Skip to content

A Study to Test a New Decongestant in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Following a Nasal Allergen Challenge

A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo Controlled, Four Way Crossover Study To Determine The Effects Of An H3 Receptor Antagonist (PF-03654746) On Congestion Following A Nasal Allergen Challenge In Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00562120
Enrollment
21
Registered
2007-11-21
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2014-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

An H3 receptor antagonist should reduce the congestion associated with allergic rhinitis. A nasal allergen challenge will be given to patients to induce rhinitis symptoms and acoustic rhinometry will be used to measure the congestion.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

A single oral dose of Placebo is dosed during the study in order to ascertain the effect of placebo on measures and in order to maintain the blind of the other drugs.

A single oral dose of Allegra is dosed to subjects in combination with PF-03654746.

A single oral dose of Allegra-D is dosed to subjects as an active comparator.

A single oral dose of PF-03654746 is the investigational drug being studied.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects 19-55 years with allergic rhinitis requiring treatment within the previous 2 years. * Subjects that respond to a ragweed nasal allergen challenge at screening.

Exclusion criteria

* History of asthma or FEV1 \< 80% predicted. * Significant concomitant disease or medications. * Symptoms of allergic rhinitis within 2 weeks prior to screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nasal Volume Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention periodAcoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. Mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as measurement at each time point. Nasal volume at Baseline was defined as mean of 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Nasal volume 'post-allergen challenge' measures recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period was averaged to derive single 'post-allergen challenge' value. Nasal volume proportion was defined as ratio of 'post-allergen challenge' value and 'Baseline/pre-allergen challenge value'. Diluent used was saline and allergen was short ragweed extract.
Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention periodAcoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. Mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as measurement at each time point. Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) at Baseline was defined as mean of 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hours (hrs) 10 minutes (min), 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Amin 'post-allergen challenge' measures recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period was averaged to derive single 'post-allergen challenge' value. Amin proportion was defined as ratio of 'post-allergen challenge' value and 'Baseline/pre-allergen challenge value'. Diluent used was saline and allergen was short ragweed extract.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nasal Volume Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention periodAcoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. The mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as the measurement at each time point. Nasal volume at Baseline was defined as mean of the 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Nasal volume 'post-allergen challenge' measures were recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period. The maximum fall for nasal volume was calculated as baseline measure minus smallest 'post-allergen challenge' nasal volume measurement among the 3 measures.
Nasal Symptom Scores: Sneezing2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention periodThe absolute number of sneezes was recorded by the participants under supervision of study personnel. Nasal symptom score for sneezing was assessed as the total number of sneezes of each intervention period at specified time-points for the post-diluent and post-challenge and post where 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' included 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period and 'post-allergen challenge' included 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period.
Nasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, Rhinorrhea2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Pre-allergen challenge); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose (Post-allergen challenge); 3 hrs 40 min post dose (Post-oxymetazoline) on Day 1 of each intervention periodNasal symptoms included; nasal congestion: participants rated sensation of nasal blockage on 0 (no blockage) to 5 (total blockage) scale, nasal itching: participants rated sensation of nasal itch on 0 (no itch) to 5 (very itchy) scale, rhinorrhea: participants rated sensation of runny nose on 0 (no running) to 5 (very runny) scale. Symptom scores were assessed as mean of each intervention period at specified time-points for 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measure and 'post-challenge' measure. Post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge (for congestion, itching, rhinorrhea) included 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period and post-allergen challenge (for congestion, itching, rhinorrhea) included 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period and (for congestion only) 3 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose (Post-oxymetazoline) at each intervention period.
Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention periodAcoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. The mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as the measurement at each time point. Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) at Baseline was defined as mean of the 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Amin 'post-allergen challenge' measures were recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period. The maximum fall in Amin was calculated as baseline measure minus smallest 'post-allergen challenge' Amin measurement of the 3 measures.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum PF-03654746 Concentration1 hr 30 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention periodOnly participants receiving PF-03654746 were analyzed for this outcome measure. Mean serum concentration of PF-03654746 was calculated of each intervention period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
All participants randomized to any treatment (PF-03654746 10 mg capsule first, PF-03654746 1 mg capsule first, Allegra-D tablet-in-capsule first and placebo first).
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
First Intervention PeriodAdverse Event1000
First Intervention PeriodRandomized but not Treated1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
15 participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 202 / 190 / 192 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 190 / 190 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry

Acoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. Mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as measurement at each time point. Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) at Baseline was defined as mean of 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hours (hrs) 10 minutes (min), 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Amin 'post-allergen challenge' measures recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period was averaged to derive single 'post-allergen challenge' value. Amin proportion was defined as ratio of 'post-allergen challenge' value and 'Baseline/pre-allergen challenge value'. Diluent used was saline and allergen was short ragweed extract.

Time frame: 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.760 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1504
PF-03654746 1 mgMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.742 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2552
Allegra-DMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.717 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1935
PlaceboMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.795 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3044
Comparison: An analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.302ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.134ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.229ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.544ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.71ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.816ANOVA
Primary

Nasal Volume Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry

Acoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. Mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as measurement at each time point. Nasal volume at Baseline was defined as mean of 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Nasal volume 'post-allergen challenge' measures recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period was averaged to derive single 'post-allergen challenge' value. Nasal volume proportion was defined as ratio of 'post-allergen challenge' value and 'Baseline/pre-allergen challenge value'. Diluent used was saline and allergen was short ragweed extract.

Time frame: 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Volume Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.800 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1825
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Volume Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.796 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2641
Allegra-DNasal Volume Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.744 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1594
PlaceboNasal Volume Proportion Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.856 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3859
Comparison: An analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.269ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.097ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.252ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.479ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.521ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.952ANOVA
Secondary

Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry

Acoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. The mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as the measurement at each time point. Minimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) at Baseline was defined as mean of the 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Amin 'post-allergen challenge' measures were recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period. The maximum fall in Amin was calculated as baseline measure minus smallest 'post-allergen challenge' Amin measurement of the 3 measures.

Time frame: 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.155 square centimeter (cm^2)Standard Deviation 0.0876
PF-03654746 1 mgMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.157 square centimeter (cm^2)Standard Deviation 0.1159
Allegra-DMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.204 square centimeter (cm^2)Standard Deviation 0.0951
PlaceboMinimum Cross-Sectional Area (Amin) Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry0.190 square centimeter (cm^2)Standard Deviation 0.151
Comparison: An analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.13ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.663ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.138ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.124ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.134ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.978ANOVA
Secondary

Nasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, Rhinorrhea

Nasal symptoms included; nasal congestion: participants rated sensation of nasal blockage on 0 (no blockage) to 5 (total blockage) scale, nasal itching: participants rated sensation of nasal itch on 0 (no itch) to 5 (very itchy) scale, rhinorrhea: participants rated sensation of runny nose on 0 (no running) to 5 (very runny) scale. Symptom scores were assessed as mean of each intervention period at specified time-points for 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measure and 'post-challenge' measure. Post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge (for congestion, itching, rhinorrhea) included 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period and post-allergen challenge (for congestion, itching, rhinorrhea) included 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period and (for congestion only) 3 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose (Post-oxymetazoline) at each intervention period.

Time frame: 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Pre-allergen challenge); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose (Post-allergen challenge); 3 hrs 40 min post dose (Post-oxymetazoline) on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Post-allergen challenge0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Post-allergen challenge0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-allergen challenge1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Pre-allergen challenge0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Pre-allergen challenge0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-oxymetazoline0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Post-allergen challenge0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Post-allergen challenge1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-allergen challenge1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Pre-allergen challenge0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-oxymetazoline0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Pre-allergen challenge0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Pre-allergen challenge0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-allergen challenge1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-oxymetazoline0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Post-allergen challenge0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Pre-allergen challenge0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Post-allergen challenge1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-oxymetazoline0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Post-allergen challenge1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaRhinorrhea: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Post-allergen challenge2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal congestion: Pre-allergen challenge0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Post-allergen challenge1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: Nasal Congestion, Nasal Itching, RhinorrheaNasal Itching: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.218ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.905ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.273ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.011ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.127ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.103ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal Itching: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal Itching: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.055ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal Itching: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.012ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal Itching: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.048ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal Itching: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.496ANOVA
Comparison: Nasal Itching: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.19ANOVA
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.019ANOVA
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.009ANOVA
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.061ANOVA
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.778ANOVA
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.102ANOVA
Secondary

Nasal Symptom Scores: Sneezing

The absolute number of sneezes was recorded by the participants under supervision of study personnel. Nasal symptom score for sneezing was assessed as the total number of sneezes of each intervention period at specified time-points for the post-diluent and post-challenge and post where 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' included 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period and 'post-allergen challenge' included 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose at each intervention period.

Time frame: 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Pre-allergen challenge0.0 sneezesStandard Deviation 0.07
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Post-allergen challenge0.7 sneezesStandard Deviation 1.54
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Post-allergen challenge0.6 sneezesStandard Deviation 0.92
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 sneezesStandard Deviation 0.23
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 sneezesStandard Deviation 0.61
Allegra-DNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Post-allergen challenge1.2 sneezesStandard Deviation 1.94
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Pre-allergen challenge0.1 sneezesStandard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboNasal Symptom Scores: SneezingSneezing: Post-allergen challenge3.6 sneezesStandard Deviation 3.24
Comparison: An analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.217ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.156ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.848ANOVA
Secondary

Nasal Volume Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry

Acoustic rhinometry: a technique intended for assessment of the geometry of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx and for evaluating nasal obstruction. At each time point, there were 2 acoustic rhinometry measurements taken, one for each nostril. The mean of the left and right nostril measurements was taken as the measurement at each time point. Nasal volume at Baseline was defined as mean of the 3, 'post-diluent, pre-allergen challenge' measures for each intervention period at 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min and 2 hrs 40 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose. Nasal volume 'post-allergen challenge' measures were recorded at 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min and 3 hrs 25 min post PF-03654746/placebo dose for each intervention period. The maximum fall for nasal volume was calculated as baseline measure minus smallest 'post-allergen challenge' nasal volume measurement among the 3 measures.

Time frame: 2 hrs 10 min, 2 hrs 25 min, 2 hrs 40 min post dose (Baseline); 2 hrs 55 min, 3 hrs 10 min, 3 hrs 25 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgNasal Volume Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry3.132 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Deviation 2.412
PF-03654746 1 mgNasal Volume Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry3.244 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Deviation 2.3676
Allegra-DNasal Volume Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry4.443 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Deviation 2.9502
PlaceboNasal Volume Maximum Fall Measured Using Acoustic Rhinometry3.275 cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Deviation 2.7001
Comparison: An analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.357ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.952ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.48ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.043ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.087ANOVA
Comparison: An ANOVA mixed model was assessed with sequence, period and treatment as fixed effects and participant within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.753ANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Serum PF-03654746 Concentration

Only participants receiving PF-03654746 were analyzed for this outcome measure. Mean serum concentration of PF-03654746 was calculated of each intervention period.

Time frame: 1 hr 30 min post dose on Day 1 of each intervention period

Population: Full analysis set included all participants randomized at baseline and who received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-03654746 10 mgSerum PF-03654746 Concentration34.16 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 17.85
PF-03654746 1 mgSerum PF-03654746 Concentration2.78 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1.55

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026