Skip to content

The Zeaxanthin and Visual Function Study

Randomized, Double Blind, Lutein Controlled Study of Zeaxanthin and Visual Function in Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00564902
Acronym
ZVF
Enrollment
60
Registered
2007-11-29
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2012-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age Related Macular Degeneration, Cognition Disorders

Keywords

Macular Pigment Optical Density, Skin Carotenoids, Lipofuscin, Photostress (Glare Recovery), Visual Field Progression, Contrast Sensitivity, Color Vision, Cognitive Function

Brief summary

To evaluate if supplementation of zeaxanthin (with or without Lutein) is beneficial to patients with early and moderate Atrophic Age Related Macular Degeneration.

Detailed description

To evaluate whether or not zeaxanthin supplementation raises macular pigment optical density (MPOD). Previous research has shown MPOD to mirror visual benefits for patients with age related atrophic macular degeneration (AMD) having visual symptoms (decreased visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, photostress glare recovery and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 scores), but lower risk National Eye Institute (NEI) / Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) characteristics.

Interventions

DRUG3R 3'R Zeaxanthin

8 mg per day during 12 months

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLutein

9 mg of Lutein during 12 months

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLutein and Zeaxanthin

8 mg of lutein and 8 mg of Zeaxanthin administered during 12 months

Sponsors

Kowa Company, Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
IMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Chrysantis, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of atrophic AMD (ICD9 362.51) by stereo bio-ophthalmoscopy and at least one vision degrading visual-psychophysical abnormality associated with AMD in one or both eyes. * clear non-lenticular ocular media (cornea, aqueous and vitreous) * free of advanced glaucoma and diabetes or any other ocular or systemic disease that could affect central or parafoveal macula visual function

Exclusion criteria

* high risk retinal characteristics for advanced AMD or advanced AMD for which existing medical / surgical options are available * presence of ophthalmologically significant active exudative, AMD pathology by fluorescein angiography but also a single large drusen, \>15, multiple intermediate drusen, parafoveal geographic atrophy or loss of vision in one eye due to advanced AMD * recent (within 6 months) cataract or retinal surgery * taking photosensitizing drugs such as phenothiazines and chloroquine * having taken lutein or zeaxanthin supplements within the past six months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Macular Pigment Optical Density4 monthsReplicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity12 monthsBlack and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.
Glare Recovery12 MonthsPhotostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).
SHAPE Discrimination12 monthsWe determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.
6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold12 monthsThe ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.
100% Kinetic Field12 MonthsScotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).
Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance12 MonthsDistance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were patients in the Ophthalmology/Optometry Clinic North Chicago DVA Medical Center (now the James A. Lovell Federal Health Center)with early and moderate AMD retinopathy up to, but not including,high risk NEI AREDS retinopathy.

Pre-assignment details

No enrolled participant was excluded before assignment to groups. Patients were asked to continue with their normal diet and were asked not to take any dietary supplement containing lutein (or zeaxanthin) beyond the 250 ug (1/4mg) commonly found in pabulum Centrum® type vitamins.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lutein
Lutein 9 mg per day
10
Lutein Zeaxanthin
3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg, Lutein 8 mg per day during 12 months
25
Zeaxanthin
3R 3'R Zeaxanthin 8 mg per day during 12 months
25
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject034

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLuteinLutein ZeaxanthinZeaxanthinTotal
100% Kinetic Field5514 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2074
1717 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 765
2649 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 750
2738 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4471
6.5 degrees Tritan threshold4.9 (dB)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
8.6 (dB)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
6 (dB)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
6.9 (dB)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants20 Participants21 Participants48 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants5 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Age Continuous73.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
75.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
74.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance212 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34
204 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30
201 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
204 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 125
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study distance visual acuity93.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
86.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
88.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
88.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Glare Recovery52.9 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
35.6 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
26.7 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
34.1 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30
Macular Pigment Optical Density0.37 Density units of macular pigment
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.05
0.29 Density units of macular pigment
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.06
0.35 Density units of macular pigment
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.04
0.33 Density units of macular pigment
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.05
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants24 Participants24 Participants57 Participants
Shape Discrimination0.7 % modulation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
0.7 % modulation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1 % modulation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
0.8 % modulation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Macular Pigment Optical Density

Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).

Time frame: 4 months

Population: All participants in all arms were tested

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.48 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.05
Lutein ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.38 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.06
ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.42 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.04
Primary

Macular Pigment Optical Density

Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering LED's and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated. The method has good repeatability (r = 0.97) and the data are comparable with an objective optical method based on retinal reflectometry (r = 0.78).

Time frame: 8 months

Population: All participants in all arms were tested

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.48 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.05
Lutein ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.44 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.06
ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.46 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.04
Primary

Macular Pigment Optical Density

Replicate measures of foveal 1 degree estimated central MPOD were evaluated with the Quantify® MPS 9000 macular pigment screener, a modified heterochromic flicker photometer (HFP). It employs alternating blue and green flickering light emitting diodes and fixation on a 1 degree target, so that a representative measurement at 0.5 degree off center from the fovea is calculated.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All participants in all arms were tested

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.54 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.05
Lutein ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.52 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.06
ZeaxanthinMacular Pigment Optical Density0.48 Density units of Macular Pigment (du)Standard Error 0.04
Secondary

100% Kinetic Field

Scotomas within the central 20 degree central macula visual field sensitivity was assessed at 5 contrast levels (20, 40, 60, 80, and full contrast). A yellow wavelength stimulus avoided confounding by the lens. Subjects outlined the boundaries of their scotoma(s) on an area-integrating and recording touch flat- screen RGB monitor displaying a central fixation point and movable horizontal/vertical raster lines. The computer calculated summed area of the scotoma(s) with arbitrary scaling from 6000 (dense scotoma) to 0 relative units (absence of scotoma).

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lutein100% Kinetic Field2704 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)Standard Error 1745
Lutein Zeaxanthin100% Kinetic Field2207 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)Standard Error 210
Zeaxanthin100% Kinetic Field1129 Units on a scale (0 to 6000)Standard Error 650
Secondary

6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold

The ChromaTest© is a computerized psychophysical test of protan and tritan color thresholds against age-corrected data. The computer finds the endpoint of the test by a Modified Binary Search method; if response is correct, on the next presentation the color difference between letter and background is halved. If response is incorrect, the color -contrast is doubled. Incorrect responses prolong the test, but do not influence the final threshold. This method of determining thresholds leads to finite steps which reach a plateau at the color contrast sensitivity threshold.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lutein6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold4.46 dBStandard Error 1.08
Lutein Zeaxanthin6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold8.37 dBStandard Error 1.39
Zeaxanthin6.5 Degrees Tritan Threshold3.45 dBStandard Error 1.09
Secondary

Contrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance

Distance photopic contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at 5 spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12 & 20 cc/deg) was determined with the Functional Vision Analyzer® (Stereo Optical Co, Inc, Chicago, IL). Contrast sensitivity readings are shown as a curve. Visual acuity is plotted along the horizontal axis and contrast sensitivity along the vertical axis. Among the normally sighted people, both visual acuity and contrast sensitivity have a wide range of variation.Low population CSF is 0-200 units; normal population CSF is 200-300 units and suprathreshold CSF is 300+ units.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinContrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance310.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 33.8
Lutein ZeaxanthinContrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance247.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 35
ZeaxanthinContrast Sensitivity Function Photopic Distance254.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 35.2
Secondary

Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity

Black and 10% contrast near reading visual acuity was assessed with a Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Reading Card with LogMAR letters (#4031, Precision Vision, LaSalle, Illinois). We determined single letter acuity on an ordinal VAS (Visual Acuity Scale). The largest letters were 0.05 LogMAR with a VAS = 35 while the most difficult smallest letters were LogMar 1.25 or VAS 105. The test card was held at 40 cm with best monocular refraction, and both low and high contrast letter acuity were assessed.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinEarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity98.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.7
Lutein ZeaxanthinEarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity92.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.9
ZeaxanthinEarly Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Distance Visual Acuity96.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.35
Secondary

Glare Recovery

Photostress glare recovery test involves exposing an individual eye to intense light, or retinal bleach, for a set duration of time and measuring the time taken for visual acuity to recover to a predetermined level. Glare photo-stress recovery (in seconds) following 30 seconds of continuous retinal bleach, was assessed using 2 line supra-threshold low contrast randomly presented Landolt Cs using the KOWA AS14B Night Vision Tester (KOWA Optimed, Tokyo, Japan).

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Eyes of all patients still in the trial were measured

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinGlare Recovery25.2 SecondsStandard Error 28.5
Lutein ZeaxanthinGlare Recovery14.85 SecondsStandard Error 22
ZeaxanthinGlare Recovery16.65 SecondsStandard Error 10.25
Secondary

SHAPE Discrimination

We determined the target deformation detection thresholds, or amplitude of the minimum detectable distortion of a 1 degree foveal circular target. The peak spatial frequency of RF (radial frequency) patterns was 5 cyc/deg; the radial modulation frequency was 8 cyc/360°; mean radii were 0.5°, 1°, 2.0°, or 2.5°; and stimulus contrast was 80%. The highest % modulation score possible is 0.13 while the easiest (lowest score) was 10% modulation.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Eyes of all participants still in the trial were measured

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuteinSHAPE Discrimination0.5 % modulationStandard Deviation 0.24
Lutein ZeaxanthinSHAPE Discrimination0.6 % modulationStandard Deviation 0.25
ZeaxanthinSHAPE Discrimination0.6 % modulationStandard Deviation 0.46

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026