Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Eight-Week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute

A Proof of Principal Randomized Controlled Eight-Week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A FDA 510(k) Equivalency Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00560105
Enrollment
40
Registered
2007-11-19
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Keywords

COPD

Brief summary

This is an eight-week, randomized, controlled, two arm parallel study. The study consists of, a screening visit, two weeks of intervention-free run-in randomization, clinic visits week 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks during the intervention period to collect 24 hour sputum and to confirm techniques of device use and entries into daily diaries. Twenty-four (24) hour sputum samples will be collected and weighed at each clinic visit. In addition to clinic visits, subjects will be expected to make daily diary entries of COPD symptoms. Clinical evaluation will include adverse event surveillance, and St. Georges Respiratory questionnaire.

Detailed description

No further details

Interventions

8 weeks home use, twice daily

DEVICEAcapella

8 weeks home use, twice daily

Sponsors

Medical Acoustics LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of over 40 with COPD

Exclusion criteria

* Children, * New mothers; and * Women intending to become pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum Weight8 weeksIn order to test the overall treatment effect on dry sputum weight over the course of the study, mixed effects analysis were performed. These models allow us to account for the longitudinal nature of the data. We assumed that the observations collected within each patient were correlated; however, observations collected across patients were assumed to be independent. Dry sputum weights obtained prior to and at randomization were regarded as baseline measurements, while those obtained at week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 were examined for treatment effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FEV1 - Baseline and Device Comparisons8 weeksSpirometric data was collected primarily to document safety of the interventions. Pre- and Post-bronchodilator spirometry was obtained at the randomization visit and at Week 8.
Quality of Life Questionnaire/Daily Diary8 weeksSt. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a well validated, widely used health status questionnaire specific for COPD. Its minimum important difference (MID) is 4 units. Unit of measure: 0 to 100 (100 = more limitation)
Change in CCQ Score8 weeksThe COPD Clinical Questionnaire (CCQ) is an objective validated tool to assess COPD symptoms. CCQ was measured at the randomization visit and at the end of the study visit at week 8. The CCQ is scaled 1 to 5. Five indicating no symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We recruited 45 subjects, of which 5 subjects either did not meet the initial inclusion/exclusion criteria (n=3) or did not meet the compliance criteria between the recruitment and randomization visit (n=2).

Pre-assignment details

Of the 40 subjects who were randomized, 20 each were randomized to the 2 devices. Of these 40 subjects, 37 completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acapella
Acapella : 8 weeks home use, twice daily The study consisted of a screening visit, two weeks of intervention-free run-in, a randomization visit and then on treatment clinic visits at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria on screening were enrolled and provided with a daily paper dairy to record symptoms and rescue albuterol use. In addition they were instructed to provide two 24 hr sputum collections over the next 2 weeks. A randomization visit was done within 2 weeks of the enrollment visit. Participants who were compliant with the 24 hr sputum collection and at least 50% of the daily dairy entries were randomized to either the Lung Flute® or the Acapella®
20
Lung Flute
Lung Flute : 8 weeks home use, twice daily The study consisted of a screening visit, two weeks of intervention-free run-in, a randomization visit and then on treatment clinic visits at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria on screening were enrolled and provided with a daily paper dairy to record symptoms and rescue albuterol use. In addition they were instructed to provide two 24 hr sputum collections over the next 2 weeks. A randomization visit was done within 2 weeks of the enrollment visit. Participants who were compliant with the 24 hr sputum collection and at least 50% of the daily dairy entries were randomized to either the Lung Flute® or the Acapella®
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studymusculoskeletal chest discomfort with us12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLung FluteAcapellaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Age, Continuous64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants20 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Safety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum Weight

In order to test the overall treatment effect on dry sputum weight over the course of the study, mixed effects analysis were performed. These models allow us to account for the longitudinal nature of the data. We assumed that the observations collected within each patient were correlated; however, observations collected across patients were assumed to be independent. Dry sputum weights obtained prior to and at randomization were regarded as baseline measurements, while those obtained at week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 were examined for treatment effects.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: All patient data included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcapellaSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightSreening Event11.9 gStandard Deviation 2.8
AcapellaSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek114.4 gStandard Deviation 3.1
AcapellaSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 214.5 gStandard Deviation 3.3
AcapellaSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 411.8 gStandard Deviation 2.8
AcapellaSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 611.7 gStandard Deviation 2.8
AcapellaSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 811.6 gStandard Deviation 2.7
Lung FluteSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 612.0 gStandard Deviation 2.8
Lung FluteSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightSreening Event14.5 gStandard Deviation 3.3
Lung FluteSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 415.2 gStandard Deviation 3.4
Lung FluteSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek114.3 gStandard Deviation 3.2
Lung FluteSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 812.1 gStandard Deviation 2.8
Lung FluteSafety and Efficacy of the Lung Flute Versus the Acapella for the Treatment of COPD in Adults. Twenty-four (24) Hour Dry Sputum WeightWeek 214.2 gStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Change in CCQ Score

The COPD Clinical Questionnaire (CCQ) is an objective validated tool to assess COPD symptoms. CCQ was measured at the randomization visit and at the end of the study visit at week 8. The CCQ is scaled 1 to 5. Five indicating no symptoms.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: A patient population included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcapellaChange in CCQ ScoreScreening2.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
AcapellaChange in CCQ ScoreWeek 82.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Lung FluteChange in CCQ ScoreScreening3.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Lung FluteChange in CCQ ScoreWeek 82.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

FEV1 - Baseline and Device Comparisons

Spirometric data was collected primarily to document safety of the interventions. Pre- and Post-bronchodilator spirometry was obtained at the randomization visit and at Week 8.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: A data collected included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcapellaFEV1 - Baseline and Device ComparisonsWeek 8 FEV11.49 literStandard Deviation 0.14
AcapellaFEV1 - Baseline and Device ComparisonsScreening FEV11.43 literStandard Deviation 0.13
Lung FluteFEV1 - Baseline and Device ComparisonsScreening FEV11.38 literStandard Deviation 0.14
Lung FluteFEV1 - Baseline and Device ComparisonsWeek 8 FEV11.44 literStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire/Daily Diary

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a well validated, widely used health status questionnaire specific for COPD. Its minimum important difference (MID) is 4 units. Unit of measure: 0 to 100 (100 = more limitation)

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: All patient data included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcapellaQuality of Life Questionnaire/Daily DiaryScreening45.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
AcapellaQuality of Life Questionnaire/Daily DiaryWeek 845.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Lung FluteQuality of Life Questionnaire/Daily DiaryScreening51.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Lung FluteQuality of Life Questionnaire/Daily DiaryWeek 847.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026