Skip to content

Remote Endarterectomy Versus Suprageniculate Femoropopliteal Bypass

The Surgical Treatment of Long Occlusions of the Superficial Femoral Artery: Initial Success and Long Term Results of Remote Endarterectomy Versus Suprageniculate Bypass Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00566436
Acronym
REVAS
Enrollment
126
Registered
2007-12-03
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2007-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis, Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Keywords

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease, Superficial Femoral Artery, Remote Endarterectomy, Suprageniculate Bypass Surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Vascular Patency

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare remote superficial femoral artery endarterectomy with suprageniculate bypass surgery in the treatment of long occlusions of the superficial femoral artery. The study hypothesis is that patency rates are comparable and therefore the minimal invasive remote superficial femoral artery endarterectomy can be considered in patients presenting with a long occlusion of the superficial femoral artery.

Detailed description

Different strategies exist in the treatment of chronic long occlusions of the superficial femoral artery and yet we still suffer a significant percentage of restenosis, re-occlusions and even major amputations, reason for continuous development of new techniques. One such technique is the recently developed minimal invasive remote endarterectomy, which shows promising patency rates and possibly less complications with earlier recovery. A more experienced and the most implemented technique is the suprageniculate femoropopliteal bypass graft, which, when using the saphenous vein, has proved durable. A randomized trial comparing both modalities was lacking so far, what makes the objective of this study a comparison of patency rates between those 2 techniques in a randomized fashion.

Interventions

PROCEDURERemote endarterectomy of the superficial femoral artery

Exposure of the common femoral, superficial femoral and profunda femoral artery through a single groin incision. Arteriotomy in the proximal SFA followed by dissection of the intima core beyond the occluded segment using the Vollmar ringstripper. The ringstripper is exchanged for a Mollring cutter all under fluoroscopic guidance. With the Mollring Cutter transection of intima core is carried out, remote from the site of entry. After removal of the intima core the transection zone is secured with an aSpire stent after balloon angioplasty. A completion arteriography will verify a patent artery, and embolectomy can be performed when necessary. As indicated a common femoral artery and profundaplasty can be performed and the arteriotomy may be closed with or without patch.

PROCEDURESuprageniculate femoropopliteal bypass

Groin and suprageniculate incision, venous (Saphenous vein) or PTFE graft with end to side anastomoses. If the saphenous vein is truly applicable for grafting will ultimately be an intra-operative decision (despite pre-operative venous mapping)

Sponsors

UMC Utrecht
CollaboratorOTHER
Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Netherlands
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Amphia Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Antonius Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with Fontaine IIB, III, IV ischemia * Long (\>10 cm) occlusion of the superficial femoral artery, with patent popliteal artery and at least 1 patent crural vessel * Atherosclerotic disease

Exclusion criteria

* Previous operations on the superficial femoral artery * Radiation therapy groin/leg region * Diameter superficial femoral artery \< 4 mm * Contrast allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
(re-)occlusion of the endarterectomized superficial femoral artery or suprageniculate femoropopliteal bypass5 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(a)symptomatic (re)stenosis of the superficial femoral artery or bypass for which a re-intervention was carried out5 year
major amputation of the ipsilateral leg5 year

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026