Skip to content

Predictive Risk Stratification Through T Variability in ICD Patients Without Pacing Indications

Predictive Risk Stratification Through T Variability in ICD Patients Without Pacing Indications

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00560768
Acronym
Prediction
Enrollment
198
Registered
2007-11-20
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2015-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sudden Cardiac Death

Keywords

Risk stratification method, negative predictive value, fast ventricular arrhythmias, ICD, The negative predictive value of the T amplitude variance as a method for risk stratification for patients with an increased risk for SCD.

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess the negative predictive value of the T amplitude variance as a method for risk stratification for patients with an increased risk for SCD.

Interventions

DEVICEOvatio VR 6250 or DR6550

The study requires the implantation of locally approved material: * A right ventricular defibrillation lead * In case of use of a dual chamber ICD a right atrial pacing lead * A single chamber or dual chamber ICD manufactured by SORIN Group. At begin of the study this will be OVATIO VR model 6250 and OVATIO DR model 6550. Any new devices of same type manufactured by SORIN Group which will become locally approved during the conduction of the trial can be used in the study. Holter recording will be performed with a market approved recording system allowing high resolution ECG recording compatible with the analysis software for TVar.

Sponsors

LivaNova
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient has been prescribed the implantation of an SORIN GROUP OvatioTM DR 6550 / VR 6250 system according to relevant currently-approved guidelines * CHF since \> 3 months and * LVEF \< 35% and * NYHA class II or III OR * Prior Myocardial infarction since more than 4 weeks and * LVEF \< 30%

Exclusion criteria

* Documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia * Prior implant of any device for ventricular cardiac pacing * Existing indication for permanent ventricular pacing * Myocardial infarction within 4 weeks prior to enrollment * Arrhythmogenic RV-Dysplasia * Brugada syndrome * Long QT syndrome * Performed within 3 months prior to enrollment or scheduled (within 3 months) cardiac revascularization (interventional or surgical) * Any indication for CRT accordingly to the relevant currently-approved ACC/AHA1 or ESC35 guidelines for the implantation of a CRT system. * Excisting or planned administration of amiodarone - initiation of amiodarone therapy during the run of the study will lead to immediate exclusion of the patient * Permanent chronic atrial fibrillation / flutter * Patient is unable to attend the scheduled follow-up visits at the participating centre * Patient is already included in another ongoing clinical study * Patient is unable to understand the objectives of the study * Patient refuses to cooperate * Patient is unable or refuses to provide informed consent * Patient is minor (less than 18-year old) * Patient has life expectancy of less than 1 year * Patient is pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
TAV score and number of tachyarrhythmic events.The two phases M0 - M12 and M12 - M24 will be examined separately. For each 12 months period the TAV score at its beginning and tachyarrhythmic events in the following 12 months will be assessed. The NPV will be calculated for both phases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
TAV change12 months of follow up

Countries

Canada, Germany, Spain, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026