Skip to content

Education/Exercise and Chiropractic for Chronic Back Pain

Education/Exercise and Chiropractic for Chronic Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00561652
Enrollment
30
Registered
2007-11-21
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2015-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low back pain, Chiropractic, Exercise, Veterans

Brief summary

As a needed first step prior to a planned full-scale RCT, in order to assess the feasibility of the RCT and refine its design and protocols, we will perform a pilot study with the following objectives:1.To assess whether enough veterans with chronic LBP can be identified, meet eligibility criteria and be randomized to demonstrate that recruitment for a planned full-scale RCT is feasible. 2.To assess whether veterans with chronic LBP will adhere to protocol interventions per study protocol. 3.To assess whether veterans with chronic LBP will complete data collection per study protocol. 4.To obtain estimates of effect sizes and the corresponding standard errors of the primary efficacy outcome measures to estimate the required sample size of a planned full-scale RCT.

Detailed description

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is associated with poor health, lower quality of life, high costs, and is highly prevalent in veterans. Both chiropractic care and exercise have modestly reduced pain and/or improved function in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with chronic LBP. However, effects may not apply similarly to all populations. For example, there are no RCT data on chiropractic care for older (age \>70) patients with chronic LBP, though with increased spinal arthritis, comorbidities and frailty, such patients may require modified chiropractic techniques and likely differ in response to chiropractic treatment. While a recent systematic review of RCTs predicted that a home exercise program that was individualized, high-dose, therapist-directed, and incorporated stretching and strengthening would be a meaningful treatment for chronic LBP, it also could provide a robust comparison group for other chronic LBP treatments. The combination of such a regimen and chiropractic care is predicted to have additive benefits for chronic LBP but this premise hasn't been directly tested. To further our aim of improving the health of chronic LBP patients, we plan an RCT in veterans with chronic LBP, to compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a tailored education/exercise (E/E) intervention alone vs. E/E plus chiropractic care. The demographics and medical complexity of the veteran population provide a great opportunity to test the appropriate role of chiropractic care for such patients with chronic LBP and to advance chronic LBP research and clinicalcare. Subjects will be recruited primarily from patients attending Minneapolis VAMC clinics with complaints of chronic LBP. Thirty eligible veterans will be randomized to E/E alone vs. E/E plus chiropractic care. All participants will receive E/E instruction in four 1-hr individual sessions over 8 weeks, including an individually designed, high dose, therapist-directed home exercise program. Chiropractic care will be delivered by chiropractors and follow standard protocols, with up to 12 sessions over 12 weeks. Participants randomized to E/E alone also will attend 10 weekly time and attention visits so that their contact with providers is comparable to that received by participants who also receive chiropractic care. Each time and attention session involved a 5 minute exam, 5 minutes of hot pack application to the low back, and 5 minutes of light massage to the low back. During these visits, participants did not receive SMT, mobilization or other active chiropractic treatment. The recruitment goal is to generate the potential to randomize 6-10 participants/month. Recruitment feasibility will be assessed by tracking the number of patients who make initial inquiries, undergo screening and in-clinic evaluation, and are randomized. Further, reasons for nonparticipation and disqualification will be examined and described. Participant adherence to interventions will be defined as completing \>3 of 4 education sessions, \>20 hrs of home exercise, and \>80% of recommended chiropractic visits or nonchiropractic follow-up exam/interviews. Adherence with clinic visits will be assessed with provider treatment logs. Home exercise compliance will be tracked by questionnaire. Participant adherence to data collection will be defined as \>90% follow-up rates at each time point and assessed by tracking questionnaire completion rates. Descriptive data for the distributions of the primary and main secondary efficacy outcome measures will be used to calculate sample size and generate power tables for the full-scale trial.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEducation & Exercise

Education & Exercise

PROCEDUREChiropractic treatment (plus Education & Exercise)

Chiropractic treatment (plus Education & Exercise)

Sponsors

Northwestern Health Sciences University
CollaboratorOTHER
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veterans enrolled to receive VA medical care * Current low back pain episode present \> 6 weeks. * LBP pain score \> 3 on scale of 0-10. * LBP classified using the Quebec Task Force (QTF) system as types 1-4 respectively, patients with LBP, stiffness or tenderness, without radiation; with radiation proximal to knee; with radiation distal to knee; or with radiation and \>2 abnormal neurological exam findings. * No change in past month in prescription medications affecting musculoskeletal pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Low back pain classified as QTF type 5-11 * Progressive neurologic deficits due to nerve root or spinal cord compression, including symptoms/signs of cauda equina syndrome. * Previous lumbar spine surgery, by history and/or screening spine radiograph. * Acute vertebral fracture, by history and spine radiograph * Self-reported ongoing LBP treatment by other healthcare providers other than stable prescription medications affecting musculoskeletal pain. * Infectious and noninfectious inflammatory destructive spine tissue changes, by spine radiograph * Self-reported pending/current litigation pertaining to back pain, including workers compensation claims; or pending evaluation of VA service connected rating related to back pain. * Clinically significant chronic inflammatory spinal arthritis * Self-reported pregnancy * Self-reported current substance abuse * History of bleeding disorder * Known arterial aneurysm near LBP area * Possible/confirmed spinal/vertebral infection, by history and spine radiograph * Primary or metastatic vertebral malignancy, by history and spine radiograph

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Adherence With Education + Exercise Visits12 weeksNumber of participants completing at least 3 of 4 education + exercise visits

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Adherence With Chiropractic Visits12 weeksNumber of participants who completed at least 12 chiropractic visits.
Participant Adherence With Time and Attention Visits12 weeksNumber of participants who completed at least 8 of 10 time and attention visits. Note that only arm 1 (nonchiropractic arm) receives time and attention visits.
Participant Adherence With Week 6 Follow-up Questionnaire6 weeksNumber of participants who completed their week 6 follow-up questionnaire
Participant Adherence With Week 12 Follow-up Questionnaire12 weeksNumber of participants who completed their week 12 follow-up questionnaire
Participant Adherence With Week 26 Follow-up Questionnaire26 weeksNumber of participants who completed week 26 follow-up questionnaire
Participant Adherence With Prescribed Home Exercise12 weeksNumber of participants who completed at least 20 hours of home exercise

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Veterans were recruited between 1/2008 & 3/2009 at the Minneapolis VA, with flyers given to patients presenting to Primary Care, Physical Therapy & Orthopedics clinics with low back pain; recruitment posters; & mailings to patients previously diagnosed with back pain.

Pre-assignment details

1075 were offered initial phone screening, 71 completed further in-clinic screening, & 30 were randomized. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups at the time of enrollment with no wash out, run-in, or transition between enrollment and group assignment. No enrolled participants were excluded from the trial before group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
Education plus exercise
10
Arm 2
Chiropractic treatment plus Education plus exercise
20
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1Arm 2Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Pacific Islander
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Nonhispanic Black
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Nonhispanic White
9 participants18 participants27 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants20 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants17 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 1018 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Participant Adherence With Education + Exercise Visits

Number of participants completing at least 3 of 4 education + exercise visits

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Participant Adherence With Education + Exercise Visits9 participants
Arm 2Participant Adherence With Education + Exercise Visits19 participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Adherence With Chiropractic Visits

Number of participants who completed at least 12 chiropractic visits.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 2Participant Adherence With Chiropractic Visits18 participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Adherence With Prescribed Home Exercise

Number of participants who completed at least 20 hours of home exercise

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Participant Adherence With Prescribed Home Exercise2 participants
Arm 2Participant Adherence With Prescribed Home Exercise10 participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Adherence With Time and Attention Visits

Number of participants who completed at least 8 of 10 time and attention visits. Note that only arm 1 (nonchiropractic arm) receives time and attention visits.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Only arm 1 received time and attention visits as their purpose was to balance the chiropractor provider contact time received by arm 2 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Participant Adherence With Time and Attention Visits1 participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Adherence With Week 12 Follow-up Questionnaire

Number of participants who completed their week 12 follow-up questionnaire

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Participant Adherence With Week 12 Follow-up Questionnaire9 participants
Arm 2Participant Adherence With Week 12 Follow-up Questionnaire18 participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Adherence With Week 26 Follow-up Questionnaire

Number of participants who completed week 26 follow-up questionnaire

Time frame: 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Participant Adherence With Week 26 Follow-up Questionnaire6 participants
Arm 2Participant Adherence With Week 26 Follow-up Questionnaire15 participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Adherence With Week 6 Follow-up Questionnaire

Number of participants who completed their week 6 follow-up questionnaire

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Participant Adherence With Week 6 Follow-up Questionnaire8 participants
Arm 2Participant Adherence With Week 6 Follow-up Questionnaire16 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026