Age Related Macular Degeneration, Cognition Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Macular Pigment Optical Density, Skin Carotenoids, Lipofuscin, Photostress (Glare Recovery), Visual Field Progression, Contrast Sensitivity, Color Vision, Cognitive Function
Brief summary
To evaluate if supplementation of zeaxanthin (with or without Lutein) is beneficial to patients with early and moderate Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration.
Detailed description
To evaluate whether or not zeaxanthin supplementation raises macular pigment optical density (MPOD). Previous research has shown MPOD to mirror visual benefits for patients with age related atrophic macular degeneration (AMD) having visual symptoms (decreased visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, photostress glare recovery and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 scores), but lower risk National Eye Institute (NEI) / Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) characteristics.
Interventions
8 mg per day during 12 months
9 mg of Lutein during 12 months
8 mg of lutein and 8 mg of Zeaxanthin administered during 12 months
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* diagnosis of atrophic AMD (ICD9 362.51) by stereo bio-ophthalmoscopy and at least one vision degrading visual-psychophysical abnormality associated with AMD in one or both eyes. * clear non-lenticular ocular media (cornea, aqueous and vitreous) * free of advanced glaucoma and diabetes or any other ocular or systemic disease that could affect central or parafoveal macula visual function
Exclusion criteria
* high risk retinal characteristics for advanced AMD or advanced AMD for which existing medical / surgical options are available * presence of ophthalmologically significant active exudative, AMD pathology by fluorescein angiography but also a single large drusen, \>15, multiple intermediate drusen, parafoveal geographic atrophy or loss of vision in one eye due to advanced AMD * recent (within 6 months) cataract or retinal surgery * taking photosensitizing drugs such as phenothiazines and chloroquine * having taken lutein or zeaxanthin supplements within the past six months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Macular Pigment Optical Density | 4 months | Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity | 12 months | Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed. |
| Glare Recovery | 12 Months | Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan). |
| SHAPE Discrimination | 12 months | We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation. |
| 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold | 12 months | The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold. |
| 100% Kinetic Field | 12 Months | Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma). |
| Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance | 12 Months | Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were patients in the Ophthalmology/Optometry Clinic North Chicago DVA Medical Center (now the James A. Lovell Federal Health Center)with early and moderate AMD retinopathy up to, but not including,high risk NEI AREDS retinopathy.
Pre-assignment details
No enrolled participant was excluded before assignment to groups. Patients were asked to continue with their normal diet and were asked not to take any dietary supplement containing lutein (or zeaxanthin) beyond the 250 ug (1/4mg) commonly found in pabulum Centrum® type vitamins.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Lutein Lutein 9 mg per day | 10 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months | 25 |
| Zeaxanthin 3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months | 25 |
| Total | 60 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Lutein | Lutein Zeaxanthin | Zeaxanthin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Kinetic Field | 5514 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) STANDARD_DEVIATION 2074 | 1717 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) STANDARD_DEVIATION 765 | 2649 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) STANDARD_DEVIATION 750 | 2738 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4471 |
| 6.5 degrees Tritan threshold | 4.9 (dB) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 | 8.6 (dB) STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 | 6 (dB) STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 6.9 (dB) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 7 Participants | 20 Participants | 21 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Age Continuous | 73.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 75.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 74.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 74.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance | 212 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 34 | 204 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 | 201 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22 | 204 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 125 |
| Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study distance visual acuity | 93.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 | 86.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 | 88.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | 88.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 |
| Glare Recovery | 52.9 Seconds STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | 35.6 Seconds STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 26.7 Seconds STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 34.1 Seconds STANDARD_DEVIATION 30 |
| Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.37 Density units of macular pigment STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.05 | 0.29 Density units of macular pigment STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.06 | 0.35 Density units of macular pigment STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.04 | 0.33 Density units of macular pigment STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.05 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 24 Participants | 24 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Shape Discrimination | 0.7 % modulation STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 0.7 % modulation STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1 | 1 % modulation STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 0.8 % modulation STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 25 |
Outcome results
Macular Pigment Optical Density
Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
Time frame: 4 months
Population: All participants in all arms were tested
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.48 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.38 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Zeaxanthin | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.42 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.04 |
Macular Pigment Optical Density
Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).
Time frame: 8 months
Population: All participants in all arms were tested
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.48 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.44 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Zeaxanthin | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.46 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.04 |
Macular Pigment Optical Density
Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: All participants in all arms were tested
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.54 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.52 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Zeaxanthin | Macular Pigment Optical Density | 0.48 Density units of Macular Pigment (du) | Standard Error 0.04 |
100% Kinetic Field
Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).
Time frame: 12 Months
Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | 100% Kinetic Field | 2704 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) | Standard Error 1745 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | 100% Kinetic Field | 2207 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) | Standard Error 210 |
| Zeaxanthin | 100% Kinetic Field | 1129 Units on a scale (0 to 6000) | Standard Error 650 |
6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold
The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold | 4.46 dB | Standard Error 1.08 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold | 8.37 dB | Standard Error 1.39 |
| Zeaxanthin | 6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold | 3.45 dB | Standard Error 1.09 |
Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance
Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.
Time frame: 12 Months
Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance | 310.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 33.8 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance | 247.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 35 |
| Zeaxanthin | Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance | 254.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 35.2 |
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity
Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity | 98.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 5.7 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity | 92.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 5.9 |
| Zeaxanthin | Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity | 96.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 8.35 |
Glare Recovery
Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).
Time frame: 12 Months
Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | Glare Recovery | 25.2 Seconds | Standard Error 28.5 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | Glare Recovery | 14.85 Seconds | Standard Error 22 |
| Zeaxanthin | Glare Recovery | 16.65 Seconds | Standard Error 10.25 |
SHAPE Discrimination
We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Eyes of all participants still in the trial were measured
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lutein | SHAPE Discrimination | 0.5 % modulation | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Lutein Zeaxanthin | SHAPE Discrimination | 0.6 % modulation | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Zeaxanthin | SHAPE Discrimination | 0.6 % modulation | Standard Deviation 0.46 |