin negative vs all others). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. Follow-up occurs 3, 6, and 12 months after the completion of radiation therapy, then every 6 months for 6 years, and then annually thereafter.

Interventions

RADIATIONPBRT

1.8 Gy per fraction once daily, 5 days a week totaling 64.8-70.2 Gy. 3D-CRT or IMRT required.

RADIATIONPLNRT

1.8 Gy per fraction once daily, 5 days a week, totaling 45 Gy. 3D-CRT or IMRT required.

DRUGAA

Antiandrogen (AA) therapy can be either 250 mg flutamide by mouth three times a day or 50 mg bicalutamide by mouth once a day.

DRUGLHRH agonist

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist can be any analog approved by the FDA (or by Health Canada for Canadian institutions) and may be given in any possible combination such that the total LHRH treatment time is 4-6 months. LHRH analogs are administered with a variety of techniques, including subcutaneous insertion of a solid plug in the abdominal wall, intramuscular injection, and subcutaneous injection.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
CollaboratorNETWORK
NRG Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated primarily with radical prostatectomy, pathologically proven to be lymph node negative by pelvic lymphadenectomy (N0) or lymph node status pathologically unknown (undissected pelvic lymph nodes \[Nx\]), i.e. lymph node dissection is not required; • Any type of radical prostatectomy will be permitted, including retropubic, perineal, laparoscopic or robotically assisted. There is no time limit for the date of radical prostatectomy. 2. A post-radical prostatectomy entry prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of ≥ 0.1 and \< 2.0 ng/mL at least 6 weeks (45 days) after prostatectomy and within 30 days of registration; 3. One of the following pathologic classifications: * T3N0/Nx disease with or without a positive prostatectomy surgical margin; or * T2N0/Nx disease with or without a positive prostatectomy surgical margin; 4. Prostatectomy Gleason score of 9 or less; 5. Zubrod Performance Status of 0-1; 6. Age ≥ 18; 7. No distant metastases, based upon the following minimum diagnostic workup: * History/physical examination (including digital rectal exam) within 8 weeks (60 days) prior to registration; * A computerized tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis (with contrast if renal function is acceptable; a noncontrast CT is permitted if the patient is not a candidate for contrast) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis within 120 days prior to registration; * Bone scan within 120 days prior to registration; if the bone scan is suspicious, a plain x-ray and/or MRI must be obtained to rule out metastasis. 8. Adequate bone marrow function, within 90 days prior to registration, defined as follows: * Platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/mm\^3 based upon compete blood count (CBC); * Hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dl based upon CBC (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 10.0 g/dl is recommended). 9. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 2 x the upper limit of normal within 90 days prior to registration; 10. Serum total testosterone must be ≥ 40% of the lower limit of normal (LLN) of the assay used (testosterone ÷ LLN must be ≥ 0.40) within 90 days prior to registration (Note: Patients who have had a unilateral orchiectomy are eligible as long as this requirement is met); 11. Patients must sign a study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

1. A palpable prostatic fossa abnormality/mass suggestive of recurrence, unless shown by biopsy under ultrasound guidance not to contain cancer; 2. N1 patients are ineligible, as are those with pelvic lymph node enlargement ≥ 1.5 cm in greatest dimension by CT scan or MRI of the pelvis, unless the enlarged lymph node is sampled and is negative; 3. Androgen deprivation therapy started prior to prostatectomy for \> 6 months (180 days) duration. Note: The use of finasteride or dutasteride (±tamsulosin) for longer periods prior to prostatectomy is acceptable; 4. Androgen deprivation therapy started after prostatectomy and prior to registration (Note: The use of finasteride or dutasteride (±tamsulosin) after prostatectomy is not acceptable - must be stopped within 3 months after prostatectomy. Androgen deprivation therapy must be stopped within 3 months after prostatectomy); 5. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before or after prostatectomy; 6. Prior chemotherapy for any other disease site if given within 5 years prior to registration; 7. Prior cryosurgery or brachytherapy of the prostate; prostatectomy should be the primary treatment and not a salvage procedure; 8. Prior pelvic radiotherapy; 9. Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) or superficial bladder cancer unless disease free for a minimum of 5 years \[for example, carcinoma in situ of the oral cavity is permissible\]; 10. Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows: * History of inflammatory bowel disease; * History of hepatitis B or C; Blood tests are not required to determine if the patient has had hepatitis B or C, unless the patient reports a history of hepatitis. * Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months; * Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months; * Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration; * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of registration; * Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects; AST or ALT are required; note, however, that laboratory tests for coagulation parameters are not required for entry into this protocol. * Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition; Note, however, that human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) testing is not required for entry into this protocol. The need to exclude patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) from this protocol is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may result in increased toxicity and immunosuppression. 11. Prior allergic reaction to the study drug(s) involved in this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 YearsFrom randomization to five years.Progression is defined as the first occurrence of the following events: biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen \[PSA\] ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional or distant), or death from any cause. The initiation of second salvage therapy before progression was a protocol violation and resulted in censoring. Progression time is defined as time from randomization to the date of progression, second salvage therapy (censored), or last known follow-up (censored). Freedom from progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Hormone-refractory disease (failure) is defined as three rises in PSA after the start of second salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Local FailureFrom randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Local failure is defined as first occurrence of local clinical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Distant MetastasisFrom randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis determined by imaging. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Cause-specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), or death following disease progression (clinical or biochemical) in the absence of or after the initiation of any salvage therapy. \[Biochemical progression is indicated by any rise in PSA.\] Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.
Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Pairwise comparisons of the overall distributions of failure times are reported in statistical analysis section, with five-year rates reported here. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)From randomization to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy (approximately 7-8 weeks).Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Pairwise comparisons of Arm 2 vs Arm 1 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 2 are reported in the statistical analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Secondary biochemical (failure) is defined as either of two occurrences: 1. For detectable post-baseline PSA values (≥ 0.1), the first occurrence of a PSA value that is both ≥ 0.4 and a second rise above nadir; 2.The start of second salvage therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section.
Comparison of Disease-specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Change by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R), Trail Making Test A & B, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.
Assessment of Mood and Depression Change Using QOL Measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.
Assessment and Comparison of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) and Quality Adjusted FFP Year (QAFFPY)From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.
Evaluation and Comparison of the Cost-utility Using EuroQoL - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.
Prognostic Value of Genomic and Proteomic Markers for the Primary and Secondary Clinical EndpointsDate of randomization to timepoint of the respective primary or secondary endpoint.
Assessment of the Relationship(s) Between the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA SI) and Urinary Morbidity (Adverse Event Terms: Urinary Frequency/Urgency) Using the CTCAE v. 3.0 Grading SystemFrom the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)AE: from 91 days after completion of RT (approximately 7-8 weeks) to last follow-up. Vital status: from randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Late adverse events (AE) are defined as occurring \> 90 days from the completion of RT. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 2 or grade 3 adverse event, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times between Arm 2 and Arm 1 and between Arm 3 and Arm 2, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored.

Countries

Canada, China, Israel, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PBRT Alone
Prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT) begins within 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) after registration.
564
PBRT + STAD
Prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT) and short term androgen deprivation therapy (STAD) consisting of antiandrogen (AA) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy begins within 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) after registration. STAD starts first, 2 months (+/- 2 weeks) before radiotherapy (RT), and lasts for 4-6 months. LHRH can last 4-6 months. AA starts at the same time as LHRH (or up to 2 weeks prior ), lasts approximately 4 months, and should end on the last day of RT (+/- 2 weeks).
578
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD
Pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT), prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT), and short term androgen deprivation therapy (STAD) consisting of antiandrogen (AA) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy begins within 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) after registration. STAD starts first, 2 months (+/- 2 weeks) before RT, and lasts for 4-6 months. LHRH can last 4-6 months. AA starts at the same time as LHRH (or up to 2 weeks prior ), lasts approximately 4 months, and should end on the last day of RT (+/- 2 weeks).
574
Total1,716

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyProtocol Violation282424

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPBRT AlonePBRT + STADPLNRT + PBRT + STADTotal
Age, Continuous64 years64 years64 years64 years
Age, Customized
Age (years)
<=49
19 Participants15 Participants8 Participants42 Participants
Age, Customized
Age (years)
50-59
118 Participants137 Participants138 Participants393 Participants
Age, Customized
Age (years)
60-69
307 Participants299 Participants307 Participants913 Participants
Age, Customized
Age (years)
>=70
120 Participants127 Participants121 Participants368 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants23 Participants30 Participants74 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
511 Participants527 Participants517 Participants1555 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
32 Participants28 Participants27 Participants87 Participants
Gleason Score
4
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Gleason Score
5
3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Gleason Score
6
80 Participants85 Participants89 Participants254 Participants
Gleason Score
7: 3+4
226 Participants240 Participants221 Participants687 Participants
Gleason Score
7:4+3
153 Participants148 Participants156 Participants457 Participants
Gleason Score
7: primary/secondary not indicated
9 Participants5 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Gleason Score
8
57 Participants60 Participants57 Participants174 Participants
Gleason Score
9
36 Participants38 Participants42 Participants116 Participants
Number of Lymph Nodes Examined5 lymph nodes6 lymph nodes5 lymph nodes6 lymph nodes
Pathologic Seminal Vesicle Involvement
No
482 Participants494 Participants488 Participants1464 Participants
Pathologic Seminal Vesicle Involvement
Yes
82 Participants84 Participants86 Participants252 Participants
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy
No
189 Participants207 Participants209 Participants605 Participants
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy
Yes
375 Participants371 Participants365 Participants1111 Participants
Pre-RT Entry PSA
>= 0.1 and <= 0.2 ng/ml
155 Participants126 Participants154 Participants435 Participants
Pre-RT Entry PSA
> 0.2 and <= 0.5 ng/ml
247 Participants256 Participants247 Participants750 Participants
Pre-RT Entry PSA
> 0.5 and <= 1.0 ng/ml
105 Participants130 Participants114 Participants349 Participants
Pre-RT Entry PSA
> 1.0 and < 2.0 ng/ml
57 Participants66 Participants59 Participants182 Participants
Pre-RT Entry PSA0.32 ng/ml0.40 ng/ml0.32 ng/ml0.35 ng/ml
Prostatectomy Margins
Negative
267 Participants284 Participants287 Participants838 Participants
Prostatectomy Margins
Positive
288 Participants289 Participants284 Participants861 Participants
Prostatectomy Margins
Unknown
9 Participants5 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Prostatectomy Tumor Stage
pT2
292 Participants317 Participants304 Participants913 Participants
Prostatectomy Tumor Stage
pT3a Extraprostatic extension
177 Participants162 Participants166 Participants505 Participants
Prostatectomy Tumor Stage
pT3b Seminal vesicle invasion
82 Participants84 Participants86 Participants252 Participants
Prostatectomy Tumor Stage
pT3 Extraprostatic extension NOS
13 Participants15 Participants18 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants6 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
74 Participants69 Participants77 Participants220 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants17 Participants10 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
464 Participants482 Participants474 Participants1420 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
564 Participants578 Participants574 Participants1716 Participants
Zubrod Performance Status
0
522 Participants539 Participants540 Participants1601 Participants
Zubrod Performance Status
1
42 Participants39 Participants34 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
48 / 54743 / 56343 / 563
other
Total, other adverse events
433 / 547492 / 563509 / 563
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 54729 / 56323 / 563

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years

Progression is defined as the first occurrence of the following events: biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen \[PSA\] ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional or distant), or death from any cause. The initiation of second salvage therapy before progression was a protocol violation and resulted in censoring. Progression time is defined as time from randomization to the date of progression, second salvage therapy (censored), or last known follow-up (censored). Freedom from progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section.

Time frame: From randomization to five years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years70.3 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years81.3 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years87.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Alternative hypotheses: 10% improvement in 5-year FFP in Arm 2 and 20% improvement in Arm 3, both relative to Arm 1, which has an assumed 5-year FFP of 70%. Sample size of 1587 (529/arm) with overall one-sided 0.025 alpha provides 90% power. Interim analyses (reported here) tested at one-sided significance level of 0.001. P\<0.001 indicates comparison crossed interim efficacy boundary. See Limitations and Caveats section.p-value: <0.001Z test
Comparison: Alternative hypotheses: 10% improvement in 5-year FFP in Arm 2 and 20% improvement in Arm 3, both relative to Arm 1, which has an assumed 5-year FFP of 70%. Sample size of 1587 (529/arm) with overall one-sided 0.025 alpha provides 90% power. Interim analyses (reported here) tested at one-sided significance level of 0.001. P\<0.001 indicates comparison crossed interim efficacy boundary. See Limitations and Caveats section.p-value: 0.003Z-test
Comparison: Alternative hypotheses: 10% improvement in 5-year FFP in Arm 2 and 20% improvement in Arm 3, both relative to Arm 1, which has an assumed 5-year FFP of 70%. Sample size of 1587 (529/arm) with overall one-sided 0.025 alpha provides 90% power. Interim analyses (reported here) tested at one-sided significance level of 0.001. P\<0.001 indicates comparison crossed interim efficacy boundary. See Limitations and Caveats section.p-value: <0.001Z-test
Secondary

Assessment and Comparison of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) and Quality Adjusted FFP Year (QAFFPY)

Time frame: From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.

Secondary

Assessment of Mood and Depression Change Using QOL Measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)

Time frame: From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.

Secondary

Assessment of the Relationship(s) Between the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA SI) and Urinary Morbidity (Adverse Event Terms: Urinary Frequency/Urgency) Using the CTCAE v. 3.0 Grading System

Time frame: From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.

Secondary

Comparison of Disease-specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Change by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R), Trail Making Test A & B, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)

Time frame: From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.

Secondary

Evaluation and Comparison of the Cost-utility Using EuroQoL - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)

Time frame: From the 6th week of radiation therapy to 5 years post radiation therapy.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)

Survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Pairwise comparisons of the overall distributions of failure times are reported in statistical analysis section, with five-year rates reported here. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)93.9 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)96.1 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)95.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.23597.5% CI: [0.54, 1.38]Log Rank
p-value: 0.48197.5% CI: [0.61, 1.6]Log Rank
p-value: 0.21397.5% CI: [0.53, 1.35]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Pairwise comparisons of Arm 2 vs Arm 1 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 2 are reported in the statistical analysis.

Time frame: From randomization to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy (approximately 7-8 weeks).

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 2+18.8 percentage of participants
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 3+4.4 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 2+36.3 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 3+8.7 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 2+43.6 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 3+12.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Acute grade 2+ acute adverse eventsp-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [1.81, 3.37]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Acute grade 2+ acute adverse eventsp-value: 0.00797.5% CI: [1.03, 1.77]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Acute grade 3+ acute adverse eventsp-value: 0.00297.5% CI: [1.16, 3.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Acute grade 3+ adverse eventsp-value: 0.02595% CI: [0.975, 2.27]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Late adverse events (AE) are defined as occurring \> 90 days from the completion of RT. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 2 or grade 3 adverse event, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times between Arm 2 and Arm 1 and between Arm 3 and Arm 2, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored.

Time frame: AE: from 91 days after completion of RT (approximately 7-8 weeks) to last follow-up. Vital status: from randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 2+52.8 percentage of participants
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 3+10.3 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 2+54.8 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 3+11.4 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 2+58.6 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)Grade 3+14.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Late grade 2+ adverse eventsp-value: 0.26897.5% CI: [0.88, 1.26]Log Rank
Comparison: Late grade 2+ adverse eventsp-value: 0.10197.5% CI: [0.93, 1.32]Log Rank
Comparison: Late grade 3+ adverse eventsp-value: 0.11997.5% CI: [0.83, 1.8]Log Rank
Comparison: Late grade 3+ adverse eventsp-value: 0.1797.5% CI: [0.82, 1.65]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)

Hormone-refractory disease (failure) is defined as three rises in PSA after the start of second salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)2.9 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)2.4 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)1.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.13797.5% CI: [0.39, 1.39]Log Rank
p-value: 0.00797.5% CI: [0.16, 0.95]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [0.12, 0.68]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)

Cause-specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), or death following disease progression (clinical or biochemical) in the absence of or after the initiation of any salvage therapy. \[Biochemical progression is indicated by any rise in PSA.\] Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)2.7 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)1.1 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)0.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.13797.5% CI: [0.35, 1.43]Log Rank
p-value: 0.14197.5% CI: [0.3, 1.54]Log Rank
p-value: 0.01497.5% CI: [0.21, 1.03]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis determined by imaging. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis8.3 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis5.9 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis4.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.10597.5% CI: [0.49, 1.22]Log Rank
p-value: 0.02297.5% CI: [0.36, 1.06]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [0.29, 0.81]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Local Failure

Local failure is defined as first occurrence of local clinical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants With Local Failure3.1 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants With Local Failure1.2 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants With Local Failure0.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0197.5% CI: [0.14, 1.01]Log Rank
p-value: 0.17797.5% CI: [0.14, 2.3]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [0.06, 0.71]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)

Secondary biochemical (failure) is defined as either of two occurrences: 1. For detectable post-baseline PSA values (≥ 0.1), the first occurrence of a PSA value that is both ≥ 0.4 and a second rise above nadir; 2.The start of second salvage therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PBRT AlonePercentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)35.7 percentage of participants
PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)22.3 percentage of participants
PLNRT + PBRT + STADPercentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)14.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [0.45, 0.72]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [0.51, 0.89]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [0.3, 0.51]Log Rank
Secondary

Prognostic Value of Genomic and Proteomic Markers for the Primary and Secondary Clinical Endpoints

Time frame: Date of randomization to timepoint of the respective primary or secondary endpoint.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026