Skip to content

Osseous Setting Improvement With Co-implantation of Osseous Matrix and Mesenchymal Progenitors Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow

Osseous Setting Improvement With Co-implantation of Osseous Matrix and Mesenchymal Progenitors Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00557635
Enrollment
50
Registered
2007-11-14
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2009-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tibia or Femur Pseudo-arthrosis

Keywords

pseudo-arthrosis, osseous matrix, cell therapy

Brief summary

Sometime osseous reconstruction needs allogeneic bone, in this study we use Ostéopure™ from Ostéobanque d'Auvergne, which is a osseous matrix. However Ostéopure™ integration lasts a long time. To optimize this integration we purpose to associate mesenchymal progenitors cells from autologous bone marrow.

Detailed description

All patients will be treated for tibia or femur pseudo-arthrosis. At the beginning of chirurgical intervention, autologous bone marrow will be sampling and will be concentrated during this one. Meanwhile osseous matrix (Ostéopure™ ) will be incubated in autologous blood serum and finally implanted in the fracture site. And after (at the end of chirurgical intervention), concentrate autologous bone marrow will be injected in the same place.

Interventions

PROCEDUREChirurgical procedure

Chirurgical procedure to treat pseudo-arthrosis, with of osseous matrix implantation and autologous bone marrow injection.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* tibia or femur pseudo-arthrosis, * patient who needs bone graft

Exclusion criteria

* \- contra indications for chirurgical intervention or bone graft

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate osseous setting at 3-months follow-up and compare our results with past studiesat 3-months follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility and tolerance of this therapeutic strategyat 3-months follow-up

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026