Skip to content

Comparing Two Different Myeloablation Therapies in Treating Young Patients Who Are Undergoing a Stem Cell Transplant for High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Phase III Randomized Trial of Single vs. Tandem Myeloablative Consolidation Therapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00567567
Enrollment
665
Registered
2007-12-05
Start date
2007-11-05
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2022-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Localized Resectable Neuroblastoma, Localized Unresectable Neuroblastoma, Recurrent Neuroblastoma, Regional Neuroblastoma, Stage 4 Neuroblastoma, Stage 4S Neuroblastoma

Brief summary

This randomized phase III trial compares two different high-dose chemotherapy regimens followed by a stem cell transplant in treating younger patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving combination chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving these treatments before a peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps kill any tumor cells that are in the body and helps make room in the patient?s bone marrow for new blood-forming cells (stem cells) to grow. After treatment, stem cells are collected from the patient's blood and stored. High-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy is then given to prepare the bone marrow for the stem cell transplant. The stem cells are then returned to the patient to replace the blood-forming cells that were destroyed by the high- chemotherapy. It is not yet known which regimen of high-dose chemotherapy is more effective for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma undergoing a peripheral blood stem cell transplant.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To improve the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of high-risk neuroblastoma patients through treatment with a tandem consolidation of thiotepa/cyclophosphamide followed by carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan (CEM) as compared to single CEM consolidation. II. To improve the rate of end-induction complete response and very good partial response, compared to historical controls, by use of a topotecan-containing induction regimen. III. To improve the 3-year local control rate, compared to historical controls, by increasing the local dose of radiation to the residual primary tumor for patients with less than a gross total resection. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the pharmacogenetic relationship of cyclophosphamide metabolizing enzymes (CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and GSTA1 genotypes) with toxicity and response following dose-intensive cyclophosphamide and topotecan induction chemotherapy. II. To determine if resection completeness is predictive of a) local control rate; or b) EFS rate in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. III. To prospectively describe the complications related to efforts at local control (surgery and radiation therapy) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. IV. To describe the neurologic outcome of patients with paraspinal primary neuroblastoma tumors. V. To determine the variability of 13-cis-retinoic-acid pharmacokinetics and relationship to pharmacogenomic parameters and determine if pharmacokinetics and/or genetic variations correlate with EFS or systemic toxicity as follows: a) To determine the variability of 13-cis-retinoic-acid pharmacokinetics and relationship to pharmacogenomic parameters. b) To determine if 13-cis-retinoic-acid pharmacokinetic levels are predictive of the EFS rate or associated with systemic toxicity following 13-cis-retinoic acid. c) To determine if pharmacogenomic variations are predictive of the EFS rate or associated with systemic toxicity following 13-cis-retinoic acid. VI. To evaluate total topotecan pharmacokinetics and correlate with patient specific data for use in an ongoing topotecan population pharmacokinetic analysis. VII. To evaluate the presence and function of T cells capable of recognizing neuroblastoma by assessing: a) if T cells recognizing the neuroblastoma antigen, survivin, circulate at diagnosis; b) if these T cells can be expanded using autologous antigen presenting cells (APCs); c) if these T cells will kill neuroblastoma cells as detected in functional assays; and d) if the presence and activity of anti-neuroblastoma immunity is decreased by stem cell transplantation. VIII. To characterize the recovery of T- cell numbers after myeloablative consolidation and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and assess the impact of tandem myeloablative consolidation on T- cell recovery. IX. To characterize minimal residual disease burden using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) evaluation of a panel of neuroblastoma specific transcripts in patient bone marrow and peripheral blood following induction chemotherapy and after single versus tandem myeloablative chemotherapy and to evaluate impact on EFS. X. To evaluate the EFS and overall survival (OS) rate for patients 12-18 months with Stage 4, MYCN nonamplified tumor with unfavorable histopathology or diploid DNA content or with indeterminant histology or ploidy and patients who are greater than 547 days of age with Stage 3, MYCN nonamplified tumor AND unfavorable histopathology or indeterminant histology following treatment with single myeloablative transplant. OUTLINE: INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY: COURSES 1 AND 2: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes and topotecan hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5 and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) or IV beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses. Patients undergo peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and harvest after course 2. COURSES 3 AND 5: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1-4, etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3, and G-CSF SC or IV beginning on day 5 and continuing until blood counts recover. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses. Patients undergo surgical resection of soft tissue disease after course 5 (or after course 6 if medically necessary). COURSES 4 AND 6: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 6 hours on days 1-2, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 24 hours on days 1-3, vincristine IV on days 1-3, and G-CSF SC or IV beginning on day 5 and continuing until blood counts recover. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses. Patients are then stratified by initial stage of disease and MYCN status, biologic characteristics, and response to induction chemotherapy (complete response/very good partial response vs partial response vs mixed response/no response). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Patients 12?18 months old (i.e., 365-547 days) with stage IV, MYCN nonamplified tumor with unfavorable histopathology or diploid DNA content or with indeterminant histology or ploidy AND patients who are 547 days of age with stage III, MYCN nonamplified tumor AND unfavorable histopathology or indeterminant histology will be nonrandomly assigned to Arm A. Patients begin consolidation chemotherapy no later than 8 weeks after the start of induction course 6. CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: ARM A (single myeloablative consolidation): Patients receive melphalan IV over 15-30 minutes on days -7 to -5, etoposide IV over 24 hours and carboplatin IV over 24 hours on days -7 to -4, and G-CSF SC or IV beginning on day 0 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) on day 0. ARM B (tandem myeloablative consolidation): Patients receive thiotepa IV over 2 hours on days -7 to -5, cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -2, and G-CSF SC or IV beginning on day 0 and continuing until blood counts recover. Following clinical recovery from initial myeloablative therapy, patients also receive melphalan, etoposide, and carboplatin as in Arm A. Patients undergo autologous PBSCT on day 0. RADIOTHERAPY: Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to primary site of disease as well as to MIBG-avid sites seen at pre-transplantation (i.e., end-induction) evaluation between 28-42 days post-transplant. Additional radiotherapy is administered to residual tumor at primary site. MAINTENANCE THERAPY: Patients are encouraged to enroll onto Children?s Oncology Group (COG)-ANBL0032 following assessment of tumor response after completion of the consolidation phase and radiotherapy. Beginning on day 60 post-transplantation patients receive oral isotretinoin twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood and tissue sample collection periodically for the following analyses; correlation between peak serum concentration level and the existence of polymorphisms, event-free survival, and toxicity rates; pharmacogenomics for uridine diphosphate (UDP) glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1), UGT2B7, CYP2C8 and CYP3A7 alleles; topotecan systemic clearance; survivin-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) detected using peptide/major histocompatibility complex (MHC) tetramers in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2+ patients; interferon (IFN)-gamma production in enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays to APCs loaded with tumor ribonucleic acid (RNA), survivin RNA, or control RNA; response of APC-stimulated CTL response to neuroblastoma cells; rate of T cell recovery; and proportion of patients with neuroblastoma detected in bone marrow and peripheral blood using RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 5 years and then annually for 5 years.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAutologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant

DRUGCarboplatin

Given IV

DRUGCisplatin

Given IV

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGDoxorubicin Hydrochloride

Given IV

DRUGEtoposide

Given IV

RADIATIONExternal Beam Radiation Therapy

Undergo EBRT

BIOLOGICALFilgrastim

Given IV or SC

DRUGIsotretinoin

Given orally

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

DRUGMelphalan

Given IV

PROCEDUREPeripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant

OTHERPharmacological Study

Correlative studies

DRUGThiotepa

Given IV

DRUGTopotecan Hydrochloride

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of neuroblastoma or ganglioneuroblastoma by histology or as evidenced by the presence of clumps of tumor cells in bone marrow and elevated catecholamine metabolites in urine meeting any of the following criteria: * Patients with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma with International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage 4 disease are eligible with the following: * MYCN amplification (i.e., greater than four-fold increase in MYCN signals as compared to reference signals), regardless of age or additional biologic features * Age \> 18 months (i.e., \> 547 days) regardless of biologic features * Age 12-18 months (i.e., 365-547 days) with none of the following three favorable biologic features (i.e., non-amplified MYCN, favorable pathology, and deoxyribonucleic acid \[DNA\] index \> 1) * Patients with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma with INSS stage 3 are eligible with the following: * MYCN amplification (i.e., greater than four-fold increase in MYCN signals as compared to reference signals), regardless of age or additional biologic features * Age \> 18 months (i.e., \> 547 days) with unfavorable pathology, regardless of MYCN status * Patients with newly diagnosed INSS stage 2a or 2b with MYCN amplification (i.e., greater than four-fold increase in MYCN signals as compared to reference signals), regardless of age or additional biologic features * Patients with newly diagnosed INSS stage 4s with MYCN amplification (i.e., greater than four-fold increase in MYCN signals as compared to reference signals), regardless of additional biologic features * Patients \>= 365 days initially diagnosed with INSS stage 1, 2, or 4S and who progressed to a stage 4 without interval chemotherapy * Must have been enrolled on COG-ANBL00B1 * Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate ? 70mL/min OR serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows: * 1 month to \< 6 months: 0.4 mg/dL * 6 months to \< 1 year: 0.5 mg/dL * 1 to \< 2 years: 0.6 mg/dL * 2 to \< 6 years: 0.8 mg/dL * 6 to \< 10 years: 1 mg/dL * 10 to \< 13 years: 1.2 mg/dL * 10 to \< 16 years: 1.5 mg/dL (male), 1.4 mg/dL (female) * \>= 16 years: 1.7 mg/dL (male), 1.4 mg/dL (female) * Total bilirubin ? 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for age * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 10 times ULN for age * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Shortening fraction \>= 27% by echocardiogram (ECHO) OR left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>= 50% by radionuclide angiogram * No known contraindication (e.g., size, weight or physical condition) to peripheral blood stem cell collection * No prior systemic therapy except for localized emergency radiation to sites of life-threatening or function-threatening disease * No more than one course of chemotherapy per low- or intermediate-risk neuroblastoma therapy prior to determination of MYCN amplification and histology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-free Survival RateThree years, from time of randomizationComparison of EFS curves, starting from the time of randomization, by treatment group (single CEM vs. tandem CEM)
Response After Induction TherapyStudy enrollment to the end of induction therapyPer the International Response Criteria: measurable tumor defined as product of longest x widest perpendicular diameter. Elevated catecholamine levels, tumor cell invasion of bone marrow also considered measurable tumor. Complete Response (CR)-no evidence of primary tumor or metastases. Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)-\>90% reduction of primary tumor; no metastases; no new bone lesions, all pre-existing lesions improved. Partial Response (PR)-50-90% reduction of primary tumor; \>50% reduction in measurable sites of metastases; 0-1 bone marrow samples with tumor; number of positive bone sites decreased by \>50%. Mixed Response (MR)-\>50% reduction of any measurable lesion (primary or metastases) with \<50% reduction in other sites; no new lesions; \<25% increase in any existing lesion. No Response (NR)-no new lesions; \<50% reduction but \<25% increase in any existing legions. Progressive Disease (PD)-any new/increased measurable lesion by \>25%; previous negative marrow positive.
Incidence Rate of Local RecurrenceUp to 3 yearsCumulative incidence rate of local recurrence comparison between ANBL0532 patients randomized or assigned to receive single CEM transplant and boost radiation versus the historical A3973 patients who were transplanted and received boost radiation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical ResponseUp to 3 yearsPercentage of patients who achieved a surgical complete resection
Type of Surgical or Radiotherapy ComplicationUp to 3 yearsThe Percentage of patients who experienced surgical or radiotherapy complications will be calculated. The complications are: bowel obstruction, chylous leaf, renal injury/atrophy/loss and diarrhea.
Intraspinal ExtensionUp to 5 yearsPercentage of patients with primary tumors with intraspinal extension.
Peak Serum Concentration of Isotretinoin in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk StudiesDay 1 of each courseMedian peak serum concentration level of isotretinoin for patients enrolled on ANBL0532
Pharmacogenetic Variants in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk StudiesAt baselineTo determine if pharmacogenomic variations are predictive of EFS, a logrank test comparison of patients with vs without a given polymorphism will be made. A Fisher's exact test will test for association of the presence of a polymorphism with the occurrence of systemic toxicity (CTC grade 3 or 4 skin, hypercalcemia, or hepatic toxicity). These tests will be performed for UGT1A1, UGT2B7, CYP2C8 and CYP3A7 alleles.
Duration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 NeutropeniaThrough completion of a participant's first cycle during induction, including treatment delays, assessed up to 39 daysA logistic regression model will be used to test the ability of the number of days of neutropenia to predict the presence of a polymorphism.
Presence and Function of T Cells Capable of Recognizing NeuroblastomaUp to 6 months (end of therapy)
Enumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsUp to 6 months after completion of assigned myeloablation therapyA descriptive comparison of the median number of T-cells (CD3, CD4, CD8) between treatment arms (single vs. tandem myeloablative regimens) will be performed.
Proportion of Patients With Neuroblastoma Detected in Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Using RT-PCR TechniqueBaselineWill be calculated overall and by treatment arm.
EFS Pts Non-randomly Assigned to Single CEM (12-18 Mths, Stg. 4, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor/Unfavorable or Indeterminant Histopathology/Diploid DNA Content & Pts>547 Days, Stg.3, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor AND Unfavorable or Indeterminant Histopathology).Up to 3 yearsKaplan-Meier curves of EFS will be plotted, and the proportion of responders to induction therapy will be tabulated.
OS in Patients 12-18 Months, Stage 4, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor/Unfavorable Histopathology/Diploid DNA Content/Indeterminant Histology/Ploidy and Patients > 547 Days, Stage 3, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor AND Unfavorable Histopathology/Indeterminant HistologyUp to 3 yearsKaplan-Meier curves of OS will be plotted, and the proportion of responders to induction therapy will be tabulated.
Topotecan Systemic ClearanceDay 1 of courses 1-2Median topotecan systemic clearance for courses 1 and 2.
Duration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 ThrombocytopeniaThrough completion of a participant's first cycle during induction, including treatment delays, assessed up to 46 daysA logistic regression model will be used to test the ability of the number of days of thrombocytopenia to predict the presence of a polymorphism.
Proportion of Patients With a PolymorphismThrough completion of a participant's first two cycles during induction, including treatment delays, assessed up to 69 daysA chi-square test will be used to test whether the response rate after two cycles of induction therapy and the presence of a polymorphism are independent in the study population.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single HST (CEM)
Induction therapy + single myeloablative consolidation
210
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly Assigned
Induction therapy + tandem myeloablative consolidation
176
Not Assigned
Patients that either failed during Induction therapy or refused randomization
279
Total665

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event025
Overall StudyDeath815
Overall StudyEnrolled another COG therapeutic study99800
Overall StudyIneligible409
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy161748
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision161884
Overall StudyRefusal by patient/parent/guardian916122
Overall StudyUnable adequate stem cell for transplant002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject002

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle HST (CEM)Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedNot AssignedTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
208 Participants176 Participants277 Participants661 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous3.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
2.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
3.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
3.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants26 Participants30 Participants78 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
181 Participants145 Participants233 Participants559 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants5 Participants16 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants5 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
23 Participants18 Participants40 Participants81 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
20 Participants21 Participants23 Participants64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
157 Participants132 Participants203 Participants492 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
11 participants8 participants10 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
19 participants21 participants23 participants63 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
3 participants1 participants3 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
176 participants146 participants243 participants565 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
95 Participants78 Participants118 Participants291 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
115 Participants98 Participants161 Participants374 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
196 / 206163 / 176230 / 269
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 20615 / 17612 / 269

Outcome results

Primary

Event-free Survival Rate

Comparison of EFS curves, starting from the time of randomization, by treatment group (single CEM vs. tandem CEM)

Time frame: Three years, from time of randomization

Population: All eligible, randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Event-free Survival Rate48.8 percent probability
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedEvent-free Survival Rate61.8 percent probability
Comparison: The event-free survival distributions of patients randomized to Regimen A - Single HST (CEM) and randomized to Regimen B - Tandem HST (CEM) were compared using the log-rank test.p-value: 0.0082Log Rank
Primary

Incidence Rate of Local Recurrence

Cumulative incidence rate of local recurrence comparison between ANBL0532 patients randomized or assigned to receive single CEM transplant and boost radiation versus the historical A3973 patients who were transplanted and received boost radiation.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: Eligible patients randomized or assigned to the single HST (CEM) treatment arm who also received boost radiation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Incidence Rate of Local Recurrence15.7 Percentage 3-year cumulative incidence
Comparison: The cumulative incidence rates of local recurrence between patients from ANBL0532 randomized or assigned to receive single CEM transplant and boost radiation and A3973 patients who were transplanted and received boost radiation were compared using Gray's test.p-value: 0.5615Gray's test for competing risks
Primary

Response After Induction Therapy

Per the International Response Criteria: measurable tumor defined as product of longest x widest perpendicular diameter. Elevated catecholamine levels, tumor cell invasion of bone marrow also considered measurable tumor. Complete Response (CR)-no evidence of primary tumor or metastases. Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)-\>90% reduction of primary tumor; no metastases; no new bone lesions, all pre-existing lesions improved. Partial Response (PR)-50-90% reduction of primary tumor; \>50% reduction in measurable sites of metastases; 0-1 bone marrow samples with tumor; number of positive bone sites decreased by \>50%. Mixed Response (MR)-\>50% reduction of any measurable lesion (primary or metastases) with \<50% reduction in other sites; no new lesions; \<25% increase in any existing lesion. No Response (NR)-no new lesions; \<50% reduction but \<25% increase in any existing legions. Progressive Disease (PD)-any new/increased measurable lesion by \>25%; previous negative marrow positive.

Time frame: Study enrollment to the end of induction therapy

Population: Eligible patients evaluated for response at the end of induction therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Response After Induction Therapy0.54 Proportion participants that responded
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedResponse After Induction Therapy0.48 Proportion participants that responded
Not AssignedResponse After Induction Therapy0.35 Proportion participants that responded
Comparison: Chi-square test of proportions in all patients to compare the proportion of responders (complete response \[CR\]+ very good partial response \[VGPR\]) at the end of induction therapy in this study to an analogous cohort of responders in A3973.p-value: 0.0034Chi-squared
Secondary

Duration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Neutropenia

A logistic regression model will be used to test the ability of the number of days of neutropenia to predict the presence of a polymorphism.

Time frame: Through completion of a participant's first cycle during induction, including treatment delays, assessed up to 39 days

Population: Eligible patients with available polymorphism and neutropenia toxicity data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Single HST (CEM)Duration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Neutropenia7 Days
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedDuration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Neutropenia7 Days
Not AssignedDuration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Neutropenia7 Days
p-value: 0.0939Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Duration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Thrombocytopenia

A logistic regression model will be used to test the ability of the number of days of thrombocytopenia to predict the presence of a polymorphism.

Time frame: Through completion of a participant's first cycle during induction, including treatment delays, assessed up to 46 days

Population: Eligible patients with available polymorphism and thrombocytopenia toxicity data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Single HST (CEM)Duration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Thrombocytopenia4 Days
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedDuration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Thrombocytopenia4 Days
Not AssignedDuration of Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 Thrombocytopenia4 Days
p-value: 0.3277Regression, Logistic
Secondary

EFS Pts Non-randomly Assigned to Single CEM (12-18 Mths, Stg. 4, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor/Unfavorable or Indeterminant Histopathology/Diploid DNA Content & Pts>547 Days, Stg.3, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor AND Unfavorable or Indeterminant Histopathology).

Kaplan-Meier curves of EFS will be plotted, and the proportion of responders to induction therapy will be tabulated.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: All eligible patients non-randomly assigned to single CEM

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)EFS Pts Non-randomly Assigned to Single CEM (12-18 Mths, Stg. 4, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor/Unfavorable or Indeterminant Histopathology/Diploid DNA Content & Pts>547 Days, Stg.3, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor AND Unfavorable or Indeterminant Histopathology).73.1 percent probability
Secondary

Enumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 Cells

A descriptive comparison of the median number of T-cells (CD3, CD4, CD8) between treatment arms (single vs. tandem myeloablative regimens) will be performed.

Time frame: Up to 6 months after completion of assigned myeloablation therapy

Population: All eligible patients that had CD3, CD4 and CD8T-cell count evaluated at the end of reporting period 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Single HST (CEM)Enumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsCD3200 cells/mm^3
Single HST (CEM)Enumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsCD473 cells/mm^3
Single HST (CEM)Enumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsCD8104 cells/mm^3
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedEnumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsCD481 cells/mm^3
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedEnumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsCD3255.5 cells/mm^3
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedEnumeration of Peripheral Blood Cluster of Differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 CellsCD8151 cells/mm^3
Secondary

Intraspinal Extension

Percentage of patients with primary tumors with intraspinal extension.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: All eligible patients enrolled on ANBL0532.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Intraspinal Extension8.25 Percentage of patients
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedIntraspinal Extension9.66 Percentage of patients
Not AssignedIntraspinal Extension7.78 Percentage of patients
Secondary

OS in Patients 12-18 Months, Stage 4, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor/Unfavorable Histopathology/Diploid DNA Content/Indeterminant Histology/Ploidy and Patients > 547 Days, Stage 3, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor AND Unfavorable Histopathology/Indeterminant Histology

Kaplan-Meier curves of OS will be plotted, and the proportion of responders to induction therapy will be tabulated.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)OS in Patients 12-18 Months, Stage 4, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor/Unfavorable Histopathology/Diploid DNA Content/Indeterminant Histology/Ploidy and Patients > 547 Days, Stage 3, MYCN Nonamplified Tumor AND Unfavorable Histopathology/Indeterminant Histology81.0 percent probability
Secondary

Peak Serum Concentration of Isotretinoin in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk Studies

Median peak serum concentration level of isotretinoin for patients enrolled on ANBL0532

Time frame: Day 1 of each course

Population: Eligible patients evaluated for peak serum concentration level of isotretinoin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Single HST (CEM)Peak Serum Concentration of Isotretinoin in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk Studies1.00 Micromolar
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedPeak Serum Concentration of Isotretinoin in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk Studies1.36 Micromolar
Not AssignedPeak Serum Concentration of Isotretinoin in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk Studies1.26 Micromolar
Comparison: The relationship between the peak serum isotretinoin concentration level with event-free survival was explored with a Cox proportional hazards model. Eligible patients treated with isotretinoin on A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0532, or ANBL0931 with peak serum concentration level data were included in the analysis.p-value: 0.6853Regression, Cox
Secondary

Pharmacogenetic Variants in Patients Enrolled on Either A3973, ANBL0032, ANBL0931, ANBL0532 and Future High Risk Studies

To determine if pharmacogenomic variations are predictive of EFS, a logrank test comparison of patients with vs without a given polymorphism will be made. A Fisher's exact test will test for association of the presence of a polymorphism with the occurrence of systemic toxicity (CTC grade 3 or 4 skin, hypercalcemia, or hepatic toxicity). These tests will be performed for UGT1A1, UGT2B7, CYP2C8 and CYP3A7 alleles.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: Data were not collected to assess this study aim.

Secondary

Presence and Function of T Cells Capable of Recognizing Neuroblastoma

Time frame: Up to 6 months (end of therapy)

Population: Data were not collected to assess this study aim.

Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Polymorphism

A chi-square test will be used to test whether the response rate after two cycles of induction therapy and the presence of a polymorphism are independent in the study population.

Time frame: Through completion of a participant's first two cycles during induction, including treatment delays, assessed up to 69 days

Population: Eligible patients with available polymorphism data and response data after two cycles of induction therapy. Measure value is the proportion of patients with a polymorphism.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Proportion of Patients With a Polymorphism0.96 Proportion of patients
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedProportion of Patients With a Polymorphism0.96 Proportion of patients
Not AssignedProportion of Patients With a Polymorphism0.97 Proportion of patients
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: The response rate after two cycles of induction therapy and the presence of a polymorphism are independent in the study populationp-value: 0.759895% CI: [0.4105, 5.001]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Neuroblastoma Detected in Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Using RT-PCR Technique

Will be calculated overall and by treatment arm.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data were not collected to assess this study aim.

Secondary

Surgical Response

Percentage of patients who achieved a surgical complete resection

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: All eligible patients enrolled on ANBL0532.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Surgical Response83.98 Percentage of patients
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedSurgical Response84.09 Percentage of patients
Not AssignedSurgical Response58.89 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Topotecan Systemic Clearance

Median topotecan systemic clearance for courses 1 and 2.

Time frame: Day 1 of courses 1-2

Population: Eligible patients evaluated for topotecan systemic clearance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Single HST (CEM)Topotecan Systemic Clearance28.1 L/h/m2
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedTopotecan Systemic Clearance28.1 L/h/m2
Not AssignedTopotecan Systemic Clearance28.5 L/h/m2
Secondary

Type of Surgical or Radiotherapy Complication

The Percentage of patients who experienced surgical or radiotherapy complications will be calculated. The complications are: bowel obstruction, chylous leaf, renal injury/atrophy/loss and diarrhea.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: All eligible patients enrolled on ANBL0532.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single HST (CEM)Type of Surgical or Radiotherapy Complication13.11 Percentage of patients
Tandem HST (CEM), Randomly AssignedType of Surgical or Radiotherapy Complication12.50 Percentage of patients
Not AssignedType of Surgical or Radiotherapy Complication11.85 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026