Skip to content

Two Different Methods of Collecting Stem Cells For an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma

Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of Immunologic Autograft Engineering Versus Standard Autograft Collection in Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00566228
Enrollment
122
Registered
2007-12-03
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2015-01-15
Last updated
2018-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma

Keywords

noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: It is not yet known which method of stem cell collection is best for patients undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing two different methods of collecting stem cells in patients undergoing stem cell transplant for diffuse large cell lymphoma.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Determine the therapeutic effect of instrument-driven lymphocyte enrichment of the autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) compared to standard autograft collection as determined by progression-free survival post-transplantation. Secondary * Determine the profile of immune effector cells of the lymphocyte enriched autograft vs standard autograft and peripheral blood after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and their impact on post- ASCT immunological reconstitution and clinical endpoints. * Perform quantitative and functional analysis of T, B, NK, and dendritic cells from the apheresis product and peripheral blood samples at multiple timepoints after transplantation. * Determine and compare the proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 1 and 2 years. * Determine the differences in overall survival between the two collection method arms. * Evaluate and characterize differences in transplantation outcomes (e.g., time to ALC engraftment, incidence of infection, and the CD34 count) between the two collection method arms. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to baseline International Prognostic Factor (≥ 2 factors vs \< 2 factors) and PET scan findings prior to transplantation (positive vs negative). Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) alone or G-CSF and sargramostim (GM-CSF) daily for stem cell mobilization. Once the peripheral CD34-positive cell count reaches ≥ 10/μL, patients undergo stem cell collection. Patients are then randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms for standard autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). * Immunologic autograft engineering: Patients' stem cells are collected according to modified Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 0.0 and RBC = 7.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis (lymphocyte enriched autograft). * Standard autograft collection: Patients' stem cells are collected according to standard Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 1.5 and RBC OFFSET = 5.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis. Patients undergo blood sample collection periodically for immunological studies. Samples are analyzed for immunophenotyping of immune cell subsets via multicolor flow cytometry, immunoglobulin reconstitution, and functional T-cell immunity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at day 15 post ASCT and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREautologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

PROCEDUREleukapheresis

Stem cells collected

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of diffuse large cell lymphoma * Low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma transformed to diffuse large cell lymphoma allowed * Candidate for with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation * Not requiring bone marrow harvest to collect stem cells * No chemotherapy with filgrastim ( G-CSF) or mobilization study drug (i.e., AMD3100) needed for mobilization of stem cells PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * ECOG performance status 0-1 * Cardiac and pulmonary status sufficient to undergo apheresis and stem cell transplantation * Negative pregnancy test * Not pregnant or nursing * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * HIV negative * No active uncontrolled infection requiring antibiotic treatment * No comorbid condition which, in view of the investigators, renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications * Willing to provide all research blood samples as required by the protocol PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (rituxan is not considered chemotherapy for the purpose of this study) * More than 4 weeks since prior experimental therapy * No concurrent enrollment on another experimental protocol during the mobilization phase * No concurrent participation in any autologous stem cell transplantation study that is not using the standard conditioning regimens for lymphomas

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Progression-free SurvivalDate of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months post enrollment.Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. Patients alive without disease progression or relapse were censored at their last disease evaluation or at their secondary primary cancer diagnosis, whichever occurred first. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1.0 cm in its short axis or in the sum of the products of diameters (SPD) of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm). A log rank test was used to assess whether PFS differed with respect to apheresis collection method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 YearsDate of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, up to two yearsProgression-free survival rate (percentage) at two years is defined as 100 times the number of patients who have not progressed, relapsed and/or died divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1.0 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm).
One-year Overall Survival Ratedate of infusion to death from any cause, up to one yearOverall survival (OS) was defined at the time from infusion to death from any cause. The one-year OS rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are still alive after one year. A log rank test was used to assess whether OS differed with respect to apheresis collection method.
Progression-free Survival Rate at 1 YearDate of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, up to one yearProgression-free survival rate (percentage) at one year is defined as 100 times the number of patients who have not progressed, relapsed and/or died divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1.0 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm).
Median Number of CD34 Cells/kg Infused5 to 7 days after patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and reached a peripheral CD34 count of 10 cells/microliter or greaterFive (5) to seven (7) days after patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and reached a peripheral CD34 count of 10 cells/microliter or greater, stem cell collection began. Apheresis collections were to be performed daily. At least 2 x 10\^6 CD34 cells/kg were to be collected. Additional collections were at the discretion of the transplantation team. The median number of CD34 cells/kg infused are reported for each arm below.
Median Time to Absolute Lymphocyte Count EngraftmentUp to 30 days after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantationThe time to absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) engraftment will be evaluated and compared between the two arms, where time to ALC engraftment is defined as the time from transplant to the time they achieve ALC \> 500.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation and Comparison of Immunologic Recovery Within and Between the Arms by Assessing the Quantitative and Functional Immune Effector Cells (T, B, or NK Cells) From the Apheresis ProductBaselineEvaluation and comparison of immunologic recovery within and between the arms by assessing the quantitative and functional immune effector cells (T, B, or NK cells) from the apheresis product

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immunologic Autograft Engineering
Patients' stem cells are collected according to modified Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 0.0 and RBC = 7.0).
61
Standard Autograft Collection
Patients' stem cells are collected according to standard Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 1.5 and RBC OFFSET = 5.0).
60
Total121

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAttempt to mobilize stem cells failed22
Overall Studyprogressed before infusion could occur01
Overall StudyUnable to collect sufficient CD34 cells32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImmunologic Autograft EngineeringStandard Autograft CollectionTotal
Age, Continuous58 years58 years58 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
61 Participants60 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants20 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants40 Participants85 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 5717 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Median Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. Patients alive without disease progression or relapse were censored at their last disease evaluation or at their secondary primary cancer diagnosis, whichever occurred first. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1.0 cm in its short axis or in the sum of the products of diameters (SPD) of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm). A log rank test was used to assess whether PFS differed with respect to apheresis collection method.

Time frame: Date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months post enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Immunologic Autograft EngineeringMedian Progression-free SurvivalNA months
Standard Autograft CollectionMedian Progression-free SurvivalNA months
p-value: 0.6995% CI: [0.62, 2.08]Log Rank
Secondary

Median Number of CD34 Cells/kg Infused

Five (5) to seven (7) days after patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and reached a peripheral CD34 count of 10 cells/microliter or greater, stem cell collection began. Apheresis collections were to be performed daily. At least 2 x 10\^6 CD34 cells/kg were to be collected. Additional collections were at the discretion of the transplantation team. The median number of CD34 cells/kg infused are reported for each arm below.

Time frame: 5 to 7 days after patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and reached a peripheral CD34 count of 10 cells/microliter or greater

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Immunologic Autograft EngineeringMedian Number of CD34 Cells/kg Infused4.6 x10^6 cells/kg
Standard Autograft CollectionMedian Number of CD34 Cells/kg Infused5.3 x10^6 cells/kg
Secondary

Median Time to Absolute Lymphocyte Count Engraftment

The time to absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) engraftment will be evaluated and compared between the two arms, where time to ALC engraftment is defined as the time from transplant to the time they achieve ALC \> 500.

Time frame: Up to 30 days after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Immunologic Autograft EngineeringMedian Time to Absolute Lymphocyte Count Engraftment14 days
Standard Autograft CollectionMedian Time to Absolute Lymphocyte Count Engraftment14 days
Secondary

One-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) was defined at the time from infusion to death from any cause. The one-year OS rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are still alive after one year. A log rank test was used to assess whether OS differed with respect to apheresis collection method.

Time frame: date of infusion to death from any cause, up to one year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Immunologic Autograft EngineeringOne-year Overall Survival Rate91.1 percentage of patients
Standard Autograft CollectionOne-year Overall Survival Rate83.6 percentage of patients
p-value: 0.679Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-free Survival Rate at 1 Year

Progression-free survival rate (percentage) at one year is defined as 100 times the number of patients who have not progressed, relapsed and/or died divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1.0 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm).

Time frame: Date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, up to one year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Immunologic Autograft EngineeringProgression-free Survival Rate at 1 Year73.1 percentage of patients
Standard Autograft CollectionProgression-free Survival Rate at 1 Year65.4 percentage of patients
Secondary

Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 Years

Progression-free survival rate (percentage) at two years is defined as 100 times the number of patients who have not progressed, relapsed and/or died divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1.0 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm).

Time frame: Date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, up to two years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Immunologic Autograft EngineeringProgression-free Survival Rate at 2 Years57.9 percentage of patients
Standard Autograft CollectionProgression-free Survival Rate at 2 Years65.4 percentage of patients
Other Pre-specified

Evaluation and Comparison of Immunologic Recovery Within and Between the Arms by Assessing the Quantitative and Functional Immune Effector Cells (T, B, or NK Cells) From the Apheresis Product

Evaluation and comparison of immunologic recovery within and between the arms by assessing the quantitative and functional immune effector cells (T, B, or NK cells) from the apheresis product

Time frame: Baseline

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026